Acute Kidney InjuryPhase 4NCT01318811
A Comparison of Dilute Versus Concentrated Heparin for CRRT Anticoagulation
A Phase 4 study testing Dilute unfractionated heparin and Standard concentration unfractionated heparin in people with Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Renal Failure, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Heparin is commonly used for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) but the optimal mode of delivery has not yet been validated. Our study will compare dilute heparin to a standard concentration of heparin. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure, Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Dilute unfractionated heparin and Standard concentration unfractionated heparin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2011to 3 Apr 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age greater than 18 years
- Renal failure, electrolyte disturbance, or volume overload requiring continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) as determined by the Nephrology consult service
Who cannot join
- Age less than 18 years
- Active bleeding
- Coagulopathy as defined by baseline INR > 1.8, aPTT > 45 seconds, or platelet count < 50 thousand/μL
- Active administration of systemic anticoagulation (such as warfarin, therapeutic unfractionated heparin, or therapeutic enoxaparin)
- Contraindication to heparin (allergy, thrombocytopenia with platelet count < 50, known or suspected heparin induced thrombocytopenia [HIT])
- Contraindication to systemic anticoagulation (recent surgical or other invasive procedure, significant bleeding disorder, concern for intracranial bleeding, or other contraindication as determined by treating physician)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Administration of drotrecogin (Xigris™)
- Anticipated surgical or other invasive procedure that would necessitate withdrawal of anticoagulation within 72 hours
- Expected termination of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) or death in < 24 hours
- The need for more than 500 cc an hour of IV fluids delivered proximal to the filter for the purpose of performing continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
About this study
Official title: A Comparison of Dilute Unfractionated Heparin and Standard Concentrated Unfractionated Heparin Protocols for Anticoagulation of the Extra-corporeal Circuit During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in the ICU
Heparin is commonly used for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) but the optimal mode of delivery has not yet been validated. Our study will compare dilute heparin to a standard concentration of heparin. The investigators hypothesize that heparin delivered in a dilute solution will augment coating of the filter fibers with anticoagulants, decreasing clotting events and increasing filter life. By improving delivery of heparin to the filter and circuit, where clotting events can disrupt dialysis, less heparin would be required for the extra-corporeal circuit and thus less heparin would be delivered back to the patient with blood return from the machine. By exposing the patient to less heparin it is hypothesized that fewer bleeding events would occur, making the dialysis treatment safer. If more of the filter's fibers remain patent and the filter is functional for a longer period of time, the CRRT would also be more effective.
Read the detailed description
Our study will compare two protocols using heparin for anticoagulation of the extra-corporeal circuit during CRRT. Study subjects will be recruited from patients started on continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) in all intensive care units at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Once enrolled, patients will be pragmatic cluster-randomized (by month of entry) into one of two study arms. Arm A will receive dilute heparin and arm B will receive standard concentrated heparin as both approaches are standard practices at VUMC. Heparin will be delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter in both groups. Replacement of the extra-corporeal circuit, including the dialysis filter, is performed under several circumstances: stopping of CRRT when the subject is transported out of the ICU for a procedure or study, machine malfunction, and clotting of the filter. All CRRT circuits and filters, regardless of patency, are replaced at 72 hours per our dialysis unit protocol. Only data from the first filter used for CVVHD will be used and the study subject's enrollment will end with replacement of the extracorporeal circuit and filter.
Study subjects will receive standard care for the duration of the study and the inpatient Nephrology team will control all aspects of the dialysis treatment. Changes to the heparin infusion rates will be made based on the heparin nomogram for this study and it applies to either arm. A copy of this nomogram will be provided to the inpatient Nephrology team who will make adjustments to the heparin infusion as required to maintain blood anticoagulation levels at goal. The principle investigators (PIs) will be available at all times by pager and phone to address questions regarding proper adjustment of the heparin infusion and will monitor each heparin dosing change to ensure consistency in implementation of the study protocol.
The following is a summary for the two interventions (arms):
Treatment Algorithm Dilute heparin: Patients in the dilute heparin arm (enrolled in odd calendar months) will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight (all heparin doses will be rounded to the nearest 100 units) by rapid (< 10 seconds) intravenous bolus. The heparin concentration for the rapid intravenous loading bolus is 1000 units per mL. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started. Heparin will be delivered as a solution of 2 units/mL and the infusion will be prepared with 2,000 units of heparin in 1,000 mL of 0.9% NaCl and delivered intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter.
Standard concentrated heparin: Patients in the concentrated heparin arm (enrolled in even calendar months) will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight* by rapid (< 10 seconds) intravenous bolus. The heparin concentration for the rapid intravenous loading bolus for this arm is also 1000 units per mL. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started and delivered via a syringe on the Prismaflex® proximal to the dialysis filter. The concentration of heparin used will be 1,000 units of heparin per mL of 0.9% NaCl.
Dose monitoring and adjustment: aPTT tests will be measured at baseline and at regular intervals thereafter. Adjustment of the heparin dose will be made using a heparin nomogram (see below) if the aPTT is not at the target level of greater than 35 seconds and less than 50 seconds. aPTT levels will be monitored every six hours routinely. If a significant change is made to the heparin infusion rate due to a prolonged aPTT, the aPTT will be checked at a shorter interval of three hours to ensure that aPTT is not persistently at a supratherapeutic level as this could increase risk for bleeding complications.
Nomogram for heparin infusion:
aPTT (in seconds)< 35, infusion (continue), infusion rate change (increase 10%), repeat aPTT (in 6 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 35 to 50, infusion (continue), infusion rate change (no change), repeat aPTT (in 6 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 51 to 60, infusion (stop for 1/2 hour), infusion rate change (decrease 10%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 61 to 70, infusion (stop for 1 hour), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 71 to 80, infusion (stop for 1.5 hours), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) >80, infusion (stop for 2 hours), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
For the purposes of this study, data will only be collected from the first filter used during the CVVHD treatment. Following the end of the study enrollment period patients will continue on CVVHD and heparin infusions at the discretion of their treating physicians. Heparin infusions will continue to be adjusted based on the heparin nomogram.
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure, Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Dilute unfractionated heparin, Standard concentration unfractionated heparin
- Keywords
- Heparin, CRRT, Continuous renal replacement therapy, CVVHD, Anticoagulation
- Medical subject headings
- Acute Kidney Injury, Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dilute unfractionated heparinDrug
Also called Heparin
Patients in the dilute heparin arm will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight by rapid intravenous bolus. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started. Heparin will be delivered as a solution of 2 units/mL and the infusion will be prepared with 2,000 units of heparin in 1,000 mL of 0.9% NaCl and delivered intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter.
Standard concentration unfractionated heparinDrug
Also called Heparin
Patients in the standard heparin arm will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight by rapid intravenous bolus. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started and delivered in a standard concentration intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter via a syringe. The concentration of heparin used will be 1,000 units of heparin per 1 mL of 0.9% NaCl.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Dilute heparin | Active comparator | Arm A will receive dilute heparin delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter. Receives: Drug: Dilute unfractionated heparin |
| Standard concentrated heparin | Active comparator | Arm B will receive standard concentrated heparin and will be delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter. Receives: Drug: Standard concentration unfractionated heparin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Filter Life
The primary endpoint for this study will be the difference in filter life in hours between the group receiving dilute heparin and the group receiving standard concentrated heparin.
Measured: 72 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Major Bleeding Complications
Information on major bleeding complications, and need for blood product transfusions will be collected.
Measured: 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2011
- Primary completion3 Apr 2016
- Study completion3 Apr 2016
Why it stopped: lack of recruitment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Kidney InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Thomas Golper, Vanderbilt University
- Investigators
- Thomas A Golper, MD, Principal investigator, Vanderbilt University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01318811
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VU 110162
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Tolwani AJ, Wille KM. Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):141-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00545.x.
PubMed 19426417van de Wetering J, Westendorp RG, van der Hoeven JG, Stolk B, Feuth JD, Chang PC. Heparin use in continuous renal replacement procedures: the struggle between filter coagulation and patient hemorrhage. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Jan;7(1):145-50. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V71145.
PubMed 8808122Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Nakata Y, Fujii T, Takahashi S, Akazawa M, Kataoka Y. Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub3.
PubMed 33314078
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Comparison of Dilute Unfractionated Heparin and Standard Concentrated Unfractionated Heparin Protocols for Anticoagulation of the Extra-corporeal Circuit During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in the ICU
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01318811
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VU 110162
- Conditions
- Acute Kidney Injury, Acute Renal Failure, Heart Failure
- Keywords
- Heparin, CRRT, Continuous renal replacement therapy, CVVHD, Anticoagulation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: lack of recruitment
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Vanderbilt UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2011
- Primary completion
- 3 Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 29 Jan 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Heparin is commonly used for anticoagulation of the extracorporeal circuit during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) but the optimal mode of delivery has not yet been validated. Our study will compare dilute heparin to a standard concentration of heparin. The investigators hypothesize that heparin delivered in a dilute solution will augment coating of the filter fibers with anticoagulants, decreasing clotting events and increasing filter life. By improving delivery of heparin to the filter and circuit, where clotting events can disrupt dialysis, less heparin would be required for the extra-corporeal circuit and thus less heparin would be delivered back to the patient with blood return from the machine. By exposing the patient to less heparin it is hypothesized that fewer bleeding events would occur, making the dialysis treatment safer. If more of the filter's fibers remain patent and the filter is functional for a longer period of time, the CRRT would also be more effective.
Detailed description
Our study will compare two protocols using heparin for anticoagulation of the extra-corporeal circuit during CRRT. Study subjects will be recruited from patients started on continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) in all intensive care units at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC). Once enrolled, patients will be pragmatic cluster-randomized (by month of entry) into one of two study arms. Arm A will receive dilute heparin and arm B will receive standard concentrated heparin as both approaches are standard practices at VUMC. Heparin will be delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter in both groups. Replacement of the extra-corporeal circuit, including the dialysis filter, is performed under several circumstances: stopping of CRRT when the subject is transported out of the ICU for a procedure or study, machine malfunction, and clotting of the filter. All CRRT circuits and filters, regardless of patency, are replaced at 72 hours per our dialysis unit protocol. Only data from the first filter used for CVVHD will be used and the study subject's enrollment will end with replacement of the extracorporeal circuit and filter.
Study subjects will receive standard care for the duration of the study and the inpatient Nephrology team will control all aspects of the dialysis treatment. Changes to the heparin infusion rates will be made based on the heparin nomogram for this study and it applies to either arm. A copy of this nomogram will be provided to the inpatient Nephrology team who will make adjustments to the heparin infusion as required to maintain blood anticoagulation levels at goal. The principle investigators (PIs) will be available at all times by pager and phone to address questions regarding proper adjustment of the heparin infusion and will monitor each heparin dosing change to ensure consistency in implementation of the study protocol.
The following is a summary for the two interventions (arms):
Treatment Algorithm Dilute heparin: Patients in the dilute heparin arm (enrolled in odd calendar months) will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight (all heparin doses will be rounded to the nearest 100 units) by rapid (< 10 seconds) intravenous bolus. The heparin concentration for the rapid intravenous loading bolus is 1000 units per mL. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started. Heparin will be delivered as a solution of 2 units/mL and the infusion will be prepared with 2,000 units of heparin in 1,000 mL of 0.9% NaCl and delivered intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter.
Standard concentrated heparin: Patients in the concentrated heparin arm (enrolled in even calendar months) will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight* by rapid (< 10 seconds) intravenous bolus. The heparin concentration for the rapid intravenous loading bolus for this arm is also 1000 units per mL. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started and delivered via a syringe on the Prismaflex® proximal to the dialysis filter. The concentration of heparin used will be 1,000 units of heparin per mL of 0.9% NaCl.
Dose monitoring and adjustment: aPTT tests will be measured at baseline and at regular intervals thereafter. Adjustment of the heparin dose will be made using a heparin nomogram (see below) if the aPTT is not at the target level of greater than 35 seconds and less than 50 seconds. aPTT levels will be monitored every six hours routinely. If a significant change is made to the heparin infusion rate due to a prolonged aPTT, the aPTT will be checked at a shorter interval of three hours to ensure that aPTT is not persistently at a supratherapeutic level as this could increase risk for bleeding complications.
Nomogram for heparin infusion:
aPTT (in seconds)< 35, infusion (continue), infusion rate change (increase 10%), repeat aPTT (in 6 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 35 to 50, infusion (continue), infusion rate change (no change), repeat aPTT (in 6 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 51 to 60, infusion (stop for 1/2 hour), infusion rate change (decrease 10%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 61 to 70, infusion (stop for 1 hour), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) 71 to 80, infusion (stop for 1.5 hours), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
aPTT (in seconds) >80, infusion (stop for 2 hours), infusion rate change (decrease 20%), repeat aPTT (in 3 hours);
For the purposes of this study, data will only be collected from the first filter used during the CVVHD treatment. Following the end of the study enrollment period patients will continue on CVVHD and heparin infusions at the discretion of their treating physicians. Heparin infusions will continue to be adjusted based on the heparin nomogram.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Dilute heparin | Active comparator | Drug: Dilute unfractionated heparinArm A will receive dilute heparin delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter. |
| Standard concentrated heparin | Active comparator | Drug: Standard concentration unfractionated heparinArm B will receive standard concentrated heparin and will be delivered as an intravenous infusion proximal to the dialysis filter. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Age greater than 18 years
- Renal failure, electrolyte disturbance, or volume overload requiring continuous venovenous hemodialysis (CVVHD) as determined by the Nephrology consult service
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age less than 18 years
- Active bleeding
- Coagulopathy as defined by baseline INR > 1.8, aPTT > 45 seconds, or platelet count < 50 thousand/μL
- Active administration of systemic anticoagulation (such as warfarin, therapeutic unfractionated heparin, or therapeutic enoxaparin)
- Contraindication to heparin (allergy, thrombocytopenia with platelet count < 50, known or suspected heparin induced thrombocytopenia [HIT])
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dilute unfractionated heparinAlso: HeparinPatients in the dilute heparin arm will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight by rapid intravenous bolus. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started. Heparin will be delivered as a solution of 2 units/mL and the infusion will be prepared with 2,000 units of heparin in 1,000 mL of 0.9% NaCl and delivered intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter. | Drug | Dilute heparin |
| Standard concentration unfractionated heparinAlso: HeparinPatients in the standard heparin arm will receive a systemic loading dose of heparin of 15 units per kilogram of weight by rapid intravenous bolus. Then a maintenance rate of heparin of 7.5 U/Kg per hour will be started and delivered in a standard concentration intravenously proximal to the dialysis filter via a syringe. The concentration of heparin used will be 1,000 units of heparin per 1 mL of 0.9% NaCl. | Drug | Standard concentrated heparin |
Primary outcome
Filter Life
Time frame: 72 hours
The primary endpoint for this study will be the difference in filter life in hours between the group receiving dilute heparin and the group receiving standard concentrated heparin.
1 secondary outcome
Number of Major Bleeding Complications
Time frame: 72 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19426417Tolwani AJ, Wille KM. Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy. Semin Dial. 2009 Mar-Apr;22(2):141-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2008.00545.x.
- Background: PubMed 8808122van de Wetering J, Westendorp RG, van der Hoeven JG, Stolk B, Feuth JD, Chang PC. Heparin use in continuous renal replacement procedures: the struggle between filter coagulation and patient hemorrhage. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Jan;7(1):145-50. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V71145.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33314078Tsujimoto H, Tsujimoto Y, Nakata Y, Fujii T, Takahashi S, Akazawa M, Kataoka Y. Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 14;12(12):CD012467. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012467.pub3.
Related trials for Acute Kidney Injury
Not yet recruiting
Vitamin C for Acute Kidney Injury in ACLF With Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)
Not yet recruiting
Early Biomarker Kidney Injury Assessment After Acumen Directed Fluid Management in Cardiac Surgery
Renal Injury, Acute Kidney Injury
Recruiting
Acute Kidney Injury and Ultra-endurance Running
AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) Due to Trauma
Recruiting
WIN Ratio Analysis to Determine a Strategy of Non- Invasive SUpport for Respiratory Failure in the EmeRgency Department
Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diastolic Shock Index for Predicting Hemodynamic Instability During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury, Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thomas A Golper, MD principal investigator
Vanderbilt University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Dilute unfractionated heparin and Standard concentration unfractionated heparin in people with Acute Kidney Injury and Acute Renal Failure, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Jan 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Filter Life (time frame: 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01318811, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2019.