Brain InjuryPariS-TBINCT01437683
PariS-TBI Study : Paris Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Study
An observational study of Brain Injury and Craniocerebral Trauma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the protocol is to study the long-term outcome of a large group of traumatic brain injury patients. This outcome is to be described in terms of activity, participation, quality of life, SOCIO-professional outcome and impact on caregivers, and in relation to health care provision. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Injury, Craniocerebral Trauma, Trauma Nervous System
- How many people
- 252 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Jun 2012
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: traumatic brain injury patients
Who may be able to join
- Adults and children over 15 years old.
- Severe TBI with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less before admission to the hospital.
- Accident within the Regional Parisian area (Paris and 7 surrounding districts).
- Alive at emergency arrival
Who cannot join
- Dead before care by emergency
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
CRFTC Centre Ressources Francilien du Traumatisme Crânien
Paris, 75014
About this study
Official title: Four Year Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Parisian Area
The primary objective of the protocol is to study the long-term outcome of a large group of traumatic brain injury patients.
This outcome is to be described in terms of activity, participation, quality of life, SOCIO-professional outcome and impact on caregivers, and in relation to health care provision.
The secondary outcome is to measure the impact on functional outcome of several predictive factors, and their relative importance on outcome. Our principal hypothesis is that SOCIO-professional and health provision factors play a major role on long-term outcome, further even than initial severity of brain injury.
Read the detailed description
This work represents a part of a larger collaborative prospective study called PariS-TBI (Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Parisian area) financed by the French National Authority for Health. The PariS-TBI study was undertaken in 2005, to provide epidemiological data. Patients aged 15 or more were included if they had sustained a severe TBI in the Parisian area, defined by an initial Coma Glasgow Score (GCS) of 8 or less. During a 20-months period, all consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria were recruited by mobile emergency services. Data from patients' demographics, injury characteristics, acute and post acute phase were collected prospectively. Patients were evaluated through a phone interview at one year post traumatism.
A total of 504 patients were included, of which 257 were alive at the end of acute care.
Investigations of the present work will be undertaken between four and six years after brain injury for survivors. Patients of the initial cohort will be contacted twice through phone call or post. Information about this follow up study will be given orally and through written form. Informed consent of patient or legal advisor will be obtained before setting an appointment for the evaluation.
Evaluation will take place either in the patient's place of living, or in a clinical setting in the hospitals Broussais, Paris, France or Raymond POINCARE, GARCHES, France, according to the patient's choice.
Two trained neuropsychologists will lead the evaluations, during an interview with the patient and the informal care giver, defined as the person (family member or friend), most responsible for day-to-day decision making and care for the patient. If a patient refuses the interview, a short questionnaire will be proposed to him by the neuropsychologist by phone.
Demographic and pre-traumatism clinical data will be available from the initial study, as well as data on type and severity of traumatism, and on evolution during acute care. Early outcome data include cognitive disability (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), global participation (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended), and return to work.
Data assessed through the present study will include an evaluation of deficiencies: presence and importance of motor sequelae, cerebellar dysfunction, visual or auditive deficiencies, epilepsy, chronic pain. Cognitive deficiencies will be assessed through the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised, the Dysexecutive Questionnaire, and a questionnaire of complaints from the patient and from his informal care giver.
Activities will be evaluated by the Barthel index. Capacity of motor vehicle driving will be assessed. Participations will be measured globally with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and specifically by a SOCIO-professional integration questionnaire and the BICRO-39 scale.
Quality of life will be assessed through the EuroQoL questionnaire, and a global evaluation of the patient's quality of life on a 0-10 numeric scale from the patient and from his care giver. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score will be measured.
Data on patients' pathway and intensity of clinical care will be collected: the clinical pathway from acute care to home or health care facility discharge, a quantification of clinical follow up and rehabilitation. The patient's environment (place of living, presence of informal carers) will be assessed, as well as modality of return to work.
The questionnaire will include data on financial compensations and intensity of formal home care.
Data on the quality of life of the informal care giver and an evaluation of the burden of care will be collected, using the ZARIT questionnaire.
The exploitation of this large data base will enable an up-to-date description of the long term outcomes of severe TBI patients in the Parisian area. It will be used to clarify the role of several factors on long term activities, participations and quality of life for severe TBI patients, the hypothesis being that factors directly related to the severity of the traumatism play a smaller role in long term outcome than SOCIO-environmental characteristics such as professional category, intensity of rehabilitation care, presence of informal care.
Statistical analysis will be conducted with the R® statistical software. Association between various predictive factors and outcome (GOSE, BICRO-39, EuroQoL) will be assessed through UNIVARIOUS tests, followed by multivarious regression models, using a backward selection strategy to select relevant variables.
- Conditions
- Brain Injury, Craniocerebral Trauma, Trauma Nervous System
- Keywords
- Craniocerebral Trauma, Quality of life, Long term outcome, Activities of Daily Living, Cognitive Deficiency, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries, Craniocerebral Trauma, Trauma, Nervous System
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| traumatic brain injury patients | a large group of traumatic brain injury patients |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
Between 3 to 5 years post-traumatism
Measured: five years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised
Measured: Five years
Dysexecutive Questionnaire
Measured: Five years
Questionnaire of complaints (patient and care giver)
Measured: Five years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionOct 2011
- Study completionJun 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain InjuryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France, CRFTC, Caisse Nationale de Solidarité pour l'Autonomie, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, HAS, DREES
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe AZOUVI, PU-PH, Principal investigator, APHP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01437683
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009-A01122-55
- Acronym
- PariS-TBI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2010
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Camara-Costa H, Dellatolas G, Jourdan C, Ruet A, Bayen E, Vallat-Azouvi C, Allain P, Chevignard M, Azouvi P. The 20-item dysexecutive questionnaire after severe traumatic brain injury: Distribution of the total score and its significance. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(5):1059-1080. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2387065. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
PubMed 39106184Vallee F, Nougue H, Cartailler J, Kounde PR, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Azouvi P, Mateo J. The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):229-237. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003515. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
PubMed 35001023
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Four Year Outcome After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Parisian Area
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01437683
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PariS-TBI / 2009-A01122-55
- Conditions
- Brain Injury, Craniocerebral Trauma, Trauma Nervous System
- Keywords
- Craniocerebral Trauma, Quality of life, Long term outcome, Activities of Daily Living, Cognitive Deficiency, Health Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 252 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut de Recherche en Santé Publique, France, CRFTC, Caisse Nationale de Solidarité pour l'Autonomie, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France, HAS, DREES
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- Oct 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the protocol is to study the long-term outcome of a large group of traumatic brain injury patients.
This outcome is to be described in terms of activity, participation, quality of life, SOCIO-professional outcome and impact on caregivers, and in relation to health care provision.
The secondary outcome is to measure the impact on functional outcome of several predictive factors, and their relative importance on outcome. Our principal hypothesis is that SOCIO-professional and health provision factors play a major role on long-term outcome, further even than initial severity of brain injury.
Detailed description
This work represents a part of a larger collaborative prospective study called PariS-TBI (Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in the Parisian area) financed by the French National Authority for Health. The PariS-TBI study was undertaken in 2005, to provide epidemiological data. Patients aged 15 or more were included if they had sustained a severe TBI in the Parisian area, defined by an initial Coma Glasgow Score (GCS) of 8 or less. During a 20-months period, all consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria were recruited by mobile emergency services. Data from patients' demographics, injury characteristics, acute and post acute phase were collected prospectively. Patients were evaluated through a phone interview at one year post traumatism.
A total of 504 patients were included, of which 257 were alive at the end of acute care.
Investigations of the present work will be undertaken between four and six years after brain injury for survivors. Patients of the initial cohort will be contacted twice through phone call or post. Information about this follow up study will be given orally and through written form. Informed consent of patient or legal advisor will be obtained before setting an appointment for the evaluation.
Evaluation will take place either in the patient's place of living, or in a clinical setting in the hospitals Broussais, Paris, France or Raymond POINCARE, GARCHES, France, according to the patient's choice.
Two trained neuropsychologists will lead the evaluations, during an interview with the patient and the informal care giver, defined as the person (family member or friend), most responsible for day-to-day decision making and care for the patient. If a patient refuses the interview, a short questionnaire will be proposed to him by the neuropsychologist by phone.
Demographic and pre-traumatism clinical data will be available from the initial study, as well as data on type and severity of traumatism, and on evolution during acute care. Early outcome data include cognitive disability (Dysexecutive Questionnaire), global participation (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended), and return to work.
Data assessed through the present study will include an evaluation of deficiencies: presence and importance of motor sequelae, cerebellar dysfunction, visual or auditive deficiencies, epilepsy, chronic pain. Cognitive deficiencies will be assessed through the Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised, the Dysexecutive Questionnaire, and a questionnaire of complaints from the patient and from his informal care giver.
Activities will be evaluated by the Barthel index. Capacity of motor vehicle driving will be assessed. Participations will be measured globally with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and specifically by a SOCIO-professional integration questionnaire and the BICRO-39 scale.
Quality of life will be assessed through the EuroQoL questionnaire, and a global evaluation of the patient's quality of life on a 0-10 numeric scale from the patient and from his care giver. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score will be measured.
Data on patients' pathway and intensity of clinical care will be collected: the clinical pathway from acute care to home or health care facility discharge, a quantification of clinical follow up and rehabilitation. The patient's environment (place of living, presence of informal carers) will be assessed, as well as modality of return to work.
The questionnaire will include data on financial compensations and intensity of formal home care.
Data on the quality of life of the informal care giver and an evaluation of the burden of care will be collected, using the ZARIT questionnaire.
The exploitation of this large data base will enable an up-to-date description of the long term outcomes of severe TBI patients in the Parisian area. It will be used to clarify the role of several factors on long term activities, participations and quality of life for severe TBI patients, the hypothesis being that factors directly related to the severity of the traumatism play a smaller role in long term outcome than SOCIO-environmental characteristics such as professional category, intensity of rehabilitation care, presence of informal care.
Statistical analysis will be conducted with the R® statistical software. Association between various predictive factors and outcome (GOSE, BICRO-39, EuroQoL) will be assessed through UNIVARIOUS tests, followed by multivarious regression models, using a backward selection strategy to select relevant variables.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| traumatic brain injury patients | – | –a large group of traumatic brain injury patients |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- traumatic brain injury patients
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults and children over 15 years old.
- Severe TBI with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 8 or less before admission to the hospital.
- Accident within the Regional Parisian area (Paris and 7 surrounding districts).
- Alive at emergency arrival
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Dead before care by emergency
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
Time frame: five years
Between 3 to 5 years post-traumatism
3 secondary outcomes
Neurobehavioural Rating Scale-Revised
Time frame: Five years
Dysexecutive Questionnaire
Time frame: Five years
Questionnaire of complaints (patient and care giver)
Time frame: Five years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2012.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39106184Camara-Costa H, Dellatolas G, Jourdan C, Ruet A, Bayen E, Vallat-Azouvi C, Allain P, Chevignard M, Azouvi P. The 20-item dysexecutive questionnaire after severe traumatic brain injury: Distribution of the total score and its significance. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2025 Jun;35(5):1059-1080. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2024.2387065. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35001023Vallee F, Nougue H, Cartailler J, Kounde PR, Mebazaa A, Gayat E, Azouvi P, Mateo J. The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):229-237. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003515. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
Related trials for Brain Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Changes in Land-Based Motor Function After Routine Hydrotherapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Assessment of Traumatic Brain Injury Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulated Evoked Potentials
Traumatic Brain Injury
RecruitingObservational study
CoMind Early Feasibility Study
Intracranial Pressure, Intracranial Pressure Changes
Recruiting
MindEx: A Novel, Multifocal, Cognitive Brain-Machine Interface System
Paralysis; Quadriplegic, Quadraplegia
Enrolling by invitation
Improving In-hospital and Post-discharge Patient Education for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Concussion, Mild, Traumatic Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe AZOUVI, PU-PH principal investigator
APHP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Brain Injury and Craniocerebral Trauma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (time frame: five years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01437683, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2012.