Brain InjuriesNCT01206283
A Study Comparing Modified Lund Concept and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy in Secondary Brain Ischaemia.
A study testing Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy in people with Brain Injuries and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by University of Sarajevo at 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Trial summary
Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- What is being tested?
- Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBosnia and Herzegovina
- Study dates
- Jan 2006to Jul 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who had anterior circulation aneurysm rupture only
- multiple anterior aneurysm rupture
- severe traumatic brain injury with isolated head injury and intradural focal lesions only
Who cannot join
- Glasgow Outcome Score of 3 with or without brainstem reflexes
- Significant co-morbidities
- posterior circulation aneurysm
- multisystem injuries
- diffuse axonal injuries
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Bosnia and Herzegovina1 site
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo
Sarajevo, 71000
About this study
Official title: Modified Lund Concept Versus Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Study in Patients With Secondary Brain Ischaemia.
Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (CPP-targeted). We present a randomised controlled study to compare the two management strategies.
The hypotheses of the study were:
Read more
- SBI developed after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI share the same crucial characteristics and any treatment applied will essentially treat the same underlying pathophysiology.
- ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring according to the modified Lund concept is superior to CPP-targeted therapy in managing comatose patients with SBI after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI.
Sixty comatose operated patients with SBI following aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI were randomized into ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring and CPP-targeted therapy groups. Mortality rates in both groups were calculated and biochemical signs of cerebral ischaemia were analysed using cerebral microdialysis. Outcome for cerebral microdialysis was measured as poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1, 2 and 3) or good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4 and 5).
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Being tested
- Modified Lund concept, Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, secondary brain ischemia, microdialysis, modified Lund concept, cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Modified Lund conceptProcedure or surgery
After surgical evacuation of intracranial mass lesion and clipping of aneurysm the objectives were achieved:
- Reduction of cerebral energy metabolism with fentanyl (2-5 µg/kg/h) and thiopenthal (0.5-3 mg/kg/h);
- Maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure with administration of red cell and albumin/plasma transfusions to maintain Hb/s 125-140 g/L and Alb/s ≈40 g/L;
- Reduction of capillary hydrostatic pressure with α2-agonist clonidine (0.4-0.8 µg/kg, 1 x 4-6 iv.) and maintaining normovolaemia;
- Reduction of mean arterial pressure and neuroprotection with Nimodipine infusion 5 ml per hour for 21 days and Urapidil 200 mg /200 ml, 7-10 ml/h.
- Control of ICP, which can be in majority of patients, kept at values below 15 mmHg.
Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapyProcedure or surgery
- ICP monitoring using an external ventricular drain and CSF drainage as a first measure if ICP was increased (over 15-20 mmHg);
- Maintenance of CPP over 70-80 mmHg (Triple 'H' therapy = 3L/24 hours including 1L of colloids - 5% albumin; drugs = dopamine, dobutamine);
- No hyperventilation if ICP was under 20-25 mmHg and hyperventilation as a third measure if ICP was increased;
- Osmotherapy (20% manitol, bolus 150-350 ml or 10% manitol, 50 ml/h for 10 hours and standard electrolytes [Na, Cl and K]);
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted | Active comparator | 15 comatose operated patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury respectively were managed postoperatively using cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy according to the American Associations of Neurological Surgeons. Results were categorised into different Glasgow Outcome Scores. Receives: Procedure: Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy |
| Intracranial pressure-targeted therapy | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Modified Lund concept |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality rate
Measurement of outcome was done using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after each specific intervention in all the patients. GOS 1 - dead, 2- vegetative, 3- severe disabled, 4- moderate disabled, 5- independent.
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2006
- Primary completionJun 2008
- Study completionJul 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Brain InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sarajevo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Kemal Dizdarevic, MD, MSc, PhD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01206283
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 030531674
- Status last verified
- Sep 2010
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Sep 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Sep 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Modified Lund Concept Versus Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Study in Patients With Secondary Brain Ischaemia.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01206283
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 030531674
- Conditions
- Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, secondary brain ischemia, microdialysis, modified Lund concept, cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SarajevoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2006
- Primary completion
- Jun 2008 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (CPP-targeted). We present a randomised controlled study to compare the two management strategies.
The hypotheses of the study were:
- SBI developed after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI share the same crucial characteristics and any treatment applied will essentially treat the same underlying pathophysiology.
- ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring according to the modified Lund concept is superior to CPP-targeted therapy in managing comatose patients with SBI after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI.
Sixty comatose operated patients with SBI following aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI were randomized into ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring and CPP-targeted therapy groups. Mortality rates in both groups were calculated and biochemical signs of cerebral ischaemia were analysed using cerebral microdialysis. Outcome for cerebral microdialysis was measured as poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1, 2 and 3) or good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4 and 5).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted | Active comparator | Procedure: Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy15 comatose operated patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury respectively were managed postoperatively using cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy according to the American Associations of Neurological Surgeons. Results were categorised into different Glasgow Outcome Scores. |
| Intracranial pressure-targeted therapy | Active comparator | Procedure: Modified Lund concept |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who had anterior circulation aneurysm rupture only
- multiple anterior aneurysm rupture
- severe traumatic brain injury with isolated head injury and intradural focal lesions only
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Glasgow Outcome Score of 3 with or without brainstem reflexes
- Significant co-morbidities
- posterior circulation aneurysm
- multisystem injuries
- diffuse axonal injuries
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Modified Lund conceptAfter surgical evacuation of intracranial mass lesion and clipping of aneurysm the objectives were achieved: * Reduction of cerebral energy metabolism with fentanyl (2-5 µg/kg/h) and thiopenthal (0.5-3 mg/kg/h); * Maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure with administration of red cell and albumin/plasma transfusions to maintain Hb/s 125-140 g/L and Alb/s ≈40 g/L; * Reduction of capillary hydrostatic pressure with α2-agonist clonidine (0.4-0.8 µg/kg, 1 x 4-6 iv.) and maintaining normovolaemia; * Reduction of mean arterial pressure and neuroprotection with Nimodipine infusion 5 ml per hour for 21 days and Urapidil 200 mg /200 ml, 7-10 ml/h. * Control of ICP, which can be in majority of patients, kept at values below 15 mmHg. | Procedure or surgery | Intracranial pressure-targeted therapy |
| Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy* ICP monitoring using an external ventricular drain and CSF drainage as a first measure if ICP was increased (over 15-20 mmHg); * Maintenance of CPP over 70-80 mmHg (Triple 'H' therapy = 3L/24 hours including 1L of colloids - 5% albumin; drugs = dopamine, dobutamine); * No hyperventilation if ICP was under 20-25 mmHg and hyperventilation as a third measure if ICP was increased; * Osmotherapy (20% manitol, bolus 150-350 ml or 10% manitol, 50 ml/h for 10 hours and standard electrolytes [Na, Cl and K]); | Procedure or surgery | Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted |
Primary outcome
Mortality rate
Time frame: 18 months
Measurement of outcome was done using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after each specific intervention in all the patients. GOS 1 - dead, 2- vegetative, 3- severe disabled, 4- moderate disabled, 5- independent.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Sep 2010.
Related trials for Brain Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Children With Pediatric Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Physical Activity in Adults With Acquired Brain Injury
Acquired Brain Injury
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adverse Events During Physical Therapy in Neurocritical ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kemal Dizdarevic, MD, MSc, PhD principal investigator
Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy in people with Brain Injuries and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by University of Sarajevo at 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality rate (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.