AzTrials
AzTrials

Exudative Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 1/2PBAMD2NCT01213082

ProspectiveTrial of Proton Beam Combined With Anti-VEGF Therapy for Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)

A Phase 1/2 study testing 24GyE proton and Anti-VEGF and 16GyE and anti-VEGF in people with Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that proton beam irradiation combined with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is safe and potentially more effective than intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy alone in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
24GyE proton and Anti-VEGF and 16GyE and anti-VEGF
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2010to 31 Jan 2017
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects will be eligible if the following criteria are met:
  • Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Age > 50 years
  • Patient related considerations
  • Able to maintain follow-up for at least 24 months.
  • Women must be postmenopausal without a period for at least one year.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Diagnosed with Age-related Macular Degeneration (ARMD) with active subfoveal choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM), newly diagnosed or treated with first dose of anti-VEGF therapy within 6 weeks of enrollment
  • Visual acuity 20/40 to 20/400
  • Lesion size < 12 Disc Area
  • Submacular hemorrhage less than 75% of total lesion and not involving foveal center
  • Submacular fibrosis less than 25% of total lesion
  • Candidate for intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from this study:
  • Prior enrollment in the study
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test) or lactation
  • Any other condition that the investigator believes would pose a significant hazard to the subject if the investigational therapy were initiated
  • Participation in another simultaneous medical investigation or trial
  • Previous treatment with Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) or thermal laser in study eye
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Anti-VEGF therapy within 6 weeks
  • Intravitreal or subtenon's Kenalog within 6 months
  • Intraocular surgery within 3 months or expected in the next 6 months
  • Current or planned participation in other experimental treatments for wet AMD
  • Other concurrent retinopathy or optic neuropathy
  • Other causes of CNVM, i.e. myopic degeneration or ocular histoplasmosis (POHS)
  • Significant media opacity precluding adequate view of the fundus for exam, photography or OCT
  • History of radiation therapy to the head or study eye
  • Diabetes mellitus or hemoglobin A1c > 6
  • Head tremor or h/o claustrophobia precluding positioning for proton irradiation
  • Inability to maintain steady fixation with either eye
  • History of Malignancy treated within 5 years
  • Allergy to Fluorescein dye

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California Davis Eye Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase I/II Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded Study of Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy Combined With Proton Beam Radiation Versus Sham Irradiation in Treating Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that proton beam irradiation combined with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy is safe and potentially more effective than intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy alone in eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration.

Read the detailed description

Radiation combined with anti-VEGF therapy has been shown to be synergistic in treating cancer and result in sustained tumor regression. On-going clinical trials have shown potential synergism between intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and epiretinal brachytherapy administered during vitrectomy surgery in treating eyes with exudative age-related macular degeneration (eAMD). In this study, we test the hypothesis that radiation to the macula administered noninvasively via proton beam is well-tolerated in eyes with eAMD when combined with intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and that this combination therapy may act synergistically to result in sustained treatment effect in eyes with eAMD.

Being tested
24GyE proton and Anti-VEGF, 16GyE and anti-VEGF, Sham Irradiation and anti-VEGF
Keywords
Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration, Proton beam irradiation, ranibizumab, bevacizumab, anti-VEGF therapy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 24GyE proton and Anti-VEGFDrug

    Also called 24Gy Proton Beam + Anti-VEGF

    24GyE proton beam will be administered in 2 fractions 24 hrs apart 2 to 6 weeks after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy

  • 16GyE and anti-VEGFDrug

    Also called 16Gy proton beam + Anti-VEGF

    16GyE of Proton Beam Irradiation will be administered in 2 fractions 24 hrs apart 2 to 6 weeks after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy

  • Sham Irradiation and anti-VEGFDrug

    Also called Sham proton beam + anti-VEGF

    2 Sessions of Sham Proton Beam Irradiation 24 hrs apart administered 2 to 6 weeks after intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy

Study groups in NCT01213082
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
24GyE + anti-VEGFExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: 24GyE proton and Anti-VEGF
16GyE + anti-VEGFExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: 16GyE and anti-VEGF
Sham Irradiation + anti-VEGFSham comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Sham Irradiation and anti-VEGF

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of Eyes With Severe Ocular Adverse

    vision loss of 3 or more lines associated with radiation retinopathy or papillopathy

    Measured: Month 24

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Number of Anti-VEGF Injections Administered

    efficacy measure

    Measured: Month 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Oct 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2017
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01213082
Sponsor's protocol ID
223071
Acronym
PBAMD2
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
29 Sep 2010
Last updated
17 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Evans JR, Igwe C, Jackson TL, Chong V. Radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 26;8(8):CD004004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004004.pub4.

    PubMed 32844399

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing 24GyE proton and Anti-VEGF and 16GyE and anti-VEGF in people with Exudative Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of Eyes With Severe Ocular Adverse (time frame: Month 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01213082, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in