Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 1/2NCT01237678
A Study of IMGN901 for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 1/2 study testing IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by ImmunoGen, Inc. at 48 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 181 participants
- Where
- 48 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must be 18 years old
- Patients must have been diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extensive disease
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2
- No prior systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or lactating females
Trial locations and contacts
48 sites in 4 countries.
48 sites in 4 countries
United States32 sites
Anne Arundel Medical Center
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21204
Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2696
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
South Carolina Oncology Associates
Columbia, South Carolina, 29210
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Holy Cross Hospital Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
Johnson Therurer Cancer Center at Hackensack
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
University of Tennessee Medical Center Cancer Institute
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920
UCLA Oncology Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UPMC Cancer Centers East, Oxford Drive
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Yale Medical Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Oklahoma University
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104-5417
St. Joseph's Hospital
Orange, California, 92868
UCLA Hematology
Pasadena, California, 91105
UPMC Cancer Center St. Margaret
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15215
Univeristy of Pittsburg Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232
UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC Passavant (HOA)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
UTHSC at San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
UCLA Oncology Clinic
Santa Monica, California, 90404
Northwest Medical Specialties
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Arizona Cancer Center @ UMC North
Tucson, Arizona, 85719
UCLA Santa Clarita Valley Cancer Center
Valencia, California, 91355
Sibley Memorial Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
UCLA Oncology Center
Westlake Village, California, 91361
Spain6 sites
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sand Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario
Madrid, 28222
Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli
Sabadell, Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Canada5 sites
Juravinski Cancer Center
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Montreal General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
St. Mary's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5
Royal Victoria
Montreal, Quebec, QC H3G
United Kingdom5 sites
Royal Sussex Hospital
Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 5BE
University College of London
London, England, NM12BU
Royal Marsden, London
London, SW3 6JJ
Royal Marsden
Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT
The Christie Hospital
Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lorvotuzumab Mertansine in Combination With Carboplatin/Etoposide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is a neuroendocrine cancer of the lung that is typically caused by smoking. Patients generally present with symptoms of cough, dyspnea, pain and weakness, and often have extensive disease at that time. It is estimated that 13% of lung cancers are SCLC in origin1. Approximately 28,530 new cases of SCLC were expected in 2009 based on an estimate of 219,440 new cases of any cancer of the lung in the US in 20092.
There are 2 stages of the disease: limited-stage disease (LD) and extensive-stage disease (ED). SCLC-LD is confined to a region of the chest (the hemithorax and mediastinum) that is more amenable to radiation therapy. Thirty percent (30%) of patients present with SCLC-LD. The remaining patients (70%) present with SCLC-ED, in which the disease has progressed outside this region of the chest. Common sites of metastatic disease include the contralateral lung, liver, adrenal glands, brain, bones and/or bone marrow3. Recurrence after therapy is typical. In the rare patient who has longer-term survival, secondary malignancies (new SCLC tumors and other malignancies) are common because of long-term exposure to carcinogens.
SCLC is very responsive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, having response rates of up to 80%4-7. In limited stage disease, the standard treatment is 'combined-modality therapy' consisting of combination chemotherapy such as cisplatin plus etoposide followed by thoracic radiation therapy. Surgery is rarely used.
Despite high response rates, therapy is rarely curative due to high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Overall 5-year survival for SCLC patients is 4%5. SCLC-LD patients typically achieve median survival of 14 to 24 months after therapy, with a 2-year survival rate of 40% to 50%. This survival rate drops to about 20% at 5 years4-7. SCLC-ED patients achieve a median survival of 8 to 12 months on therapy8.
Patients will typically have recurrent disease after therapy. While many of these patients may be eligible for further chemotherapy, survival at this stage is usually less than 6 months.
No treatment modality has a significant impact on overall survival. Studies utilizing regimens with greater numbers of chemotherapeutic agents or longer therapy duration have not improved survival. Thus, a new therapy that can improve survival is needed.
IMGN901 is an antibody drug conjugate which is anticipated to result in lower systemic toxicity and greater efficacy than currently available therapies based on its specific and high affinity binding to its target antigen, CD56. This antigen has been shown to be present in almost all cases of SCLC (~ 95% based on in-house data). In in vivo studies, IMGN901 has demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity against CD56-positive carcinomas including xenograft models of SCLC as well as complete regressions when combined with cisplatin/etoposide. Preliminary clinical activity of single agent IMGN901 based on data from two Phase 1 studies shows a disease control rate (PR and SD, defined as non-progression for at least 75 days) estimated to be 24% in a heterogeneous population of patients with pretreated and drug resistant SCLC. Additional data supportive of the potential activity of IMGN901 includes complete responses and clinically relevant stable disease in patients with MCC (clinical benefit rate = 39%). Further, the tolerability profile demonstrating minimal myelosuppression with administration of IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.
IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.
Therefore, the Phase 1 portion of this study is designed to first determine the MTD, presumably the recommended Phase 2 dose, of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide treatment and to characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of this triplet combination.
Improvement in disease control and survival of patients with SCLC-ED remains a major therapeutic challenge. New agents with better activity and tolerability are needed for this population. However, because large-scale clinical studies often are necessary to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of these new agents, it is desirable to first evaluate some measure of relative effectiveness in a Phase 2 study.
Therefore the Phase 2 portion of the study will utilize a Simon two-stage design in which the activity of IMGN901 will be assessed by comparing the PFS rate at six months in the IMGN901 experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical 6 month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). In this study, an improvement of 2.5 months in median PFS will be deemed clinically relevant and correlates to a PFS rate of 0.58 (HR = 0.667). The control arm will be used primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and will further serve as an informal validation of the historical data.
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- IMGN901, Carboplatin and Etoposide
- Keywords
- Immunogen, Lung, Small Cell Lung Cancer, Carboplatin, ADC
- Medical subject headings
- Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IMGN901Drug
Also called BB-10901, Lorvotuzumab mertansine
Phase 2 regimen is IMGN901, Carboplatin, and Etoposide. IMGN901 to be given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.
Carboplatin and EtoposideDrug
Also called Toposar®, VePesid®, Etopophos®
Patients assigned to Arm 2 were to receive carboplatin at the same AUC as utilized in Arm 1
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IMGN901 with carboplatin and etoposide | Experimental | Patients will receive IMGN901 along with carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles and then be able to continue on IMGN901 alone until no further benefit or toxicity. Receives: Drug: IMGN901 |
| Carboplatin and Etoposide | Active comparator | Patients will receive Carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles. Receives: Drug: Carboplatin and Etoposide |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
The primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. For the purposes of dose escalation and determination of MTD, DLTs were defined as AEs or abnormal laboratory values related to study treatment which occurred in Cycle 1 of the Dose Escalation phase, including any AEs that resulted in failure to meet the criteria for re-treatment. The following events were considered DLTs (using the most current version of CTCAE): febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; ≥ Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; ≥ Grade 3 vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea that persisted despite the use of optimal therapy; other ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (with the exception of brief fatigue i.e. ≤ 72 hours and alopecia)
Measured: 21 days (Cycle 1)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Phase II
The primary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the efficacy of IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. PFS was defined as the time from enrollment until objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed.
Measured: From randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of IMGN901
A primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. The MTD was determined based on DLTs that occurred during Cycle 1.
Measured: 21 days (Cycle 1)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
To assess the type and frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). An AE was defined as any noxious, pathologic, or unintended change un anatomical, physiologic, or metabolic function as indicated by physical signs, symptoms, or laboratory changes occurring in any phase of the study, whether or not deemed study drug-related. An SAE was any AE resulting in death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital defect. All AEs were reported from the time of the first dose of study treatment until 28 days after the final dose of study drug. the severity of AEs were graded by the Investigator using National cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0.
Measured: From the first dose of study drug on Cycle 1, Day 1 until 28 days after the last study treatment (up to 22 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months
The trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to PFS. The activity of IMGN901 was assessed by comparing the PFS rate at 6 months in the IMGN901 experimental arm against the historical 6-month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the objective was to compare PFS at 6 months in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months) for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed.
Measured: 6 months
Median Overall Survival (OS) in Phase II
A secondary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the overall survival of patients treated with IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy versus carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Measured: From the time of enrollment until death on study due to any cause (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 12 Months
OS was analyzed based on a binary definition of the number of patients dead or censored prior to 12 months and the number of patients alive at 12 months. The primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates. The control arm was primarily planned to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed. Further, the trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to OS and no determination of the OS rate at 12 months for the control arm was performed; therefore only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Why it stopped: Study was stopped early due to lack of efficacy signal and safety concerns
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ImmunoGen, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01237678
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Immunogen 0007
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 18 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lorvotuzumab Mertansine in Combination With Carboplatin/Etoposide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01237678
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Immunogen 0007
- Conditions
- Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Immunogen, Lung, Small Cell Lung Cancer, Carboplatin, ADC
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Study was stopped early due to lack of efficacy signal and safety concerns
- Enrolment
- 181 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ImmunoGen, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is a neuroendocrine cancer of the lung that is typically caused by smoking. Patients generally present with symptoms of cough, dyspnea, pain and weakness, and often have extensive disease at that time. It is estimated that 13% of lung cancers are SCLC in origin1. Approximately 28,530 new cases of SCLC were expected in 2009 based on an estimate of 219,440 new cases of any cancer of the lung in the US in 20092.
There are 2 stages of the disease: limited-stage disease (LD) and extensive-stage disease (ED). SCLC-LD is confined to a region of the chest (the hemithorax and mediastinum) that is more amenable to radiation therapy. Thirty percent (30%) of patients present with SCLC-LD. The remaining patients (70%) present with SCLC-ED, in which the disease has progressed outside this region of the chest. Common sites of metastatic disease include the contralateral lung, liver, adrenal glands, brain, bones and/or bone marrow3. Recurrence after therapy is typical. In the rare patient who has longer-term survival, secondary malignancies (new SCLC tumors and other malignancies) are common because of long-term exposure to carcinogens.
SCLC is very responsive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, having response rates of up to 80%4-7. In limited stage disease, the standard treatment is 'combined-modality therapy' consisting of combination chemotherapy such as cisplatin plus etoposide followed by thoracic radiation therapy. Surgery is rarely used.
Despite high response rates, therapy is rarely curative due to high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Overall 5-year survival for SCLC patients is 4%5. SCLC-LD patients typically achieve median survival of 14 to 24 months after therapy, with a 2-year survival rate of 40% to 50%. This survival rate drops to about 20% at 5 years4-7. SCLC-ED patients achieve a median survival of 8 to 12 months on therapy8.
Patients will typically have recurrent disease after therapy. While many of these patients may be eligible for further chemotherapy, survival at this stage is usually less than 6 months.
No treatment modality has a significant impact on overall survival. Studies utilizing regimens with greater numbers of chemotherapeutic agents or longer therapy duration have not improved survival. Thus, a new therapy that can improve survival is needed.
IMGN901 is an antibody drug conjugate which is anticipated to result in lower systemic toxicity and greater efficacy than currently available therapies based on its specific and high affinity binding to its target antigen, CD56. This antigen has been shown to be present in almost all cases of SCLC (~ 95% based on in-house data). In in vivo studies, IMGN901 has demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity against CD56-positive carcinomas including xenograft models of SCLC as well as complete regressions when combined with cisplatin/etoposide. Preliminary clinical activity of single agent IMGN901 based on data from two Phase 1 studies shows a disease control rate (PR and SD, defined as non-progression for at least 75 days) estimated to be 24% in a heterogeneous population of patients with pretreated and drug resistant SCLC. Additional data supportive of the potential activity of IMGN901 includes complete responses and clinically relevant stable disease in patients with MCC (clinical benefit rate = 39%). Further, the tolerability profile demonstrating minimal myelosuppression with administration of IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.
IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.
Therefore, the Phase 1 portion of this study is designed to first determine the MTD, presumably the recommended Phase 2 dose, of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide treatment and to characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of this triplet combination.
Improvement in disease control and survival of patients with SCLC-ED remains a major therapeutic challenge. New agents with better activity and tolerability are needed for this population. However, because large-scale clinical studies often are necessary to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of these new agents, it is desirable to first evaluate some measure of relative effectiveness in a Phase 2 study.
Therefore the Phase 2 portion of the study will utilize a Simon two-stage design in which the activity of IMGN901 will be assessed by comparing the PFS rate at six months in the IMGN901 experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical 6 month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). In this study, an improvement of 2.5 months in median PFS will be deemed clinically relevant and correlates to a PFS rate of 0.58 (HR = 0.667). The control arm will be used primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and will further serve as an informal validation of the historical data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IMGN901 with carboplatin and etoposide | Experimental | Drug: IMGN901Patients will receive IMGN901 along with carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles and then be able to continue on IMGN901 alone until no further benefit or toxicity. |
| Carboplatin and Etoposide | Active comparator | Drug: Carboplatin and EtoposidePatients will receive Carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients must be 18 years old
- Patients must have been diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extensive disease
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2
- No prior systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnant or lactating females
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IMGN901Also: BB-10901, Lorvotuzumab mertansinePhase 2 regimen is IMGN901, Carboplatin, and Etoposide. IMGN901 to be given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. | Drug | IMGN901 with carboplatin and etoposide |
| Carboplatin and EtoposideAlso: Toposar®, VePesid®, Etopophos®Patients assigned to Arm 2 were to receive carboplatin at the same AUC as utilized in Arm 1 | Drug | Carboplatin and Etoposide |
Primary outcome
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
Time frame: 21 days (Cycle 1)
The primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. For the purposes of dose escalation and determination of MTD, DLTs were defined as AEs or abnormal laboratory values related to study treatment which occurred in Cycle 1 of the Dose Escalation phase, including any AEs that resulted in failure to meet the criteria for re-treatment. The following events were considered DLTs (using the most current version of CTCAE): febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; ≥ Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; ≥ Grade 3 vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea that persisted despite the use of optimal therapy; other ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (with the exception of brief fatigue i.e. ≤ 72 hours and alopecia)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Phase II
Time frame: From randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)
The primary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the efficacy of IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. PFS was defined as the time from enrollment until objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed.
Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of IMGN901
Time frame: 21 days (Cycle 1)
A primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. The MTD was determined based on DLTs that occurred during Cycle 1.
4 secondary outcomes
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From the first dose of study drug on Cycle 1, Day 1 until 28 days after the last study treatment (up to 22 months)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months
Median Overall Survival (OS) in Phase II
Time frame: From the time of enrollment until death on study due to any cause (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jan 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046054/SGN-PDL1V Versus Docetaxel in Adult Participants With Previously-Treated Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Non-small Cell Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
A Randomized Trial of Standard vs. Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiotherapy for Progression in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
Limited Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Real-World Outcomes of Sevabertinib in HER2-Mutant Advanced NSCLC: A Bidirectional Cohort Study
HER2-mutant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
CAN-2409 Plus Prodrug With Standard of Care Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Stage III/IV NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Hotspot Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy Versus Traditional Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Early Stage Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Stage I Lung Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
48 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by ImmunoGen, Inc. at 48 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 48 sites in United States, Spain, Canada, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (time frame: 21 days (Cycle 1)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2018.