Peripheral Arterial DiseasePhase 4DUR-POPNCT01412450
Efficacity Study With the Protégé EverFlex Stent in Popliteal Lesions
A Phase 4 study testing nitinol stent in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Flanders Medical Research Program at 4 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
This study will assess the results up to 12 months with the Protégé EverFlex stent (ev3) in patients presenting with a narrowing or blocking at the level of the knee artery, which leads to a limited walking distance, rest pain or non-healing ulcers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- What is being tested?
- nitinol stent
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- Jul 2010to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- General Inclusion criteria
- De novo, restenotic or reoccluded lesion located in the popliteal artery, with or without superficial femoral artery involvement
- Patient presenting a score from 2 to 5 following Rutherford classification
- Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
- Patient is >18 years old
- Patient (or their legal representative) understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrolment in the study
Show all 13Show fewer
- Prior to enrollment, the guidewire has crossed target lesion
- Patient is eligible for treatment with the self-expanding nitinol EverFlex (ev3) stent
- Angiographic Inclusion Criteria
- The target lesion has angiographic evidence of stenosis or restenosis > 50% or occlusion which can be passed with standard guidewire manipulation
- The target lesion, visually estimated, has a maximal length of 14 cm and can be categorized as either a type A or B lesions according the TASC II guidelines
- Target vessel diameter visually estimated is >3.5mm and <7.5 mm
- There is angiographic evidence of at least one-vessel-runoff to the foot
Who cannot join
- Presence of another stent in the target vessel that was placed during a previous procedure
- Presence of an aortic thrombosis or significant common femoral ipsilateral stenosis
- Previous by-pass surgery in the same limb
- Patients for whom antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated
- Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus of the proposed lesion site
- Perforation at the angioplasty site evidenced by extravasation of contrast medium
Show all 15Show fewer
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium
- Patients with uncorrected bleeding disorders
- Aneurysm located at the level of the SFA and/or popliteal artery
- Female patient with child bearing potential not taking adequate contraceptives or currently breastfeeding
- Life expectancy of less than twelve months
- Ipsilateral iliac treatment before the target lesion procedure with a residual stenosis > 30% or ipsilateral iliac treatment conducted after the target lesion procedure
- Use of thrombectomy, artherectomy or laser devices during procedure
- Any patient considered to be hemodynamically unstable at onset of procedure
- Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not completed the entire follow up period.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Belgium4 sites
Imeldaziekenhuis
Bonheiden, Antwerp, 2820
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
Dendermonde, East-Flanders, 9200
University Hospital Antwerp
Edegem, Antwerp, 2650
Heilig-Hart Ziekenhuis
Tienen, Flemish Brabant, 3300
About this study
Official title: DURABILITY-POP Study - Physician Initiated Trial Investigating the Efficacy of the Implant of Protégé EverFlex Nitinol Stents in Popliteal Lesions
This study will assess the results up to 12 months with the Protégé EverFlex stent (ev3) in patients presenting with a narrowing or blocking at the level of the knee artery, which leads to a limited walking distance, rest pain or non-healing ulcers.
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Being tested
- nitinol stent
- Keywords
- symptomatic popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion
- Medical subject headings
- Peripheral Arterial Disease, Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
nitinol stentDevice
Also called Protégé EverFlex stent
implantation of one Protégé EverFlex stent
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| nitinol stent | Experimental | Protégé EverFlex stent Receives: Device: nitinol stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
primary patency
primary patency at 12 months, defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without TLR within 12 months
Measured: 12 months post-procedure
Secondary outcomes (5)
Technical success
Technical success, defined as the ability to cross and dilate the lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% and residual stenosis less than 50% by duplex imaging
Measured: 1 day post-procedure
Primary patency rate at 6-, 12-month follow-up.
Patients that present without a hemodynamically significant stenosis at the target area on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without prior TLR are defined as being primary patent.
Measured: 6-, 12-month follow-up
Clinical success
Clinical success at follow-up is defined as an improvement of Rutherford classification at 6-, 12-month follow-up of one class or more as compared to the pre-procedure Rutherford classification.
Measured: 6-, 12-month follow-up
tent fracture rate at 12-month follow-up
Determined according the following classification on x-ray: Class 0 (no strut factures); Class I (single tine fracture); Class II (multiple tine factures); Class III (Stent fracture(s) with preserved alignment of the components); Class IV (Stent fracture(s) with mal-alignment of the components); Class V (Stent fracture(s) in a trans-axial spiral configuration)
Measured: 12-month follow-up
Serious adverse events
Defined as any clinical event that is fatal, life-threatening, or judged to be severe by the investigator; resulted in persistent or significant disability; necessitated surgical or percutaneous intervention; or required prolonged hospitalization.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2010
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peripheral Arterial DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Flanders Medical Research Program
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marc Bosiers, MD, Principal investigator, A.Z. Sint-Blasius
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01412450
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FMRP-100702
- Acronym
- DUR-POP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2010
- Last updated
- 1 Oct 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Oct 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DURABILITY-POP Study - Physician Initiated Trial Investigating the Efficacy of the Implant of Protégé EverFlex Nitinol Stents in Popliteal Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01412450
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DUR-POP / FMRP-100702
- Conditions
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Keywords
- symptomatic popliteal artery stenosis or occlusion
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Flanders Medical Research ProgramResearch network
- Study start
- Jul 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the results up to 12 months with the Protégé EverFlex stent (ev3) in patients presenting with a narrowing or blocking at the level of the knee artery, which leads to a limited walking distance, rest pain or non-healing ulcers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| nitinol stent | Experimental | Device: nitinol stentProtégé EverFlex stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- General Inclusion criteria
- De novo, restenotic or reoccluded lesion located in the popliteal artery, with or without superficial femoral artery involvement
- Patient presenting a score from 2 to 5 following Rutherford classification
- Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
- Patient is >18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Presence of another stent in the target vessel that was placed during a previous procedure
- Presence of an aortic thrombosis or significant common femoral ipsilateral stenosis
- Previous by-pass surgery in the same limb
- Patients for whom antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulants or thrombolytic drugs are contraindicated
- Patients who exhibit persistent acute intraluminal thrombus of the proposed lesion site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| nitinol stentAlso: Protégé EverFlex stentimplantation of one Protégé EverFlex stent | Device | nitinol stent |
Primary outcome
primary patency
Time frame: 12 months post-procedure
primary patency at 12 months, defined as a target lesion without a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) and without TLR within 12 months
5 secondary outcomes
Technical success
Time frame: 1 day post-procedure
Primary patency rate at 6-, 12-month follow-up.
Time frame: 6-, 12-month follow-up
Clinical success
Time frame: 6-, 12-month follow-up
tent fracture rate at 12-month follow-up
Time frame: 12-month follow-up
Serious adverse events
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Oct 2013.
Related trials for Peripheral Arterial Disease
Recruiting
Personalised Multicomponent Exercise Programme in Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Intermittent Claudication
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1b Study of BHV-7000 in Participants With Inherited Erythromelalgia
Familial Erythromelalgia
RecruitingPhase 4
Inclisiran Versus Placebo for the Prevention of Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Limb Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Peripheral Endovascular Intervention
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Peripheral Endovascular Intervention
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Bioequivalence and Safety Study of AJU-B718 and B718R in Healthy Adult Volunteers Under Fasting Conditions
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marc Bosiers, MD principal investigator
A.Z. Sint-Blasius
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing nitinol stent in people with Peripheral Arterial Disease, run by Flanders Medical Research Program at 4 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
primary patency (time frame: 12 months post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2013.