Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 2/3NCT01457040
Intensified Conditioning Regimen With High-Dose-Etoposide for Allo-HSCT for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
A Phase 2/3 study testing TBI+CY+VP-16 and FA+TBI+CY+VP-16 in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Evolving paradigms in the treatment of adult ALL include the application of intense pediatric regimens to the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYA) and the optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the cure of patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic
- What is being tested?
- TBI+CY+VP-16 and FA+TBI+CY+VP-16
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 14 years to 65 years
- Diagnosis of High-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia or standard-risk ALL in ≥CR2
- Patient will receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- The informed consent form has been signed.
Who cannot join
- Patient with severe cardiac dysfunction with less than 50% EF
- Patient with severe lung dysfunction
- Patient with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction with more than 3 times the upper limit of normal range (ULN) of serum ALT or AST levels, or with more than 2 times the upper limit of normal range (ULN) of serum TBIL level or less than 40% of normal prothrombin time activity (PTA); or with more than 2 times the ULN of serum Cr
- Patient with severe active infection
- Patient with allergy history about suspected drug in conditioning regimen
- Patient with other conditions considered unsuitable for the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515
About this study
Official title: A Prospective Study of Intensified Conditioning Regimen With High-Dose-Etoposide for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in China
Evolving paradigms in the treatment of adult ALL include the application of intense pediatric regimens to the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYA) and the optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the cure of patients. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) first asked whether AYA between the ages of 16 and 20 fared differently whether they were treated on pediatric protocols. The results of this study demonstrated that although the complete remission rates were identical for the AYAs treated on the CALGB and CCG trials, the AYAs had a 63% event-free survival (EFS) and 67% OS at 7 years on the CCG trials compared with 34% and 46%, respectively, on the CALGB trials.
High relapse and transplantation-related-mortality still remains great challenge for HSCT of adult ALL, which both range between 25% and 30%. Recently, risk-adapted indication and optimization of conditioning regimen are highlighted, which aiming to reduce TRM and relapse rate, respectively.City of Hope National Medical Center studied the substitution of etoposide (VP-16) for CY in the treatment of ALL patients receiving HCT. The result suggested that etoposide and TBI are associated with a decreased relapse rate following transplantation for ALL, compared with those receiving CY and TBI. Japanese and Germany reports pronounced the advantage of VP-16 in intensified regimen for adult ALL. On the same time, the investigators previous researches have confirmed the effect and safety of FA-intensified conditioning regimen on relapse and refractary leukemia.
Based on mentioned above, the investigators speculate that VP-16-intensified conditioning regimen could improve the outcome for adult ALL. The potential mechanism will be attributed to reduce MRD and promote GVL effect via providing enough time-window for immuno-reconstitution by high-dose preparative regimen.
Read the detailed description
In the first decade of the new millennium, multiple studies have begun to change our thinking about the treatment of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In pediatric patients cure rates in the range of 80% to 90% are now attainable. While adult patients with ALL now have a 90% complete remission (CR) with modern chemotherapy, most patients will relapse, and leukemia-free survival with 3 to 7 years of follow-up in large series is only in the range of 30% to 40%. The poor outcome of chemotherapy in adults with ALL as compared to children relates to multiple factors, including poor tolerance of intensive courses of chemotherapy and a higher incidence of poor prognostic subtypes of ALL such as Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL and a lower incidence of favorable subtypes such as the t (12; 21).
Evolving paradigms in the treatment of adult ALL include the application of intense pediatric regimens to the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYA) and the optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the cure of patients. Adult regimens are typically less intense than pediatric regimens. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) first asked whether AYA between the ages of 16 and 20 fared differently whether they were treated on pediatric protocols. The results of this study demonstrated that although the complete remission rates were identical for the AYAs treated on the CALGB and CCG trials, the AYAs had a 63% event-free survival (EFS) and 67% OS at 7 years on the CCG trials compared with 34% and 46%, respectively, on the CALGB trials. These results have prompted new studies where pediatric ALL regimens have been adapted to the treatment of younger adults. With short follow-up, GRAALL-2003 reports suggest EFS and OS outcomes in the range of 60%. This improved outcome was more pronounced in the standard-risk patients with a donor who had an OS at 5 years of 69%. On the same time, our previous researches have confirmed the effect and safety of FA-intensified conditioning regimen on relapse and refractary leukemia.
Based on mentioned above, we speculate that VP-16-intensified conditioning regimen could improve the outcome for adult ALL. The potential mechanism will be attributed to reduce MRD and promote GVL effect via providing enough time-window for immuno-reconstitution by high-dose preparative regimen.
- Being tested
- TBI+CY+VP-16, FA+TBI+CY+VP-16
- Keywords
- Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TBI+CY+VP-16Drug
CR Cohort will receive conditioning regimen of TBI+CY+VP-16: TBI: 4.5Gy/d, -5d, -4d; CY: 60mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d; VP-16: 15mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d
FA+TBI+CY+VP-16Drug
NR Cohort will receive conditioning regimen of FA+TBI+CY+VP-16: Flu: 35mg/m2/d: -10~-6d; AraC: 1g/m2/d, -10d~-6d; TBI: 4.5Gy/d, -5d,-4d; CY:60mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d; VP-16: 15mg/kg, -3d, -2d
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Remission (CR) | Experimental | CR Cohort: high-risk ALL in CR and standard-risk ALL in the status of ≥CR2 Receives: Drug: TBI+CY+VP-16 |
| Non-Remission (NR) | Experimental | NR Cohort: ALL in non-remission Receives: Drug: FA+TBI+CY+VP-16 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Over Survival
Measured: 3 years after HSCT
Secondary outcomes (2)
Leukemia-Free-Survival
Measured: 3 years after HSCT
relapse rate
Measured: 3 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hongsheng Zhou, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
- Investigators
- Qifa Liu, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01457040
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HDE-ALL-2011
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 11 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Liu QF, Fan ZP, Zhang Y, Jiang ZJ, Wang CY, Xu D, Sun J, Xiao Y, Tan H. Sequential intensified conditioning and tapering of prophylactic immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Nov;15(11):1376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
PubMed 19822296Ottmann OG, Pfeifer H. Management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:371-81. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.371.
PubMed 20008223Laport GG, Alvarnas JC, Palmer JM, Snyder DS, Slovak ML, Cherry AM, Wong RM, Negrin RS, Blume KG, Forman SJ. Long-term remission of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from matched sibling donors: a 20-year experience with the fractionated total body irradiation-etoposide regimen. Blood. 2008 Aug 1;112(3):903-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143115. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
PubMed 18519812Seibel NL. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: peaks and pitfalls. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008:374-80. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2008.1.374.
PubMed 19074113Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 12;354(2):166-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052603. No abstract available.
PubMed 16407512Kantarjian H, Thomas D, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Giles F, Jeha S, Bueso-Ramos CE, Pierce S, Shan J, Koller C, Beran M, Keating M, Freireich EJ. Long-term follow-up results of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper-CVAD), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2004 Dec 15;101(12):2788-801. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20668.
PubMed 15481055Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Franklin IM, Litzow MR, Ciobanu N, Prentice HG, Durrant J, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH; ECOG; MRC/NCRI Adult Leukemia Working Party. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993. Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3760-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1623. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
PubMed 16105981Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, Paietta E, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Durrant J, McMillan A, Franklin IM, Luger S, Ciobanu N, Rowe JM. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008 Feb 15;111(4):1827-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116582. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
PubMed 18048644Huguet F, Leguay T, Raffoux E, Thomas X, Beldjord K, Delabesse E, Chevallier P, Buzyn A, Delannoy A, Chalandon Y, Vernant JP, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Chassevent A, Lheritier V, Macintyre E, Bene MC, Ifrah N, Dombret H. Pediatric-inspired therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):911-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6916. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
PubMed 19124805Marks DI, Forman SJ, Blume KG, Perez WS, Weisdorf DJ, Keating A, Gale RP, Cairo MS, Copelan EA, Horan JT, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, McCarthy PL, Schultz KR, Smith DD, Trigg ME, Zhang MJ, Horowitz MM. A comparison of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with etoposide and total body irradiation as conditioning regimens for patients undergoing sibling allografting for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second complete remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;12(4):438-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.12.029.
PubMed 16545728
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study of Intensified Conditioning Regimen With High-Dose-Etoposide for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in China
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01457040
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HDE-ALL-2011
- Keywords
- Acute Lymphoblastic leukemia, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Evolving paradigms in the treatment of adult ALL include the application of intense pediatric regimens to the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYA) and the optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the cure of patients. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) first asked whether AYA between the ages of 16 and 20 fared differently whether they were treated on pediatric protocols. The results of this study demonstrated that although the complete remission rates were identical for the AYAs treated on the CALGB and CCG trials, the AYAs had a 63% event-free survival (EFS) and 67% OS at 7 years on the CCG trials compared with 34% and 46%, respectively, on the CALGB trials.
High relapse and transplantation-related-mortality still remains great challenge for HSCT of adult ALL, which both range between 25% and 30%. Recently, risk-adapted indication and optimization of conditioning regimen are highlighted, which aiming to reduce TRM and relapse rate, respectively.City of Hope National Medical Center studied the substitution of etoposide (VP-16) for CY in the treatment of ALL patients receiving HCT. The result suggested that etoposide and TBI are associated with a decreased relapse rate following transplantation for ALL, compared with those receiving CY and TBI. Japanese and Germany reports pronounced the advantage of VP-16 in intensified regimen for adult ALL. On the same time, the investigators previous researches have confirmed the effect and safety of FA-intensified conditioning regimen on relapse and refractary leukemia.
Based on mentioned above, the investigators speculate that VP-16-intensified conditioning regimen could improve the outcome for adult ALL. The potential mechanism will be attributed to reduce MRD and promote GVL effect via providing enough time-window for immuno-reconstitution by high-dose preparative regimen.
Detailed description
In the first decade of the new millennium, multiple studies have begun to change our thinking about the treatment of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). In pediatric patients cure rates in the range of 80% to 90% are now attainable. While adult patients with ALL now have a 90% complete remission (CR) with modern chemotherapy, most patients will relapse, and leukemia-free survival with 3 to 7 years of follow-up in large series is only in the range of 30% to 40%. The poor outcome of chemotherapy in adults with ALL as compared to children relates to multiple factors, including poor tolerance of intensive courses of chemotherapy and a higher incidence of poor prognostic subtypes of ALL such as Philadelphia chromosome-positive ALL and a lower incidence of favorable subtypes such as the t (12; 21).
Evolving paradigms in the treatment of adult ALL include the application of intense pediatric regimens to the treatment of adolescents and young adults (AYA) and the optimization of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in the cure of patients. Adult regimens are typically less intense than pediatric regimens. The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) and the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) first asked whether AYA between the ages of 16 and 20 fared differently whether they were treated on pediatric protocols. The results of this study demonstrated that although the complete remission rates were identical for the AYAs treated on the CALGB and CCG trials, the AYAs had a 63% event-free survival (EFS) and 67% OS at 7 years on the CCG trials compared with 34% and 46%, respectively, on the CALGB trials. These results have prompted new studies where pediatric ALL regimens have been adapted to the treatment of younger adults. With short follow-up, GRAALL-2003 reports suggest EFS and OS outcomes in the range of 60%. This improved outcome was more pronounced in the standard-risk patients with a donor who had an OS at 5 years of 69%. On the same time, our previous researches have confirmed the effect and safety of FA-intensified conditioning regimen on relapse and refractary leukemia.
Based on mentioned above, we speculate that VP-16-intensified conditioning regimen could improve the outcome for adult ALL. The potential mechanism will be attributed to reduce MRD and promote GVL effect via providing enough time-window for immuno-reconstitution by high-dose preparative regimen.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Remission (CR) | Experimental | Drug: TBI+CY+VP-16CR Cohort: high-risk ALL in CR and standard-risk ALL in the status of ≥CR2 |
| Non-Remission (NR) | Experimental | Drug: FA+TBI+CY+VP-16NR Cohort: ALL in non-remission |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age: 14 years to 65 years
- Diagnosis of High-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia or standard-risk ALL in ≥CR2
- Patient will receive allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
- The informed consent form has been signed.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient with severe cardiac dysfunction with less than 50% EF
- Patient with severe lung dysfunction
- Patient with severe hepatic or renal dysfunction with more than 3 times the upper limit of normal range (ULN) of serum ALT or AST levels, or with more than 2 times the upper limit of normal range (ULN) of serum TBIL level or less than 40% of normal prothrombin time activity (PTA); or with more than 2 times the ULN of serum Cr
- Patient with severe active infection
- Patient with allergy history about suspected drug in conditioning regimen
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TBI+CY+VP-16CR Cohort will receive conditioning regimen of TBI+CY+VP-16: TBI: 4.5Gy/d, -5d, -4d; CY: 60mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d; VP-16: 15mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d | Drug | Complete Remission (CR) |
| FA+TBI+CY+VP-16NR Cohort will receive conditioning regimen of FA+TBI+CY+VP-16: Flu: 35mg/m2/d: -10~-6d; AraC: 1g/m2/d, -10d~-6d; TBI: 4.5Gy/d, -5d,-4d; CY:60mg/kg/d, -3d, -2d; VP-16: 15mg/kg, -3d, -2d | Drug | Non-Remission (NR) |
Primary outcome
Over Survival
Time frame: 3 years after HSCT
2 secondary outcomes
Leukemia-Free-Survival
Time frame: 3 years after HSCT
relapse rate
Time frame: 3 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2017.
- Background: PubMed 19822296Liu QF, Fan ZP, Zhang Y, Jiang ZJ, Wang CY, Xu D, Sun J, Xiao Y, Tan H. Sequential intensified conditioning and tapering of prophylactic immunosuppressants for graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009 Nov;15(11):1376-85. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.06.017. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 20008223Ottmann OG, Pfeifer H. Management of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2009:371-81. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2009.1.371.
- Background: PubMed 18519812Laport GG, Alvarnas JC, Palmer JM, Snyder DS, Slovak ML, Cherry AM, Wong RM, Negrin RS, Blume KG, Forman SJ. Long-term remission of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from matched sibling donors: a 20-year experience with the fractionated total body irradiation-etoposide regimen. Blood. 2008 Aug 1;112(3):903-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143115. Epub 2008 Jun 2.
- Background: PubMed 19074113Seibel NL. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: peaks and pitfalls. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2008:374-80. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2008.1.374.
- Background: PubMed 16407512Pui CH, Evans WE. Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 12;354(2):166-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra052603. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15481055Kantarjian H, Thomas D, O'Brien S, Cortes J, Giles F, Jeha S, Bueso-Ramos CE, Pierce S, Shan J, Koller C, Beran M, Keating M, Freireich EJ. Long-term follow-up results of hyperfractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (Hyper-CVAD), a dose-intensive regimen, in adult acute lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. 2004 Dec 15;101(12):2788-801. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20668.
- Background: PubMed 16105981Rowe JM, Buck G, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Franklin IM, Litzow MR, Ciobanu N, Prentice HG, Durrant J, Tallman MS, Goldstone AH; ECOG; MRC/NCRI Adult Leukemia Working Party. Induction therapy for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of more than 1500 patients from the international ALL trial: MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993. Blood. 2005 Dec 1;106(12):3760-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-04-1623. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
- Background: PubMed 18048644Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK, Burnett AK, Chopra R, Wiernik PH, Foroni L, Paietta E, Litzow MR, Marks DI, Durrant J, McMillan A, Franklin IM, Luger S, Ciobanu N, Rowe JM. In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplantation is less effective than conventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients: final results of the International ALL Trial (MRC UKALL XII/ECOG E2993). Blood. 2008 Feb 15;111(4):1827-33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116582. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
- Background: PubMed 19124805Huguet F, Leguay T, Raffoux E, Thomas X, Beldjord K, Delabesse E, Chevallier P, Buzyn A, Delannoy A, Chalandon Y, Vernant JP, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Chassevent A, Lheritier V, Macintyre E, Bene MC, Ifrah N, Dombret H. Pediatric-inspired therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-2003 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 20;27(6):911-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.6916. Epub 2009 Jan 5.
- Background: PubMed 16545728Marks DI, Forman SJ, Blume KG, Perez WS, Weisdorf DJ, Keating A, Gale RP, Cairo MS, Copelan EA, Horan JT, Lazarus HM, Litzow MR, McCarthy PL, Schultz KR, Smith DD, Trigg ME, Zhang MJ, Horowitz MM. A comparison of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with etoposide and total body irradiation as conditioning regimens for patients undergoing sibling allografting for acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or second complete remission. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2006 Apr;12(4):438-53. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.12.029.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Qifa Liu, MD principal investigator
Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing TBI+CY+VP-16 and FA+TBI+CY+VP-16 in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Stem Cell Transplantation, Hematopoietic, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Over Survival (time frame: 3 years after HSCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01457040, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2017.