AzTrials
AzTrials

Brain InjuriesNCT01206283

A Study Comparing Modified Lund Concept and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy in Secondary Brain Ischaemia.

A study testing Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy in people with Brain Injuries and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by University of Sarajevo at 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
What is being tested?
Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteBosnia and Herzegovina
Study dates
Jan 2006to Jul 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who had anterior circulation aneurysm rupture only
  • multiple anterior aneurysm rupture
  • severe traumatic brain injury with isolated head injury and intradural focal lesions only

Who cannot join

  • Glasgow Outcome Score of 3 with or without brainstem reflexes
  • Significant co-morbidities
  • posterior circulation aneurysm
  • multisystem injuries
  • diffuse axonal injuries

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Bosnia and Herzegovina1 site
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Centre University of Sarajevo

    Sarajevo, 71000

Other trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina

About this study

Official title: Modified Lund Concept Versus Cerebral Perfusion Pressure-targeted Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Study in Patients With Secondary Brain Ischaemia.

Secondary brain ischaemia (SBI) usually develops after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The current management strategies are based on intracranial pressure-targeted therapy (ICP-targeted) with cerebral microdialysis monitoring (modified Lund concept) or cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy (CPP-targeted). We present a randomised controlled study to compare the two management strategies.

The hypotheses of the study were:

Read more
  • SBI developed after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI share the same crucial characteristics and any treatment applied will essentially treat the same underlying pathophysiology.
  • ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring according to the modified Lund concept is superior to CPP-targeted therapy in managing comatose patients with SBI after aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI.

Sixty comatose operated patients with SBI following aneurysmal SAH and severe TBI were randomized into ICP-targeted therapy with cerebral microdialysis monitoring and CPP-targeted therapy groups. Mortality rates in both groups were calculated and biochemical signs of cerebral ischaemia were analysed using cerebral microdialysis. Outcome for cerebral microdialysis was measured as poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 1, 2 and 3) or good outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score 4 and 5).

Being tested
Modified Lund concept, Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy
Keywords
traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, secondary brain ischemia, microdialysis, modified Lund concept, cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure
Medical subject headings
Brain Injuries, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Brain Injuries, Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Lund conceptProcedure or surgery

    After surgical evacuation of intracranial mass lesion and clipping of aneurysm the objectives were achieved:

    • Reduction of cerebral energy metabolism with fentanyl (2-5 µg/kg/h) and thiopenthal (0.5-3 mg/kg/h);
    • Maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure with administration of red cell and albumin/plasma transfusions to maintain Hb/s 125-140 g/L and Alb/s ≈40 g/L;
    • Reduction of capillary hydrostatic pressure with α2-agonist clonidine (0.4-0.8 µg/kg, 1 x 4-6 iv.) and maintaining normovolaemia;
    • Reduction of mean arterial pressure and neuroprotection with Nimodipine infusion 5 ml per hour for 21 days and Urapidil 200 mg /200 ml, 7-10 ml/h.
    • Control of ICP, which can be in majority of patients, kept at values below 15 mmHg.
  • Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapyProcedure or surgery

    • ICP monitoring using an external ventricular drain and CSF drainage as a first measure if ICP was increased (over 15-20 mmHg);
    • Maintenance of CPP over 70-80 mmHg (Triple 'H' therapy = 3L/24 hours including 1L of colloids - 5% albumin; drugs = dopamine, dobutamine);
    • No hyperventilation if ICP was under 20-25 mmHg and hyperventilation as a third measure if ICP was increased;
    • Osmotherapy (20% manitol, bolus 150-350 ml or 10% manitol, 50 ml/h for 10 hours and standard electrolytes [Na, Cl and K]);
Study groups in NCT01206283
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cerebral perfusion pressure-targetedActive comparator15 comatose operated patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and severe traumatic brain injury respectively were managed postoperatively using cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy according to the American Associations of Neurological Surgeons. Results were categorised into different Glasgow Outcome Scores.
Receives: Procedure: Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy
Intracranial pressure-targeted therapyActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Modified Lund concept

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality rate

    Measurement of outcome was done using the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) after each specific intervention in all the patients. GOS 1 - dead, 2- vegetative, 3- severe disabled, 4- moderate disabled, 5- independent.

    Measured: 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2006
  3. Primary completionJun 2008
  4. Study completionJul 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01206283
Sponsor's protocol ID
030531674
Status last verified
Sep 2010
First submitted
20 Sep 2010
Last updated
21 Sep 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Modified Lund concept and Cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted therapy in people with Brain Injuries and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, run by University of Sarajevo at 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality rate (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2010; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 29 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in