Trigeminal NeuralgiaPhase 4NCT01447108
Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound in Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
A Phase 4 study testing Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™) in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia and Tic Douloureux, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
The "Suicide Disease", Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is arguably caused by one of the most discrete and eloquently reversible central nervous system lesions known to the field of neurology. Recently Dr Adahan H. and Dr Binshtok A. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Tic Douloureux
- What is being tested?
- Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia refractory to medical treatment (modified BNI V).
Who cannot join
- Male or female, under the age of 18.
- Active illicit drug use
- Pregnancy.
- Psychiatric illness which may prevent the patient from participation in the study.
- Anesthesia dolorosa with pain greater than or equal to 3/10
- Dental implants.
- Other known pathology of the trigeminal nerve including iatrogenic anesthesia dolorosa.
- Cancer and bone metastases.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Examining the Efficacy of Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound(LILF/SAWU) in Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
The "Suicide Disease", Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is arguably caused by one of the most discrete and eloquently reversible central nervous system lesions known to the field of neurology.
Recently Dr Adahan H. and Dr Binshtok A. have completed an open label series of 25 subjects with refractory TN showing a remarkable positive response rate to TN's treatment with Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU).
Read more
The primary objective of this study, therefore, is to determine whether this apparent efficacy of Low Intensity Low Frequency Ultrasound (LILFU) in the treatment of TN pain could withstand the rigors of an n=1 crossover placebo control study.
Participants with refractory trigeminal neuralgia pain despite optimized pharmacotherapy for at least six months will be screened for participation in the study based on rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. It is judged rather unlikely that such subjects will experience spontaneous regression of their disease in the course of this study.
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be treated with four weeks of a placebo Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU) device while continuing with their pharmaco-analgesic regimen. All patients will be crossed over to active LILF/SAWU therapy for the next four weeks. Patients will be blinded to all treatments throughout the study. Patients will be instructed to use the device daily overnight, and remove it upon wakening. The device is programmed to work in cycles of 30 minutes on and 30 minutes off, for a total of six- eight hours of intermittent treatment.
At the end of the second month of the study, patients will be offered a choice as to whether they wished to continue with the current (active) device or go back to the 1st (sham) device.
Patient's pain severity will be tracked every two weeks over the course of three months. Functional health and well being will be monitored at intake, post "Placebo" period, post "Active" period and at completion of the study.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is one of the most severe and progressive forms of chronic neuropathic pain. The latest scientific work has shown that the most likely cause of TN is a highly reversible tiny central nervous system (CNS) lesion at the root entry zone (REZ) of the trigeminal nerve measuring less than 0.5 cm cubed. The presence of a discrete, highly eloquent and highly reversible central nervous system (CNS) lesion presents a unique opportunity to test and measure the neuroegenerative potential of therapeutic modalities that can be effectively delivered to the site of this pathology. Ultrasound has been shown to be an effective treatment for the demyelination found in carpal tunnel syndrome in man ( Ebenbicher , Resch , Nicolakis, Weisinger ,Uhl, Ghanemm and Fialka 1998) , with numerous research studies showing its ability to accelerate peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery in rats(Crisci and Ferreria, 2002). There is also a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound in facilitating wound healing and analgesia. Numerous published research studies of ultrasound, and specifically LILFU, have provided Level 1 evidence of efficacy in bone healing, prevention and treatment of fracture non-union, acceleration of fracture healing, and it is also showing promise in the field of tendon healing. (Campbell C.K and Jorns 2007). In vitro, low-intensity ultrasound, has been shown to have direct non thermal effects on cell physiology, stimulating the expression of numerous genes involved in the healing process, including aggrecan, an insulin-like growth factor, transforming collagen, nitric oxide synthase, cytokines, and angiogenesis (Devor, Amir and Rappaport , 2002). A dynamic balance appears to exist between ongoing neural damage from the repetitive mechanical stress at the sight of neurovascular compression and the ongoing efforts of the LILFU to repair the damage via endogenous remyelination. The investigators hypothesize that the nature of this balance may determine whether the TN sufferer finds himself in either a TN pain crisis or remission. This would explain the remission recurrence pattern typically seen in the early course of the disease as well as the progressive nature of the illness, which may be attributable to the progressive effect of repetitive micro-injury. It is possible that LILF/SAWU might be the catalyst in promoting neuroregeneration thus helping induce and sustain remission
- Rationale of the study TN, a form of neuropathic pain, is generally considered one of the most severe and life disrupting pains known to patients. Unfortunately, in most people, TN is a progressive illness that intensifies and becomes more difficult to control over the years. Medication, although often initially affective, usually loses its effectiveness over the trajectory course of the illness. Each patient with TN has a different response to these medications and to his/her pain, but over the years of disease progression, many will eventually find that medications do not adequately control their progressively worsening condition. (Zakrezewska and Linskey, 2009) Medication has not been shown to slow the progression of the disease. On the contrary, over the years, many people find themselves having to take higher doses of medication or having to take several different medications together to control their pain with a resultant accumulation of problematic side effects. Eventually, over the long term, more than half of trigeminal neuralgia patients will seek a surgical solution to manage their pain.(Zakrezewska et al.2009) There is a growing emphasis and desire for minimally invasive therapy and treatments of all abnormal pathologies and disease particularly TN. Although stereotactic radio-surgery is presently one of the least invasive procedures, it does have some potentially serious adverse effect, such as permanent nerve damage, causing weakness and sensory impairment, and in some cases anesthesia dolorosa, which can also occur with all ablative procedures (Emril and Ho, 2010) As stated earlier, this intractable pain appears due to a highly reversible micro lesion in the CNS at the REZ of the trigeminal nerve is considered to be the result of focal microvascular compression. The resulting demyelination and dysmyelination contributes to ephatic transmission between large myelinated fibers and pain conducting C-fibers possibly triggered by the pulsatile compression of the artery against the injured nerve. The reversibility of this small CNS injury is witnessed by the rapid onset of recovery of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP's) measured pre-operatively at the time of surgical decompression as well as by the fact that anatomical studies show little axon-notmesis.( Leandri 2002 , Devor 2002 and Love, 1998) ) Our hypothesis is that the initial intermittent nature of TN pain is witness to the delicate balance between repetitive injury to the REZ of the trigeminal nerve and the bodies inherent ability to overcome it as shown by anatomical studies showing signs of remyelination. The presence of a discrete yet highly reversible CNS lesion presents a unique opportunity for our future research to test and objectively measure the neuroregenerative potential of therapeutic modalities that can be effectively delivered to the site of this pathology in an attempt to reinforce the potential of the CNS to regenerate the CNS myelin destroyed by this disease. Today, there are no readily accessible therapies for central or peripheral neuropathic pain that hold the promise of facilitating neuroregeneration. Ultrasound delivered to injured nerves has been shown in five animal studies in the past eight years to have neuroregenerative capacities and has also been associated with improved remyelination in carpal tunnel syndrome in humans in one RCT (Ebenbicher , Resch , Nicolakis, Weisinger ,Uhl, Ghanemm and Fialka 1998) Ultrasound delivered to injured nerves has been shown in several studies to reverse nerve damage commonly seen in the trigeminal nerve of patient's with TN.(Crisci 2002, Chang 2004, Mourad 2001, Paik 2002, Zhou 2006) Traditional high energy, high frequency bulk wave ultrasound devices does not penetrate the cranium and cannot, therefore, be used for treating the REZ of the trigeminal ganglion. Until the advent of the Painshield™ device, low intensity, low frequency surface acoustic wave ultrasound technology (LILF/SAWU) had not been applied in the field of medicine. It is, however, ever-present in cell phone devices' electronic circuits (Campell C.K). Based on the known physical properties of SAW acoustics, it is expected that when a SAW transducer is applied to a surface which has underlying bone, such as the forehead, the energy spreads over the entire surface of the bony skull and its internal foramina. It is efficiently transmitted via the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to the CNS structures situated close to or beside the bony structures. Hence, the REZ and ganglion of the trigeminal nerve, as well as the entire length of all its branches, are exposed to potentially healing acoustic ultrasound energy. The PainShieldTM system is a novel, patch based therapeutic ultrasound product, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of painful conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia. The device is a portable and battery powered and can be connected to a disposable patch through which it delivers localized energy creating waves, which affect localized pain and induce soft tissue healing. This is made possible due to the company's proprietary technology which allows for the creation of a therapeutic transducer that can be made disposable and incorporated into a patch. Until the Painshield™ technology came to light; there was no available ultrasound device that could safely deliver surface acoustic ultrasound technology intracranially, for up to several hours daily. In this single blinded crossover study, the investigators aim to determine the effectiveness of Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU) in the treatment of TN pain.
- Objectives and Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Low Intensity Low Frequency Ultrasound Surface Acoustic Wave (LILFU/SAW) in the treatment of TN using a single blind n=1 cross over study design. Our hypothesis (H1) is that LILFU treatment, via Painshield™, will provide pain relief in patients suffering with chronic TN as measured by the modified Barrow Neurological Index score. The investigators further hypothesize (H2) that following this relief in pain the TN sufferers will enjoy improved functional health and well being as measured by the SF-36. This in turn will lead to a further hypothesis (H3) that the TN sufferers will reduce the amount of medication they consume each month, as reported by the participants themselves.
- Study Design:
The study is designed as a single blind crossover trial. This design was chosen because TN is a rare disease and recruitment of adequate subjects for a formal RCT would prove too difficult. Subjects diagnosed with refractory TN for at least six months despite currently undergoing optimized pharmacotherapy (BNI V) will be treated with four weeks of a placebo PainSheield™ while continuing with their current pharmaco- analgesic regimen. All patients will be crossed over to active Painshield™ therapy for the next four weeks. They will apply the Painshield™ patch to their forehead for six-eight hours a night (depends on how many hours they sleep) for the four weeks.
At the end of the second month of the study, patients will be offered to either continue with active PainShield™ treatment for the third and final month, or return to the "sham" PainShield™ treatment.
Assessment of pain via the BNI index and Short form MCGILL Pain Questionnaire ("SFMPQ") will be recorded at two week intervals throughout the three months of the study. Functional health and wellbeing will be measured by the SF-36 Questionnaire at intake, cross over time (initial four weeks), post "Active" treatment and at the end of the three month study period.
Statistical Analysis:
The following parameters will be calculated:
- Mean scores of the Barrow Neurological Index.
- Mean scores for each SF-36 dimensions (General health, role limitation due to a physical problem, physical function and bodily pain).
- Percentage of patients who chose to continue with the active Painshield™ treatment for further four weeks.
- Proportion/ percentage of BNI scores- Initial response to treatment will be defined as an improvement in patient-reported BNI score to a level of BNI< IIIB.
Comparisons of BNI scores between groups will be evaluated using following statistical tests: independent paired T-test for SF-36 scores, Wilcoxon test for BNI scores, and Chi-Square test in order to calculate the proportion of BNI scores.
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Tic Douloureux
- Being tested
- Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™)
- Keywords
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Tic Douloureux, Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound
- Medical subject headings
- Trigeminal Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™)Device
Also called PainShield™
All subjects will be treated four weeks with a placebo PainShield™ while continuing with their current pharmaco- analgesic regimen. Aferterwards all subjects will be crossed over to active Painshield™ therapy for the next four weeks.
The Painshield™ device is a patch, which will be applied to their forehead for six-eight hours during night while sleeping.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TN patients | Experimental | Patients suffering from Trigeminal neuralgia Receives: Device: Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Level of pain
Barrow Neurological Index score (BNI ) pain intensity scale will be used
Measured: Change in level of pain from baseline to after two months of treatment
Pain intensity and quality of pain
"SFMPQ" - Short form MCGILL Pain Questionnaire will be used.
Measured: Change in intensity and quality of pain from baseline to after two months of treatment
Functional Health and Wellbeing
SF-36 Questionnaire will be used
Measured: Change in functional health and wellbeing from baseline to after two months of treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (18)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Trigeminal NeuralgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sheba Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr. Manuel Zwecker MD, Sheba Medical Center
- Investigators
- Manuel Zwecker, MD, Principal investigator, Sheba Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01447108
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SHEBA-8601-11-MZ-CTIL
- Status last verified
- Dec 2012
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 27 Dec 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Crisci AR, Ferreira AL. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates the regeneration of the sciatic nerve after neurotomy in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002 Oct;28(10):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00576-8.
PubMed 12467860Chang CJ, Hsu SH. The effects of low-intensity ultrasound on peripheral nerve regeneration in poly(DL-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) conduits seeded with Schwann cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Aug;30(8):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.06.005.
PubMed 15474752Mourad PD, Lazar DA, Curra FP, Mohr BC, Andrus KC, Avellino AM, McNutt LD, Crum LA, Kliot M. Ultrasound accelerates functional recovery after peripheral nerve damage. Neurosurgery. 2001 May;48(5):1136-40; discussion 1140-1. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200105000-00035.
PubMed 11334281Paik NJ, Cho SH, Han TR. Ultrasound therapy facilitates the recovery of acute pressure-induced conduction block of the median nerve in rabbits. Muscle Nerve. 2002 Sep;26(3):356-61. doi: 10.1002/mus.10209.
PubMed 12210364Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, Wiesinger GF, Uhl F, Ghanem AH, Fialka V. Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised "sham" controlled trial. BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):731-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.731.
PubMed 9529407Campbell C. K. Surface Acoustic wave devices for mobile and wireless communications. Chapter-Fundamentals of surface acoustic waves and devices. Academic press NY p20-25.
Jorns TP, Zakrzewska JM. Evidence-based approach to the medical management of trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;21(3):253-61. doi: 10.1080/02688690701219175.
PubMed 17612914Devor M, Amir R, Rappaport ZH. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain. 2002 Jan-Feb;18(1):4-13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002.
PubMed 11803297Leandri M, Eldridge P, Miles J. Recovery of nerve conduction following microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1641-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.6.1641.
PubMed 9855516Devor M, Govrin-Lippmann R, Rappaport ZH. Mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia: an ultrastructural analysis of trigeminal root specimens obtained during microvascular decompression surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002 Mar;96(3):532-43. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.3.0532.
PubMed 11883839Love S, Hilton DA, Coakham HB. Central demyelination of the Vth nerve root in trigeminal neuralgia associated with vascular compression. Brain Pathol. 1998 Jan;8(1):1-11; discussion 11-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00126.x.
PubMed 9458161Poole HM, Murphy P, Nurmikko TJ. Development and preliminary validation of the NePIQoL: a quality-of-life measure for neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Feb;37(2):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
PubMed 18676118Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1013-9. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(00)00513-7.
PubMed 10863073Azar M, Yahyavi ST, Bitaraf MA, Gazik FK, Allahverdi M, Shahbazi S, Alikhani M. Gamma knife radiosurgery in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: quality of life, outcomes, and complications. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 Feb;111(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2008.09.020. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
PubMed 18995955Lewin-Epstein N, Sagiv-Schifter T, Shabtai EL, Shmueli A. Validation of the 36-item short-form Health Survey (Hebrew version) in the adult population of Israel. Med Care. 1998 Sep;36(9):1361-70. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199809000-00008.
PubMed 9749659
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Dec 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Examining the Efficacy of Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound(LILF/SAWU) in Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01447108
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SHEBA-8601-11-MZ-CTIL
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Tic Douloureux
- Keywords
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Tic Douloureux, Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sheba Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The "Suicide Disease", Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) is arguably caused by one of the most discrete and eloquently reversible central nervous system lesions known to the field of neurology.
Recently Dr Adahan H. and Dr Binshtok A. have completed an open label series of 25 subjects with refractory TN showing a remarkable positive response rate to TN's treatment with Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU).
The primary objective of this study, therefore, is to determine whether this apparent efficacy of Low Intensity Low Frequency Ultrasound (LILFU) in the treatment of TN pain could withstand the rigors of an n=1 crossover placebo control study.
Participants with refractory trigeminal neuralgia pain despite optimized pharmacotherapy for at least six months will be screened for participation in the study based on rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria. It is judged rather unlikely that such subjects will experience spontaneous regression of their disease in the course of this study.
Patients meeting the inclusion criteria will be treated with four weeks of a placebo Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU) device while continuing with their pharmaco-analgesic regimen. All patients will be crossed over to active LILF/SAWU therapy for the next four weeks. Patients will be blinded to all treatments throughout the study. Patients will be instructed to use the device daily overnight, and remove it upon wakening. The device is programmed to work in cycles of 30 minutes on and 30 minutes off, for a total of six- eight hours of intermittent treatment.
At the end of the second month of the study, patients will be offered a choice as to whether they wished to continue with the current (active) device or go back to the 1st (sham) device.
Patient's pain severity will be tracked every two weeks over the course of three months. Functional health and well being will be monitored at intake, post "Placebo" period, post "Active" period and at completion of the study.
Detailed description
- Introduction: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is one of the most severe and progressive forms of chronic neuropathic pain. The latest scientific work has shown that the most likely cause of TN is a highly reversible tiny central nervous system (CNS) lesion at the root entry zone (REZ) of the trigeminal nerve measuring less than 0.5 cm cubed. The presence of a discrete, highly eloquent and highly reversible central nervous system (CNS) lesion presents a unique opportunity to test and measure the neuroegenerative potential of therapeutic modalities that can be effectively delivered to the site of this pathology. Ultrasound has been shown to be an effective treatment for the demyelination found in carpal tunnel syndrome in man ( Ebenbicher , Resch , Nicolakis, Weisinger ,Uhl, Ghanemm and Fialka 1998) , with numerous research studies showing its ability to accelerate peripheral nerve regeneration and functional recovery in rats(Crisci and Ferreria, 2002). There is also a growing body of scientific evidence demonstrating the efficacy of ultrasound in facilitating wound healing and analgesia. Numerous published research studies of ultrasound, and specifically LILFU, have provided Level 1 evidence of efficacy in bone healing, prevention and treatment of fracture non-union, acceleration of fracture healing, and it is also showing promise in the field of tendon healing. (Campbell C.K and Jorns 2007). In vitro, low-intensity ultrasound, has been shown to have direct non thermal effects on cell physiology, stimulating the expression of numerous genes involved in the healing process, including aggrecan, an insulin-like growth factor, transforming collagen, nitric oxide synthase, cytokines, and angiogenesis (Devor, Amir and Rappaport , 2002). A dynamic balance appears to exist between ongoing neural damage from the repetitive mechanical stress at the sight of neurovascular compression and the ongoing efforts of the LILFU to repair the damage via endogenous remyelination. The investigators hypothesize that the nature of this balance may determine whether the TN sufferer finds himself in either a TN pain crisis or remission. This would explain the remission recurrence pattern typically seen in the early course of the disease as well as the progressive nature of the illness, which may be attributable to the progressive effect of repetitive micro-injury. It is possible that LILF/SAWU might be the catalyst in promoting neuroregeneration thus helping induce and sustain remission
- Rationale of the study TN, a form of neuropathic pain, is generally considered one of the most severe and life disrupting pains known to patients. Unfortunately, in most people, TN is a progressive illness that intensifies and becomes more difficult to control over the years. Medication, although often initially affective, usually loses its effectiveness over the trajectory course of the illness. Each patient with TN has a different response to these medications and to his/her pain, but over the years of disease progression, many will eventually find that medications do not adequately control their progressively worsening condition. (Zakrezewska and Linskey, 2009) Medication has not been shown to slow the progression of the disease. On the contrary, over the years, many people find themselves having to take higher doses of medication or having to take several different medications together to control their pain with a resultant accumulation of problematic side effects. Eventually, over the long term, more than half of trigeminal neuralgia patients will seek a surgical solution to manage their pain.(Zakrezewska et al.2009) There is a growing emphasis and desire for minimally invasive therapy and treatments of all abnormal pathologies and disease particularly TN. Although stereotactic radio-surgery is presently one of the least invasive procedures, it does have some potentially serious adverse effect, such as permanent nerve damage, causing weakness and sensory impairment, and in some cases anesthesia dolorosa, which can also occur with all ablative procedures (Emril and Ho, 2010) As stated earlier, this intractable pain appears due to a highly reversible micro lesion in the CNS at the REZ of the trigeminal nerve is considered to be the result of focal microvascular compression. The resulting demyelination and dysmyelination contributes to ephatic transmission between large myelinated fibers and pain conducting C-fibers possibly triggered by the pulsatile compression of the artery against the injured nerve. The reversibility of this small CNS injury is witnessed by the rapid onset of recovery of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP's) measured pre-operatively at the time of surgical decompression as well as by the fact that anatomical studies show little axon-notmesis.( Leandri 2002 , Devor 2002 and Love, 1998) ) Our hypothesis is that the initial intermittent nature of TN pain is witness to the delicate balance between repetitive injury to the REZ of the trigeminal nerve and the bodies inherent ability to overcome it as shown by anatomical studies showing signs of remyelination. The presence of a discrete yet highly reversible CNS lesion presents a unique opportunity for our future research to test and objectively measure the neuroregenerative potential of therapeutic modalities that can be effectively delivered to the site of this pathology in an attempt to reinforce the potential of the CNS to regenerate the CNS myelin destroyed by this disease. Today, there are no readily accessible therapies for central or peripheral neuropathic pain that hold the promise of facilitating neuroregeneration. Ultrasound delivered to injured nerves has been shown in five animal studies in the past eight years to have neuroregenerative capacities and has also been associated with improved remyelination in carpal tunnel syndrome in humans in one RCT (Ebenbicher , Resch , Nicolakis, Weisinger ,Uhl, Ghanemm and Fialka 1998) Ultrasound delivered to injured nerves has been shown in several studies to reverse nerve damage commonly seen in the trigeminal nerve of patient's with TN.(Crisci 2002, Chang 2004, Mourad 2001, Paik 2002, Zhou 2006) Traditional high energy, high frequency bulk wave ultrasound devices does not penetrate the cranium and cannot, therefore, be used for treating the REZ of the trigeminal ganglion. Until the advent of the Painshield™ device, low intensity, low frequency surface acoustic wave ultrasound technology (LILF/SAWU) had not been applied in the field of medicine. It is, however, ever-present in cell phone devices' electronic circuits (Campell C.K). Based on the known physical properties of SAW acoustics, it is expected that when a SAW transducer is applied to a surface which has underlying bone, such as the forehead, the energy spreads over the entire surface of the bony skull and its internal foramina. It is efficiently transmitted via the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to the CNS structures situated close to or beside the bony structures. Hence, the REZ and ganglion of the trigeminal nerve, as well as the entire length of all its branches, are exposed to potentially healing acoustic ultrasound energy. The PainShieldTM system is a novel, patch based therapeutic ultrasound product, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for the treatment of painful conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia. The device is a portable and battery powered and can be connected to a disposable patch through which it delivers localized energy creating waves, which affect localized pain and induce soft tissue healing. This is made possible due to the company's proprietary technology which allows for the creation of a therapeutic transducer that can be made disposable and incorporated into a patch. Until the Painshield™ technology came to light; there was no available ultrasound device that could safely deliver surface acoustic ultrasound technology intracranially, for up to several hours daily. In this single blinded crossover study, the investigators aim to determine the effectiveness of Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (LILF/SAWU) in the treatment of TN pain.
- Objectives and Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of Low Intensity Low Frequency Ultrasound Surface Acoustic Wave (LILFU/SAW) in the treatment of TN using a single blind n=1 cross over study design. Our hypothesis (H1) is that LILFU treatment, via Painshield™, will provide pain relief in patients suffering with chronic TN as measured by the modified Barrow Neurological Index score. The investigators further hypothesize (H2) that following this relief in pain the TN sufferers will enjoy improved functional health and well being as measured by the SF-36. This in turn will lead to a further hypothesis (H3) that the TN sufferers will reduce the amount of medication they consume each month, as reported by the participants themselves.
- Study Design:
The study is designed as a single blind crossover trial. This design was chosen because TN is a rare disease and recruitment of adequate subjects for a formal RCT would prove too difficult. Subjects diagnosed with refractory TN for at least six months despite currently undergoing optimized pharmacotherapy (BNI V) will be treated with four weeks of a placebo PainSheield™ while continuing with their current pharmaco- analgesic regimen. All patients will be crossed over to active Painshield™ therapy for the next four weeks. They will apply the Painshield™ patch to their forehead for six-eight hours a night (depends on how many hours they sleep) for the four weeks.
At the end of the second month of the study, patients will be offered to either continue with active PainShield™ treatment for the third and final month, or return to the "sham" PainShield™ treatment.
Assessment of pain via the BNI index and Short form MCGILL Pain Questionnaire ("SFMPQ") will be recorded at two week intervals throughout the three months of the study. Functional health and wellbeing will be measured by the SF-36 Questionnaire at intake, cross over time (initial four weeks), post "Active" treatment and at the end of the three month study period.
Statistical Analysis:
The following parameters will be calculated:
- Mean scores of the Barrow Neurological Index.
- Mean scores for each SF-36 dimensions (General health, role limitation due to a physical problem, physical function and bodily pain).
- Percentage of patients who chose to continue with the active Painshield™ treatment for further four weeks.
- Proportion/ percentage of BNI scores- Initial response to treatment will be defined as an improvement in patient-reported BNI score to a level of BNI< IIIB.
Comparisons of BNI scores between groups will be evaluated using following statistical tests: independent paired T-test for SF-36 scores, Wilcoxon test for BNI scores, and Chi-Square test in order to calculate the proportion of BNI scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TN patients | Experimental | Device: Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™)Patients suffering from Trigeminal neuralgia |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia refractory to medical treatment (modified BNI V).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female, under the age of 18.
- Active illicit drug use
- Pregnancy.
- Psychiatric illness which may prevent the patient from participation in the study.
- Anesthesia dolorosa with pain greater than or equal to 3/10
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™)Also: PainShield™All subjects will be treated four weeks with a placebo PainShield™ while continuing with their current pharmaco- analgesic regimen. Aferterwards all subjects will be crossed over to active Painshield™ therapy for the next four weeks. The Painshield™ device is a patch, which will be applied to their forehead for six-eight hours during night while sleeping. | Device | TN patients |
Primary outcome
Level of pain
Time frame: Change in level of pain from baseline to after two months of treatment
Barrow Neurological Index score (BNI ) pain intensity scale will be used
Pain intensity and quality of pain
Time frame: Change in intensity and quality of pain from baseline to after two months of treatment
"SFMPQ" - Short form MCGILL Pain Questionnaire will be used.
Functional Health and Wellbeing
Time frame: Change in functional health and wellbeing from baseline to after two months of treatment
SF-36 Questionnaire will be used
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Dec 2012.
- Background: PubMed 12467860Crisci AR, Ferreira AL. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates the regeneration of the sciatic nerve after neurotomy in rats. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002 Oct;28(10):1335-41. doi: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00576-8.
- Background: PubMed 15474752Chang CJ, Hsu SH. The effects of low-intensity ultrasound on peripheral nerve regeneration in poly(DL-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) conduits seeded with Schwann cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004 Aug;30(8):1079-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.06.005.
- Background: PubMed 11334281Mourad PD, Lazar DA, Curra FP, Mohr BC, Andrus KC, Avellino AM, McNutt LD, Crum LA, Kliot M. Ultrasound accelerates functional recovery after peripheral nerve damage. Neurosurgery. 2001 May;48(5):1136-40; discussion 1140-1. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200105000-00035.
- Background: PubMed 12210364Paik NJ, Cho SH, Han TR. Ultrasound therapy facilitates the recovery of acute pressure-induced conduction block of the median nerve in rabbits. Muscle Nerve. 2002 Sep;26(3):356-61. doi: 10.1002/mus.10209.
- Background: PubMed 9529407Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, Wiesinger GF, Uhl F, Ghanem AH, Fialka V. Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised "sham" controlled trial. BMJ. 1998 Mar 7;316(7133):731-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7133.731.
- BackgroundCampbell C. K. Surface Acoustic wave devices for mobile and wireless communications. Chapter-Fundamentals of surface acoustic waves and devices. Academic press NY p20-25.
- Background: PubMed 17612914Jorns TP, Zakrzewska JM. Evidence-based approach to the medical management of trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg. 2007 Jun;21(3):253-61. doi: 10.1080/02688690701219175.
- Background: PubMed 11803297Devor M, Amir R, Rappaport ZH. Pathophysiology of trigeminal neuralgia: the ignition hypothesis. Clin J Pain. 2002 Jan-Feb;18(1):4-13. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200201000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 9855516Leandri M, Eldridge P, Miles J. Recovery of nerve conduction following microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurology. 1998 Dec;51(6):1641-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.6.1641.
- Background: PubMed 11883839Devor M, Govrin-Lippmann R, Rappaport ZH. Mechanism of trigeminal neuralgia: an ultrastructural analysis of trigeminal root specimens obtained during microvascular decompression surgery. J Neurosurg. 2002 Mar;96(3):532-43. doi: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.3.0532.
- Background: PubMed 9458161Love S, Hilton DA, Coakham HB. Central demyelination of the Vth nerve root in trigeminal neuralgia associated with vascular compression. Brain Pathol. 1998 Jan;8(1):1-11; discussion 11-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00126.x.
- Background: PubMed 18676118Poole HM, Murphy P, Nurmikko TJ. Development and preliminary validation of the NePIQoL: a quality-of-life measure for neuropathic pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Feb;37(2):233-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
Related trials for Trigeminal Neuralgia
RecruitingPhase 2
Effectiveness of Phenotype-based Pain Management Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancer Related Pain: a Pilot Study
Cancer Pain, Orofacial Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Trigeminal Neuralgia Electrophysiology
Trigeminal Neuralgia
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Trigeminal Evoked Responses to Improve Rhizotomy
Trigeminal Neuralgia, Rhizotomy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Twenty-five Years of Advanced RadioTherapy at San Raffaele Hospital
Malignant Tumor, Benign Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1/2
RP-008 in Combination With Daily Oral Varenicline for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia
Trigeminal Neuralgia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manuel Zwecker, MD principal investigator
Sheba Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Low Intensity Low Frequency Surface Acoustic Wave Ultrasound (PainShield™) in people with Trigeminal Neuralgia and Tic Douloureux, run by Sheba Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Level of pain (time frame: Change in level of pain from baseline to after two months of treatment). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01447108, which also lists 18 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.