Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 3NCT01347710
A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients With CAD.
A Phase 3 study testing Flurpiridaz F18 and 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Lantheus Medical Imaging at 81 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Flurpiridaz F18 and 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 795 participants
- Where
- 81 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Invasive Coronary Angiography. Men or Women age 18 or older - see protocol for additional details.
Who cannot join
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of child bearing potential who are not practicing birth control.
- Unstable cardiac status. History of coronary artery bypass graft. History of percutaneous coronary intervention within the past six months. See protocol for additional details.
Trial locations and contacts
81 sites in 4 countries.
81 sites in 4 countries
United States73 sites
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5873
Maine Research Associates
Auburn, Maine, 04210
Georgia Health Sciences Univ/Med College of GA
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Elite Research and Clinical Trials
Aventura, Florida, 33180
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287-0817
West Side Medical Associates of Los Angeles
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
Mass General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Boston University Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Independent Imaging, LLC
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33437
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Coastal Cardiology Consultants dba The Heart & Vascular Institute of Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Missouri Cardiovascular Specialists, LLP
Columbia, Missouri, 65201
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
OhioHealth Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, 43214
Dallas VA Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Wayne State University - Harper University Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Henry Ford Hospital
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Florida Heart Associates
Fort Myers, Florida, 33907
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555-0709
St. Mary's Healthcare (Trinity Health)
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute/ Associated Cardiologists
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110
Hattiesburg Clinic
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 39401
Excel Diagnostics and Nuclear Oncology Center
Houston, Texas, 77042
St. Luke's Cardiology Associates
Jacksonville, Florida, 32216
Gateway Cardiology, PC
Jerseyville, Illinois, 62052
Cardiovascular Imaging Technologies (CVIT)
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Katy Cardiology
Katy, Texas, 77493
Kettering Medical Center
Kettering, Ohio, 45429
Wellmont CVA Heart Institute
Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660
Center for Biomedical Research
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Cardiovascular Research of Knoxville - St. Mary's Health Care System, Inc.
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37917
The Cardiovascular Center, PA
Lake Mary, Florida, 32746
Las Vegas Radiology
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89128
USC PET Imaging Science Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
VA West Los Angeles Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90073
UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Norton Cardiovascular Associates
Louisville, Kentucky, 40205-3372
Cardiology Associates of Mobile, Inc.
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
McLaren Macomb
Mount Clemens, Michigan, 48043
Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Alfieri Cardiology
Newark, Delaware, 19713
Christiana Care Health System
Newark, Delaware, 19718
Florida Hospital/Cardiovascular Institute (Florida Heart Group)
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System
Palo Alto, California, 94304
South Florida Research Solutions
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33028
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Presbyterian University Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Cardiovascular Consultants Medical Group
Pleasant Hill, California, 94523
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
McGuire Veteran Affairs Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
Carilion Cardiology Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Roanoke Heart Institute
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
St. Francis Hospital
Roslyn, New York, 11576
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073-6769
Northern California PET Imaging Center-Palo Alto
Sacramento, California, 95816
VA San Diego Healthcare System
San Diego, California, 92161
UCSF Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94107
South Coast Imaging Center
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Biomedical Research Foundation of Northwest Louisiana
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71133-8050
Saint Louis University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Memorial Hospital of Tampa
Tampa, Florida, 33609
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants, LLC
Tomball, Texas, 77375
Berks Cardiologists, Ltd.
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, 19610
York Hospital /Wellspan Health
York, Pennsylvania, 17405
Canada4 sites
University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
KMH Cardiology and Diagnostic and MRI Centres
Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2L3
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS)
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H 5N4
Finland2 sites
Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, 00029 HUS
Turku PET Centre
Turku, FI-20520
Puerto Rico2 sites
San Patricio MEDFLIX (San Patricio MRI & CT Center)
Guaynabo, 00968
VA Caribbean Healthcare System
San Juan, 00921
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Open Label, Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection in Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or a documented history of Myocardial Infarction (MI).
Read the detailed description
The study will assess the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection MPI against SPECT MPI in patients screened for CAD as determined by ICA. Six hundred and eighty evaluable patients will be enrolled and will undergo SPECT MPI and Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI. Patients will be considered for enrollment if they are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prior ICA without intervention (being either positive or negative for CAD).
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Flurpiridaz F18, 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease., Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging., Single Positron Emission Computed Tomography., Flurpiridaz F18 Injection.
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Flurpiridaz F18Drug
Also called flurpiridaz F 18
Injection of Flurpiridaz F18 for the purposes of PET myocardial profusion imaging (MPI) analysis
99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)Drug
Also called 99mTc sestamibi or 99mTc Tetrofosmin
Injection of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for the purposes of SPECT MPI analysis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Flurpiridaz F18 | Experimental | Open-label study of a single dose of Flurpiridaz F18 injection for PET MPI compared to a single dose of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for SPECT MPI in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred for coronary catheterization Receives: Drug: Flurpiridaz F18; Drug: 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity
Diagnostic efficacy of one day rest and stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by majority rule using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard,
Measured: 60 days
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity
Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET MPI specificity versus SPECT MPI specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Secondary outcomes (10)
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.
Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, , in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
I
Measured: 60 days
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.
Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI specificity versus SPECT specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard, in subgroups: pharmacologic stress, females and BMI >/=30. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT).
Overall sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in coronary territories (Qualitative Diagnosis vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT).
Overall specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI in Coronary Territories (Qualitative Diagnosis) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angiographic stenosis greater than or equal to 50% stenosis and confirmed MI); left descending coronary artery (LAD), left circumflex artery (LCX), right coronary artery (RCA), and non - LAD. Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).
Overall summary of sensitivity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).
Overall summary of specificity for identifying multi-vessel disease between flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. majority rule (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good
Overall summary of sensitivity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative image quality of excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs. truth standard(angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value reported is the number of true positives, i.e. True Positive: Patients with abnormal MPI and disease positive by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good
Overall summary of specificity of flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI (qualitative, image quality excellent or good) vs. SPECT MPI by majority rule vs truth standard (angio >/=50% stenosis and confirmed MI). Value represents the number of true negative, i.e. True Negative: Patients with normal MPI and disease negative by the truth standard
Measured: 60 days
Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT).
Overall summary of rest and stress image quality for flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule. Value represents the number of subject images evaluated as excellent/good and fair/poor
Measured: 60 days
Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI
Overall summary of diagnostic certainty in flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI and SPECT MPI by majority rule
Measured: 60 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJul 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 795 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Cesare Orlandi, MD, Study director, Lantheus Medical Imaging
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01347710
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BMS747158-301
- Status last verified
- Aug 2014
- First submitted
- 11 Apr 2011
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lopez DM, Huck DM, Divakaran S, Brown JM, Weber BN, Lemley M, Builoff V, Shanbhag A, Lan Z, Buckley C, Al-Mallah MH, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Slomka P, Di Carli MF. Utility of 18F-Flurpiridaz PET Relative Flow Reserve in Differentiating Obstructive From Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Nov;18(11):e018323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018323. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
PubMed 41064867Poitrasson-Riviere A, Moody JB, Renaud JM, Hagio T, Arida-Moody L, Buckley CJ, Al-Mallah MH, Nallamothu BK, Weinberg RL, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06455-2. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
PubMed 37807004Hagio T, Moody JB, Poitrasson-Riviere A, Renaud JM, Pierce L, Buckley C, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Multi-center, multi-vendor validation of deep learning-based attenuation correction in SPECT MPI: data from the international flurpiridaz-301 trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Mar;50(4):1028-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06045-8. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
PubMed 36401636Maddahi J, Lazewatsky J, Udelson JE, Berman DS, Beanlands RSB, Heller GV, Bateman TM, Knuuti J, Orlandi C. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 28;76(4):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.063.
PubMed 32703509
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Open Label, Multicenter Study for the Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Imaging of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection in Patients With Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01347710
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BMS747158-301
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- Coronary Artery Disease., Positron Emission Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging., Single Positron Emission Computed Tomography., Flurpiridaz F18 Injection.
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 795 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Lantheus Medical ImagingIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 5 Apr 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic efficacy (specificity and sensitivity) of flurpiridaz F18 injection PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) compared to single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI in the detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by invasive coronary angiography (ICA) or a documented history of Myocardial Infarction (MI).
Detailed description
The study will assess the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of Flurpiridaz F18 Injection MPI against SPECT MPI in patients screened for CAD as determined by ICA. Six hundred and eighty evaluable patients will be enrolled and will undergo SPECT MPI and Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI. Patients will be considered for enrollment if they are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prior ICA without intervention (being either positive or negative for CAD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Flurpiridaz F18 | Experimental | Drug: Flurpiridaz F18, Drug: 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)Open-label study of a single dose of Flurpiridaz F18 injection for PET MPI compared to a single dose of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for SPECT MPI in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred for coronary catheterization |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Invasive Coronary Angiography. Men or Women age 18 or older - see protocol for additional details.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of child bearing potential who are not practicing birth control.
- Unstable cardiac status. History of coronary artery bypass graft. History of percutaneous coronary intervention within the past six months. See protocol for additional details.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Flurpiridaz F18Also: flurpiridaz F 18Injection of Flurpiridaz F18 for the purposes of PET myocardial profusion imaging (MPI) analysis | Drug | Flurpiridaz F18 |
| 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin)Also: 99mTc sestamibi or 99mTc TetrofosminInjection of 99mTc sestamibi or tetrofosmin for the purposes of SPECT MPI analysis | Drug | Flurpiridaz F18 |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic efficacy of one day rest and stress flurpiridaz F 18 PET MPI sensitivity versus SPECT MPI sensitivity in the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by majority rule using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard,
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT MPI Specificity
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET MPI specificity versus SPECT MPI specificity by majority rule in the detection of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard
10 secondary outcomes
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Sensitivity Versus SPECT MPI Sensitivity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F18 PET MPI Specificity Versus SPECT Specificity in Subgroups: Pharmacologic Stress, Females and BMI>/=30.
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Sensitivity (PETVsSPECT).
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic Performance Evaluation of Localization of CAD for Specificity (PETVsSPECT).
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnositic Performance Evaluation of Multivessel Disease (PETvsSPECT).
Time frame: 60 days
Overall Summary of Sensitivity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality Excellent or Good
Time frame: 60 days
Overall Summary of Specificity of PET MPI vs SPECT MPI; Image Quality of Excellent or Good
Time frame: 60 days
Image Quality of Rest and Stress (PET vs SPECT).
Time frame: 60 days
Diagnostic Certainty in PET MPI and SPECT MPI
Time frame: 60 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41064867Lopez DM, Huck DM, Divakaran S, Brown JM, Weber BN, Lemley M, Builoff V, Shanbhag A, Lan Z, Buckley C, Al-Mallah MH, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Slomka P, Di Carli MF. Utility of 18F-Flurpiridaz PET Relative Flow Reserve in Differentiating Obstructive From Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Nov;18(11):e018323. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018323. Epub 2025 Oct 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37807004Poitrasson-Riviere A, Moody JB, Renaud JM, Hagio T, Arida-Moody L, Buckley CJ, Al-Mallah MH, Nallamothu BK, Weinberg RL, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Integrated myocardial flow reserve (iMFR) assessment: optimized PET blood flow quantification for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Dec;51(1):136-146. doi: 10.1007/s00259-023-06455-2. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36401636Hagio T, Moody JB, Poitrasson-Riviere A, Renaud JM, Pierce L, Buckley C, Ficaro EP, Murthy VL. Multi-center, multi-vendor validation of deep learning-based attenuation correction in SPECT MPI: data from the international flurpiridaz-301 trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023 Mar;50(4):1028-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-06045-8. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32703509Maddahi J, Lazewatsky J, Udelson JE, Berman DS, Beanlands RSB, Heller GV, Bateman TM, Knuuti J, Orlandi C. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 28;76(4):391-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.063.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Lipoic Acid on Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Patients
Heart Failure Due to Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Acoustics for Early Disease Detection
Valvular Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cesare Orlandi, MD study director
Lantheus Medical Imaging
81 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Flurpiridaz F18 and 99mTechnicium (sestamibi or tetrofosmin) in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Lantheus Medical Imaging at 81 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 81 sites in United States, Canada, Finland, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 5 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz F 18 PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI) Sensitivity Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Sensitivity (time frame: 60 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01347710, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2020.