Gastroesophageal RefluxCARPNICNCT01307982
Comparative Anti-Reflux Procedures in Neurologically Impaired Children
A study testing Fundoplication and Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux and Nervous System Diseases, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This trial is a randomized controlled trial of two standard anti-reflux procedures, Nissen fundoplication versus gastrojejunal feeding tubes (GJ tubes), in children and adolescents with functional and intellectual impairment who have gastrostomy feeding tubes and medically refractory or severe gastroesophageal reflux… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Nervous System Diseases, Fundoplication
- What is being tested?
- Fundoplication and Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2011to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- patient is between 6 months and 18 years of age; AND
- patient has functional impairment classified by either gross motor functional classification of 3, 4 or 5 OR impaired function in walking, crawling/standing, rolling/sitting, arm use, hand use, ability to hold head up; AND
- patient has a gastrostomy; AND
- patient has intolerance of feedings or other complications attributed to GERD as defined below; AND
- patient has a positive GERD diagnostic evaluation as define below:
- GERD diagnostic evaluation will include the following investigations;
Show all 27Show fewer
- endoscopy and biopsy for visual assessment and histology of the esophageal mucosa
- pH study and/or multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII) probe to detect and quantify gastroesophageal reflux
- GER demonstrated by:
- Reflux Esophagitis: Endoscopic appearance of mucosal breaks in the distal esophagus with or without pathologist diagnosis based on one or more biopsy histologic features of: inflammatory cellular infiltrate, basal cell hyperplasia, elongation of the vascular papillae AND no infectious microorganisms and < 15 eosinophils per high power field; OR
- pH OR pH/multichannel intraluminal impedance(MII) probe evidence of pathologic GER:
- pH probe: acid reflux index > 7 % OR
- pH/MII reflux symptom-associated acid or non-acid volume associated reflux events;
- Upper GI will only be used to determine normal anatomy; AND
- patient has either medically refractory GERD or severe GERD as defined below:
- Medically refractory GERD - GERD that has not responded to 12 weeks of treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (and verified gastric pH > 4) and/or trial of continuous intragastric feedings and has one of the following complications:
- Esophagitis: Endoscopic appearance of mucosal breaks in the distal esophagus with or without pathologist diagnosis based on one or more biopsy histologic features of: inflammatory cellular infiltrate, basal cell hyperplasia, elongation of the vascular papillae
- Failure to thrive: diminishing weight percentile for age or weight for age z-score sustained over 6 months.
- Pneumonia consistent with aspiration,
- Acute life threatening event,
- Severe GERD - at least one severe complication of GERD and patient cannot safely tolerate a trial of medical management due to one of the following life-threatening complications:
- aspiration pneumonia,
- acute life threatening event (ALTE),
- complete loss of airway protection (absent cough/gag) AND,
- Upper GI barium contrast study for anatomy; AND
- Barium pharyngeal swallow study or modified barium swallow study or Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) in past year; AND
- the parent or legal guardian speaks English or Spanish (the only two languages in which the instruments are standardized)
Who cannot join
- Upper GI findings that would mandate a fundoplication including: hiatal hernia, esophageal stricture, Barret's esophagus; OR
- Upper GI findings show uncorrected distal gastrointestinal obstruction including: gastric outlet obstruction, duodenal obstruction, malrotation; OR
- Upper GI demonstrates structural foregut abnormalities that preclude a fundoplication including: microgastria, short esophagus, high anesthetic risk; OR
- Diagnosis or history of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction; OR
- Endoscopy and biopsy demonstrates esophagitis from causes other than GER including: eosinophilic esophagitis, candida esophagitis, viral esophagitis); OR
- Rapidly changing or indeterminate neurological including either a deteriorating neurological condition such as rapid loss of developmental milestones or improving, such as rapid recovery following severe neurological insult; OR
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient has unacceptable general anesthetic risk; OR
- A previous Nissen fundoplication; OR
- Feeds delivered by GJ/NJ at the time of enrollment occurring for greater than 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Primary Children's Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113
About this study
This trial is a randomized controlled trial of two standard anti-reflux procedures, Nissen fundoplication versus gastrojejunal feeding tubes (GJ tubes), in children and adolescents with functional and intellectual impairment who have gastrostomy feeding tubes and medically refractory or severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This is a pilot study to establish feasibility before initiating a multi-centered study.
- Being tested
- Fundoplication, Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube
- Keywords
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Nervous System Diseases, Fundoplication, Enteral Nutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Nervous System Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FundoplicationProcedure or surgery
Also called Nissen Fundoplication
During fundoplication surgery, the upper curve of the stomach (the fundus) is wrapped around the esophagus and sewn into place so that the lower portion of the esophagus passes through a small tunnel of stomach muscle. This surgery strengthens the valve between the esophagus and stomach (lower esophageal sphincter), which stops acid from backing up into the esophagus as easily.
Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tubeProcedure or surgery
Also called GJ tube
Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement is an image guided technique in which a special soft feeding catheter is placed through an existing hole in the stomach (gastrostomy) into the small bowel (jejunum).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fundoplication | Active comparator | During fundoplication surgery, the upper curve of the stomach (the fundus) is wrapped around the esophagus and sewn into place so that the lower portion of the esophagus passes through a small tunnel of stomach muscle. This surgery strengthens the valve between the esophagus and stomach (lower esophageal sphincter), which stops acid from backing up into the esophagus as easily. Receives: Procedure: Fundoplication |
| Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube | Active comparator | Gastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement is an image guided technique in which a special soft feeding catheter is placed through an existing hole in the stomach (gastrostomy) into the small bowel (jejunum). Receives: Procedure: Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
GERD-related hospitalization and ED visits
Parental interviews and chart reviews will be used to record all health care encounters. Each encounter will be classified as either GERD-related or not. GERD-related hospitalizations and ED visits will be further classified as; diagnostic testing, procedural problems, likely aspiration pneumonia (AP or bacterial pneumonia), respiratory distress of other etiology, or death from any cause.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Health Related Quality of Life
These are a series of surveys about the child and caregiver's health related quality of life.
Measured: 12 months
Total length of stay
This is the length of stay for each hospitalization and ED visit.
Measured: 12 months
Complications from treatment
This will be monitored with hospitalizations (primary outcome)
Measured: 12 months
Complications from failure of treatment
This will be monitored with hospitalizations (primary outcome), and will include things such as repeat procedure for fundoplication arm, ongoing need for GERD medications, and treatment cross-over.
Measured: 12 months
Mortality
Any cause captured at 28 days and 12 months post procedure. Procedure related deaths will also be captured.
Measured: 12 months
Costs related to hospital, ED, outpatient, and home-health care
This will be abstracted from hospital administrative database.
Measured: 12 months
Nutritional outcomes
Nutritional outcomes will be measured through anthropomorphic measurements including:
- weight for age z-score
- tibial length
- triceps and subscapular skinfold thickness
Measured: 12 months
Other outpatient health care
This will include primary care provider, neurology, gastroenterology, surgery, physiotherapy, etc.
Measured: 12 months
Symptom control
We will ask parents/caregivers to evaluate their childs symptoms and severity.
Measured: 12 months
Parental Goals of either treatment for GERD
We will ask parents/caregivers their goals for treatment and evaluate if they have been met.
Measured: 12 months
Physician Goals of either treatment for GERD
We will ask physicians their goals for treatment and evaluate if they have been met.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2011
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Gastroesophageal RefluxStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of UtahThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Raj Srivastava, University of Utah
- Investigators
- Raj Srivastava, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01307982
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00043616
- Acronym
- CARPNIC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2013
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2011
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Anti-Reflux Procedures in Neurologically Impaired Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01307982
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARPNIC / 00043616
- Keywords
- Gastroesophageal Reflux, Nervous System Diseases, Fundoplication, Enteral Nutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial is a randomized controlled trial of two standard anti-reflux procedures, Nissen fundoplication versus gastrojejunal feeding tubes (GJ tubes), in children and adolescents with functional and intellectual impairment who have gastrostomy feeding tubes and medically refractory or severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This is a pilot study to establish feasibility before initiating a multi-centered study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fundoplication | Active comparator | Procedure: FundoplicationDuring fundoplication surgery, the upper curve of the stomach (the fundus) is wrapped around the esophagus and sewn into place so that the lower portion of the esophagus passes through a small tunnel of stomach muscle. This surgery strengthens the valve between the esophagus and stomach (lower esophageal sphincter), which stops acid from backing up into the esophagus as easily. |
| Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube | Active comparator | Procedure: Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tubeGastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement is an image guided technique in which a special soft feeding catheter is placed through an existing hole in the stomach (gastrostomy) into the small bowel (jejunum). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (27 listed)
- patient is between 6 months and 18 years of age; AND
- patient has functional impairment classified by either gross motor functional classification of 3, 4 or 5 OR impaired function in walking, crawling/standing, rolling/sitting, arm use, hand use, ability to hold head up; AND
- patient has a gastrostomy; AND
- patient has intolerance of feedings or other complications attributed to GERD as defined below; AND
- patient has a positive GERD diagnostic evaluation as define below:
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Upper GI findings that would mandate a fundoplication including: hiatal hernia, esophageal stricture, Barret's esophagus; OR
- Upper GI findings show uncorrected distal gastrointestinal obstruction including: gastric outlet obstruction, duodenal obstruction, malrotation; OR
- Upper GI demonstrates structural foregut abnormalities that preclude a fundoplication including: microgastria, short esophagus, high anesthetic risk; OR
- Diagnosis or history of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction; OR
- Endoscopy and biopsy demonstrates esophagitis from causes other than GER including: eosinophilic esophagitis, candida esophagitis, viral esophagitis); OR
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FundoplicationAlso: Nissen FundoplicationDuring fundoplication surgery, the upper curve of the stomach (the fundus) is wrapped around the esophagus and sewn into place so that the lower portion of the esophagus passes through a small tunnel of stomach muscle. This surgery strengthens the valve between the esophagus and stomach (lower esophageal sphincter), which stops acid from backing up into the esophagus as easily. | Procedure or surgery | Fundoplication |
| Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tubeAlso: GJ tubeGastrojejunal (GJ) tube placement is an image guided technique in which a special soft feeding catheter is placed through an existing hole in the stomach (gastrostomy) into the small bowel (jejunum). | Procedure or surgery | Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube |
Primary outcome
GERD-related hospitalization and ED visits
Time frame: 12 months
Parental interviews and chart reviews will be used to record all health care encounters. Each encounter will be classified as either GERD-related or not. GERD-related hospitalizations and ED visits will be further classified as; diagnostic testing, procedural problems, likely aspiration pneumonia (AP or bacterial pneumonia), respiratory distress of other etiology, or death from any cause.
11 secondary outcomes
Health Related Quality of Life
Time frame: 12 months
Total length of stay
Time frame: 12 months
Complications from treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Complications from failure of treatment
Time frame: 12 months
Mortality
Time frame: 12 months
Costs related to hospital, ED, outpatient, and home-health care
Time frame: 12 months
Nutritional outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Other outpatient health care
Time frame: 12 months
Symptom control
Time frame: 12 months
Parental Goals of either treatment for GERD
Time frame: 12 months
Physician Goals of either treatment for GERD
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2013.
Related trials for Gastroesophageal Reflux
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Long-term Administration of K-CAB Tab./K-CAB ODT(Tegoprazan) 25 mg as Maintenance Therapy Following the Treatment of GERD
Maintenance Therapy Following Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease(GERD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
RETHINK REFLUX Registry
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Recruiting
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Symptomatic Mitral Regurgitation - APOLLO-EU Trial
Mitral Regurgitation
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Tirzepatide on Esophagogastric Junction Mechanics, Reflux Burden, and Gastric Physiology in Adults With Obesity
Obese Adults
Recruiting
Mesh Vs Pledgets for Repair of Paraesophageal Hernia
Paraesophageal Hernia, GERD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Raj Srivastava, MD, MPH principal investigator
University of Utah
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Fundoplication and Gastrojejunal (GJ) feeding tube in people with Gastroesophageal Reflux and Nervous System Diseases, run by University of Utah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 27 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
GERD-related hospitalization and ED visits (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2013.