AzTrials
AzTrials

Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 1/2NCT01237678

A Study of IMGN901 for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 1/2 study testing IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by ImmunoGen, Inc. at 48 sites in 4 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
181 participants
Where
48 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
Nov 2010to May 2015
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients must be 18 years old
  • Patients must have been diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and extensive disease
  • ECOG performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • No prior systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of SCLC

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or lactating females

Trial locations and contacts

48 sites in 4 countries.

48 sites in 4 countries

United States32 sites
  • Anne Arundel Medical Center

    Annapolis, Maryland, 21401

  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21204

  • Bayview Medical Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21224

  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2696

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University Hospitals of Cleveland

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • South Carolina Oncology Associates

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29210

  • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Holy Cross Hospital Bienes Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33308

  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Johnson Therurer Cancer Center at Hackensack

    Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601

  • University of Tennessee Medical Center Cancer Institute

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

  • UCLA Oncology Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • UPMC Cancer Centers East, Oxford Drive

    Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146

  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Yale Medical Center

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510

  • Oklahoma University

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104-5417

  • St. Joseph's Hospital

    Orange, California, 92868

  • UCLA Hematology

    Pasadena, California, 91105

  • UPMC Cancer Center St. Margaret

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15215

  • Univeristy of Pittsburg Medical Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • UPMC Cancer Center at UPMC Passavant (HOA)

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15237

  • Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • UTHSC at San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • UCLA Oncology Clinic

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Northwest Medical Specialties

    Tacoma, Washington, 98405

  • Arizona Cancer Center @ UMC North

    Tucson, Arizona, 85719

  • UCLA Santa Clarita Valley Cancer Center

    Valencia, California, 91355

  • Sibley Memorial Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016

  • UCLA Oncology Center

    Westlake Village, California, 91361

Other trials in United States

Spain6 sites
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital de la Santa Creu y Sand Pau

    Barcelona, 08041

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid, 28041

  • Hospital Universitario

    Madrid, 28222

  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli

    Sabadell, Barcelona

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

Canada5 sites
  • Juravinski Cancer Center

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2

  • Montreal General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • St. Mary's Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1M5

  • Royal Victoria

    Montreal, Quebec, QC H3G

Other trials in Canada

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Royal Sussex Hospital

    Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 5BE

  • University College of London

    London, England, NM12BU

  • Royal Marsden, London

    London, SW3 6JJ

  • Royal Marsden

    Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5PT

  • The Christie Hospital

    Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Phase 1/2 Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Lorvotuzumab Mertansine in Combination With Carboplatin/Etoposide in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors Including Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study is to test safety and efficacy of this combination treatment (IMGN901, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with solid tumors and extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Read the detailed description

Small-Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is a neuroendocrine cancer of the lung that is typically caused by smoking. Patients generally present with symptoms of cough, dyspnea, pain and weakness, and often have extensive disease at that time. It is estimated that 13% of lung cancers are SCLC in origin1. Approximately 28,530 new cases of SCLC were expected in 2009 based on an estimate of 219,440 new cases of any cancer of the lung in the US in 20092.

There are 2 stages of the disease: limited-stage disease (LD) and extensive-stage disease (ED). SCLC-LD is confined to a region of the chest (the hemithorax and mediastinum) that is more amenable to radiation therapy. Thirty percent (30%) of patients present with SCLC-LD. The remaining patients (70%) present with SCLC-ED, in which the disease has progressed outside this region of the chest. Common sites of metastatic disease include the contralateral lung, liver, adrenal glands, brain, bones and/or bone marrow3. Recurrence after therapy is typical. In the rare patient who has longer-term survival, secondary malignancies (new SCLC tumors and other malignancies) are common because of long-term exposure to carcinogens.

SCLC is very responsive to chemotherapy and radiation therapy, having response rates of up to 80%4-7. In limited stage disease, the standard treatment is 'combined-modality therapy' consisting of combination chemotherapy such as cisplatin plus etoposide followed by thoracic radiation therapy. Surgery is rarely used.

Despite high response rates, therapy is rarely curative due to high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Overall 5-year survival for SCLC patients is 4%5. SCLC-LD patients typically achieve median survival of 14 to 24 months after therapy, with a 2-year survival rate of 40% to 50%. This survival rate drops to about 20% at 5 years4-7. SCLC-ED patients achieve a median survival of 8 to 12 months on therapy8.

Patients will typically have recurrent disease after therapy. While many of these patients may be eligible for further chemotherapy, survival at this stage is usually less than 6 months.

No treatment modality has a significant impact on overall survival. Studies utilizing regimens with greater numbers of chemotherapeutic agents or longer therapy duration have not improved survival. Thus, a new therapy that can improve survival is needed.

IMGN901 is an antibody drug conjugate which is anticipated to result in lower systemic toxicity and greater efficacy than currently available therapies based on its specific and high affinity binding to its target antigen, CD56. This antigen has been shown to be present in almost all cases of SCLC (~ 95% based on in-house data). In in vivo studies, IMGN901 has demonstrated potent anti-tumor activity against CD56-positive carcinomas including xenograft models of SCLC as well as complete regressions when combined with cisplatin/etoposide. Preliminary clinical activity of single agent IMGN901 based on data from two Phase 1 studies shows a disease control rate (PR and SD, defined as non-progression for at least 75 days) estimated to be 24% in a heterogeneous population of patients with pretreated and drug resistant SCLC. Additional data supportive of the potential activity of IMGN901 includes complete responses and clinically relevant stable disease in patients with MCC (clinical benefit rate = 39%). Further, the tolerability profile demonstrating minimal myelosuppression with administration of IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.

IMGN901 is supportive of exploring its use in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.

Therefore, the Phase 1 portion of this study is designed to first determine the MTD, presumably the recommended Phase 2 dose, of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide treatment and to characterize the safety, tolerability, PK, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-tumor activity of this triplet combination.

Improvement in disease control and survival of patients with SCLC-ED remains a major therapeutic challenge. New agents with better activity and tolerability are needed for this population. However, because large-scale clinical studies often are necessary to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of these new agents, it is desirable to first evaluate some measure of relative effectiveness in a Phase 2 study.

Therefore the Phase 2 portion of the study will utilize a Simon two-stage design in which the activity of IMGN901 will be assessed by comparing the PFS rate at six months in the IMGN901 experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical 6 month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). In this study, an improvement of 2.5 months in median PFS will be deemed clinically relevant and correlates to a PFS rate of 0.58 (HR = 0.667). The control arm will be used primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and will further serve as an informal validation of the historical data.

Being tested
IMGN901, Carboplatin and Etoposide
Keywords
Immunogen, Lung, Small Cell Lung Cancer, Carboplatin, ADC
Medical subject headings
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IMGN901Drug

    Also called BB-10901, Lorvotuzumab mertansine

    Phase 2 regimen is IMGN901, Carboplatin, and Etoposide. IMGN901 to be given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days.

  • Carboplatin and EtoposideDrug

    Also called Toposar®, VePesid®, Etopophos®

    Patients assigned to Arm 2 were to receive carboplatin at the same AUC as utilized in Arm 1

Study groups in NCT01237678
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IMGN901 with carboplatin and etoposideExperimentalPatients will receive IMGN901 along with carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles and then be able to continue on IMGN901 alone until no further benefit or toxicity.
Receives: Drug: IMGN901
Carboplatin and EtoposideActive comparatorPatients will receive Carboplatin and etoposide for up to 6 cycles.
Receives: Drug: Carboplatin and Etoposide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

    The primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and characterize the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. For the purposes of dose escalation and determination of MTD, DLTs were defined as AEs or abnormal laboratory values related to study treatment which occurred in Cycle 1 of the Dose Escalation phase, including any AEs that resulted in failure to meet the criteria for re-treatment. The following events were considered DLTs (using the most current version of CTCAE): febrile neutropenia; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia or Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding; ≥ Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; ≥ Grade 3 vomiting, nausea, or diarrhea that persisted despite the use of optimal therapy; other ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity (with the exception of brief fatigue i.e. ≤ 72 hours and alopecia)

    Measured: 21 days (Cycle 1)

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Phase II

    The primary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the efficacy of IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. PFS was defined as the time from enrollment until objective tumor progression according to RECIST 1.1 or death on study due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed.

    Measured: From randomization to objective tumor progression or death (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)

  3. Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of IMGN901

    A primary outcome measure for Phase I was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of IMGN901 when administered in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy followed by IMGN901 alone in patients with solid tumors. The MTD was determined based on DLTs that occurred during Cycle 1.

    Measured: 21 days (Cycle 1)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    To assess the type and frequency of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs). An AE was defined as any noxious, pathologic, or unintended change un anatomical, physiologic, or metabolic function as indicated by physical signs, symptoms, or laboratory changes occurring in any phase of the study, whether or not deemed study drug-related. An SAE was any AE resulting in death, life-threatening experience, initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or congenital defect. All AEs were reported from the time of the first dose of study treatment until 28 days after the final dose of study drug. the severity of AEs were graded by the Investigator using National cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for AEs (CTCAE) version 4.0.

    Measured: From the first dose of study drug on Cycle 1, Day 1 until 28 days after the last study treatment (up to 22 months)

  2. Progression Free Survival (PFS) Rate at 6 Months

    The trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to PFS. The activity of IMGN901 was assessed by comparing the PFS rate at 6 months in the IMGN901 experimental arm against the historical 6-month PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months). Only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented as the objective was to compare PFS at 6 months in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against the historical PFS rate of 0.44 (equivalently a median PFS = 5 months) for carboplatin and etoposide. The control arm was planned primarily to reliably assess the safety of IMGN901 and to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Median Overall Survival (OS) in Phase II

    A secondary outcome measure for Phase II was to determine the overall survival of patients treated with IMGN901 in combination with carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy versus carboplatin/etoposide chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

    Measured: From the time of enrollment until death on study due to any cause (up to post-treatment follow-up 28 days after last dose, up to 22 months)

  4. Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 12 Months

    OS was analyzed based on a binary definition of the number of patients dead or censored prior to 12 months and the number of patients alive at 12 months. The primary objective of this phase of the study was to compare PFS in the experimental arm (triplet combination) against historical PFS rates. The control arm was primarily planned to demonstrate whether the or not the historical assumptions regarding efficacy were confirmed. Further, the trial was not empowered to permit a statistically informative comparison of the randomized treatment groups with respect to OS and no determination of the OS rate at 12 months for the control arm was performed; therefore only the results from the experimental arm (IMGN901 + carboplatin + etoposide) are presented.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Why it stopped: Study was stopped early due to lack of efficacy signal and safety concerns

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
181 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01237678
Sponsor's protocol ID
Immunogen 0007
Status last verified
Dec 2017
First submitted
8 Nov 2010
Last updated
18 Jan 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing IMGN901 and Carboplatin and Etoposide in people with Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by ImmunoGen, Inc. at 48 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 48 sites in United States, Spain, Canada, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Occurrence of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (time frame: 21 days (Cycle 1)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in