AzTrials
AzTrials

Neonatal Respiratory FailurePhase 3BIPAPNCT01318824

A Study of Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) Versus Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure

A Phase 3 study testing Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) and Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) in people with Neonatal Respiratory Failure, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To research the effect of Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) for neonatal respiratory failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 28 days
Conditions the study is for
Neonatal Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) and Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Dec 2010to Feb 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 28 days
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Newborn infants with birth weight > 500 gm.
  • Gestational age > 24 completed weeks.
  • Intention to manage the infant with non-invasive respiratory support (i.e. no endotracheal tube), where either: the infant is within the first 7 days of life and has never been intubated or has received less than 24 hours of total cumulative intubated respiratory support the infant is within the first 28 days of life, has been managed with intubated respiratory support for 24 hours or more and is a candidate for extubation followed by non-invasive respiratory support.
  • No known lethal congenital anomaly or genetic syndromes.
  • Signed parental informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Considered non-viable by clinician (decision not to administer effective therapies)
  • Life-threatening congenital abnormalities including congenital heart disease (excluding patent ductus arteriosis)
  • Infants known to require surgical treatment
  • Abnormalities of the upper and lower airways
  • Neuromuscular disorders
  • Infants who are > 28 days old and continue to require mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Deaprtment of Pediatrics, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University

    Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400042

Other trials in China

About this study

To research the effect of Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) for neonatal respiratory failure.

Read the detailed description

Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure(BiPAP) is similar to Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), but also gives some breaths, or extra support, to newborn infants through a small tube in the nose. BiPAP is safe and effective. Nevertheless, BiPAP has never been used in Chinese babies.

Being tested
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV), Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP)
Keywords
Neonatal Respiratory Failure, Newborn Infant, BiPAP, NIPPV

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)Procedure or surgery

    Also called Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation

    The Control group receiving Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) treatment

  • Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP)Procedure or surgery

    Also called Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure

    BiPAP group receive Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) treatment

Study groups in NCT01318824
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
I=NIPPVPlacebo comparatorThis group receiving Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) treatment.
Receives: Procedure: Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
II=BiPAPExperimentalThis group receive Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) treatment
Receives: Procedure: Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the effect of Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure

    get the effect of Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure

    Measured: At 7 days, 28 days and at 36 weeks postmenstraul age

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the effect of Versus Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure

    get the effect of Versus Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure

    Measured: At 7 days, 28 days and at 36 weeks postmenstraul age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Mar 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2011
  4. Study completionFeb 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01318824
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011002
Acronym
BIPAP
Status last verified
Jan 2011
First submitted
23 Feb 2011
Last updated
23 Mar 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) and Bi-Level Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) in people with Neonatal Respiratory Failure, run by Daping Hospital and the Research Institute of Surgery of the Third Military Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the effect of Non Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV) for Neonatal Respiratory Failure (time frame: At 7 days, 28 days and at 36 weeks postmenstraul age). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in