Sinus-node DysfunctionRVOTCARENCT01294839
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Study
A study testing Right ventricular lead location in people with Sinus-node Dysfunction, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sinus-node Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Right ventricular lead location
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 380 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to Jun 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with only sinus-node dysfunction and meet pacing indication
- Patients with LVEF≥60% and with ventricular synchrony.
- Patients signed the written informed consent for the study
- Patients can endure the required follow up
Who cannot join
- Patients with atrial fibrillation
- Patients with atrial-ventricular block
- Patients with LBBB
- Patients with significant valvular disease
- Patients with severe hematopathy or severe renal inadequacy
- Patients with life expectancy < 1.5 year
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patients who are in the period of pregnant or lactation
- Patients who are younger than 18 years old
- Patients who are ongoing other devices or agents study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing for Cardiac Dysfunction Prevention Evaluation
This is a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.
Read the detailed description
Ventricular pacing is unavoidable in many patients because of unreliable or absent AV conduction, or permanent AF. In recognition of this need, interest has focused on alternative site(s) ventricular pacing to maximize pumping function. These sites include the RV septum, His bundle, various LV sites, and combination of LV and RV (biventricular [BiV]). The RV outflow tract septum (RVOTs) seems to be the most promising site within the RV.
However, small enrollment and inconsistent experimental methods hinder the interpretation of these studies. Locations of alternative pacing sites were not clearly specified, were largely topographic, and lacked consistent anatomic designation. And what is more, there was no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing (sinus node dysfunction) in China. There was also no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAIR pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction in the world.
So SJM China will sponsor a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.
- Conditions
- Sinus-node Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Right ventricular lead location
- Keywords
- sinus-node dysfunction, RVOTs pacing, RVA pacing
- Medical subject headings
- Sick Sinus Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Right ventricular lead locationDevice
RV leads in RVOTs group will be located in right ventricular outflow tract septum, RV leads in the other two group will be implanted in right ventricular apex, for the last RVOTs and RVA groups, the accumulated ventricular pacrouping percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RVOTs | Experimental | 555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVOTs arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular outflow tract septum,the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays. Receives: Device: Right ventricular lead location |
| AAI | Experimental | 555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in AAI arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex. Receives: Device: Right ventricular lead location |
| RVA | Active comparator | 555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVA arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex, the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays. Receives: Device: Right ventricular lead location |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
To demonstrate:
- Whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing(sinus node dysfunction)
- Whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAI pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction.
Measured: 18 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)
To demonstrate:
- Whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing(sinus node dysfunction)
- Whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAI pacing in avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction.
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completionJun 2016
- Study completionJun 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sinus-node DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01294839
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR-10-016-AP-LV
- Acronym
- RVOTCARE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2019
- First submitted
- 10 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing for Cardiac Dysfunction Prevention Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01294839
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RVOTCARE / CR-10-016-AP-LV
- Conditions
- Sinus-node Dysfunction
- Keywords
- sinus-node dysfunction, RVOTs pacing, RVA pacing
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 380 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.
Detailed description
Ventricular pacing is unavoidable in many patients because of unreliable or absent AV conduction, or permanent AF. In recognition of this need, interest has focused on alternative site(s) ventricular pacing to maximize pumping function. These sites include the RV septum, His bundle, various LV sites, and combination of LV and RV (biventricular [BiV]). The RV outflow tract septum (RVOTs) seems to be the most promising site within the RV.
However, small enrollment and inconsistent experimental methods hinder the interpretation of these studies. Locations of alternative pacing sites were not clearly specified, were largely topographic, and lacked consistent anatomic designation. And what is more, there was no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing (sinus node dysfunction) in China. There was also no prospective, double-blind randomized, multi-center clinical trial which is design to test whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAIR pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function and avoiding adverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction in the world.
So SJM China will sponsor a prospective, randomized, double blinded, multi-center, controlled study to evaluate the clinical impact at 18 months after DDD implantation of alternative pacing site (RVOTs and RVA) and the different conduction path (RVOTs and AV node) on cardiac dysfunction prevention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RVOTs | Experimental | Device: Right ventricular lead location555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVOTs arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular outflow tract septum,the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays. |
| AAI | Experimental | Device: Right ventricular lead location555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in AAI arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex. |
| RVA | Active comparator | Device: Right ventricular lead location555 Patients will be randomized to three groups(RVOTs, RVA, AAI) in 1:1:1, 185 patients in RVA arm, the RV lead of this group patients will be implanted in right ventricular apex, the accumulated ventricular pacing percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with only sinus-node dysfunction and meet pacing indication
- Patients with LVEF≥60% and with ventricular synchrony.
- Patients signed the written informed consent for the study
- Patients can endure the required follow up
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with atrial fibrillation
- Patients with atrial-ventricular block
- Patients with LBBB
- Patients with significant valvular disease
- Patients with severe hematopathy or severe renal inadequacy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Right ventricular lead locationRV leads in RVOTs group will be located in right ventricular outflow tract septum, RV leads in the other two group will be implanted in right ventricular apex, for the last RVOTs and RVA groups, the accumulated ventricular pacrouping percentage should be over 80% by adjusting AV delays. | Device | AAI, RVA, RVOTs |
Primary outcome
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
Time frame: 18 months
To demonstrate: * Whether RVOTs pacing is superior to right ventricular apical pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and standard indications for pacing(sinus node dysfunction) * Whether RVOTs pacing is not inferior to AAI pacing in preserving left ventricular systolic function in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular synchrony and sinus node dysfunction.
1 secondary outcome
left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV)
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2019.
Related trials for Sinus-node Dysfunction
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Recruiting
Posterosuperior Bundle Pacing for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Sinus Node Dysfunction
Pacing Therapy, Cardiac Pacing
Recruiting
Impact of Allometric Pacing Rate on Ventricular Diastolic Function and Cerebral Blood Flow in Hypertensive Patients With Sinus Node Dysfunction
Bradycardia
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Repository for Cardiac Arrhythmias at the Cleveland Clinic
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
RecruitingObservational study
BIO|STREAM.CSP CLS
Sinus Node Disease, Atrioventricular Block
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Right ventricular lead location in people with Sinus-node Dysfunction, run by Abbott Medical Devices at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (time frame: 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2019.