AzTrials
AzTrials

Congenital CataractPhase 4NCT01297153

Aphakia Versus Pseudophakia in Children Under 2 Years Undergoing Bilateral Congenital Cataract Surgery

A Phase 4 study testing Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL) and No IOL in people with Congenital Cataract, run by Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center at 1 site in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to document the safety and efficacy of primary IOL implantation in children below 2 years of age undergoing congenital cataract surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 24 months
Conditions the study is for
Congenital Cataract
What is being tested?
Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL) and No IOL
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
May 2003to May 2011
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 24 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children less than 2 years
  • Congenital cataract
  • Bilateral cataracts
  • IOL fixation - Bag/Ciliary fixated

Who cannot join

  • Microphthalmos (Mean axial length 2 SDs less than normal for age)
  • Microcornea (Horizontal corneal diameter <9.5 mm-asper that particular age)
  • Iris coloboma
  • PHPV
  • Aniridia
  • *Glaucoma - IOP more than or equal to 25 mmHg
  • One eyed
  • Cataract surgery already performed in fellow eye

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

India1 site
  • Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre

    Ahmedabad

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Aphakia vs Pseudophakia - Randomized Clinical Trial in Children Under 2 Years Undergoing Bilateral Congenital Cataract Surgery

The purpose of this study is to document the safety and efficacy of primary IOL implantation in children below 2 years of age undergoing congenital cataract surgery.

Read the detailed description

The use of IOLs in pediatric patients has become increasingly popular in recent years and may represent a standard of care for older children. The refinements in surgical techniques attained in adult cataract surgery have been translated to pediatric cataract surgery to produce a technically safe eye. Nevertheless, the use of IOLs in children younger than 2 years remains controversial. Exaggerated inflammation, capsular opacification and changing refractive status of the developing eye should be considered before the use of IOLs in the first two years of life. Further more, there is concern about the unknown risks of an IOL over the long life span.

Currently, there are 3 methods of optical rehabilitation following congenital cataract surgery :

  1. Primary IOL implantation.
  2. Aphakic glasses.
  3. Contact lenses.

At present, there is no randomized clinical trial reported to document the safety and efficacy of IOL implantation in children less than 2 years.

Aim : To compare the technical outcome (safety) and functional outcome (benefits) following primary IOL implantation and aphakia in children less than 2 years.

Being tested
Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL), No IOL
Keywords
Congenital Cataract, Children younger than 2 years, Aphakia, Primary IOL Implantation
Medical subject headings
Aphakia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL)Device

    Also called Hydrophobic Acrylic IOL

    IOL fixation, material and size are important determinants of immediate and long-term outcome. In-the-bag fixation is the most preferred site of IOL implantation.

  • No IOLDevice

    No IOL will be implanted in these eyes

Study groups in NCT01297153
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AphakiaActive comparator* The patient is randomly assigned for aphakia / pseudophakia. This is done only after vitrectomy. If it is aphakia,IOL will not be implanted.Aphakia will be corrected with aphakic glasses / contact lenses. Bilateral aphakes are given both contact lenses and glasses. So when they do not wear contact lenses they can put on aphakic glasses. Unilateral aphakes are given only contact lenses. Contact lenses should be fitted in the eye in OT immediately after the operation. * Aphakic glasses : Prescribed within 2 weeks of surgery for both eyes.
Receives: Device: No IOL
PseudophakiaActive comparatorThe patient is randomly assigned for aphakia / pseudophakia. This is done only after vitrectomy. Hydrophobic Acrysof IOL is implanted.All pseudophakic children will be refracted and given the residual correction within a month of surgery.
Receives: Device: Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual axis obscuration

    Visual axis obscuration(VAO) assesed on slitlamp or under operating microscope in dilated pupil.VAO is defined as fibrous or proliferative cell growth leadind to a dull retinoscopic reflex.

    Measured: 4 years

  2. Glaucoma

    Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Perkins handheld applanation tonometer.

    Glaucoma defined as :

    IOP>21 mmHg >1 occasion with any of these 3 criteria

    1. Optic nerve cupping asymmetry >0.2 cd ratio asymmetry , CD ratio >0.4
    2. Abnormal asymmetrical axial length elongation
    3. Corneal oedema or enlargement

    Measured: 4 years

  3. Central Corneal Thickness

    Corneal thickness assessed by ultrasonic pachymetry. An average of 3 values with an error less than 0.001 would be taken into account.

    Measured: 4 Years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Visual Acuity

    An Objective visual assessment to be performed using Lea Grating Paddles(Grating Acuity Test developed by Lea Hyvarinen16), Cardiff Acuity Cards(Preferential Looking Test17), or ETDRS (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart. Vision is subjectively assessed as the ability to follow or to fixate on a point source of light or on an object shown to the child.. Ocular alignment was measured using alternative cover testing. If this kind of testing was not feasible, Hirschberg testing was performed..

    Measured: 4 years .

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Feb 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2003
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionMay 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01297153
Sponsor's protocol ID
icircAP
Status last verified
Jun 2011
First submitted
14 Feb 2011
Last updated
1 Jul 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Intraocular Lens (Acrysof IOL) and No IOL in people with Congenital Cataract, run by Iladevi Cataract and IOL Research Center at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual axis obscuration (time frame: 4 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in