Prostate CancerPROMOTENCT01410656
Prostate Cancer Survivors Moving Toward Exercise (PROMOTE) Trial
A study testing Telephone Implementation Intention and Self-completed implementation intention in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of the study is to determine the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity (PA) behaviour in prostate cancer survivors. Secondary aims are to (a) compare the effects of a telephone-assisted implementation intention intervention against a self-administered… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Telephone Implementation Intention and Self-completed implementation intention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 423 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- May 2011to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Prostate cancer survivors
- at least 18 years old
- proficient in English
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Prostate Cancer Survivors MOving Toward Exercise (PROMOTE) Trial
The primary purpose of the study is to determine the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity (PA) behaviour in prostate cancer survivors. Secondary aims are to (a) compare the effects of a telephone-assisted implementation intention intervention against a self-administered implementation intention intervention and a standard recommendation group on physical activity behaviour and (b) document the effects of these interventions on quality of life (QoL), fatigue, symptom management, and physical functioning.
Hypotheses: Evidence exists that an implementation intention intervention can lead to significant improvements in PA levels and that regular PA has been shown to improve QoL, fatigue levels, manage symptoms and improve physical functioning in cancer survivors'. As such, the following hypotheses were generated: (1) prostate cancer survivors exposed to the researcher-assisted implementation intention intervention will have higher PA levels at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups compared to the self-completed implementation intention intervention and the standard recommendation group; (2) prostate cancer survivors in the researcher-assisted implementation intention intervention will show significant improvements in QoL, fatigue levels, symptom management, and physical functioning compared to the self-completed implementation intention intervention and the standard recommendation group at the 1- and 3-month follow-up; and (3) prostate cancer survivors in the self-completed implementation intention intervention will have higher PA levels, and better improvements in QoL, fatigue levels, symptom management, and physical functioning compared to the standard recommendation group at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer among Canadian men, with an estimated 24,600 men being diagnosed in 2010. In Alberta specifically, roughly 2,500 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 440 men will die of the disease in 2010 (Canadian Cancer Society, 2011). Improvements in the treatment of prostate cancer has reduced tumour growth and improved survival rates, however, it has also been associated with significant negative changes in cancer survivors' quality of life, physical functioning, body fat percentage and fatigue levels that may persist for years following treatment. One behavioural strategy that has been consistently shown to combat these negative side effects and enhance psychosocial and physical well-being in prostate cancer survivors is physical activity. Unfortunately it has been established that physical activity levels decline significantly from pre-diagnosis to during treatment and may never regain pre-diagnosis levels; thus it is important to test novel, innovative and inexpensive ways to increase physical activity patterns in prostate cancer survivors.
PURPOSE:
The primary purpose of the study is to determine the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity behaviour in prostate cancer survivors. Secondary aims are to (a) compare the effects of a telephone-assisted implementation intention intervention against a self-administered implementation intention intervention and a standard recommendation group on physical activity behaviour and (b) document the effects of these interventions on quality of life, fatigue, symptom management, and physical functioning.
METHODS:
A three-arm randomized controlled trial for prostate cancer survivors will be performed through the Alberta Cancer Registry. To obtain a sample of at least 300 participants, 1500 prostate cancer survivors will be contacted in the initial mail-out. Following the initial mail-out prostate cancer survivors agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized to one of the three conditions. All groups will receive a written physical activity recommendation, as well as the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines. In addition to the physical activity materials, participants in the telephone-assisted and self-administered groups will be asked to complete an implementation intention intervention. Finally, the telephone-assisted group will receive a 10-20 minute telephone call to assist them with the completion of implementation intention intervention. Measures at baseline (i.e., initial mail-out) will include self-reported physical activity, demographic, health and medical factors, quality of life, fatigue, physical functioning. Follow-up at month 1 and 3 following the intervention will include self-reported physical activity, quality of life, fatigue and physical function measures.
SUMMARY:
This mail-out study will offer insight into the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity levels in an understudied cancer population, and further explore the effect of physical activity as part of the usual care recommended for the treatment of prostate cancer on quality of life, fatigue and symptom management.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Telephone Implementation Intention, Self-completed implementation intention
- Keywords
- Survivors
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telephone Implementation IntentionBehavioural
Telephone implementation intention counseling
Self-completed implementation intentionBehavioural
Self-administered implementation intention intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard PA Recommendation | No intervention | Received the standard physical activity recommendation. |
| Telephone Implementation Intention | Experimental | Behavioural Telephone Assisted Implementation Intention Intervention Receives: Behavioral: Telephone Implementation Intention |
| Self-completed implementation intention | Experimental | Self-administered implementation intention intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Self-completed implementation intention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Physical activity Levels From Baseline to Month 1 and Month 3
Measured by the Leisure score index. Looking for change in Physical Activity levels from baseline to month 1 and month 3 follow-ups.
Measured: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quality of life/ physical functioning
Looking for change in the FACT-P and SF-36.
Measured: baseline, 3 months
fatigue
Looking for change in the FACIT-F
Measured: baseline, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of AlbertaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 423 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alberta
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kerry Courneya, University of Alberta
- Investigators
- Kerry S Courneya, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Alberta
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01410656
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RES-0006611
- Acronym
- PROMOTE
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 19 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 4 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
McGowan EL, Fuller D, Cutumisu N, North S, Courneya KS. The role of the built environment in a randomized controlled trial to increase physical activity among men with prostate cancer: the PROMOTE trial. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):2993-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3798-1. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
PubMed 28656468McGowan EL, North S, Courneya KS. Randomized controlled trial of a behavior change intervention to increase physical activity and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Dec;46(3):382-93. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9519-1.
PubMed 23783829
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prostate Cancer Survivors MOving Toward Exercise (PROMOTE) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01410656
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROMOTE / RES-0006611
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- Survivors
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 423 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of AlbertaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of the study is to determine the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity (PA) behaviour in prostate cancer survivors. Secondary aims are to (a) compare the effects of a telephone-assisted implementation intention intervention against a self-administered implementation intention intervention and a standard recommendation group on physical activity behaviour and (b) document the effects of these interventions on quality of life (QoL), fatigue, symptom management, and physical functioning.
Hypotheses: Evidence exists that an implementation intention intervention can lead to significant improvements in PA levels and that regular PA has been shown to improve QoL, fatigue levels, manage symptoms and improve physical functioning in cancer survivors'. As such, the following hypotheses were generated: (1) prostate cancer survivors exposed to the researcher-assisted implementation intention intervention will have higher PA levels at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups compared to the self-completed implementation intention intervention and the standard recommendation group; (2) prostate cancer survivors in the researcher-assisted implementation intention intervention will show significant improvements in QoL, fatigue levels, symptom management, and physical functioning compared to the self-completed implementation intention intervention and the standard recommendation group at the 1- and 3-month follow-up; and (3) prostate cancer survivors in the self-completed implementation intention intervention will have higher PA levels, and better improvements in QoL, fatigue levels, symptom management, and physical functioning compared to the standard recommendation group at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed cancer among Canadian men, with an estimated 24,600 men being diagnosed in 2010. In Alberta specifically, roughly 2,500 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer, and 440 men will die of the disease in 2010 (Canadian Cancer Society, 2011). Improvements in the treatment of prostate cancer has reduced tumour growth and improved survival rates, however, it has also been associated with significant negative changes in cancer survivors' quality of life, physical functioning, body fat percentage and fatigue levels that may persist for years following treatment. One behavioural strategy that has been consistently shown to combat these negative side effects and enhance psychosocial and physical well-being in prostate cancer survivors is physical activity. Unfortunately it has been established that physical activity levels decline significantly from pre-diagnosis to during treatment and may never regain pre-diagnosis levels; thus it is important to test novel, innovative and inexpensive ways to increase physical activity patterns in prostate cancer survivors.
PURPOSE:
The primary purpose of the study is to determine the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity behaviour in prostate cancer survivors. Secondary aims are to (a) compare the effects of a telephone-assisted implementation intention intervention against a self-administered implementation intention intervention and a standard recommendation group on physical activity behaviour and (b) document the effects of these interventions on quality of life, fatigue, symptom management, and physical functioning.
METHODS:
A three-arm randomized controlled trial for prostate cancer survivors will be performed through the Alberta Cancer Registry. To obtain a sample of at least 300 participants, 1500 prostate cancer survivors will be contacted in the initial mail-out. Following the initial mail-out prostate cancer survivors agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized to one of the three conditions. All groups will receive a written physical activity recommendation, as well as the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines. In addition to the physical activity materials, participants in the telephone-assisted and self-administered groups will be asked to complete an implementation intention intervention. Finally, the telephone-assisted group will receive a 10-20 minute telephone call to assist them with the completion of implementation intention intervention. Measures at baseline (i.e., initial mail-out) will include self-reported physical activity, demographic, health and medical factors, quality of life, fatigue, physical functioning. Follow-up at month 1 and 3 following the intervention will include self-reported physical activity, quality of life, fatigue and physical function measures.
SUMMARY:
This mail-out study will offer insight into the effects of an implementation intention intervention on physical activity levels in an understudied cancer population, and further explore the effect of physical activity as part of the usual care recommended for the treatment of prostate cancer on quality of life, fatigue and symptom management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard PA Recommendation | No intervention | –Received the standard physical activity recommendation. |
| Telephone Implementation Intention | Experimental | Behavioral: Telephone Implementation IntentionBehavioural Telephone Assisted Implementation Intention Intervention |
| Self-completed implementation intention | Experimental | Behavioral: Self-completed implementation intentionSelf-administered implementation intention intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prostate cancer survivors
- at least 18 years old
- proficient in English
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telephone Implementation IntentionTelephone implementation intention counseling | Behavioural | Telephone Implementation Intention |
| Self-completed implementation intentionSelf-administered implementation intention intervention | Behavioural | Self-completed implementation intention |
Primary outcome
Change in Physical activity Levels From Baseline to Month 1 and Month 3
Time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months
Measured by the Leisure score index. Looking for change in Physical Activity levels from baseline to month 1 and month 3 follow-ups.
2 secondary outcomes
Quality of life/ physical functioning
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
fatigue
Time frame: baseline, 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28656468McGowan EL, Fuller D, Cutumisu N, North S, Courneya KS. The role of the built environment in a randomized controlled trial to increase physical activity among men with prostate cancer: the PROMOTE trial. Support Care Cancer. 2017 Oct;25(10):2993-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3798-1. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23783829McGowan EL, North S, Courneya KS. Randomized controlled trial of a behavior change intervention to increase physical activity and quality of life in prostate cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Dec;46(3):382-93. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9519-1.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kerry S Courneya, PhD principal investigator
University of Alberta
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telephone Implementation Intention and Self-completed implementation intention in people with Prostate Cancer, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Physical activity Levels From Baseline to Month 1 and Month 3 (time frame: baseline, 1 month, 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01410656, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2018.