Major Depressive DisorderPhase 2/3NCT01409317
Neural Predictors and Longitudinal Neural Correlates of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treating Major Depression
A Phase 2/3 study testing Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Douglas Mental Health University Institute at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Standard high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-TMS) is a noninvasive method to activate or de-activate neurons in superficial regions of the brain through the induction of weak electric currents in the brain tissue produced by rapidly changing magnetic fields. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Depressive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Apr 2013to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of a current major depressive disorder (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) that has not improved after ≥ 1 but ≤ 3 adequate antidepressant trial(s) in the current episode
- Baseline score ≥ 21 on the HAM-D21
- Stable medication regimen (> 4 weeks)
Who cannot join
- Psychotic features in the current episode
- Lifetime history of psychotic disorders and/or bipolar I or II disorders
- Substance or alcohol abuse/dependence in the past 6 months
- Lifetime history of a major neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson's, stroke)
- Uncontrolled medical disease (e.g., cardiovascular, renal)
- Pregnancy and/or lactation
- Presence of a specific contraindication for DTMS/rTMS/MRI (e.g., personal history of epilepsy, metallic head implant, cardiac pacemaker)
- Personal history of abnormal brain MRI findings
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Neuromodulation Research Clinic, Douglas Mental Health University Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H4H1R3
About this study
Official title: Neural Predictors and Longitudinal Neural Correlates of Clinical Improvement After Standard or Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depression: A Randomized Study
Standard high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-TMS) is a noninvasive method to activate or de-activate neurons in superficial regions of the brain through the induction of weak electric currents in the brain tissue produced by rapidly changing magnetic fields. Studies have generally shown standard HF-TMS to be effective in treating major depressive disorder (MDD), although treatment effects are often highly variable and there are several negative trials in the specialized literature. One reason for these discrepant results might be that standard HF-TMS only enables direct stimulation of superficial brain areas and, consequently, it is possible that the stimulation of deeper and more widespread brain regions could produce superior and more reliable results. Recently, a novel form of HF-rTMS (called deep transcranial magnetic stimulation or DTMS), that allows direct stimulation of much larger and deeper brain regions, has also been shown to be effective and safe in treating MDD. Neuroimaging studies have shown that standard HF-rTMS directly affects several superficial areas of the brain, but to date there is no data on the brain effects of DTMS. Thus, this study aims to explore, for the first time, the brain effects of DTMS in MDD. More specifically, we, the investigators, hope to identify possible neural predictors of clinical improvement after DTMS and also clarify the impact of DTMS in the brain activity over time. In this study, DTMS will be applied over the left side of the front of the head (a region known as the 'prefrontal cortex'), and will be compared with standard HF-TMS in terms of its effectiveness and brain effects. For this, subjects with at least moderate MDD will be randomized to receive daily DTMS or standard HF-rTMS treatment for 4 weeks, and will undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after treatment. fMRI is a neuroimaging technique that allows us to measure which areas of the brain are more or less 'active' in response to specific stimuli at a particular time. During the fMRI sessions, we will use a validated cognitive task on working memory. Our results could eventually lead us, among other things, to identify which depressed patients would be best candidates for receiving either standard HF-rTMS or DTMS, and which areas of the brain should be targeted by these neuromodulation techniques.
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Being tested
- Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Keywords
- Major Depression, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, rTMS, DTMS, fMRI, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Major
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deep Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDevice
DTMS will be administered according to the following parameters: 18 Hz in 84 trains of 2 seconds duration, with 20 seconds inter-train interval (3,024 pulses per session) at 120% of the resting motor threshold
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDevice
rTMS will be administered according to the following parameters: 18 Hz in 84 trains of 2 seconds duration, with 20 seconds inter-train interval (3,024 pulses per session) at 120% of the resting motor threshold.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21)
Pre-post neuromodulation changes on HAM-D21 scores
Measured: week 5
Secondary outcomes (2)
21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21)
Response to treatment is defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the scores of the HAM-D21. Remission is defined as a HAM-D21 score ≤ 8.
Measured: week 5
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR)
Response is defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in the scores of the QIDS-SR. Remission is defined as a QIDS-SR score ≤ 5.
Measured: week 5
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2013
- Primary completionJan 2015
- Study completionJan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Depressive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brainsway
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, MARCELO T. BERLIM, Douglas Mental Health University Institute
- Investigators
- Marcelo T. Berlim, MD, MSc, Principal investigator, McGill University & Douglas Mental Health University Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01409317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DTMS-ERB11/28-2011
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 28 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Levkovitz Y, Roth Y, Harel EV, Braw Y, Sheer A, Zangen A. A randomized controlled feasibility and safety study of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2730-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.061. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
PubMed 17977787Levkovitz Y, Harel EV, Roth Y, Braw Y, Most D, Katz LN, Sheer A, Gersner R, Zangen A. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex: evaluation of antidepressant and cognitive effects in depressive patients. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
PubMed 20633419Isserles M, Rosenberg O, Dannon P, Levkovitz Y, Kotler M, Deutsch F, Lerer B, Zangen A. Cognitive-emotional reactivation during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex of depressive patients affects antidepressant outcome. J Affect Disord. 2011 Feb;128(3):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.038. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
PubMed 20663568
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neural Predictors and Longitudinal Neural Correlates of Clinical Improvement After Standard or Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Major Depression: A Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01409317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DTMS-ERB11/28-2011
- Conditions
- Major Depressive Disorder
- Keywords
- Major Depression, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, rTMS, DTMS, fMRI, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Douglas Mental Health University InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Brainsway
- Study start
- Apr 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Standard high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-TMS) is a noninvasive method to activate or de-activate neurons in superficial regions of the brain through the induction of weak electric currents in the brain tissue produced by rapidly changing magnetic fields. Studies have generally shown standard HF-TMS to be effective in treating major depressive disorder (MDD), although treatment effects are often highly variable and there are several negative trials in the specialized literature. One reason for these discrepant results might be that standard HF-TMS only enables direct stimulation of superficial brain areas and, consequently, it is possible that the stimulation of deeper and more widespread brain regions could produce superior and more reliable results. Recently, a novel form of HF-rTMS (called deep transcranial magnetic stimulation or DTMS), that allows direct stimulation of much larger and deeper brain regions, has also been shown to be effective and safe in treating MDD. Neuroimaging studies have shown that standard HF-rTMS directly affects several superficial areas of the brain, but to date there is no data on the brain effects of DTMS. Thus, this study aims to explore, for the first time, the brain effects of DTMS in MDD. More specifically, we, the investigators, hope to identify possible neural predictors of clinical improvement after DTMS and also clarify the impact of DTMS in the brain activity over time. In this study, DTMS will be applied over the left side of the front of the head (a region known as the 'prefrontal cortex'), and will be compared with standard HF-TMS in terms of its effectiveness and brain effects. For this, subjects with at least moderate MDD will be randomized to receive daily DTMS or standard HF-rTMS treatment for 4 weeks, and will undergo functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after treatment. fMRI is a neuroimaging technique that allows us to measure which areas of the brain are more or less 'active' in response to specific stimuli at a particular time. During the fMRI sessions, we will use a validated cognitive task on working memory. Our results could eventually lead us, among other things, to identify which depressed patients would be best candidates for receiving either standard HF-rTMS or DTMS, and which areas of the brain should be targeted by these neuromodulation techniques.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Experimental | Device: Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Presence of a current major depressive disorder (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Fourth Edition, Text Revision [DSM-IV-TR]) that has not improved after ≥ 1 but ≤ 3 adequate antidepressant trial(s) in the current episode
- Baseline score ≥ 21 on the HAM-D21
- Stable medication regimen (> 4 weeks)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Psychotic features in the current episode
- Lifetime history of psychotic disorders and/or bipolar I or II disorders
- Substance or alcohol abuse/dependence in the past 6 months
- Lifetime history of a major neurological disease (e.g., Parkinson's, stroke)
- Uncontrolled medical disease (e.g., cardiovascular, renal)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDTMS will be administered according to the following parameters: 18 Hz in 84 trains of 2 seconds duration, with 20 seconds inter-train interval (3,024 pulses per session) at 120% of the resting motor threshold | Device | Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic StimulationrTMS will be administered according to the following parameters: 18 Hz in 84 trains of 2 seconds duration, with 20 seconds inter-train interval (3,024 pulses per session) at 120% of the resting motor threshold. | Device | Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
Primary outcome
21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21)
Time frame: week 5
Pre-post neuromodulation changes on HAM-D21 scores
2 secondary outcomes
21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21)
Time frame: week 5
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR)
Time frame: week 5
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 17977787Levkovitz Y, Roth Y, Harel EV, Braw Y, Sheer A, Zangen A. A randomized controlled feasibility and safety study of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2730-44. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.061. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 20633419Levkovitz Y, Harel EV, Roth Y, Braw Y, Most D, Katz LN, Sheer A, Gersner R, Zangen A. Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex: evaluation of antidepressant and cognitive effects in depressive patients. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
- Background: PubMed 20663568Isserles M, Rosenberg O, Dannon P, Levkovitz Y, Kotler M, Deutsch F, Lerer B, Zangen A. Cognitive-emotional reactivation during deep transcranial magnetic stimulation over the prefrontal cortex of depressive patients affects antidepressant outcome. J Affect Disord. 2011 Feb;128(3):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.038. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
Related trials for Major Depressive Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
RecruitingPhase 4
Biomarker-Guided Antidepressant Selection
Depression - Major Depressive Disorder, Treatment-resistant Depression (TRD)
Recruiting
Targeting Network Dysfunction in Apathy of Late-life Depression Using Digital Therapeutics
Major Depressive Disorder, Apathy
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Acute Intermittent Hypoxia Therapy for Depression
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marcelo T. Berlim, MD, MSc principal investigator
McGill University & Douglas Mental Health University Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in people with Major Depressive Disorder, run by Douglas Mental Health University Institute at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D21) (time frame: week 5). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01409317, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2015.