Aortic Valve StenosisSGAVNCT01236469
CryoValve® SG Aortic Human Heart Valve Combination Study
An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Aortic Valve Insufficiency, run by CryoLife, Inc. at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the probable benefit of CryoValve SG Aortic Human Heart Valve used in pediatric patients as an aortic valve replacement. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 27 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- Echocardiogram
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Feb 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 27 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Pediatric (21 years of age or younger) patients who received a CryoValve SG Aortic Valve distributed during the 2000 to 2003 period as an aortic valve replacement.
Who may be able to join
- Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as an aortic valve replacement.
- Patients who were ≤ 21 years of age at the time of implant.
Who cannot join
- Patients in whom the CryoValve SGAV was used as a patch or a non-valved conduit.
- Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as a pulmonary valve replacement.
- Patients that were ≥ 22 years of age at the time of implant.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
The Children's Hsopital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
The Children's Mercy Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Arizona Pediatric Cardiology Consultants
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Rady Children's Hospital
San Diego, California, 92123
About this study
Official title: CryoValve® SG Aortic Human Heart Valve Combination Retrospective/Prospective, Multi-Center, Cohort Study
The purpose of this study is to assess the probable benefit of CryoValve SG Aortic Human Heart Valve used in pediatric patients as an aortic valve replacement.
Read the detailed description
The CryoValve SG aortic human heart valve is recovered from deceased human donors, treated with the SynerGraft® (SG) process,which is designed to reduce the donor cells present on the graft. The valve is then cryopreserved for storage until use. Removing cells from the heart valve has been shown to reduce a component of the immune response after implant compared to a standard allograft valve. However, it is not known how this affects the long-term durability of the valve.
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
- Being tested
- Echocardiogram
- Keywords
- Aortic Valve
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EchocardiogramProcedure or surgery
A prospective follow-up Study Echocardiogram will be performed, as applicable, for those subjects who do not have echo data as of January 1, 2009.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective Patients | Pediatric (21 years of age or younger) patients who received a CryoValve SG Aortic Valve distributed during the 2000 to 2003 period as an aortic valve replacement. Receives: Procedure: Echocardiogram |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemodynamic Performance
Peak Aortic Gradient (or Peak Velocity), Mean Aortic Gradient, Aortic Insufficiency, Effective Orifice Area
Measured: From Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)
Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Safety parameters will follow the guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations as established by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
Evaluation of the following adverse events:
- Mortality (all cause and valve-related)
- Reoperation/reintervention
- Explant
- Endocarditis (all and valvular)
- Thrombosis
- Thromboembolism
- Non-structural dysfunction
- Perivalvular leak (all and major)
- Bleeding (all and major)
- Hemolysis
- Calcification
- Conduit failure
Measured: From Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionMay 2011
- Study completionFeb 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Aortic Valve StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CryoLife, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Scott B Capps, MS, Study director, CryoLife, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01236469
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SGA0903.000 - C(09/09)
- Acronym
- SGAV
- Status last verified
- Aug 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 19 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176857. No abstract available.
PubMed 16880336Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, Takkenberg JJ, David TE, Butchart EG, Adams DH, Shahian DM, Hagl S, Mayer JE, Lytle BW; Councils of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; European Assoication for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;135(4):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.002. No abstract available.
PubMed 18374749Zehr KJ, Yagubyan M, Connolly HM, Nelson SM, Schaff HV. Aortic root replacement with a novel decellularized cryopreserved aortic homograft: postoperative immunoreactivity and early results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):1010-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.044.
PubMed 16214512
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CryoValve® SG Aortic Human Heart Valve Combination Retrospective/Prospective, Multi-Center, Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01236469
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SGAV / SGA0903.000 - C(09/09)
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Insufficiency
- Keywords
- Aortic Valve
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CryoLife, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the probable benefit of CryoValve SG Aortic Human Heart Valve used in pediatric patients as an aortic valve replacement.
Detailed description
The CryoValve SG aortic human heart valve is recovered from deceased human donors, treated with the SynerGraft® (SG) process,which is designed to reduce the donor cells present on the graft. The valve is then cryopreserved for storage until use. Removing cells from the heart valve has been shown to reduce a component of the immune response after implant compared to a standard allograft valve. However, it is not known how this affects the long-term durability of the valve.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective Patients | – | Procedure: EchocardiogramPediatric (21 years of age or younger) patients who received a CryoValve SG Aortic Valve distributed during the 2000 to 2003 period as an aortic valve replacement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 27 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Pediatric (21 years of age or younger) patients who received a CryoValve SG Aortic Valve distributed during the 2000 to 2003 period as an aortic valve replacement.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as an aortic valve replacement.
- Patients who were ≤ 21 years of age at the time of implant.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients in whom the CryoValve SGAV was used as a patch or a non-valved conduit.
- Patients implanted with a CryoValve SGAV as a pulmonary valve replacement.
- Patients that were ≥ 22 years of age at the time of implant.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EchocardiogramA prospective follow-up Study Echocardiogram will be performed, as applicable, for those subjects who do not have echo data as of January 1, 2009. | Procedure or surgery | Retrospective Patients |
Primary outcome
Hemodynamic Performance
Time frame: From Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)
Peak Aortic Gradient (or Peak Velocity), Mean Aortic Gradient, Aortic Insufficiency, Effective Orifice Area
Number of Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Time frame: From Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)
Safety parameters will follow the guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations as established by The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Evaluation of the following adverse events: * Mortality (all cause and valve-related) * Reoperation/reintervention * Explant * Endocarditis (all and valvular) * Thrombosis * Thromboembolism * Non-structural dysfunction * Perivalvular leak (all and major) * Bleeding (all and major) * Hemolysis * Calcification * Conduit failure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Aug 2015.
- Background: PubMed 16880336American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, de Leon AC Jr, Faxon DP, Freed MD, Gaasch WH, Lytle BW, Nishimura RA, O'Gara PT, O'Rourke RA, Otto CM, Shah PM, Shanewise JS, Smith SC Jr, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Antman EM, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing committee to revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2006 Aug 1;114(5):e84-231. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.176857. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18374749Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, Kouchoukos NT, Blackstone EH, Grunkemeier GL, Takkenberg JJ, David TE, Butchart EG, Adams DH, Shahian DM, Hagl S, Mayer JE, Lytle BW; Councils of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; European Assoication for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Apr;135(4):732-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.002. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16214512Zehr KJ, Yagubyan M, Connolly HM, Nelson SM, Schaff HV. Aortic root replacement with a novel decellularized cryopreserved aortic homograft: postoperative immunoreactivity and early results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Oct;130(4):1010-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.03.044.
Related trials for Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Application of TAVI at Experienced Interventional Cardiac Centers Without On-site Cardiac Surgery (ATLAS Study)
Aortic Stenosis, Severe Aortic Stenosis
Active, not recruiting
Early Valve Replacement Guided by Biomarkers of LV Decompensation in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe AS
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Scott B Capps, MS study director
CryoLife, Inc.
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aortic Valve Stenosis and Aortic Valve Insufficiency, run by CryoLife, Inc. at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemodynamic Performance (time frame: From Implant until Study Enrollment (on average, 7 years)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01236469, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2015.