AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiomyopathies, PrimaryEUTrigTreatNCT01209494

An Arrhythmia Risk Stratification and Genetic Trial

An observational study of Cardiomyopathies, Primary and Arrhythmia, run by University Medical Center Goettingen at 4 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The prospective EUTrigTreat multi-center study is an observational, advanced diagnostics and genetic risk stratification trial in patients with standard indications for ICD treatment, with and without myocardial infarction in their history. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
672 participants
Where
4 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Jan 2010to Sep 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with standard indications for ICD treatment according to ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines with and without myocardial infarction in their history are eligible for the study

Who may be able to join

  • Standard indication for ICD treatment according to ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for primary or secondary prevention of SCD
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Nonischemic cardiomyopathies: DCM, HCM/HOCM, ARVC or
  • Channelopathies: Brugada, LQT, CPVT or
  • Idiopathic VT/VF or
  • Diffuse coronary artery disease, without transmural myocardial infarction in history (ACS and NSTEMI with CK maximum of 400 U/l allowed)

Who cannot join

  • Unstable cardiac disease
  • PCI or CABG < 3 months ago
  • Implantation of a CRT device < 6 months ago
  • ICD unable to deliver programmed ventricular stimulation via programmer (only in the noninvasive EP study group)
  • Women of childbearing potential in case of positive pregnancy test at the time of enrollment

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 4 countries.

4 sites in 4 countries

Belgium1 site
  • Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Dept. of Cardiology

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Germany1 site
  • University Medical Center Goettingen, Dept. of Cardiology and Pneumology

    Göttingen, 37075

Other trials in Germany

Greece1 site
  • Attikon Hospital University of Athens, BRFAA, Dept. of Cardiology

    Athens, 17151

Other trials in Greece

Netherlands1 site
  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Depts. of Cardiology and Physiology

    Utrecht, 3584 CM

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: The EU TrigTreat Clinical Study: An Advanced Diagnostics and Observational Trial for Arrhythmia Risk Stratification and Correlation With Genotype

The prospective EUTrigTreat multi-center study is an observational, advanced diagnostics and genetic risk stratification trial in patients with standard indications for ICD treatment, with and without myocardial infarction in their history.

Its aims are fourfold: 1) To accurately risk stratify a large cohort of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients for ICD shock risk and mortality using traditional risk markers as well as genetic markers 2) To find a link between repolarization biomarkers and genetic markers of calcium metabolism. 3) To compare invasive and noninvasive electrophysiologic (EP) testing systematically 4) To assess temporal changes of typical noninvasive risk stratifiers and their prognostic implication.

In five European academic clinical centers, 700 ICD patients are prospectively enrolled (optionally the number of enrolled patients may be expanded to 1000 patients). Comprehensive non-invasive risk stratifying ECG diagnostics including beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) are applied, and candidate genes associated with malignant arrhythmias are analyzed. Programmed electrical stimulation is performed to test for inducibility of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and BVR. In a subset of patients, electrophysiologic studies include recording of monophasic action potentials (MAP) from the right ventricle for assessment of restitution properties. Non-invasive risk stratifying ECG methods are repeated annually. Outcome (mortality, ICD shocks) will be assessed until September 2014.

Read the detailed description

An increasing number of patients receive implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for primary and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death. Within this group, it is difficult to differentiate between patients at high risk with need for additional treatment and, on the other hand, patients at low risk without benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Risk stratification techniques have been studied extensively over the last decades, but no conclusive recommendations can be found in the current guidelines for prevention of SCD. Furthermore, new genetic markers associated with sudden cardiac death were discovered recently, however, have not been implemented in concurrent risk analysis. Last, time dependent changes of risk stratification assessment are unknown.

The prospective EUTrigTreat multi-center study is an observational, advanced diagnostics and genetic risk stratification trial in patients with standard indications for ICD treatment and without myocardial infarction in their history.

Its aims are fourfold: 1) To accurately risk stratify a large cohort of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients for ICD shock risk and mortality using traditional risk markers as well as genetic markers 2) To find a link between repolarization biomarkers and genetic markers of calcium metabolism. 3) To compare invasive and noninvasive electrophysiologic (EP) testing systematically 4) To assess temporal changes of typical noninvasive risk stratifiers and their prognostic implication.

In four European academic clinical centers, 700 ICD patients are prospectively enrolled. Optionally, the number of patients may be expanded to 1000. Comprehensive non-invasive risk stratifying ECG diagnostics including beat-to-beat variability of repolarization (BVR) are applied, and candidate genes associated with malignant arrhythmias are analyzed. Programmed electrical stimulation is performed to test for inducibility of malignant ventricular arrhythmias and BVR. In a subset of patients, electrophysiologic studies include recording of monophasic action potentials (MAP) from the right ventricle for assessment of restitution properties. Non-invasive risk stratifying ECG methods are repeated annually. Outcome (mortality, ICD shocks) will be assessed until September 2014.

Keywords
sudden cardiac death, implantable cardioverter defibrillator, ventricular arrhythmias, genetic syndromes, calcium metabolism, ventricular repolarization, ECG, T wave, programmed electrical stimulation, alternans, late potentials, risk stratification
Medical subject headings
Cardiomyopathies, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Calcium Metabolism Disorders, Genetic Diseases, Inborn

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01209494
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Invasive EP Study Group200 patients are studied before clinically indicated (according to AHA/ACC/ESC guidelines) first ICD implantation or ICD exchange. Invasive EP study is performed to test inducibility of malignant arrhythmia. In addition MAP recordings are performed for measurements of restitution properties. Pacing is done for 12-lead ECG and MAP recordings for analysis of BVR and TWA, if applicable.
Noninvasive EP Study GroupThe assignment of patients to the invasive and noninvasive EP groups does not occur by randomization or for intervention. In the noninvasive EP study group, 500 patients with chronically implanted ICD (>3 month after implantation) are investigated using non-invasive EP study via ICD programmer. Programmed electrical stimulation is performed to test for inducibility of malignant arrhythmia. In addition pacing is done for measurements of BVR from the 12-lead ECG.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Mortality

    Measured: 2010-2014

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Sudden Cardiac, Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Mortality

    The standard definition of SCD applied. A cardiac death is defined as any death presumed to have occurred from a cardiac cause other than SCD. Non-cardiac deaths are all other deaths.

    Measured: 2010-2014

  2. Appropriate and Inappropriate Shocks

    Appropriate shock is a secondary endpoint. ICD shock is classified as appropriate if delivered for a true ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the VT or VF zone. Appropriate ICD shock is classified as 1 primarily delivered in the VF zone, 2 secondarily delivered as a backup to failed ATP in the VT zone or 3 secondarily delivered after acceleration of failed ATP to VF zone.

    Inappropriate shock is a secondary endpoint. Inappropriate shock is an ICD shock caused by oversensing of cardiac or non-cardiac electrical signals as VT or VF, or by inappropriate interpretation of SVT as VT/VF by the device.

    Measured: 2010-2014

  3. Secondary Composite Endpoints

    A secondary composite endpoint of total mortality and appropriate ICD shocks is defined. Another secondary composite endpoint is defined as the sum of appropriate and inappropriate ICD shocks, i.e. all ICD shocks.

    Measured: 2010-2014

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
672 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01209494
Sponsor's protocol ID
HEALTH-F2-2009-241526
Acronym
EUTrigTreat
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
24 Sep 2010
Last updated
2 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Koller MT, Schaer B, Wolbers M, Sticherling C, Bucher HC, Osswald S. Death without prior appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: a competing risk study. Circulation. 2008 Apr 15;117(15):1918-26. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742155. Epub 2008 Apr 7.

    PubMed 18391108
  • Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH, Reddy RK, Marchlinski FE, Yee R, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Wilber DJ, Fishbein DP, Packer DL, Mark DB, Lee KL, Bardy GH. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 4;359(10):1009-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071098.

    PubMed 18768944
  • Vollmann D, Luthje L, Vonhof S, Unterberg C. Inappropriate therapy and fatal proarrhythmia by an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm. 2005 Mar;2(3):307-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.11.019. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15851324
  • Zabel M, Malik M, Hnatkova K, Papademetriou V, Pittaras A, Fletcher RD, Franz MR. Analysis of T-wave morphology from the 12-lead electrocardiogram for prediction of long-term prognosis in male US veterans. Circulation. 2002 Mar 5;105(9):1066-70. doi: 10.1161/hc0902.104598.

    PubMed 11877356
  • Zabel M, Acar B, Klingenheben T, Franz MR, Hohnloser SH, Malik M. Analysis of 12-lead T-wave morphology for risk stratification after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1252-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1252.

    PubMed 10982539
  • Bloomfield DM, Hohnloser SH, Cohen RJ; New Collective Author. Interpretation and classification of microvolt T wave alternans tests. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 May;13(5):502-12. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00502.x.

    PubMed 12030535
  • Schmidt G, Malik M, Barthel P, Schneider R, Ulm K, Rolnitzky L, Camm AJ, Bigger JT Jr, Schomig A. Heart-rate turbulence after ventricular premature beats as a predictor of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1390-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08428-1.

    PubMed 10227219
  • Franz MR, Chin MC, Sharkey HR, Griffin JC, Scheinman MM. A new single catheter technique for simultaneous measurement of action potential duration and refractory period in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Oct;16(4):878-86. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(10)80336-5.

    PubMed 2212368
  • Hummel JD, Strickberger SA, Daoud E, Niebauer M, Bakr O, Man KC, Williamson BD, Morady F. Results and efficiency of programmed ventricular stimulation with four extrastimuli compared with one, two, and three extrastimuli. Circulation. 1994 Dec;90(6):2827-32. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.6.2827.

    PubMed 7994827
  • Thomsen MB, Volders PG, Beekman JD, Matz J, Vos MA. Beat-to-Beat variability of repolarization determines proarrhythmic outcome in dogs susceptible to drug-induced torsades de pointes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Sep 19;48(6):1268-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.048. Epub 2006 Aug 28.

    PubMed 16979017
  • Narayan SM, Franz MR, Lalani G, Kim J, Sastry A. T-wave alternans, restitution of human action potential duration, and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Dec 18;50(25):2385-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.011.

    PubMed 18154963
  • Arvanitis DA, Sanoudou D, Kolokathis F, Vafiadaki E, Papalouka V, Kontrogianni-Konstantopoulos A, Theodorakis GN, Paraskevaidis IA, Adamopoulos S, Dorn GW 2nd, Kremastinos DT, Kranias EG. The Ser96Ala variant in histidine-rich calcium-binding protein is associated with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J. 2008 Oct;29(20):2514-25. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn328. Epub 2008 Jul 9.

    PubMed 18617481
  • Lehnart SE, Lederer WJ. An antidote for calcium leak: targeting molecular arrhythmia mechanisms. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010 Feb;48(2):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Nov 26. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19931542
  • Seegers J, Vos MA, Flevari P, Willems R, Sohns C, Vollmann D, Luthje L, Kremastinos DT, Flore V, Meine M, Tuinenburg A, Myles RC, Simon D, Brockmoller J, Friede T, Hasenfuss G, Lehnart SE, Zabel M; EUTrigTreat Clinical Study Investigators. Rationale, objectives, and design of the EUTrigTreat clinical study: a prospective observational study for arrhythmia risk stratification and assessment of interrelationships among repolarization markers and genotype. Europace. 2012 Mar;14(3):416-22. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur352. Epub 2011 Nov 23.

    PubMed 22117037

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiomyopathies, Primary and Arrhythmia, run by University Medical Center Goettingen at 4 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Belgium, Germany, Greece, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Mortality (time frame: 2010-2014). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01209494, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in