Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 3SEAMLESSNCT01303796
A Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing Sapacitabine and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 118 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
This Phase 3 study assesses two drug regimens as the initial treatment of patients who are at least 70 years of age and have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom the doctor does not recommend the use of standard intensive treatment or the patient has decided not to receive standard intensive treatment… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Sapacitabine and Decitabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 482 participants
- Where
- 118 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2011to 31 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Newly diagnosed AML based on WHO (World Health Organization) classification
- Age 70 years or older for whom the treatment of choice is low-intensity therapy by investigator assessment or who has refused intensive induction therapy recommended by investigator
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
- Adequate renal function
- Adequate liver function
- Able to swallow capsules
- Agree to practice effective contraception
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- AML is of the sub-type of acute promyelocytic leukemia or extramedullary myeloid tumor without bone marrow involvement
- Having received any systemic anti-cancer therapy for AML or received treatment with hypomethylating agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy for preceding myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative disease (MPD)
- Known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) involvement by leukemia
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
- Known hypersensitivity to decitabine
- Known to be HIV-positive
Trial locations and contacts
118 sites in 12 countries.
118 sites in 12 countries
United States39 sites
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
University of Maryland Greenbaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Alabama Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Gabrail Cancer Center Research
Canton, Ohio, 44718
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
The University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Shands Cancer Hospital at University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
Saint Francis Hospital
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
John Theurer Cancer Center at the Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Westchester Hematology Oncology Group, PC
Hawthorne, New York, 10532
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030-3387
St. Francis Medical Group Oncology and Hematology Specialists
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Saint Luke's Cancer Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Scripps Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
Dartmouth - Hitchcock Medical Center
Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center
Lubbock, Texas, 79410
The Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York, 10003
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Norwalk Hospital
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06850
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112
St. Louis University Cancer Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331
Italy15 sites
AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I
Ancona
AO Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo
Bergamo
Universita di Bologna Ist Ematologia Oncologia Medica Seragnoli
Bologna
AO Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia
Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Campobasso
AOU Careggi
Florence
AOU San Martino IST
Genova
PO Vito Fazzi
Lecce
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan
AORN Antonio Cardarelli
Naples
Uni. Napoli Ospedale Federico lI
Naples
AOU Maggiore della Carità di Novara
Novara
AOOR Villa Sofia Cervello di Palermo
Palermo
Policlinico San Matteo Di Pavia
Pavia
AOU San Luigi Gonzaga
Torino
Spain15 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol ICO Badalona
Badalona
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona
Hospital De La Santa Creu Sant Pau
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
Madrid
MD Anderson Cancer Center
Madrid
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca
Hospital Universitari Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Pamplona
Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra
Pamplona
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna
Hospital Clinico Universitario
Santiago de Compostela
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville
Hospital Universitari "La Fe"
Valencia
France13 sites
CHU d'Amiens Hopital Sud
Amiens
Centre Hospitalier de la Cote Basque
Bayonne
CHU de Lyon - Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille
CHRU De Montpellier Hopital St. Eloi
Montpellier
Centre Hospitalier De Mulhouse
Mulhouse
Hopital St Louis Universite Paris 7
Paris
Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux
Périgueux
Centre Hospitalier d'Annecy
Pringy
Centre Hospitalier de Saint-Brieuc Yves Ie Foll
Saint-Brieuc
CHU de Strasbourg - Hopital Civil
Strasbourg
Strasbourg Oncologie Liberale
Strasbourg
CHU de Tours Hopital Bretonneau
Tours
Germany11 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Charite Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin
Berlin
Universitaetsklinikum Carl-Gustav-Carus Dresden
Dresden
St. Johannes Hospital
Duisburg
Klinikum Frankfurt Hoechst
Frankfurt
Asklepios Klinik Altona
Hamburg
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Hanover
SLK Kliniken Heilbronn
Heilbronn
Klinikum St. Georg
Leipzig
Johannes Wesling Klinikum
Minden
TU Muenchen
München
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster
Austria7 sites
Medizinische Universitaetsklinik
Innsbruck
Elisabethinen Krankenhaus
Linz
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern
Linz
Univ. Klinik fur Innere Medizin III LKH
Salzburg
AKH Wien
Vienna
Hanusch Krankenhaus
Vienna
Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH
Wels
Poland6 sites
Akademickie Centrum Kliniczne Szpital Akademii Medycznej w Gdansku
Gdansk
Wojewodzki Szpital Specjalistyczny
Legnica
Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny w Legnicy
Legnica
University of Lodz N. Copernicus Memorial Hospital
Lodz
IHT Instytut Hematologii I Transfuzjologii w Warszawie
Warsaw
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny Nr 1 w Wroclawiu
Wroclaw
Belgium5 sites
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen Stuivenberg
Antwerp
AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende
Bruges
Universite Catholique de Louvain
Brussels
Centre Hospitalier De Jolimont-Lobbes
La Louvière
Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir
Hungary3 sites
University of Debrecen
Debrecen
Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz
Győr
Kaposi Mor Oktato Korhaz
Kaposvár
Sweden2 sites
Sunderby Hospital
Luleå
Skåne Universitetssjukhus Univ Hospital Lund
Lund
United Kingdom1 site
Kings College Hospital and Guys and St Thomas' Hospital
London
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
This Phase 3 study assesses two drug regimens as the initial treatment of patients who are at least 70 years of age and have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom the doctor does not recommend the use of standard intensive treatment or the patient has decided not to receive standard intensive treatment after being fully informed about its benefits and risks by his/her doctor. The two drug regimens are sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine or decitabine alone. The purpose of the study is to learn which drug regimen is more likely to keep AML in check as long as possible.
Read the detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, Phase 3 study ("SEAMLESS") comparing two drug regimens (arms) as the front-line treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive induction chemotherapy. In Arm A, sapacitabine is administered in alternating cycles with decitabine, and in Arm C decitabine is administered alone. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival. The study is designed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival of Arm A versus Arm C.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- Sapacitabine, Decitabine
- Keywords
- AML
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SapacitabineDrug
Also called CYC682
Oral sapacitabine capsules
DecitabineDrug
Also called Decitabine intravenous
Decitabine intravenous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sapacitabine-decitabine alternating | Experimental | Arm A sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine Receives: Drug: Sapacitabine; Drug: Decitabine |
| Decitabine | Active comparator | Arm C Decitabine Receives: Drug: Decitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival
The distribution of overall survival was estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. A log-rank analysis stratified by randomization stratification factors was used to compare overall survival between Arm A (decitabine/sapacitabine) versus Arm C (decitabine). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictive factors for overall survival.
Measured: up to 43 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Complete Remission (CR)
Normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, and bone marrow to <=5 % blasts; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.
- independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (CRp)
Normalization of bone marrow to <=5% blasts; peripheral neutrophils >=1000 /microliter, platelet <=100,000 /microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.
*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Partial Remission (PR)
Normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, >=50% decrease in bone marrow blasts over pre-treatment but still >5%; independent of transfusions*
*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Hematological Improvement
HI with duration (HI)
- Erythroid response (HI-E) for patients with pre-treatment hemoglobin < 11 g/dL; Major response: >2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, transfusion independence* Minor response: 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, a 50% decrease in transfusion requirements
- Platelet response (HI-P) for pre-treatment platelet count <100,000/mm3; Major response: an absolute increase of platelet count by >=30,000/mm3; stabilization of platelet counts and platelet transfusion independence* Minor response: >=50% increase in platelet count with a net increase > 10,000/mm3 but <30,000/mm3
- Neutrophil response (HI-N) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,500/mm3 before therapy; Major response: >=100% increase, or an absolute increase of >500/mm3, whichever is greater Minor response: >=100% increase, but absolute increase < 500/mm3
- independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Stable Disease (SD)
Failure to achieve at least hematologic improvement (HI), but no evidence of clinically significant progression for > 16 weeks.
Measured: up to 43 months
Blood Products Transfused
Number of units of packed red blood cells (PRBC) and/or platelet transfusions administered per 8-week period prior to the first dose of study drug and through the date of treatment discontinuation.
Measured: up to 43 months
Hospitalized Days
In-patient days in hospital.
Measured: up to 12 months
1-year Survival
One-year survival is the percentage of patients who are alive at 1-year measured from the date of randomization.
Measured: Percentage of patients alive at 1 year after randomization (participants were assessed up to 43 months for overall survival curve estimation but this measure presents the 1 year survival rate percentage).
Duration of Complete Remission (dCR)
Durations of normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, and bone marrow to <=5 % blasts; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.
- independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Duration of Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (dCRp)
Duration of normalization of bone marrow to <=5% blasts; peripheral neutrophils >=1000 /microliter, platelet <=100,000 /microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate; independent of transfusions*; and no extramedullary leukemia.
*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Duration of Partial Remission (dPR)
Duration of normalization of peripheral neutrophils to >=1000 /microliter, platelet to >=100,000/microliter within 2 weeks of bone marrow biopsy/aspirate, >=50% decrease in bone marrow blasts over pre-treatment but still >5%; independent of transfusions*
*independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Duration of Hematological Improvement (dHI)
Duration of HI
- Erythroid response (HI-E) for patients with pre-treatment hemoglobin < 11 g/dL; Major response: >2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, transfusion independence* Minor response: 1 to 2 g/dL increase in hemoglobin; for RBC, a 50% decrease in transfusion requirements
- Platelet response (HI-P) for pre-treatment platelet count <100,000/mm3; Major response: an absolute increase of platelet count by >=30,000/mm3; stabilization of platelet counts and platelet transfusion independence* Minor response: >=50% increase in platelet count with a net increase > 10,000/mm3 but <30,000/mm3
- Neutrophil response (HI-N) for absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1,500/mm3 before therapy; Major response: >=100% increase, or an absolute increase of >500/mm3, whichever is greater Minor response: >=100% increase, but absolute increase < 500/mm3
- independent of transfusions refer to no platelet transfusion for 1 week prior to achieving the response
Measured: up to 43 months
Duration of Stable Disease (dSD)
Failure to achieve at least hematologic improvement (HI), but no evidence of clinically significant progression for > 16 weeks.
Measured: up to 43 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Study start1 Oct 2011
- Primary completion15 Dec 2016
- Study completion31 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 482 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hagop M Kantarjian, M.D., Study chair, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01303796
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CYC682-12
- Acronym
- SEAMLESS
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 21 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kantarjian HM, Begna KH, Altman JK, Goldberg SL, Sekeres MA, Strickland SA, Arellano ML, Claxton DF, Baer MR, Gautier M, Berman E, Seiter K, Solomon SR, Schiller GJ, Luger SM, Butrym A, Gaidano G, Thomas XG, Montesinos P, Rizzieri DA, Quick DP, Venugopal P, Gaur R, Maness LJ, Kadia TM, Ravandi F, Buyse ME, Chiao JH. Results of a randomized phase 3 study of oral sapacitabine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (SEAMLESS). Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4421-4431. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33828. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
PubMed 34424530
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Randomized Study of Oral Sapacitabine in Elderly Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01303796
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SEAMLESS / CYC682-12
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- AML
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 482 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Jun 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase 3 study assesses two drug regimens as the initial treatment of patients who are at least 70 years of age and have newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) for whom the doctor does not recommend the use of standard intensive treatment or the patient has decided not to receive standard intensive treatment after being fully informed about its benefits and risks by his/her doctor. The two drug regimens are sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine or decitabine alone. The purpose of the study is to learn which drug regimen is more likely to keep AML in check as long as possible.
Detailed description
This is a multicenter, randomized, Phase 3 study ("SEAMLESS") comparing two drug regimens (arms) as the front-line treatment of elderly patients aged 70 years or older with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive induction chemotherapy. In Arm A, sapacitabine is administered in alternating cycles with decitabine, and in Arm C decitabine is administered alone. The primary efficacy endpoint is overall survival. The study is designed to demonstrate an improvement in overall survival of Arm A versus Arm C.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sapacitabine-decitabine alternating | Experimental | Drug: Sapacitabine, Drug: DecitabineArm A sapacitabine administered in alternating cycles with decitabine |
| Decitabine | Active comparator | Drug: DecitabineArm C Decitabine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Newly diagnosed AML based on WHO (World Health Organization) classification
- Age 70 years or older for whom the treatment of choice is low-intensity therapy by investigator assessment or who has refused intensive induction therapy recommended by investigator
- ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0-2
- Adequate renal function
- Adequate liver function
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- AML is of the sub-type of acute promyelocytic leukemia or extramedullary myeloid tumor without bone marrow involvement
- Having received any systemic anti-cancer therapy for AML or received treatment with hypomethylating agents or cytotoxic chemotherapy for preceding myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or myeloproliferative disease (MPD)
- Known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) involvement by leukemia
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
- Known hypersensitivity to decitabine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SapacitabineAlso: CYC682Oral sapacitabine capsules | Drug | Sapacitabine-decitabine alternating |
| DecitabineAlso: Decitabine intravenousDecitabine intravenous | Drug | Decitabine, Sapacitabine-decitabine alternating |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival
Time frame: up to 43 months
The distribution of overall survival was estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. A log-rank analysis stratified by randomization stratification factors was used to compare overall survival between Arm A (decitabine/sapacitabine) versus Arm C (decitabine). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictive factors for overall survival.
13 secondary outcomes
Complete Remission (CR)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (CRp)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Partial Remission (PR)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Hematological Improvement
Time frame: up to 43 months
Stable Disease (SD)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Blood Products Transfused
Time frame: up to 43 months
Hospitalized Days
Time frame: up to 12 months
1-year Survival
Time frame: Percentage of patients alive at 1 year after randomization (participants were assessed up to 43 months for overall survival curve estimation but this measure presents the 1 year survival rate percentage).
Duration of Complete Remission (dCR)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Duration of Complete Remission With Incomplete Platelet Count Recovery (dCRp)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Duration of Partial Remission (dPR)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Duration of Hematological Improvement (dHI)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Duration of Stable Disease (dSD)
Time frame: up to 43 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 34424530Kantarjian HM, Begna KH, Altman JK, Goldberg SL, Sekeres MA, Strickland SA, Arellano ML, Claxton DF, Baer MR, Gautier M, Berman E, Seiter K, Solomon SR, Schiller GJ, Luger SM, Butrym A, Gaidano G, Thomas XG, Montesinos P, Rizzieri DA, Quick DP, Venugopal P, Gaur R, Maness LJ, Kadia TM, Ravandi F, Buyse ME, Chiao JH. Results of a randomized phase 3 study of oral sapacitabine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (SEAMLESS). Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4421-4431. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33828. Epub 2021 Aug 23.
- Results of a randomized phase 3 study of oral sapacitabine in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (SEAMLESS)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hagop M Kantarjian, M.D. study chair
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
118 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Sapacitabine and Decitabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 118 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 118 sites in United States, Italy, Spain, France, Germany and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (time frame: up to 43 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01303796, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2022.