Bipolar DisorderNCT01370668
Functional Remediation for Bipolar Disorder
A study testing Functional remediation, Psychoeducation and Treatment as usual in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental.
Trial summary
Bipolar disorder is a severe, chronic and recurrent illness, that affects nearly the 5% of the population. Recent research point at the relevance and persistence of cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar patients even beyond the acute phases, although cognitive impairment has been classically associated with schizophrenia… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bipolar Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Functional remediation, Psychoeducation and Treatment as usual
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 198 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Outpatients
- Diagnosis of bipolar disorder type I or II, according to DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed criteria
- Adult patients, aged between 18 and 55 years old
- Euthymic (YMRS < 6, HDRS < 8) for at least three months prior to study entry.
- Signed inform consent
- Severe or moderate functional impairment (FAST > 18)
Who cannot join
- IQ < 85
- Neurological illness
- Present diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence according to DSM-IV criteria the last three months
- Significant medical illness considered as severe by the study that may interfere with assessments
- having been enrolled in any kind of cognitive rehabilitation intervention the last two years
About this study
Official title: Comparative Efficacy of Two Psychosocial Strategies of Intervention (Neurocognitive vs Psychoeducative) as add-on Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual in Bipolar Disorder
Bipolar disorder is a severe, chronic and recurrent illness, that affects nearly the 5% of the population. Recent research point at the relevance and persistence of cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar patients even beyond the acute phases, although cognitive impairment has been classically associated with schizophrenia and not bipolar disorder. Current findings suggest that some intervention is needed in order to improve not only affective symptoms but also cognitive dysfunctions, so that patients could benefit from cognitive remediation techniques to improve cognitive impairment and the functional outcome. There is no previous research on the efficacy of cognitive remediation programs on bipolar disorder.
Read the detailed description
The method consists of a randomized clinical trial with 3 arms: 1) one group (n=66) will receive a cognitive rehabilitation program + pharmacological treatment, 2) another group (n=66) will receive a psychoeducation program + pharmacological treatment, and 3) a control group (n=66) will only receive pharmacological treatment. A psychopathological, neuropsychological and functional assessment will be administered pre and post-intervention and a 12-month follow-up to assess the long term effects of the intervention.
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Being tested
- Functional remediation, Psychoeducation, Treatment as usual
- Keywords
- functional remediation, psychoeducation, neurocognition
- Medical subject headings
- Bipolar Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Functional remediationBehavioural
The functional remediation program is composed of 21 weekly sessions of 90 minutes, each aimed at improving the following cognitive domains: attention, memory and executive functions and psychosocial functioning.
The program will be performed in an 12- to 15-patient group conducted by 2 experienced neuropsychologists with previous experience with bipolar patients and specific training on patients' group management.
PsychoeducationBehavioural
Group psychoeducation is a tested and manualized intervention consisting of 21 weekly sessions of 90 minutes aimed at improving 4 main issues: illness awareness, treatment adherence, early detection of prodromal symptoms and recurrences, and lifestyle regularity.
Treatment as usualBehavioural
The patients will not receive any add-on psychosocial intervention. All patients will keep on receiving standard psychiatric treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Functional remediation | Experimental | Patients assigned to the experimental treatment will receive standard psychiatric care and will be enrolled in the neurocognitive intervention program composed of 21 sessions of 90 minutes, each aimed at improving the following cognitive domains: attention, memory and executive functions and psychosocial functioning.
The program will be performed in an 8-to-10 patient group conducted by 2 experienced neuropsychologists. with previous experience with bipolar patients (at least 3 years) and specific training on patients' group management. Receives: Behavioral: Functional remediation |
| Psychoeducation | Active comparator | The group psychoeducation is a tested (Colom et al, 2003) and manualized intervention (Vieta and Colom, 2006) consisting on 21 sessions of 90 minutes, aimed at improving 4 main issues: illness awareness, treatment adherence, early detection of prodromal symptoms and recurrences and lifestyle regularity. The program will be performed in an 8-10 patient group conducted by 2 experienced psychologists with previous experience with bipolar patients and specific training on patients' group management. The structure of each session consists of a 30 to 40 minute speech on the topic of the day, followed by an exercise related to the issue (eg. drawing a life chart, writing a list of potential triggering factors) and a discussion. Receives: Behavioral: Psychoeducation |
| Treatment as Usual | Active comparator | This arm will not receive any sort of add-on psychosocial intervention. All patients will keep on receiving standard psychiatric treatment. Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as usual |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Measured: Baseline
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Measured: 6 months
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionDec 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bipolar DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Benito Menni, University of Valencia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universidad de Oviedo, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Hospital Santiago Apóstol de Vitoria, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
- Investigators
- Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01370668
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PI08/90094
- Other IDs
- PI080180
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bonnin CM, Torrent C, Arango C, Amann BL, Sole B, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Crespo JM, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Reinares M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Garcia-Portilla MP, Ibanez A, Salamero M, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A; CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group. Functional remediation in bipolar disorder: 1-year follow-up of neurocognitive and functional outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208(1):87-93. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162123. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
PubMed 26541692Sole B, Bonnin CM, Mayoral M, Amann BL, Torres I, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Jimenez E, Crespo JM, Colom F, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Reinares M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Soria S, Garcia-Portilla MP, Ibanez A, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A, Torrent C; CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group. Functional remediation for patients with bipolar II disorder: improvement of functioning and subsyndromal symptoms. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;25(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 20.
PubMed 24906790Torrent C, Bonnin Cdel M, Martinez-Aran A, Valle J, Amann BL, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Crespo JM, Ibanez A, Garcia-Portilla MP, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Arango C, Colom F, Sole B, Pacchiarotti I, Rosa AR, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Anaya C, Fernandez P, Landin-Romero R, Alonso-Lana S, Ortiz-Gil J, Segura B, Barbeito S, Vega P, Fernandez M, Ugarte A, Subira M, Cerrillo E, Custal N, Menchon JM, Saiz-Ruiz J, Rodao JM, Isella S, Alegria A, Al-Halabi S, Bobes J, Galvan G, Saiz PA, Balanza-Martinez V, Selva G, Fuentes-Dura I, Correa P, Mayoral M, Chiclana G, Merchan-Naranjo J, Rapado-Castro M, Salamero M, Vieta E. Efficacy of functional remediation in bipolar disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):852-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070971.
PubMed 23511717
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Efficacy of Two Psychosocial Strategies of Intervention (Neurocognitive vs Psychoeducative) as add-on Therapy Versus Treatment as Usual in Bipolar Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01370668
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PI08/90094
- Conditions
- Bipolar Disorder
- Keywords
- functional remediation, psychoeducation, neurocognition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 198 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud MentalResearch network
- Collaborators
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Benito Menni, University of Valencia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Universidad de Oviedo, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Hospital Santiago Apóstol de Vitoria, Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bipolar disorder is a severe, chronic and recurrent illness, that affects nearly the 5% of the population. Recent research point at the relevance and persistence of cognitive dysfunctions in bipolar patients even beyond the acute phases, although cognitive impairment has been classically associated with schizophrenia and not bipolar disorder. Current findings suggest that some intervention is needed in order to improve not only affective symptoms but also cognitive dysfunctions, so that patients could benefit from cognitive remediation techniques to improve cognitive impairment and the functional outcome. There is no previous research on the efficacy of cognitive remediation programs on bipolar disorder.
Detailed description
The method consists of a randomized clinical trial with 3 arms: 1) one group (n=66) will receive a cognitive rehabilitation program + pharmacological treatment, 2) another group (n=66) will receive a psychoeducation program + pharmacological treatment, and 3) a control group (n=66) will only receive pharmacological treatment. A psychopathological, neuropsychological and functional assessment will be administered pre and post-intervention and a 12-month follow-up to assess the long term effects of the intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Functional remediation | Experimental | Behavioral: Functional remediationPatients assigned to the experimental treatment will receive standard psychiatric care and will be enrolled in the neurocognitive intervention program composed of 21 sessions of 90 minutes, each aimed at improving the following cognitive domains: attention, memory and executive functions and psychosocial functioning. The program will be performed in an 8-to-10 patient group conducted by 2 experienced neuropsychologists. with previous experience with bipolar patients (at least 3 years) and specific training on patients' group management. |
| Psychoeducation | Active comparator | Behavioral: PsychoeducationThe group psychoeducation is a tested (Colom et al, 2003) and manualized intervention (Vieta and Colom, 2006) consisting on 21 sessions of 90 minutes, aimed at improving 4 main issues: illness awareness, treatment adherence, early detection of prodromal symptoms and recurrences and lifestyle regularity. The program will be performed in an 8-10 patient group conducted by 2 experienced psychologists with previous experience with bipolar patients and specific training on patients' group management. The structure of each session consists of a 30 to 40 minute speech on the topic of the day, followed by an exercise related to the issue (eg. drawing a life chart, writing a list of potential triggering factors) and a discussion. |
| Treatment as Usual | Active comparator | Behavioral: Treatment as usualThis arm will not receive any sort of add-on psychosocial intervention. All patients will keep on receiving standard psychiatric treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Outpatients
- Diagnosis of bipolar disorder type I or II, according to DSM-IV-TR 4ª Ed criteria
- Adult patients, aged between 18 and 55 years old
- Euthymic (YMRS < 6, HDRS < 8) for at least three months prior to study entry.
- Signed inform consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- IQ < 85
- Neurological illness
- Present diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence according to DSM-IV criteria the last three months
- Significant medical illness considered as severe by the study that may interfere with assessments
- having been enrolled in any kind of cognitive rehabilitation intervention the last two years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Functional remediationThe functional remediation program is composed of 21 weekly sessions of 90 minutes, each aimed at improving the following cognitive domains: attention, memory and executive functions and psychosocial functioning. The program will be performed in an 12- to 15-patient group conducted by 2 experienced neuropsychologists with previous experience with bipolar patients and specific training on patients' group management. | Behavioural | Functional remediation |
| PsychoeducationGroup psychoeducation is a tested and manualized intervention consisting of 21 weekly sessions of 90 minutes aimed at improving 4 main issues: illness awareness, treatment adherence, early detection of prodromal symptoms and recurrences, and lifestyle regularity. | Behavioural | Psychoeducation |
| Treatment as usualThe patients will not receive any add-on psychosocial intervention. All patients will keep on receiving standard psychiatric treatment. | Behavioural | Treatment as Usual |
Primary outcome
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
Time frame: Baseline
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
Time frame: 6 months
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST)
Time frame: 12 months
The FAST is a valid and reliable instrument, easy to apply which requires a short period of time to administer. Evaluates functioning taking into account the last 15 days. It was developed for the clinical evaluation of the main difficulties presented by psychiatric patients, and has been validated in several languages for patients with bipolar disorder. The FAST scale consists of 24 items which allow the assessment of six specific areas of functioning: autonomy, occupational functioning, cognitive functioning, financial issues, interpersonal relationships and leisure time.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26541692Bonnin CM, Torrent C, Arango C, Amann BL, Sole B, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Crespo JM, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Reinares M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Garcia-Portilla MP, Ibanez A, Salamero M, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A; CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group. Functional remediation in bipolar disorder: 1-year follow-up of neurocognitive and functional outcome. Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;208(1):87-93. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.162123. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 24906790Sole B, Bonnin CM, Mayoral M, Amann BL, Torres I, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Jimenez E, Crespo JM, Colom F, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Reinares M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Soria S, Garcia-Portilla MP, Ibanez A, Vieta E, Martinez-Aran A, Torrent C; CIBERSAM Functional Remediation Group. Functional remediation for patients with bipolar II disorder: improvement of functioning and subsyndromal symptoms. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2015 Feb;25(2):257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23511717Torrent C, Bonnin Cdel M, Martinez-Aran A, Valle J, Amann BL, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Crespo JM, Ibanez A, Garcia-Portilla MP, Tabares-Seisdedos R, Arango C, Colom F, Sole B, Pacchiarotti I, Rosa AR, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Anaya C, Fernandez P, Landin-Romero R, Alonso-Lana S, Ortiz-Gil J, Segura B, Barbeito S, Vega P, Fernandez M, Ugarte A, Subira M, Cerrillo E, Custal N, Menchon JM, Saiz-Ruiz J, Rodao JM, Isella S, Alegria A, Al-Halabi S, Bobes J, Galvan G, Saiz PA, Balanza-Martinez V, Selva G, Fuentes-Dura I, Correa P, Mayoral M, Chiclana G, Merchan-Naranjo J, Rapado-Castro M, Salamero M, Vieta E. Efficacy of functional remediation in bipolar disorder: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;170(8):852-9. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070971.
Related trials for Bipolar Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess the Long-term Safety of KarXT for the Treatment of Manic Episodes in Bipolar-I Disorder (BALSAM-3)
Bipolar Disorder Type I With Mania
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
RecruitingPhase 2
NMDA Receptor Modulation for the Treatment of Bipolar I Disorder
Bipolar I Disorder
Enrolling by invitation
Incentives and Long-Acting Injectable Adherence After Involuntary Hospitalization
Schizophrenia Disorder, Schizoaffective Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KarXT for the Treatment of Manic Episodes in Bipolar-I Disorder
Bipolar-I Disorder With Mania or Mania With Mixed Features
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eduard Vieta, MD, PhD principal investigator
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Functional remediation, Psychoeducation and Treatment as usual in people with Bipolar Disorder, run by Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Assessment Short Test (FAST) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01370668, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2011.