Lung TransplantNCT01365429
Novel Lung Trial: Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion (Evlp) As An Assessment Of Extended/Marginal Donor Lungs
A study testing XPS™ with Steen Solution™ in people with Lung Transplant, run by XVIVO Perfusion at 18 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Human donor lungs that do not meet the standard clinical criteria for donor lung utilization but fit into the study inclusion criteria will be retrieved from the donor using current donor lung retrieval techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Transplant
- What is being tested?
- XPS™ with Steen Solution™
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 252 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Recipient Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria The recipient inclusion/exclusion criteria apply to patients enrolled in the control or EVLP treatment arms.
- Recipient Inclusion Criteria
- Requires single or bilateral lung transplant.
- Male or Female, 18 years of age or older.
- Subject or Subject's Representative provides a legally effective informed consent.
- Recipient exclusion Criteria
- A recipient is HIV positive.
- A recipient has active Hepatitis.
- Investigator believes that the recipient has infection that excludes them from transplant in the study.
- To receive multi-organ transplant.
- Is on hemodialysis or has chronic severe renal dysfunction. Severe renal dysfunction is defined as a glomerular filtration rate of 29 or less (mL/min/1.73m2).
- Is to have planned concurrent cardiac procedures.
- A recipient is a re-transplant. (A re-transplant is defined as a recipient having the removal and transplant of a previously transplanted lung. A recipient with a previously single lung transplant is eligible to enroll in the trial if it is for the other lung and within 6 months of previous transplant.)
- A recipient is on Nova Lung, ECMO, or on mechanical ventilation. (CPAP and BIPAP are not exclusionary)
Donor Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria for EVLP Assessment
- Donor Inclusion Criteria
- The Donor lung must meet the following criteria to proceed with EVLP:
- At the time of the clinical evaluation , the PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300mmHg Or If PaO2/FiO2 > 30mmHg and the donor has any one or more of the following donor risk factors:
- Multiple blood transfusions.
- Pulmonary edema detected via CXR, bronchoscopy or palpation of lungs.
- Donation after circulatory death donors.
- Investigator evaluation of donor lung as "unsuitable" for standard criteria for lung transplant. List reason for "unsuitable" determination.
- Donor Exclusion Criteria
- Lung has significant pneumonia and/or persistent purulent secretions on bronchoscopy as determined by investigator.
- Donor has known significant aspiration of gastric contents within the lung.
- Donor lung has significant mechanical lung injury or trauma determined by chest x-ray, bronchoscopy, CT Scan or visual inspection.
- Donor lung has active infectious disease such as HIV, Hepatitis B or C, HTLV or Syphilis. Note: This information is not available at the start of EVLP. Therefore this criteria can be assessed during or post EVLP, but prior to transplant.
Donor Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria for Transplant Suitability after EVLP
- Donor Inclusion Criteria for Transplant Suitability
- Surgeon must be clinically satisfied with the lung evaluation (i.e.) overall improvement, if not, the reason for refusal must be listed.
- Stability or improvement of other lung function parameters during EVLP perfusion - PVR, Compliance, Airway Pressures.
- Two delta PO2 greater than 350 mmHg, if two delta PO2 mm Hg are not met than three out of four of the following parameters must be present:
- One delta PO2 of > 350 or absolute PO2 of > 400.
- Chest x-ray findings with absence or improvement of pulmonary edema/infiltrates
- Compliance static (greater than 35 single and greater than 60 for a double)
- Absence of consolidation by palpation
- Donor Exclusion Criteria for Transplant Suitability after EVLP
- All delta PO2 (s) are less than 350 mmHg (measured with a FiO2 set at 1.0) or all absolute PO2s are less than 400.
- Overall greater than 10-15% Functional deterioration of other lung function across all parameters (PVR, Compliance, PawP) with chest x-ray findings showing deterioration.
- Donor lung positive for infectious diseases such as HIV, Hepatitis B or C, or Syphilis.
Note: This information is not available until at the start of EVLP. Therefore this criteria can be assessed during or post EVLP, but prior to transplant.
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 1 country.
18 sites in 1 country
United States18 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60631
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
University of Texas Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Henry Ford
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of Florida-Gainesville
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Indiana University Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Columbia University Medical Centre
New York, New York, 10032
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15632
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Barnes Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606
About this study
Human donor lungs that do not meet the standard clinical criteria for donor lung utilization but fit into the study inclusion criteria will be retrieved from the donor using current donor lung retrieval techniques.
Read the detailed description
These lungs will be brought to the study transplant center to be re-assessed by the transplant team. The lungs will be physiologically assessed during ex vivo perfusion with Steen Solution. Perfusion of these lungs will be performed using Steen solution with the addition of methylprednisolone, heparin and antibiotics. With respect to the decision of lung utilization those organs with a delta pO2 (Δ pO2 = Pulmonary vein pO2 - pulmonary artery pO2) during ex vivo perfusion assessment > 350mmHg, good lung compliance, and a favorable opinion of the transplant surgeon will be considered transplantable. Lungs will be excluded for transplantation: if the Δ pO2 is less than 350mmHg or if they demonstrate >10% deterioration in any of the following functional parameters: pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), dynamic compliance or airway pressures. Lungs will also be excluded if they are deemed unsuitable based on the clinical judgment of the lung transplant surgeon.
- Conditions
- Lung Transplant
- Being tested
- XPS™ with Steen Solution™
- Keywords
- Lung Transplant, Transplantation Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
XPS™ with Steen Solution™Device
Also called EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusion
The XPS™ System is an integrated cardiac bypass system comprised of various components such as a Maquet CardioHelp centrifugal pump (K102726), the HicoVariotherm Heater/Cooler, the Hamilton C2 ICU (intensive care unit) pressure- controlled ventilator (K092148), the perfusate gas monitors, and the display monitors. The XPS™ System is responsible for housing the organ for preservation, providing the normothermic environment, and perfusing the organ with the STEEN Solution™. Donor lungs that meet inclusion criteria are placed on the XPS™ and rewarmed and perfused with STEEN Solution™ and ventilated for 3-6 hours. If the lungs meet transplant suitability, they are cooled down and transplanted into a consented recipient that meet's trial criteria.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EVLP Group | Experimental | EVLP Group are those recipient lung transplant patients that received donor lungs that had been placed on the XPS™ with Steen Solution™ and undergone ex-vivo lung perfusion before being transplanted. Receives: Device: XPS™ with Steen Solution™ |
| Control Group | No intervention | Control Group are those recipient lung transplant patients that receive donor lungs via conventional transplant. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PAS Study Primary Endpoint
The primary end point is a co-primary endpoint comparing survival rates and rates of grade 3 PGD at 72 hours with success if and only if both endpoints are met.
Treatment Group (T) = EVLP transplant subjects Control Group (C) = standard transplant subjects
Co-Primary Endpoints:
Endpoint #1: Survival of T is non-inferior to C Ho: C - T ≥ M1 (T is inferior to the control by M1 or more) Ha: C - T < M1 (T is inferior to the control by less than M1) where M1 = 0.12 Endpoint #2: Rate of grade 3 PGD at 72 hours for T is non-inferior to the rate for C Ho: C - T ≥ M2 Ha: C - T < M2 where M2 = 0.12
Measured: 3 Years
PMA Study Primary Endpoint
The primary end point is non-inferiority of the 3-year survival rate of the EVLP group as compared to 3-year survival rate of the control group.
Ho: C - T ≥ M3 (T is inferior to the control by M3 or more) Ha: C - T < M3 (T is inferior to the control by less than M3) where M3 = 0.12
Measured: 72hrs and Survival
Secondary outcomes (2)
PMA Secondary Endpoints
Primary Lung Graft Dysfunction (PGD) is an indicator for significant morbidity The PMA secondary endpoints are as follows:
- FEV1 at 3 mos, 6 mos, 9 mos, and 1 yr
- PGD score at 24 and 48 hrs
- ICU LOS
- Hospital LOS
- Use of ECMO due to lung function post transplant
- Duration of mechanical ventilation post transplant
- Quality of Life and functional status at one year
Measured: 3 Years
PAS Secondary Endpoint:
Quality of Life measured by functional status, physical capability, and employment limitations.
- Episodes of rejection per UNOS registry
- FEV1 at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Measured: 5 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung TransplantStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- XVIVO Perfusion
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jaya Tiwari, BS, CCRP, Study director, XVIVO Perfusion, Inc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01365429
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- VSS-NA-001, XVO-NA-002
- Status last verified
- Mar 2018
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 7 Mar 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pierre AF, Sekine Y, Hutcheon MA, Waddell TK, Keshavjee SH. Marginal donor lungs: a reassessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;123(3):421-7; discussion, 427-8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.120345.
PubMed 11882811Fisher AJ, Donnelly SC, Hirani N, Haslett C, Strieter RM, Dark JH, Corris PA. Elevated levels of interleukin-8 in donor lungs is associated with early graft failure after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):259-65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.2005093.
PubMed 11208654Power BM, Van Heerden PV. The physiological changes associated with brain death--current concepts and implications for treatment of the brain dead organ donor. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995 Feb;23(1):26-36. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9502300107.
PubMed 7778744Avlonitis VS, Wigfield CH, Golledge HD, Kirby JA, Dark JH. Early hemodynamic injury during donor brain death determines the severity of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007 Jan;7(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01593.x.
PubMed 17227559Botha P, Fisher AJ, Dark JH. Marginal lung donors: A diminishing margin of safety? Transplantation. 2006 Nov 27;82(10):1273-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000236099.52382.74.
PubMed 17130774Kawut SM, Reyentovich A, Wilt JS, Anzeck R, Lederer DJ, O'Shea MK, Sonett JR, Arcasoy SM. Outcomes of extended donor lung recipients after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2005 Feb 15;79(3):310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000149504.53710.ae.
PubMed 15699761Botha P, Trivedi D, Weir CJ, Searl CP, Corris PA, Dark JH, Schueler SV. Extended donor criteria in lung transplantation: impact on organ allocation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.037.
PubMed 16678604Cohen RG, Starnes VA. Living donor lung transplantation. World J Surg. 2001 Feb;25(2):244-50. doi: 10.1007/s002680020025.
PubMed 11338028Yamane M, Date H, Okazaki M, Toyooka S, Aoe M, Sano Y. Long-term improvement in pulmonary function after living donor lobar lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Jul;26(7):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
PubMed 17613398Steen S, Sjoberg T, Pierre L, Liao Q, Eriksson L, Algotsson L. Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor. Lancet. 2001 Mar 17;357(9259):825-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04195-7.
PubMed 11265950de Antonio DG, Marcos R, Laporta R, Mora G, Garcia-Gallo C, Gamez P, Cordoba M, Moradiellos J, Ussetti P, Carreno MC, Nunez JR, Calatayud J, Del Rio F, Varela A. Results of clinical lung transplant from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 May;26(5):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.01.028.
PubMed 17449425Steen S, Liao Q, Wierup PN, Bolys R, Pierre L, Sjoberg T. Transplantation of lungs from non-heart-beating donors after functional assessment ex vivo. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jul;76(1):244-52; discussion 252. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00191-7.
PubMed 12842550Snell GI, Oto T, Levvey B, McEgan R, Mennan M, Higuchi T, Eriksson L, Williams TJ, Rosenfeldt F. Evaluation of techniques for lung transplantation following donation after cardiac death. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Jun;81(6):2014-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.01.014.
PubMed 16731122Cypel M, Sato M, Yildirim E, Karolak W, Chen F, Yeung J, Boasquevisque C, Leist V, Singer LG, Yasufuku K, Deperrot M, Waddell TK, Keshavjee S, Pierre A. Initial experience with lung donation after cardiocirculatory death in Canada. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Aug;28(8):753-8. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2009.05.009. Epub 2009 Jun 28.
PubMed 19632569Mason DP, Thuita L, Alster JM, Murthy SC, Budev MM, Mehta AC, Pettersson GB, Blackstone EH. Should lung transplantation be performed using donation after cardiac death? The United States experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Oct;136(4):1061-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.023.
PubMed 18954650
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Mar 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Novel Lung Trial: Normothermic Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion (Evlp) As An Assessment Of Extended/Marginal Donor Lungs
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01365429
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VSS-NA-001, XVO-NA-002
- Conditions
- Lung Transplant
- Keywords
- Lung Transplant, Transplantation Lung
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- XVIVO PerfusionIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Human donor lungs that do not meet the standard clinical criteria for donor lung utilization but fit into the study inclusion criteria will be retrieved from the donor using current donor lung retrieval techniques.
Detailed description
These lungs will be brought to the study transplant center to be re-assessed by the transplant team. The lungs will be physiologically assessed during ex vivo perfusion with Steen Solution. Perfusion of these lungs will be performed using Steen solution with the addition of methylprednisolone, heparin and antibiotics. With respect to the decision of lung utilization those organs with a delta pO2 (Δ pO2 = Pulmonary vein pO2 - pulmonary artery pO2) during ex vivo perfusion assessment > 350mmHg, good lung compliance, and a favorable opinion of the transplant surgeon will be considered transplantable. Lungs will be excluded for transplantation: if the Δ pO2 is less than 350mmHg or if they demonstrate >10% deterioration in any of the following functional parameters: pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), dynamic compliance or airway pressures. Lungs will also be excluded if they are deemed unsuitable based on the clinical judgment of the lung transplant surgeon.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EVLP Group | Experimental | Device: XPS™ with Steen Solution™EVLP Group are those recipient lung transplant patients that received donor lungs that had been placed on the XPS™ with Steen Solution™ and undergone ex-vivo lung perfusion before being transplanted. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –Control Group are those recipient lung transplant patients that receive donor lungs via conventional transplant. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| XPS™ with Steen Solution™Also: EVLP, ex vivo lung perfusionThe XPS™ System is an integrated cardiac bypass system comprised of various components such as a Maquet CardioHelp centrifugal pump (K102726), the HicoVariotherm Heater/Cooler, the Hamilton C2 ICU (intensive care unit) pressure- controlled ventilator (K092148), the perfusate gas monitors, and the display monitors. The XPS™ System is responsible for housing the organ for preservation, providing the normothermic environment, and perfusing the organ with the STEEN Solution™. Donor lungs that meet inclusion criteria are placed on the XPS™ and rewarmed and perfused with STEEN Solution™ and ventilated for 3-6 hours. If the lungs meet transplant suitability, they are cooled down and transplanted into a consented recipient that meet's trial criteria. | Device | EVLP Group |
Primary outcome
PAS Study Primary Endpoint
Time frame: 3 Years
The primary end point is a co-primary endpoint comparing survival rates and rates of grade 3 PGD at 72 hours with success if and only if both endpoints are met. Treatment Group (T) = EVLP transplant subjects Control Group (C) = standard transplant subjects Co-Primary Endpoints: Endpoint #1: Survival of T is non-inferior to C Ho: C - T ≥ M1 (T is inferior to the control by M1 or more) Ha: C - T < M1 (T is inferior to the control by less than M1) where M1 = 0.12 Endpoint #2: Rate of grade 3 PGD at 72 hours for T is non-inferior to the rate for C Ho: C - T ≥ M2 Ha: C - T < M2 where M2 = 0.12
PMA Study Primary Endpoint
Time frame: 72hrs and Survival
The primary end point is non-inferiority of the 3-year survival rate of the EVLP group as compared to 3-year survival rate of the control group. Ho: C - T ≥ M3 (T is inferior to the control by M3 or more) Ha: C - T < M3 (T is inferior to the control by less than M3) where M3 = 0.12
2 secondary outcomes
PMA Secondary Endpoints
Time frame: 3 Years
PAS Secondary Endpoint:
Time frame: 5 Years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Mar 2018.
- Background: PubMed 11882811Pierre AF, Sekine Y, Hutcheon MA, Waddell TK, Keshavjee SH. Marginal donor lungs: a reassessment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;123(3):421-7; discussion, 427-8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.120345.
- Background: PubMed 11208654Fisher AJ, Donnelly SC, Hirani N, Haslett C, Strieter RM, Dark JH, Corris PA. Elevated levels of interleukin-8 in donor lungs is associated with early graft failure after lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Jan;163(1):259-65. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.1.2005093.
- Background: PubMed 7778744Power BM, Van Heerden PV. The physiological changes associated with brain death--current concepts and implications for treatment of the brain dead organ donor. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1995 Feb;23(1):26-36. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9502300107.
- Background: PubMed 17227559Avlonitis VS, Wigfield CH, Golledge HD, Kirby JA, Dark JH. Early hemodynamic injury during donor brain death determines the severity of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2007 Jan;7(1):83-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01593.x.
- Background: PubMed 17130774Botha P, Fisher AJ, Dark JH. Marginal lung donors: A diminishing margin of safety? Transplantation. 2006 Nov 27;82(10):1273-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000236099.52382.74.
- Background: PubMed 15699761Kawut SM, Reyentovich A, Wilt JS, Anzeck R, Lederer DJ, O'Shea MK, Sonett JR, Arcasoy SM. Outcomes of extended donor lung recipients after lung transplantation. Transplantation. 2005 Feb 15;79(3):310-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000149504.53710.ae.
- Background: PubMed 16678604Botha P, Trivedi D, Weir CJ, Searl CP, Corris PA, Dark JH, Schueler SV. Extended donor criteria in lung transplantation: impact on organ allocation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2005.12.037.
- Background: PubMed 11338028Cohen RG, Starnes VA. Living donor lung transplantation. World J Surg. 2001 Feb;25(2):244-50. doi: 10.1007/s002680020025.
- Background: PubMed 17613398Yamane M, Date H, Okazaki M, Toyooka S, Aoe M, Sano Y. Long-term improvement in pulmonary function after living donor lobar lung transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Jul;26(7):687-92. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.04.008. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 11265950Steen S, Sjoberg T, Pierre L, Liao Q, Eriksson L, Algotsson L. Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor. Lancet. 2001 Mar 17;357(9259):825-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04195-7.
- Background: PubMed 17449425de Antonio DG, Marcos R, Laporta R, Mora G, Garcia-Gallo C, Gamez P, Cordoba M, Moradiellos J, Ussetti P, Carreno MC, Nunez JR, Calatayud J, Del Rio F, Varela A. Results of clinical lung transplant from uncontrolled non-heart-beating donors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 May;26(5):529-34. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.01.028.
- Background: PubMed 12842550Steen S, Liao Q, Wierup PN, Bolys R, Pierre L, Sjoberg T. Transplantation of lungs from non-heart-beating donors after functional assessment ex vivo. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Jul;76(1):244-52; discussion 252. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)00191-7.
Related trials for Lung Transplant
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
RecruitingPhase 1
Syk Inhibition in MItigating Lung Allograft Rejection (SIMILAR): A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Fostamatinib in Lung Transplant Patients With Donor-Specific Antibodies
Lung Transplantation
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Pilot Study of Microbiota Transplant With Antibiotic Preconditioning and Fiber Supplementation in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (GUT RESTORE-PAH)
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Anaesthetic Management in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Preoperative Fasting, Pulmonary Aspiration During Anesthetic Induction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jaya Tiwari, BS, CCRP study director
XVIVO Perfusion, Inc
18 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing XPS™ with Steen Solution™ in people with Lung Transplant, run by XVIVO Perfusion at 18 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PAS Study Primary Endpoint (time frame: 3 Years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01365429, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2018.