InfluenzaPhase 4RETOSNCT01248715
Rapid Empiric Treatment With Oseltamivir Study (RETOS)
A Phase 4 study testing oseltamivir in people with Influenza and Pneumonia, run by University of Louisville at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Current guidelines recommend early initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy to cover typical and atypical bacteria that may cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Influenza antiviral therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed influenza. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- oseltamivir
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,107 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- For oseltamivir and standard of care groups:
- 18 years of age or older
- No oseltamivir or zanamivir ordered in hospital admission orders
- Meets criteria for acute LRTI
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- For oseltamivir and standard of care groups:
- Oseltamivir or zanamivir ordered in hospital admission orders
- Patients hospitalized for the LRTI for more than 24 hours before enrollment into the trial.
- Patients with mental conditions who are unlikely to comply with the study protocol and who cannot give informed consent and have no guardian or proxy.
- Patients who have had severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis or serious skin reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or erythema multiforme to any component of oseltamivir (TAMIFLU).
- Prisoners
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Jewish Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Norton Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
University of Louisville Hospital
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Rex Robley VA Medical Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40206
Baptist Hospital East
Louisville, Kentucky, 40272
About this study
Official title: Title: Effectiveness of Empiric Antiviral Treatment for Hospitalized Community Acquired Pneumonia During the Influenza Season (U18)
Current guidelines recommend early initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy to cover typical and atypical bacteria that may cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Influenza antiviral therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed influenza. However, many clinicians do not suspect influenza among patients with CAP or other acute lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) and often do not test for influenza. Additionally, results from currently available diagnostic tests for influenza may be delayed and several tests have low sensitivity and will give false negative results. Thus, anti-influenza treatment for patients with hospitalized influenza CAP and LRTI is frequently initiated late if at all. There is an association between delayed time to administration of empiric antibiotic therapy with increased clinical failure and mortality. As a result, empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with suspect CAP is begun within 4 - 6 hours of hospitalization. This has recently been demonstrated for delayed antiviral treatment as well. We hypothesize that, as happens with early empiric antibiotics for bacterial CAP, a standardized approach of adding early empiric anti-influenza therapy during the influenza season to hospitalized patients with suspect CAP and LRTI will improve clinical outcomes of patients with influenza associated CAP and LRTI.
To test our hypothesis we plan a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of hospitalized patients with acute LRTI, including suspect CAP, during . If early anti-influenza medications were not included on the patients admission orders, patients will be randomized to standard care, including empiric antibacterial therapy as recommended by ATS/IDSA guidelines plus standard influenza diagnostics and treatment (Standard of care) versus early initiation of empiric antiinfluenza therapy plus standard care, e.g. empiric antibacterial (oseltamivir group). The primary study outcome will be development of clinical failure and selected clinical outcomes during the 30 days after enrollment. Other clinical outcomes that will be compared between study groups include time to clinical stability, duration of hospitalization, development of cardiovascular events, re-hospitalization, short-term mortality (30 days), and long-term mortality (1 year). The secondary study outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Read the detailed description
This will be both a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical study of hospitalized patients with acute LRTI admitted in one of four institutions in Louisville, KY (rapid empiric treatment with oseltamivir study[RETOS]) and a prospective observation study to describe influenza LRTI (Flu LRTI study). All hospitalized patients with acute LRTI will be invited to participate in one of the arms of study. If the admitting clinician does not order oseltamivir or zanamivir at the time of hospital admission, the patient is eligible for randomization into Group A (standard clinical care, including empiric antibiotics and anti-influenza drugs at the clinician discretion) or Group B (oseltamivir administered to the patient within 24 hours of admission, ideally within 8-12 hours of admission, plus empiric antibiotics).
Patients will be enrolled from one of four hospitals, the University of Louisville Hospital, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Louisville, Norton Hospital of Louisville, and Jewish Hospital of Louisville. Eligible patients will be identified primarily in the Emergency Departments of all four hospitals and evaluated for inclusion/exclusion criteria after hospital admission orders are written. Patients will be enrolled only during the influenza season. For this study, the influenza season is defined as December 1st until May 1st, unless surveillance data suggests that influenza viruses are circulating earlier or have stopped circulating.
For all three study groups, diagnosis of influenza will be based on nucleic acid amplification through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). At the time of enrollment into the study, a nasopharyngeal swab will be obtained for PCR. The University of Louisville Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory has extensive experience using molecular techniques for the diagnosis of respiratory pathogens and will test batched specimens at monthly intervals. In addition, we will collect the results from tests done for routine care and bacterial or virus isolates identified during routine care for further characterization.
The management of patients in Group A and Group B will be different only in regard to early empiric anti-influenza therapy. All other aspects of the management of these patients will be in compliance with national guideline recommendations from IDSA/ATS (2). Patients in Group A may have antiviral therapy started later in hospitalization or not treated at all. The study will not interfere with Group A patient care.
A 1:1 randomization ratio within the two study arms is planned for EOS. A pre-defined randomization chart will be designed in order to have the randomization process Internet-based. The randomization table will be accessible by the project manager as a back up in the event that any problem occurs with the Internet or the computerized system.
We will attempt to begin oseltamivir within 8 - 12 hours after hospital admission, and no later than 24 hours. The study nurse will facilitate receipt of early oseltamivir treatment for the consented patient in collaboration with the hospital pharmacies. The time of oseltamivir administration will be recorded for all enrolled patients.
- Being tested
- oseltamivir
- Keywords
- pneumonia, bacterial, pneumonia, viral, respiratory tract infections, oseltamivir, therapeutic use
- Medical subject headings
- Influenza, Human, Pneumonia, Pneumonia, Bacterial, Pneumonia, Viral, Respiratory Tract Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
oseltamivirDrug
Also called Tamiflu
These patients will receive early (within 8-12 hours of admission, no later than 24 hours after admission) oseltamivir plus current, standard empiric antibacterial therapy based on national recommendations from the IDSA/ATS guidelines for management of hospitalized patients with CAP (2). Anti-influenza therapy will be given using oseltamivir at a dose of 75 mg twice daily. The oseltamivir dose will be adjusted in patients with renal insufficiency according to the package insert. Duration of antiviral therapy will be for a minimum of 5 days for patients with evidence of early clinical improvement and prolonged depending on clinical stability
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Oseltamirvir | Experimental | These patients will receive early oseltamivir plus current, standard empiric antibacterial therapy. Receives: Drug: oseltamivir |
| Standard of care | No intervention | These patients will be treated with the current, standard care, including currently recommended antibiotics or antiviral therapy based on national recommendations from the IDSA/ATS guidelines for management of hospitalized patients with CAP and ACIP antiviral use guidelines for hospitalized patients with confirmed of suspect influenza, per clinician discretion. In addition these patients with have a NP swab collected for influenza PCR testing and clinical information will be extracted from the medical record. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Clinical Failure (Failure to Reach Clinical Stability)
Number of subject that showed lack of clinical improvement within 7 days. Criteria for clinical improvement include no fever; white blood cell count decreases, or increases in the case of leukopenia, to more than 10% from the prior day; the evaluation of signs and symptoms of CAP to define when the patient is subjectively better, and the patient is able to tolerate food by mouth.
Measured: 7 days
Number of Participants to Transfer to ICU After 24 h
Number of subjects that were transfered to an intensive care unit (ICU) after 24 hours of hospitalization. A patient transferred to ICU within 24 hours of admission was considered as a direct admission to ICU and not meeting criteria for clinical failure.
Measured: 24 h
Number of Participants That Required Re-hospitalization
Participants that were re-hospitalized within 30 days after enrollment.
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants That Had Short-term Mortality
Number of subjects who died within 30 days of enrollment
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Days to Reach Clinical Stability
Time to clinical improvement. The criteria for clinical improvement were followed during the first week from the day of admission and defined as follows: a) improvement of signs and symptoms of LRTI reported by patient b) afebrile for at least 8 hours, c) decrease in white blood cell count to more than 10% from the prior day, and d) able to tolerate oral feeding. A patient was considered clinically improved on the day that these four criteria were all met.
Measured: 30 days
Length of Hospital Stay
Duration of hospitalization calculated as the day of discharge minus the day of admission.
Measured: through study completion, up to 30 days
Number of Participants With Hospital Mortality.
Number of subjects who died while hospitalized
Measured: through study completion, up to 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of LouisvilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,107 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Louisville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Julio A Ramirez, MD, Principal investigator, University of Louisville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01248715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RETOS
- Acronym
- RETOS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
PubMed 17278083Wiemken TL, Furmanek SP, Carrico RM, Peyrani P, Hoft D, Fry AM, Ramirez JA. Effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment on clinical failure in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06812-2.
PubMed 34702188Wiemken TL, Jala VR, Kelley RR, Peyrani P, Mattingly WA, Arnold FW, Cabral PW, Cavallazzi R, Haribabu B, Ramirez JA. The upper respiratory tract microbiome of hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia of unknown aetiology: a pilot study. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2015 Dec 1;6:83-89. doi: 10.15172/pneu.2015.6/682. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 31641582Ramirez J, Peyrani P, Wiemken T, Chaves SS, Fry AM. A Randomized Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Oseltamivir Initiated at the Time of Hospital Admission in Adults Hospitalized With Influenza-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):736-742. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy163.
PubMed 29659754
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Title: Effectiveness of Empiric Antiviral Treatment for Hospitalized Community Acquired Pneumonia During the Influenza Season (U18)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01248715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RETOS / RETOS
- Keywords
- pneumonia, bacterial, pneumonia, viral, respiratory tract infections, oseltamivir, therapeutic use
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,107 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LouisvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Study start
- Nov 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Sep 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Current guidelines recommend early initiation of empiric antibiotic therapy to cover typical and atypical bacteria that may cause community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Influenza antiviral therapy in patients with suspected or confirmed influenza. However, many clinicians do not suspect influenza among patients with CAP or other acute lower respiratory tract illness (LRTI) and often do not test for influenza. Additionally, results from currently available diagnostic tests for influenza may be delayed and several tests have low sensitivity and will give false negative results. Thus, anti-influenza treatment for patients with hospitalized influenza CAP and LRTI is frequently initiated late if at all. There is an association between delayed time to administration of empiric antibiotic therapy with increased clinical failure and mortality. As a result, empiric antibiotic therapy for patients with suspect CAP is begun within 4 - 6 hours of hospitalization. This has recently been demonstrated for delayed antiviral treatment as well. We hypothesize that, as happens with early empiric antibiotics for bacterial CAP, a standardized approach of adding early empiric anti-influenza therapy during the influenza season to hospitalized patients with suspect CAP and LRTI will improve clinical outcomes of patients with influenza associated CAP and LRTI.
To test our hypothesis we plan a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial of hospitalized patients with acute LRTI, including suspect CAP, during . If early anti-influenza medications were not included on the patients admission orders, patients will be randomized to standard care, including empiric antibacterial therapy as recommended by ATS/IDSA guidelines plus standard influenza diagnostics and treatment (Standard of care) versus early initiation of empiric antiinfluenza therapy plus standard care, e.g. empiric antibacterial (oseltamivir group). The primary study outcome will be development of clinical failure and selected clinical outcomes during the 30 days after enrollment. Other clinical outcomes that will be compared between study groups include time to clinical stability, duration of hospitalization, development of cardiovascular events, re-hospitalization, short-term mortality (30 days), and long-term mortality (1 year). The secondary study outcome will be the cost-effectiveness of the intervention.
Detailed description
This will be both a prospective, randomized, unblinded clinical study of hospitalized patients with acute LRTI admitted in one of four institutions in Louisville, KY (rapid empiric treatment with oseltamivir study[RETOS]) and a prospective observation study to describe influenza LRTI (Flu LRTI study). All hospitalized patients with acute LRTI will be invited to participate in one of the arms of study. If the admitting clinician does not order oseltamivir or zanamivir at the time of hospital admission, the patient is eligible for randomization into Group A (standard clinical care, including empiric antibiotics and anti-influenza drugs at the clinician discretion) or Group B (oseltamivir administered to the patient within 24 hours of admission, ideally within 8-12 hours of admission, plus empiric antibiotics).
Patients will be enrolled from one of four hospitals, the University of Louisville Hospital, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Louisville, Norton Hospital of Louisville, and Jewish Hospital of Louisville. Eligible patients will be identified primarily in the Emergency Departments of all four hospitals and evaluated for inclusion/exclusion criteria after hospital admission orders are written. Patients will be enrolled only during the influenza season. For this study, the influenza season is defined as December 1st until May 1st, unless surveillance data suggests that influenza viruses are circulating earlier or have stopped circulating.
For all three study groups, diagnosis of influenza will be based on nucleic acid amplification through polymerase chain reaction (PCR). At the time of enrollment into the study, a nasopharyngeal swab will be obtained for PCR. The University of Louisville Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory has extensive experience using molecular techniques for the diagnosis of respiratory pathogens and will test batched specimens at monthly intervals. In addition, we will collect the results from tests done for routine care and bacterial or virus isolates identified during routine care for further characterization.
The management of patients in Group A and Group B will be different only in regard to early empiric anti-influenza therapy. All other aspects of the management of these patients will be in compliance with national guideline recommendations from IDSA/ATS (2). Patients in Group A may have antiviral therapy started later in hospitalization or not treated at all. The study will not interfere with Group A patient care.
A 1:1 randomization ratio within the two study arms is planned for EOS. A pre-defined randomization chart will be designed in order to have the randomization process Internet-based. The randomization table will be accessible by the project manager as a back up in the event that any problem occurs with the Internet or the computerized system.
We will attempt to begin oseltamivir within 8 - 12 hours after hospital admission, and no later than 24 hours. The study nurse will facilitate receipt of early oseltamivir treatment for the consented patient in collaboration with the hospital pharmacies. The time of oseltamivir administration will be recorded for all enrolled patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Oseltamirvir | Experimental | Drug: oseltamivirThese patients will receive early oseltamivir plus current, standard empiric antibacterial therapy. |
| Standard of care | No intervention | –These patients will be treated with the current, standard care, including currently recommended antibiotics or antiviral therapy based on national recommendations from the IDSA/ATS guidelines for management of hospitalized patients with CAP and ACIP antiviral use guidelines for hospitalized patients with confirmed of suspect influenza, per clinician discretion. In addition these patients with have a NP swab collected for influenza PCR testing and clinical information will be extracted from the medical record. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- No oseltamivir or zanamivir ordered in hospital admission orders
- Meets criteria for acute LRTI
- Signed informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Oseltamivir or zanamivir ordered in hospital admission orders
- Patients hospitalized for the LRTI for more than 24 hours before enrollment into the trial.
- Patients with mental conditions who are unlikely to comply with the study protocol and who cannot give informed consent and have no guardian or proxy.
- Patients who have had severe allergic reactions such as anaphylaxis or serious skin reactions such as toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or erythema multiforme to any component of oseltamivir (TAMIFLU).
- Prisoners
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| oseltamivirAlso: TamifluThese patients will receive early (within 8-12 hours of admission, no later than 24 hours after admission) oseltamivir plus current, standard empiric antibacterial therapy based on national recommendations from the IDSA/ATS guidelines for management of hospitalized patients with CAP (2). Anti-influenza therapy will be given using oseltamivir at a dose of 75 mg twice daily. The oseltamivir dose will be adjusted in patients with renal insufficiency according to the package insert. Duration of antiviral therapy will be for a minimum of 5 days for patients with evidence of early clinical improvement and prolonged depending on clinical stability | Drug | Oseltamirvir |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Clinical Failure (Failure to Reach Clinical Stability)
Time frame: 7 days
Number of subject that showed lack of clinical improvement within 7 days. Criteria for clinical improvement include no fever; white blood cell count decreases, or increases in the case of leukopenia, to more than 10% from the prior day; the evaluation of signs and symptoms of CAP to define when the patient is subjectively better, and the patient is able to tolerate food by mouth.
Number of Participants to Transfer to ICU After 24 h
Time frame: 24 h
Number of subjects that were transfered to an intensive care unit (ICU) after 24 hours of hospitalization. A patient transferred to ICU within 24 hours of admission was considered as a direct admission to ICU and not meeting criteria for clinical failure.
Number of Participants That Required Re-hospitalization
Time frame: 30 days
Participants that were re-hospitalized within 30 days after enrollment.
Number of Participants That Had Short-term Mortality
Time frame: 30 days
Number of subjects who died within 30 days of enrollment
3 secondary outcomes
Days to Reach Clinical Stability
Time frame: 30 days
Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: through study completion, up to 30 days
Number of Participants With Hospital Mortality.
Time frame: through study completion, up to 30 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17278083Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG; Infectious Diseases Society of America; American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S27-72. doi: 10.1086/511159. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34702188Wiemken TL, Furmanek SP, Carrico RM, Peyrani P, Hoft D, Fry AM, Ramirez JA. Effectiveness of oseltamivir treatment on clinical failure in hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 27;21(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06812-2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31641582Wiemken TL, Jala VR, Kelley RR, Peyrani P, Mattingly WA, Arnold FW, Cabral PW, Cavallazzi R, Haribabu B, Ramirez JA. The upper respiratory tract microbiome of hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia of unknown aetiology: a pilot study. Pneumonia (Nathan). 2015 Dec 1;6:83-89. doi: 10.15172/pneu.2015.6/682. eCollection 2015.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29659754Ramirez J, Peyrani P, Wiemken T, Chaves SS, Fry AM. A Randomized Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of Oseltamivir Initiated at the Time of Hospital Admission in Adults Hospitalized With Influenza-Associated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):736-742. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy163.
Related trials for Influenza
RecruitingPhase 2
BPL-1357 Against H1N1 Influenza Virus Challenge
Influenza, Human
RecruitingObservational study
Screening for LID Clinical Studies Unit Healthy Volunteer Protocols
Zika, Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of mRNA-1010 in Healthy Children
Seasonal Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial Adaptive Platform Trial for Community- Acquired Pneumonia
Respiratory Tract Diseases, Influenza (Pandemic)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
SCIVAX: Biomarkers of Immune Dysfunction and Vaccine Responsiveness in Chronic SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Julio A Ramirez, MD principal investigator
University of Louisville
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing oseltamivir in people with Influenza and Pneumonia, run by University of Louisville at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Sep 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Clinical Failure (Failure to Reach Clinical Stability) (time frame: 7 days). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01248715, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2023.