AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreas CancerEarly Phase 1NCT01371240

Secretin-Assisted Computed Tomography Scan and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Improving Pancreatic Tumor Conspicuity

A Early Phase 1 study testing Secretin Synthetic Human (RG1068) in people with Pancreas Cancer, run by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Accurate preoperative tumor detection and staging are fundamental for treating patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients with unresectable tumors can benefit from being spared an extensive operation associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, cost, and pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pancreas Cancer
What is being tested?
Secretin Synthetic Human (RG1068)
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2011to Jun 2012
Phase
Early Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 18 or above will be included in the study.
  • Patients suspected of pancreatic mass or with a known pancreatic mass would be enrolled in the study.
  • Patients with suspected pancreatic pathology and scheduled for imaging study (CT vs. MRI) will be included if they had obstructive jaundice, with either a stricture in the lower common bile duct on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or a pancreatic mass on ultrasound or other imaging study.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with known advanced pancreatic tumors and those with previous pancreatic resection will be excluded.
  • Patients with renal insufficiency: increase Cr level or glomerular filteration rate (GFR) of less than 45 ml/min/1.73.
  • Patients who demonstrate increase in Cr level or patients with acute renal injury.
  • Claustrophobic or patients who are not able to tolerate MRI.
  • Patients with previous history of contrast allergies.
  • Pregnant patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Efficiency of Secretin-Assisted Computed Tomography Scan and Secretin-Assisted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Improving Pancreatic Enhancement and Tumor Conspicuity: Prospective Study

Accurate preoperative tumor detection and staging are fundamental for treating patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients with unresectable tumors can benefit from being spared an extensive operation associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, cost, and pain. On the other hand, patients with localized disease, which is amenable to surgical removal, have the option of operation. Therefore, accurate staging of pancreatic cancer requires the detection of the tumor, and evaluation of its size, its relationship to major peri-pancreatic vascular structures and portal venous system, locoregional lymph nodes, and distant metastases. Multiple imaging techniques have been used to evaluate the pancreas. Although, at this point, no consensus exists as to the best staging algorithm, multidetector (MD) computed tomogrophy (CT) and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide sufficient information for the management of most patients.

Patients with a tumor larger than 3 cm are characterized as non-surgical. CT sensitivity in detecting small pancreatic tumors of less than 2 cm is low. Multiple methods have been suggested to increase the sensitivity of CT. The sensitivity of CT increases with using multidetector CT which now has an accuracy rate of about 95-97% for initial detection and approximating that of 100% for staging.

Read more

Secretin (a natural hormone produced by the duodenal mucosal cells) is known to increase blood flow to the pancreas. The principal use of secretin in imaging today is in exocrine function of the pancreas or morphological evaluation of the pancreatic duct under ultrasound or MRI. Theoretically, pancreatic contrast enhancement should also increase after secretin administration. This would imply that tumor conspicuity might also be increased if contrast enhancement of the normal pancreas increases. Secretin CT has been advocated by other centers to improve depiction of the ampulla and periampullary/duodenal diseases and to improve contrast enhancement. O'Connell et al, used secretin in patients suspected or with known pancreatic mass and concluded that administration of intravenous secretin leads to greater enhancement of the pancreas with greater tumor conspicuity, than imaging without secretin.

MRI of the pancreas has undergone a major change because it can provide noninvasive images of the pancreatic ducts and the parenchyma. MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) enables detection of anatomic variants such as pancreas divisum. Although contrast material-enhanced CT is still considered the gold standard in acute pancreatitis and for the detection of calcifications in chronic pancreatitis, MR imaging and secretin-enhanced MRCP are useful in evaluating pseudocysts and pancreatic disruption.

The role of MR is still debated in pancreatic neoplasms except the cystic lesions where MR imaging provides critical information regarding the lesion's content and a possible communication with the pancreatic ducts. Although some articles have shown that MRI was equivalent to CT in diagnosis and staging, others have shown the opposite. Nishiharu et al. found comparable tumor detection but a benefit with CT, notably for peripancreatic and vascular invasion. Comparing CT, echoendoscopy, and MRI, Soriano et al. demonstrated that CT showed the highest level of precision in primary tumor staging, local-regional staging, vascular invasion, distant metastases, Tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging, and tumor resectability. MRI retains its originality in imaging the parenchyma, the pancreatic and biliary ducts, and vascular structures; however, in many institutions, CT remains the reference imaging choice for diagnosing and staging pancreatic cancer. Other than CT's advantages for the tumor, its excellent spatial resolution also provides detailed reconstructions in all planes and arterial mapping and therefore makes it possible to search for surgical contraindications such as celiac trunk stenosis. MRI is still used today as a second-intention tool when there is doubt or when CT and echoendoscopy are not sufficiently conclusive; it is not currently recommended to use MRI in first-intention diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this pilot study is to determine whether the administration of intravenous secretin before contrast-enhanced CT and MRI improves pancreatic enhancement and pancreatic tumor conspicuity and to evaluate which technique is more appropriate for pancreatic tumor detection, staging and evaluation of resectability.

Conditions
Pancreas Cancer
Being tested
Secretin Synthetic Human (RG1068)
Keywords
pancreas cancer, MRI, CT scan
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Secretin Synthetic Human (RG1068)Drug

    A maximum dose of 100 consumer unit (CU) of RG1068, synthetic human secretin (Repligen Corporation) or one CU per kg body wt for patients that weight less than 100 kg will be injected (0.2µg of RG1068 are equal to 1CU) (RepliGen Co., Waltham, MA, USA). This dose will be given as an intravenous bolus at 3 minutes before injecting the contrast.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Increase in pancreatic tumor conspicuity.

    Quantitative analysis will be performed using CT attenuation values obtained from the pancreas and from pancreatic tumors. The average CT attenuation will be calculated for the normal pancreatic tissue and any tumor. The mean pancreatic enhancement for the pancreatic and portal venous phases will be obtained by subtracting the mean CT attenuation value on nonenhanced images from the mean CT attenuation obtained from pancreatic and portal venous phase enhanced images. Mean enhancement for the pancreatic and portal venous phases will be calculated for both secretin and nonsecretin patients.

    Measured: one year

  2. Pancreatic tumor conspicuity on MRI

    The diameter of the main pancreatic duct before and after secretin stimulation will be measured to monitor variations in ductal size.

    The size of the tumor both before secretin administration and afterwards will be measured.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. post-injection complications and side effects of secretin

    All patients will be evaluated before the injection and throughout the entire study. Complete physical examination will be performed immediately after the study completion. The patients will be observed for 10 minutes after the study is done and re-evaluated for side effects.

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2011 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2012 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Study never started

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01371240
Sponsor's protocol ID
CC00035
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
7 Jun 2011
Last updated
16 Jun 2022
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Early Phase 1 study testing Secretin Synthetic Human (RG1068) in people with Pancreas Cancer, run by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Increase in pancreatic tumor conspicuity. (time frame: one year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in