Inguinal HerniaNCT01334775
Comparison of Self-adhering Mesh and Conventional Mesh in Inguinal Hernia Repair.
A study testing Open anterior inguinal hernia repair in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 4 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Inguinal hernia repair coincides with a high rate of postoperative pain, extending to over a year in 10-20% of patients. Although this is of major concern, early postoperative pain also has an important impact on patients and their ability to regain normal work and activities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- Open anterior inguinal hernia repair
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male
- Primary, unilateral inguinal hernia
- Age ≥18 years
- Social status: professionally employed
- ASA-score I-III
- Signed informed consent
- Elective surgery
Who cannot join
- Female
- Bilateral and/or recurrent inguinal hernia
- Femoral or scrotal hernia
- Vasectomy
- Social status: unemployed
- Chronic use of pain medication
Show all 10Show fewer
- Symptomatic acute hernia (i.e. bowel obstruction, incarceration, strangulation, peritonitis or perforation of bowel contents)
- ASA-score IV or above
- Incapacitated adult or no signed informed consent
- Patient is unable to speak Dutch
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Netherlands4 sites
Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, dept. of Surgery
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Maastricht University Medical Centre, dept. of General Surgery
Maastricht, 6229HX
Orbis Medical Centre
Sittard-Geleen, 6162 BG
VieCuri Medical Centre, dept. of General Surgery
Venlo, 5912 BL
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™ Versus Conventional Mesh in Open Anterior Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.
Inguinal hernia repair coincides with a high rate of postoperative pain, extending to over a year in 10-20% of patients. Although this is of major concern, early postoperative pain also has an important impact on patients and their ability to regain normal work and activities. Since inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation worldwide, a small reduction in loss of workdays can already have significant impact on financial issues. As for the origin of the pain, it might be the result of local inflammation caused by the mesh material, but also by nerve entrapment due to fixation techniques. The development of a new mesh which enables sutureless fixation, Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™, may overcome pain related to fixation techniques used in the open hernia repair procedure according to Lichtenstein. Furthermore, the Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™ mesh has already been in use in our institutions and surgeons familiarized themselves with the application.
The investigators would like to conduct a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the difference in early postoperative pain after unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair in males. The procedures will be performed in day surgery. Early postoperative pain is defined as the pain during the first month, with a special interest in the first two weeks. In addition, the investigators want to measure the possible benefit in terms of time to return to work, daily activities, quality of life, operation length, complications and long term postoperative pain.
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- Open anterior inguinal hernia repair
- Keywords
- Inguinal hernia, Postoperative pain, Surgical mesh
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Open anterior inguinal hernia repairProcedure or surgery
Also called Cousin Biotech Adhesix, Cousin Biotech Biomesh P8
Placement of a surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental - Cousin Biotech Adhesix | Experimental | Placement of a self-adhering (sutureless) surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair Receives: Procedure: Open anterior inguinal hernia repair |
| Conventional - Cousin Biotech Biomesh P8 | Active comparator | Placement of the conventional (sutured) surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair Receives: Procedure: Open anterior inguinal hernia repair |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in early postoperative pain scores
Measured with VAS-scores
Measured: 0-4 weeks after surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Difference in long-term postoperative pain scores
Measured with VAS-scores
Measured: 4 weeks - 12 months after surgery
Number of days to return to normal daily activities
Measured: 0-12 months after surgery
Number of days to return to work
Measured: 0-12 months after surgery
Differences in use of analgesics
Measured: frequency, dose and type.
Measured: 0-12 months after surgery
Differences in reported Quality of life
Measured with SF-36 questionnaire
Measured: 0-12 months after surgery
Number of patients with complications/adverse events
All adverse events/complications are recorded (i.e. infection, recurrence, bleeding)
Measured: 0-12 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionJun 2017
Why it stopped: Inclusion speed too slow, no longer relevant and takeover
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Inguinal HerniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Maastricht University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Orbis Medical Centre, VieCuri Medical Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicole D. Bouvy, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Maastricht University Medical Centre, dept. of General Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01334775
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL36322.068.11
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 5 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™ Versus Conventional Mesh in Open Anterior Inguinal Hernia Repair: a Multi-centre, Randomised, Double-blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01334775
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NL36322.068.11
- Conditions
- Inguinal Hernia
- Keywords
- Inguinal hernia, Postoperative pain, Surgical mesh
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Inclusion speed too slow, no longer relevant and takeover
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Orbis Medical Centre, VieCuri Medical Centre
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inguinal hernia repair coincides with a high rate of postoperative pain, extending to over a year in 10-20% of patients. Although this is of major concern, early postoperative pain also has an important impact on patients and their ability to regain normal work and activities. Since inguinal hernia repair is the most frequently performed operation worldwide, a small reduction in loss of workdays can already have significant impact on financial issues. As for the origin of the pain, it might be the result of local inflammation caused by the mesh material, but also by nerve entrapment due to fixation techniques. The development of a new mesh which enables sutureless fixation, Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™, may overcome pain related to fixation techniques used in the open hernia repair procedure according to Lichtenstein. Furthermore, the Cousin Biotech® Adhesix™ mesh has already been in use in our institutions and surgeons familiarized themselves with the application.
The investigators would like to conduct a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial to compare the difference in early postoperative pain after unilateral primary inguinal hernia repair in males. The procedures will be performed in day surgery. Early postoperative pain is defined as the pain during the first month, with a special interest in the first two weeks. In addition, the investigators want to measure the possible benefit in terms of time to return to work, daily activities, quality of life, operation length, complications and long term postoperative pain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental - Cousin Biotech Adhesix | Experimental | Procedure: Open anterior inguinal hernia repairPlacement of a self-adhering (sutureless) surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair |
| Conventional - Cousin Biotech Biomesh P8 | Active comparator | Procedure: Open anterior inguinal hernia repairPlacement of the conventional (sutured) surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male
- Primary, unilateral inguinal hernia
- Age ≥18 years
- Social status: professionally employed
- ASA-score I-III
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Female
- Bilateral and/or recurrent inguinal hernia
- Femoral or scrotal hernia
- Vasectomy
- Social status: unemployed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Open anterior inguinal hernia repairAlso: Cousin Biotech Adhesix, Cousin Biotech Biomesh P8Placement of a surgical mesh in open anterior inguinal hernia repair. | Procedure or surgery | Conventional - Cousin Biotech Biomesh P8, Experimental - Cousin Biotech Adhesix |
Primary outcome
Difference in early postoperative pain scores
Time frame: 0-4 weeks after surgery
Measured with VAS-scores
6 secondary outcomes
Difference in long-term postoperative pain scores
Time frame: 4 weeks - 12 months after surgery
Number of days to return to normal daily activities
Time frame: 0-12 months after surgery
Number of days to return to work
Time frame: 0-12 months after surgery
Differences in use of analgesics
Time frame: 0-12 months after surgery
Differences in reported Quality of life
Time frame: 0-12 months after surgery
Number of patients with complications/adverse events
Time frame: 0-12 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Inclusion speed too slow, no longer relevant and takeover). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2018.
Related trials for Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Repair for Occult Contralateral Inguinal Hernias.
Inguinal Hernia Bilateral, Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
Recruiting
Primary Sac Abandonment and Distal Sac Fixation vs Complete Sac Dissection for Inguinoscrotal Hernias
Seroma, Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparing Two Laparoscopic Techniques for Hernia Repair in Children
Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicole D. Bouvy, MD, PhD principal investigator
Maastricht University Medical Centre, dept. of General Surgery
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Open anterior inguinal hernia repair in people with Inguinal Hernia, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 4 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Inclusion speed too slow, no longer relevant and takeover). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in early postoperative pain scores (time frame: 0-4 weeks after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2018.