PainPhase 3NCT01324570
Safety, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Efficacy of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Children
A Phase 3 study testing Buprenorphine transdermal system in people with Pain, run by Purdue Pharma LP at 22 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 16 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Buprenorphine transdermal system
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 41 participants
- Where
- 22 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 16 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Male and female patients, 7 to 16 years of age, inclusive, with malignant and/or nonmalignant moderate to severe pain requiring or anticipated to require continuous, around-the-clock, opioid treatment for at least 2 weeks (based on the investigator's judgment);
- Patients must have written informed consent provided by the parent or legal guardian and assent provided by the patient, when appropriate;
- Patients on incoming opioids must be taking ≤ 80 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 12 to 16 years or ≤ 40 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 7 to 11 years prior to the screening visit;
- Patients and patient's parent/caregiver must be compliant with the protocol, ie, must be able to perform study assessments and understand and complete the age-appropriate scale to rate pain intensity. Patients must not have a cognitive developmental delay or any other condition that would preclude them from completing the age-appropriate pain scale.
Who cannot join
- Patients who are allergic to buprenorphine or have a history of allergies to other opioids (this criterion does not include patients who have experienced common opioid side effects [eg, nausea, constipation]) or who have allergies or other contraindications to transdermal delivery systems or patch adhesives;
- Patients with a dermatological disorder, including burn and skin graft sites, at any relevant patch application site that would preclude proper placement and/or rotation of BTDS patches;
- Patients with evidence of impaired renal function;
- Patients with hepatic impairment;
- Patients with history of seizures;
- Patients with intracranial pressure;
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients who have a history of sleep apnea within the past year;
- Patients who require mechanical ventilation during study treatment period, are cyanotic, or who have unstable respiratory disease;
- Patients with clinically significant structural heart disease or a pacemaker;
- Patients with clinically unstable cardiac disease;
- Patients who receive or anticipate to receive investigational medication/therapy during study drug treatment period.
- Other protocol-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
Trial locations and contacts
22 sites in 1 country.
22 sites in 1 country
United States22 sites
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta at Egleston
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Children's Blood and Cancer Center
Austin, Texas, 78723
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Vidant Medical Center
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Connecticut Children's Medical Center
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Long Beach, California, 90806
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Children's Health Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1752
Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit - University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Jackson Memorial Hospital / University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Saint Peter's University Hospital
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
WCMC, Department of Pediatrics - Hematology/Oncology
New York, New York, 10065
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224
Rhode Island Hospital, Department of Pediatrics
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Road Runner Research, Ltd.
San Antonio, Texas, 78258
Willis-Knighton Physician Network
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71118
Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Children's Hospital at Montefiore
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Howard University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060
The Center for Clinical Research - Carolina Pain Institute
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Children From 7 to 16 Years of Age, Inclusive, Who Require Continuous Opioid Analgesia for Moderate to Severe Pain
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years.
Read the detailed description
A study of safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years, inclusive, who require continuous opioid analgesia for moderate to severe pain.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Buprenorphine transdermal system
- Keywords
- Pain, Opioid, Analgesia, Moderate to severe pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Buprenorphine transdermal systemDrug
Also called Butrans
Buprenorphine transdermal system 2.5 mcg/h, 5 mcg/h, 10 mcg/h or 20 mcg/h applied transdermally for 7-day wear.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Overall BTDS | Experimental | Buprenorphine transdermal system Receives: Drug: Buprenorphine transdermal system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Safety assessments consisted of reports of AEs, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and temperature), weight, hemoglobin-oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), clinical laboratory tests, somnolence (assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale [UMSS]), conventional 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and 24-hour digital 12-lead ECGs (Holter monitor). Safety variables were summarized descriptively within age group for the safety population.
Measured: Up to 28 weeks
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the CL/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
Measured: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vc/F)
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the Vc/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
Measured: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 7 to 11 Years, Inclusive
Pain right now was assessed using the Faces of Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). The FPS-R is a horizontal row of 6 faces representing pain intensity, with "no hurt" at the far left and "hurts worst" at the far right; the intensities are scored as 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10. A score of 0=no pain, and 10=very much pain. For screening to week 4, pain right now was assessed at 30 minutes before initial BTDS application on day 1; one hour after initial BTDS application on day 1; thereafter, once daily at approximately 8 PM for the first 4 weeks. Baseline score was the last assessment prior to the first dose. For weeks 1-4, weekly averages of the pain right now scores were calculated using the sum of all available pain right now scores recorded daily during a given week divided by the number of available scores.
The study measured pain right now for weeks 6-24 once a week at approximately 8 PM while on treatment; however, no patients in this age group were treated beyond week 12.
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 12 to 16 Years, Inclusive
Pain right now was assessed using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). The 100-mm VAS is a 100-mm line with 1 end marked as "no pain" and the other marked as "pain as bad as it could be." The patient was asked to make a mark on that line indicating his or her level of pain. Pain right now score was defined as the distance (in mm) from the "no pain" end to the patient's mark; 0=no pain and bigger numbers indicate more pain. For screening to week 4, pain right now was assessed 30 minutes before initial BTDS application on day 1; one hour after initial BTDS application on day 1; thereafter, once daily at approximately 8 PM for the first 4 weeks. Baseline was the last assessment prior to the first dose. For weeks 1-4, weekly averages of the pain right now scores were calculated using the sum of all available pain right now scores recorded daily during a given week divided by the number of available scores.
For weeks 6-24, pain right now was measured once a week at approximately 8 PM.
Measured: Up to 24 weeks
Parent/Caregiver-assessed Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
The PGIC rating score variable was collected on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 to 7 (where 1 = very much improved; and 7 = very much worse). The PGIC is designed to assess overall satisfaction with the treatment. The PGIC score was summarized using the number and percent of patients in each of the 7 possible response categories overall and by age group. PGIC was assessed by the parent/caregiver at the end of treatment visit or early discontinuation visit.
Measured: End of treatment (week 24) or early discontinuation visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Purdue Pharma LP
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01324570
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BUP3031
- Other IDs
- 2010-021954-21
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 6 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Multicenter Study of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Buprenorphine Transdermal System (BTDS) in Children From 7 to 16 Years of Age, Inclusive, Who Require Continuous Opioid Analgesia for Moderate to Severe Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01324570
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BUP3031
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- Pain, Opioid, Analgesia, Moderate to severe pain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 41 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Purdue Pharma LPIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years.
Detailed description
A study of safety, PK, and efficacy of BTDS in patients of ages 7 to 16 years, inclusive, who require continuous opioid analgesia for moderate to severe pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Overall BTDS | Experimental | Drug: Buprenorphine transdermal systemBuprenorphine transdermal system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 16 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male and female patients, 7 to 16 years of age, inclusive, with malignant and/or nonmalignant moderate to severe pain requiring or anticipated to require continuous, around-the-clock, opioid treatment for at least 2 weeks (based on the investigator's judgment);
- Patients must have written informed consent provided by the parent or legal guardian and assent provided by the patient, when appropriate;
- Patients on incoming opioids must be taking ≤ 80 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 12 to 16 years or ≤ 40 mg/day morphine or equivalent if aged 7 to 11 years prior to the screening visit;
- Patients and patient's parent/caregiver must be compliant with the protocol, ie, must be able to perform study assessments and understand and complete the age-appropriate scale to rate pain intensity. Patients must not have a cognitive developmental delay or any other condition that would preclude them from completing the age-appropriate pain scale.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients who are allergic to buprenorphine or have a history of allergies to other opioids (this criterion does not include patients who have experienced common opioid side effects [eg, nausea, constipation]) or who have allergies or other contraindications to transdermal delivery systems or patch adhesives;
- Patients with a dermatological disorder, including burn and skin graft sites, at any relevant patch application site that would preclude proper placement and/or rotation of BTDS patches;
- Patients with evidence of impaired renal function;
- Patients with hepatic impairment;
- Patients with history of seizures;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Buprenorphine transdermal systemAlso: ButransBuprenorphine transdermal system 2.5 mcg/h, 5 mcg/h, 10 mcg/h or 20 mcg/h applied transdermally for 7-day wear. | Drug | Overall BTDS |
Primary outcome
The Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety
Time frame: Up to 28 weeks
Safety assessments consisted of reports of AEs, vital signs (blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate, and temperature), weight, hemoglobin-oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2), clinical laboratory tests, somnolence (assessed by the University of Michigan Sedation Scale [UMSS]), conventional 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and 24-hour digital 12-lead ECGs (Holter monitor). Safety variables were summarized descriptively within age group for the safety population.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Clearance (CL/F)
Time frame: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the CL/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Buprenorphine Following Transdermal Administration: Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vc/F)
Time frame: Day 1, end of week 1, days 9/10, end of week 2, and end of week 4 or at discontinuation prior to end of study visit
The population PK (PopPK) of BTDS buprenorphine in pediatric patients ages 7 to 16 years was described by a 2-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption from the patch. A fixed allometric relationship was used to describe the effects of changes in ideal body weight (IBW) across pediatric patients on all clearance and volume parameters. Given the sparse sample collections, small sample size, and complexity of the absorption process with the patch formulation, this PopPK model was fit to the pediatric data using nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NONMEM) Bayes method with selective use of priors from previous adult PopPK results. Estimates of fixed effects from the final model were used to calculate the Vc/F after patch dosing given the covariate distribution in the PopPK dataset and the typical weights from children in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) dataset.
3 secondary outcomes
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 7 to 11 Years, Inclusive
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Pain Right Now Assessment by Patients Aged 12 to 16 Years, Inclusive
Time frame: Up to 24 weeks
Parent/Caregiver-assessed Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: End of treatment (week 24) or early discontinuation visit
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
22 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Buprenorphine transdermal system in people with Pain, run by Purdue Pharma LP at 22 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 22 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Number of Participants With Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety (time frame: Up to 28 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jul 2017.