Cardiovascular DiseasesISCHEMIANCT01471522
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)
A study testing cardiac catheterization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by NYU Langone Health at 320 sites in 37 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- cardiac catheterization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 5,179 participants
- Where
- 320 sitesin 37 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to 30 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least moderate ischemia on a qualifying stress test
- Participant is willing to comply with all aspects of the protocol, including adherence to the assigned strategy, medical therapy and follow-up visits
- Participant is willing to give written informed consent
- Age ≥ 21 years
Who cannot join
- LVEF < 35%
- History of unprotected left main stenosis >50% on prior coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or prior cardiac catheterization (if available)
- Finding of "no obstructive CAD" (<50% stenosis in all major epicardial vessels) on prior CCTA or prior catheterization, performed within 12 months
- Coronary anatomy unsuitable for either PCI or CABG
- Unacceptable level of angina despite maximal medical therapy
- Very dissatisfied with medical management of angina
Show all 28Show fewer
- History of noncompliance with medical therapy
- Acute coronary syndrome within the previous 2 months
- PCI within the previous 12 months
- Stroke within the previous 6 months or spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage at any time
- History of ventricular tachycardia requiring therapy for termination, or symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia not due to a transient reversible cause
- NYHA class III-IV heart failure at entry or hospitalization for exacerbation of chronic heart failure within the previous 6 months
- Non-ischemic dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- End stage renal disease on dialysis or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30mL/min (not an exclusion criterion for CKD ancillary trial, see CKD ancillary trial, Section 18)
- Severe valvular disease or valvular disease likely to require surgery or percutaneous valve replacement during the trial
- Allergy to radiographic contrast that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or any prior anaphylaxis to radiographic contrast
- Planned major surgery necessitating interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy (note that patients may be eligible after planned surgery)
- Life expectancy less than the duration of the trial due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity
- Pregnancy (known to be pregnant; to be confirmed before CCTA and/or randomization, if applicable)
- Patient who, in the judgment of the patient's physician, is likely to have significant unprotected left main stenosis (Those who are able to undergo CCTA will have visual assessment of the left main coronary artery by the CCTA core lab)
- Enrolled in a competing trial that involves a non-approved cardiac drug or device
- Inability to comply with the protocol
- Exceeds the weight or size limit for CCTA or cardiac catheterization at the site
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class III angina of recent onset, OR angina of any class with a rapidly progressive or accelerating pattern
- Canadian Cardiovascular Society Class IV angina, including unprovoked rest angina
- High risk of bleeding which would contraindicate the use of dual antiplatelet therapy
- Cardiac transplant recipient
- Prior CABG, unless CABG was performed more than 12 months ago, and coronary anatomy has been demonstrated to be suitable for PCI or repeat CABG to accomplish complete revascularization of ischemic areas (CCC approval required)
Trial locations and contacts
320 sites in 37 countries.
320 sites in 37 countries
United States109 sites
Albany Medical Center Hospital
Albany, New York, 12208
Samuel Stratton VA Medical Center of Albany NY
Albany, New York, 12208
Capital Cardiology Associates
Albany, New York, 12211
Asheville Cardiology Associates
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Maryland Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
University of Washington Medical Center
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
NIH Heart Center at Suburban Hospital
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889
Saint Luke's Hospital and Health Network
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18018
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
UAB Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
NYU-HHC Kings County Hospital Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
New York -Presbyterian/Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
NYU-HHC Woodhull Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11229
Coney Island Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11235
Holy Spirit Hospital Cardiovascular Institute
Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, 17011
Cardiovascular Associates, Ltd.
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Cincinnati VA Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45220
Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Ohio Health Grant Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
NYP Medical Medical Group Hudson Valley Cardiology
Cortlandt Manor, New York, 10567
V.A. North Texas Health Care System
Dallas, Texas, 75216
Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
Davenport, Iowa, 52803
Daytona Heart Group
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32114
Atlanta VA Medical Center
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Doylestown Health Cardiology
Doylestown, Pennsylvania, 18901
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Englewood Hospital and Medical Center
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
Advanced Heart Care Group
Fairview Heights, Illinois, 62208
Sanford Health
Fargo, North Dakota, 58122
New York University - Langone Cardiovascular Associates
Flushing, New York, 11355
UCSF - Fresno Community Regional Medical Center
Fresno, California, 93721
Malcom Randall VAMC
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
Spectrum Health
Grand Rapids, Michigan, 49503
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Houston Heart & Vascular Associates
Houston, Texas, 77339
Indiana University/Krannert Institute of Cardiology
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Mayo Clinic Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Conemaugh Valley Memorial Hospital
Johnstown, Pennsylvania, 15905
Saint Luke's Hospital
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Kansas City VA Medical Center
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
Mid Valley Cardiology
Kingston, New York, 12401
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Center
La Crosse, Wisconsin, 54601
Cardiovascular Specialists of Southwest Louisiana
Lake Charles, Louisiana, 70601
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
Lexington VA Medical Center
Lexington, Kentucky, 42503
South Denver Cardiology Associates, P.C.
Littleton, Colorado, 80120
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, 40292
Medical Center of the Rockies
Loveland, Colorado, 80538
Stroobants Cardiovascular Center
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24501
Northwell Health - Manhasset
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Loyola University Medical Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
NYU Winthrop
Mineola, New York, 11501
Minneapolis VAMC
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55417
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Saint Thomas Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, 373203
VA New York Harbor Health Care System
New York, New York, 10010
Beth Israel Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016
NYU Langone Medical Center-Bellevue Hospital
New York, New York, 10016
NYU New York Medical Associates
New York, New York, 10022
Mount Sinai Saint Luke's Hospital
New York, New York, 10025
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
University of California Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute
Palo Alto, California, 94087
VA Palo Alto HealthCare System
Palo Alto, California, 94550
Baylor Research Institute at Legacy Heart Center
Plano, Texas, 75024
The Heart Hospital Baylor
Plano, Texas, 75093
AtlantiCare Regional Medical Center
Pomona, New Jersey, 08240
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97201
Providence Heart and Vascular Institute
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Miriam Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14642
Hackensack University Medical Center
Saddle Brook, New Jersey, 07663
Covenant Medical Center, Inc.
Saginaw, Michigan, 01876
HealthEast Saint Joseph's Hospital
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102
Salt Lake City VA Medical Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84148
Audie Murphy V.A.
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Kaiser Permanente San Jose
San Jose, California, 94538
Coastal Heart Medical Group
Santa Ana, California, 92704
Cardiovascular Center of Sarasota
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Cardiology Associates of Schenectady P.C.
Schenectady, New York, 12309
Providence - Providence Park Hospital
Southfield, Michigan, 48075
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, 94305
Medicus Alliance Clinical Research Org., Inc.
Sugar Land, Texas, 77478
University of South Florida
Tampa, Florida, 33606
NYU-HHC Lincoln Medical and Mental Health Center
The Bronx, New York, 10451
Jacobi Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Torrance Memorial Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90505
Oklahoma Heart Institute
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74133
Kent Hospital
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02886
VA Connecticut Healthcare System
West Haven, Connecticut, 06111
VA Boston Healthcare System
West Roxbury, Massachusetts, 02132
VAMC-White River Junction
White River Junction, Vermont, 05009
Wichita Falls Heart Clinic
Wichita Falls, Texas, 76301
Winchester Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, PC
Winchester, Virginia, 22601
Saint Vincent Hospital at Worcester Medical Center
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01608
Michigan Heart, PC
Ypsilanti, Michigan, 48197
Yuma Regional Medical Center
Yuma, Arizona, 85364
United Kingdom28 sites
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Basingstoke, Hampshire, RG24 9NA
Bedford Hospital NHS Trust
Bedford, Bedfordshire, MK42 9DJ
Belfast Trust
Belfast, Antrim, BT12 6BA
South Eastern Health and Social Care
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT16 1RH
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
Bournemouth, Dorset, BH7 7DW
Bradford Royal Infirmary
Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD9 6RJ
Papworth Hospital
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB23 3RE
Broomfield Hospital
Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 7ET
University of Glasgow
Clydebank, Strathclyde, G81 4DY
The University of Hull/Castle Hill Hospital
Cottingham, East Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ
Cardiovascular Research Unit, Craigavon Area Hospital
Craigavon, Northern Ireland, BT63 5QQ
Dorset County Hospital
Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 2JY
Russells Hall Hospital
Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, Scotland, EH4 2XU
Northwick Park Hospital Harrow/ Royal Brompton Hospital London
Harrow, Middlesex, HA1 3UJ
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/Barts Health NHS Trust
London, EC1A 7BE
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
London, NW3 2QG
King's College NHS Foundation Hospital
London, SE13 6LH
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W12OHS
Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS FT
Luton, Berdfordshire, LU4 0DZ
Central Manchester University Hospital
Manchester, M13 9WL
The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough
Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS4 3BW
Nottingham University Hospitals
Nottingham, Notts, NG5 1PB
The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Oldham, Lancashire, OL1 2JH
Peterborough City Hospital
Peterborough, Cambs, PE3 9GZ
Pinderfields Hospital
Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 4DG
Southend University Hospital
Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex, SS0 0RY
China20 sites
Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100020
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730
Beijing Anzhen Hospital
Beijing, Chaoyang, 100029
Liangxiang Hospital, Beijing Fangshan District
Beijing, Fangshan, 102401
Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University
Dalian, Liaoning, 116001
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510100
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
Jining, Shandong, 272000
Qingdao Fuwai Hospital
Qingdao, Shandong, 266071
Shanxi Cardiovascular Hospital
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030024
Tangshan Gongren Hospital
Tangshan, Hebei, 063000
TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital
Tianjing, Tianjing, 300457
First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Ürümqi, Xinjiang, 830054
Tongji Medical College
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030
Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital
Wuhan, Hubei
Wuhan Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong Science and Tech University
Wuhan, Hubei
Shanxi Provincial People's Hospital
Xian, Shanxi, 710000
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450014
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450052
Canada19 sites
University of Calgary
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9
University of Alberta
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7
West Lincoln Memorial Hospital
Grimsby, Ontario, L3M 1P3
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
Dixie Medical Group
Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 0C2
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5
Dr. James Cha
Oshawa, Ontario, L1J 2K1
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, K1Y 4W7
Scarborough Cardiology Research
Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1E 5E9
Saint Catharines General Hospital
St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S0A9
CISSSL - Hopital Pierre-Le Gardeur
Terrebonne, Quebec, J6V 2H2
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
Women's College Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1N8
University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Centre Hospitalier de Regional Trois-Rivieres
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9
Vancouver General Hospital
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
Northwest GTA Cardiovascular and Heart Rhythm Program
Vaughan, Ontario, L4H0P6
India19 sites
Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences and Research
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560069
Government Medical College
Calicut, Kerala, 673008
Apollo Research and Innovation
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600081
Gurunanak CARE Hospital
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500020
CARE Hospital
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500034
CARE Nampally
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500001
Apollo Research & Innovations
Hyderabad, Telangana, 600081
MOSC Medical College Hospital, Kolenchery
Kolenchery, Kerala, 682311
King George's Medical University, Department of Cardiology
Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226003
Hero DMC Heart Institute, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital
Ludhiana, Punjab, 141001
Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110001
Fortis Escort Heart Institute
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110025
Batra Hospital and Medical Research Centre (BHMRC)
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110062
Fortis Healthcare Fl.t Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital
New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, 110070
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, 110029
Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research (JIPMER)
Pondicherry, Tamil Nadu, 605006
Ruby Hall Clinic,Grant Medical Foundation
Pune, Maharashtra, 411001
KEM Hospital Pune
Pune, Maharashtra, 411011
Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology
Trivandrum, Kerala, 695011
Brazil17 sites
Hospital Lifecenter
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30110-921
Hospital Pró-Cardíaco
Botafogo, Rio de Janeiro, 22280-020
Quanta Diagnostico & Terapia
Curitiba, Paraná, 80045-170
Hospital Cardiologico Costantini
Curitiba, Paraná, 80320-320
Hospital Sao Vicente de Paulo
Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul, 99010080
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
Ibirapuera, São Paulo, 04012-909
Hospital Maternidade e Pronto Socorro Santa Lucia
Poços de Caldas, Minas Gerais, 37701-045
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Hospital Sao Lucas da Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio Grande do Sol
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000
Instituto de Cardiologia de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90620-001
Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900
Fundacao Bahiana de Cardilogia
Salvador, Estado de Bahia, 41810-010
Hospital da Bahia
Salvador, BA, 41820-011
Hospital TotalCor
São Paulo, São Paulo, 1418100
Unifesp - Hospital Sao Paulo
São Paulo, 04025-011
Heart Institute (InCor) University of São Paulo
São Paulo, 05403-000
Hospital Celso Pierro
São Paulo, 13059-740
Italy13 sites
Cardiology and CCU - Ospedali Riuniti Ancona
Ancona, The Marches, 60020
Ospedale Regionale Umberto Parini
Aosta, 11100
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle
Cuneo, Piedmont, 12100
Ospedale "G.B. Morgagni - L. Pierantoni" Forli (AUSL della Romagna)
Forlì, Emilia-Romagna, 47100
Policlinico di Monza, Monza MB
Monza, MB, 20900
AORN Dei Colli "V. Monaldi" UOC Cardiologia Università della Campania "L.Vanvitelli"
Naples, Campania, 80131
Clinica Mediterranea
Naples, 80121
University of Padua- Cardiology Clinic
Padua, Veneto, 35100
UO Cardiologia Ospedale SS Cosma e Damiano
Pescia, Tuscany, 54100
Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI)
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
IRCCS "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza"
San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, 71013
Azienda Servizi Sanitaria n.3 Alto Friuli-Collinare-Medio Friuli
Tolmezzo, Udine, 33028
Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese, 21100
Poland12 sites
University Hospital in Bialystok
Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-276
Department of Coronary Disease, John Paul II Hospital, Jagiellonian University Medical College
Krakow, Maopolskie, 31-200
Cardiology Clinic, Medical University in Lodz
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 91-425
Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Pańskiego
Poznan, 61-848
Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-005
Coronary and Structural Heart Diseases Department, Institute of Cardiology
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 04-628
Department of Interventional Cardiology & Angiology, Institute of Cardiology
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 04-628
Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, PL-02-097
Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw
Warsaw, Mazovian, 04-628
T.Marciniak Hospital
Wroclaw, Dolny Śląsk, 54-090
Military Hospital / Medical University
Wroclaw, 50-981
Medical University of Silesia, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry, Department of Cardiology, Congenital Heart Diseases and Electrotherapy, Silesian Center for Heart Diseases
Zabrze, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-800
Spain9 sites
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC) Sergas, Department of Cardiology. INIBIC A Coruña. CIBER-CV. Universidad de A Coruña, Spain
A Coruña, 15008
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital De Bellvitge
Barcelona, 08907
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hospital La Paz. IdiPaz
Madrid, 28046
HUVA, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen De La Arrixaca
Murcia, 30120
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
Santiago de Compostela, La Coruna, 15706
Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
France7 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers
Angers, Pays de la Loire Region, 49933
Ambroise Pare Hospital
Boulogne-Billancourt, Île-de-France Region, 92100
C.H. Louis Pasteur
Châtres, Centre-Val de Loire, 28018
Antoine-Beclere Hospital
Clamart, Île-de-France Region, 92141
Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien
Corbeil-Essonnes, Île-de-France Region, 91100
Grenoble University Hospital
Grenoble, Isere, 38700
Bichat Hospital
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75018
Serbia7 sites
Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000
Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade; Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia
Belgrade, 11000
University Clinical Hospital Zvezdara
Belgrade, 11000
University Hospital Center Bezanijska Kosa
Belgrade, 11000
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia and Faculty of Medicine, University of Novi Sad
Kamenitz, Vojvodina, 21204
Clinical Center Kragujevac
Kragujevac, 11000
Clinic for Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Center Nis
Niš, 18000
Argentina6 sites
Hospital Italiano Regional del Sur Bahia Blanca
Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, 8000
Fundacion Favaloro
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1093AAS
Instituto Medico DAMIC
Córdoba, CBA, 5009
Clinica Del Prado
Córdoba, 5000
Clinica Romagosa and Clinica De La Familia
Córdoba, 5000
Clínica Privada Vélez Sarsfield
Córdoba, 5000
Hungary5 sites
Eszszk- Szent Istvan Hospital
Budapest, 1097
Military Hospital, Budapest
Budapest, 1117
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University
Budapest, 1122
George Gottsegen National Institute of Cardiology
Budapest, H-1096
University of Szeged
Szeged, Szeged Megyei Varos, 6720
Australia4 sites
Flinders Medical Centre
Adelaide, South Australia, 5042
John Hunter Hospital
New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305
Royal Perth Hospital
Perth, Western Australia, 6000
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Woodville South, South Australia, 5011
Germany4 sites
Universitatsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53105
Praxisklinik Herz Und Gefaesse
Dresden, Saxony, D-01099
University Hospital Jena
Jena, Thuringia, 07747
Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70376
Russia4 sites
National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascuar Surgery
Moscow, Gorod Moskva, 121552
E.Meshalkin National Medical Research Center of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast, 630055
Federal Almazov North-West Medical Research Centre
Saint Petersburg, 197341
North-Western State Medical University
Saint Petersburg, 199106
Austria3 sites
LKH Graz West Austria
Graz, Stmk, 8020
Medical University of Vienna, Department of Cardiology
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090
Wilhelminen Hospital Vienna
Vienna, State of Vienna, A-1160
Japan3 sites
Saitama Medical University
Hidaka, Saitama, 350-0495
Keio University Hospital
Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-8582
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-8565
Netherlands3 sites
Cardio Research Hartcentrum OLVG
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1091 AC
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, 6500 HB
Isala Klinieken
Zwolle, 8025 AB
Portugal3 sites
Hospital de Santa Marta
Lisbon, 1150-291
Santa Maria University Hospital, Cardiology Department, CHLN
Lisbon, 1649-028
Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, EPE
Vila Nova de Gaia, 4434-502
Singapore3 sites
National University Heart Center Singapore
Singapore, 119228
National Heart Centre Singapore
Singapore, 169609
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, 308433
Israel2 sites
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, 31096
Assuta Medical Centers
Tel Aviv, 67891
Mexico2 sites
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social
Benito Juárez, Mexico City, 3100
Instituto Nacional de Cardiología "Ignacio Chávez"
Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080
New Zealand2 sites
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, 1142
Waikato Hospital
Hamilton, Waikato Region, 3240
Romania2 sites
Emergency County Hospital Baia Mare
Baia Mare, 021967
Emergency Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases ''Prof. Dr. C. C. Iliescu''
Bucharest, 022328
Sweden2 sites
Karolinska Institutet at Danderyd Hospital
Stockholm, S-18288
Uppsala University
Uppsala, SE-751 85
Thailand2 sites
Ramathibodi Hospital
Bangkok, 10400
Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital
Chiang Mai, Meung, 50200
Lithuania1 site
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskes Clinic
Vilnius, LT-08661
North Macedonia1 site
University Clinic of Cardiology
Skopje, Republic of Macedo, 1000
Peru1 site
Instituto Neuro Cardiovascular De Las Americas
Miraflores, Lima region, 18
Saudi Arabia1 site
King AbdulAziz Cardiac Center
Riyadh, Central Province, 11426
South Africa1 site
Groote Schuur Hospital / University of Cape Town
Cape Town, Western Cape, 7945
About this study
The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. A blinded coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) was performed in most participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 to identify and exclude participants with either significant unprotected left main disease (≥50% stenosis) or those without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all major coronary arteries). Of 8518 participants enrolled, those that had insufficient ischemia, ineligible anatomy demonstrated on CCTA or another exclusion criterion, did not go on to randomization. Eligible participants were then assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization, if feasible, plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT.
SPECIFIC AIMS
Read more
- Primary Aim The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization followed by optimal revascularization, if feasible, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure in participants with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia over an average follow-up of approximately 3.5 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for failure of OMT.
- Secondary Aims Secondary aims are to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared to a conservative strategy will improve: 1) the composite of CV death or MI; 2) angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire; 3) all-cause mortality; 4) net clinical benefit assessed by including stroke in the primary and secondary composite endpoints; and 5) individual components of the composite endpoints.
Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Coronary CT Angiogram Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III per NIH
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Evidence supporting a routine invasive practice paradigm for patients with SIHD is outdated. In strategy trials conducted in the 1970s, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improved survival as compared with no CABG in SIHD patients with high-risk anatomic features. The relevance of these studies today is speculative because contemporary secondary prevention-aspirin, beta-blockers, statins, ACE inhibitors, and lifestyle interventions-were used minimally if at all. Subsequent trials have compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with medical therapy, as PCI has replaced CABG as the dominant method of revascularization for SIHD. To date, PCI has not been shown to reduce death or myocardial infarction (MI) compared with medical therapy in SIHD patients.
COURAGE and BARI 2D, the two largest trials comparing coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in SIHD patients, found that among patients selected on the basis of coronary anatomy after cardiac catheterization, an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (PCI, PCI or CABG, respectively) did not reduce the primary endpoints of death or MI (COURAGE), or death (BARI 2D) compared with OMT alone. These data suggest, but do not prove, that routine cardiac catheterization--which often leads to ad hoc PCI through the diagnostic-therapeutic cascade--may not be required in SIHD patients. However, most patients enrolled in COURAGE and BARI 2D who had ischemia severity documented at baseline had only mild or moderate ischemia, leaving open the question of the appropriate role of cardiac catheterization and revascularization among higher-risk patients with more severe ischemia. Observational data suggest that revascularization of patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia is associated with a lower mortality than medical therapy alone, but such data cannot establish a cause and effect relationship. In clinical practice only about half such patients are referred for cardiac catheterization, indicating equipoise. Furthermore, analysis of outcomes for 468 COURAGE patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia at baseline did not reveal a benefit from PCI. This issue cannot be resolved using available data because all prior SIHD strategy trials enrolled patients after cardiac catheterization, introducing undefined selection biases (e.g., highest risk patients not enrolled) and making translation of study results problematic for clinicians managing patients who have not yet had cardiac catheterization.
A clinical trial in SIHD patients uniformly at higher risk (which could not have been performed before COURAGE and BARI 2D results were available) is needed to inform optimal management for such patients.
DESIGN NARRATIVE, INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS DURING THE TRIAL
Primary Endpoint
A composite of CV death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure was proposed as the primary endpoint in the application that was funded by NLHBI, with a secondary endpoint of CV death or MI. Study protocol version 1.0 was finalized on January 18, 2012 after review and approval by the protocol review committee (DSMB) with the primary endpoint specified as the composite of CV death or MI. Regarding the final status of the primary endpoint, the protocol stated:
"To ensure that the primary analysis is well-powered and useful, a prospective plan to allow extending follow-up and/or changing the primary endpoint based on aggregate event rate data will be established prior to the first review of unblinded trial data. At a designated time during the trial, an analysis will be conducted to estimate the overall aggregate primary endpoint event rate and project the final number of observed events. If the estimated unconditional power (i.e. based on aggregate event rate data; not by treatment group) is less than the originally targeted 90%, then one or more of the following options will be considered:
- Extend follow-up to allow more events to accrue.
- Change the primary endpoint to one that occurs more frequently. The current primary endpoint would become a secondary endpoint. The proposed new primary endpoint would be the composite of CV death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.
- Follow the recommendation of an independent advisory panel. An independent advisory panel, separate from the DSMB, will be convened for the purpose of reviewing unconditional power estimates and making a recommendation to the NHLBI Director. Members of this panel will not have access to unblinded data by treatment group or other data that may bias their recommendation." All 5 event types were adjudicated throughout the trial. Study protocol v2.0 (January 2014) allowed ischemia eligibility by non-imaging exercise stress test if more stringent (≥70% stenosis) CCTA criteria were met. The 2016 protocol addendum describes the NHLBI-approved reduction in sample size and extension of recruitment and follow-up due to slower than projected recruitment.
The pre-specified first analysis for monitoring and projecting the final aggregate number of primary endpoint events was conducted in 2015. In 2016, the projected need to increase the power by extending follow-up and elevating the 5-component secondary endpoint to become primary was discussed at Steering Committee and Investigator meetings and communicated by email.
An Independent Advisory Panel convened by NHLBI met in May 2017, and in June 2017 NHLBI approved the Independent Advisory Panel's recommendation to elevate the 5-component secondary endpoint to become primary and retain the 2-component composite as a key secondary endpoint. The panel also recommended extension of follow-up. This was communicated to the Steering Committee and Investigators at August and November 2017 meetings and by email. The last visit date was June 30, 2019.
A statistical plan developed for the Independent Advisory Panel process in 2012 specified that a decision about changing the primary endpoint would be targeted to occur before 75% of the final number of primary endpoint events had accrued. Although the final number of primary endpoint events was unknown during the course of the trial, estimates performed at the time of the Advisory Panel meeting suggested that the ratio of accrued endpoint events to final endpoint events was below 50%. See Maron DJ et al. Am Heart J. 2018 201:124-135. PMC6005768 for additional details about modifications to the trial while it was being conducted.
Analysis of Patients' Health Status as a Key Secondary Endpoint
A key secondary objective of the ISCHEMIA trial is to compare the quality of life outcomes-patients' symptoms, functioning and well-being-between those assigned to an invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. In the protocol, angina frequency and disease-specific quality of life measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Angina Frequency and Quality of Life scales, respectively, are described as the tools that will be used to make this comparative assessment. Recent work has indicated that it is possible to combine the information from the individual domain scores in the SAQ into a new Summary Score that captures the information from the SAQ Angina Frequency, Physical Limitation and Quality of Life scales into a single overall score. The advantages of using a summary score as the primary measure of QOL effects of a therapy are a single primary endpoint comparison rather than two or three (eliminating concerns some may have about multiple comparisons) and a more intuitive holistic (patient-centric) interpretation of the effectiveness results. With these advantages in mind, the ISCHEMIA leadership has agreed that the SAQ Summary Score will be designated as the primary way this outcome for this key secondary endpoint of the ISCHEMIA trial will be analyzed and interpreted, with the individual SAQ scores being used in a secondary, explanatory and descriptive role.
PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES:
North America:
Canada; Mexico; USA
South America:
Argentina; Brazil; Peru
Asia:
China; India; Japan; Malaysia; Singapore; Taiwan; Thailand; Russian Federation
Pacifica:
Australia; New Zealand
Europe:
Austria; Belgium; France; Germany; Hungary; Italy; Lithuania; Macedonia; Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Serbia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; UK
Middle East:
Egypt; Israel; Saudi Arabia
Africa:
South Africa
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
- Being tested
- cardiac catheterization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, percutaneous coronary intervention, Lifestyle, Medication
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cardiac catheterizationProcedure or surgery
Also called cath
Narrowed blood vessels can be opened without surgery using stents or can be bypassed with surgery. To determine which is the best approach for you the doctor needs to look at your blood vessels to see where the narrowings are and how much narrowing there is. This is done by a procedure known as a cardiac catheterization.
coronary artery bypass graft surgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called CABG
Artery narrowing is bypassed during surgery with a healthy artery or vein from another part of the body. This is known as coronary artery bypass grafting, or CABG (said, "cabbage"). The surgery creates new routes around narrowed and blocked heart arteries. This allows more blood flow to the heart.
percutaneous coronary interventionProcedure or surgery
Also called PCI
Percutaneous coronary intervention may be done as part of the cardiac catheterization procedure. With this procedure a small, hollow, mesh tube (stent) is inserted into the narrowed part of the artery. The stent pushes the plaque against the artery wall, and opens the vessel to allow better blood flow.
LifestyleBehavioural
Also called Behavior change
diet, physical activity, smoking cessation
MedicationDrug
Also called Pharmacologic Therapy
antiplatelet, statin, other lipid lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-ischemic medical therapies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Invasive Strategy (INV) | Active comparator | Routine invasive strategy with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization plus optimal medical therapy. Receives: Procedure: cardiac catheterization; Procedure: coronary artery bypass graft surgery; Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention; Behavioral: Lifestyle; Drug: Medication |
| Conservative Strategy | Active comparator | Optimal medical therapy with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for patients with acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest or refractory symptoms. Receives: Behavioral: Lifestyle; Drug: Medication |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Composite Outcome: Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest
Measured: 3.2 year follow-up (median)
Cumulative Event Rate of Primary Composite Outcome (Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest)
This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing the primary endpoint within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction
Measured: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction
This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing Death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Any Cause
Measured: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause
Measured: 5 years
Number of Participants That Experienced Myocardial Infarction
Measured: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction
Measured: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate ( %) of Primary Composite Outcome: Invasive Minus Conservative
The primary composite outcome includes death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.
Measured: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes: Invasive Minus Conservative or Myocardial Infarction Between Invasive and Conservative Strategies
Measured: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause: Invasive Minus Conservative
Measured: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction: Invasive Minus Conservative
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (53)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by NYU Langone HealthThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 5,179 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New York University, Stanford University, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University, Duke University, East Carolina University, Emory University, Harvard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Montreal Heart Institute, University of British Columbia, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Vanderbilt University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Judith S Hochman, MD, Study chair, New York UniversityDavid J Maron, MD, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01471522
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11-00498
- Other IDs
- 1U01HL105907
- Acronym
- ISCHEMIA
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Data will be submitted to the NHLBI according to their guidelines within 3 years after the final patient follow-up (June 30, 2019) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first.
Publications
Maron DJ, Stone GW, Berman DS, Mancini GB, Scott TA, Byrne DW, Harrell FE Jr, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Boden WE, Weintraub WS, Spertus JA. Is cardiac catheterization necessary before initial management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease? Results from a Web-based survey of cardiologists. Am Heart J. 2011 Dec;162(6):1034-1043.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.001.
PubMed 22137077Phillips LM, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Iskandrian AE, Min JK, Picard MH, Kwong RY, Friedrich MG, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Hayes SW, Sharir T, Gosselin G, Mazzanti M, Senior R, Beanlands R, Smanio P, Goyal A, Al-Mallah M, Reynolds H, Stone GW, Maron DJ, Shaw LJ. Lessons learned from MPI and physiologic testing in randomized trials of stable ischemic heart disease: COURAGE, BARI 2D, FAME, and ISCHEMIA. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9773-4.
PubMed 23963599ISCHEMIA Trial Research Group; Maron DJ, Hochman JS, O'Brien SM, Reynolds HR, Boden WE, Stone GW, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Mark DB, Alexander KP, Shaw L, Berger JS, Ferguson TB Jr, Williams DO, Harrington RA, Rosenberg Y. International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
PubMed 29778671Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Alexander KP, Senior R, Boden WE, Stone GW, Goodman SG, Lopes RD, Lopez-Sendon J, White HD, Maggioni AP, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Picard MH, Berman DS, Chaitman BR, Mark DB, Spertus JA, Cyr DD, Bhargava B, Ruzyllo W, Wander GS, Chernyavskiy AM, Rosenberg YD, Maron DJ; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):273-286. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014.
PubMed 30810700Phillips LM, Jones PG, Shaw LJ, Mark DB, Berman DS, Kwong RY, Picard MH, Chaitman BR, Min JK, Celutkiene J, Stone GW, Vitola J, Moorthy N, Steg PG, Ong P, Hueb WA, Rezende PC, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Reynolds HR, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Health status relationship to ischemia and coronary artery disease severity in the ISCHEMIA trial. Am Heart J. 2026 Aug 25;303:107586. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107586. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42641674O'Keefe EL, Saxon JT, Cho YJ, Jones PG, Mark DB, Bangalore S, Boden WE, Stone GW, Reynolds HR, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Assessing the Prognostic Value of Serial Seattle Angina Questionnaire Scores in Chronic Coronary Disease. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Aug 5:e013063. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.013063. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42554061O'Keefe E, Sperry BW, Jones PG, O'Keefe JH, Phillips LM, Reynolds HR, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Picard MH, Kwong RY, Chaitman BR, Bateman TM, Bangalore S, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Variability in Cardiac Stress Test Interpretation: Agreement Between Enrollment Sites and Core Laboratories in the Global ISCHEMIA Trial. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Jul 1:e012920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012920. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42384892Muller M, Cornwell MG, Rajkumar S, Chen Z, Coit D, Drouard G, Sastourne-Haletou P, Yang H, Raitakari O, Lehtimaki T, Hochman J, Maron DJ, Berger JS, Newman JD, Ruggles KV; ISCHEMIA Biorepository Research Group. Whole blood epigenomic and transcriptomic characterization identifies vulnerable molecular subtypes of chronic coronary disease. Nat Commun. 2026 Jun 16;17(1):7647. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-73815-5.
PubMed 42303606Singh A, Brown DL, Jones PG, Fu Z, Reynolds HR, Boden WE, O'Brien SM, Mavromatis K, Poh KK, Ali Z, Stone GW, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Maron DJ, Hochman JS; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Residual Angina Following Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial: Frequency, Clinical Characteristics, Health Status, and Cardiovascular Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026 May 19;15(10):e047355. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.047355. Epub 2026 May 14.
PubMed 42132177Grodzinsky A, Cho YJ, Jones PG, Shaw LJ, Merz CNB, Boden WE, Stone GW, Mark DB, Spertus JA, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR. Sex differences in coronary disease health Status outcomes: the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2026 Aug 11;12(5):765-769. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag052.
PubMed 41978343Navarese EP, Talanas G, Kereiakes DJ, Henry TD, Gasior M, Kalarus Z, Uminska J, Burzotta F, Buffon A, Van Belle E, Wojakowski W, Mizia-Stec K, Smolka G, Hudzik B, Ciesla D, Waksman R, Kubica J, Sangiorgi GM, Farkouh ME, Stone GW, Andreotti F. Mortality score in chronic coronary syndrome: prediction model from the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2026 Mar 11:zwag116. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag116. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41812133Kwong RY, Heydari B, Abbasi S, Mongeon FP, Marcotte F, Friedrich M, Shaw LJ, Xu Y, Anthopolos R, Bekeredjian R, Monti L, Selvanayagam J, Lesiak M, Picard MH, Berman DS, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Stone GW, Boden WE, Min J, Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, Budoff M, Hague C, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Reynolds HR; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Ischemia Burden and Cardiovascular Events: Post-Hoc Analysis From the ISCHEMIA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2026 Mar;19(3):326-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.10.015. Epub 2025 Dec 5.
PubMed 41351610Ikemura N, Jones PG, Fu Z, Chan PS, Sherrod CF 4th, Arnold SV, Cohen DJ, Mark DB, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Trajectories of Angina After Initial Invasive vs Conservative Strategy for Chronic Coronary Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Sep 16;86(11):782-793. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.06.044.
PubMed 40930615Huded CP, Spertus JA, Jones PG, O'Brien SM, Mark DB, Bangalore S, Stone GW, Williams DO, White HD, Boden WE, Reynolds HR, Hochman JS, Maron DJ; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Health Status Outcomes With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in ISCHEMIA. Circulation. 2025 Sep 23;152(12):846-858. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.073591. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
PubMed 40910165Shaw LJ, Phillips LM, Leipsic J, Broderick S, Mieres JH, Marwick TH, Friedrich MG, Miller T, Lopes RD, Chow B, Cerci R, Blankstein R, DiCarli M, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Alexander KP, Stone GW, O'Brien S, Chaitman BR, Kwong RY, Picard MH, Berman DS, Reynolds HR; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Comparative Prognosis by Stress ECG and Stress Imaging: Results From the ISCHEMIA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Sep;18(9):943-955. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.03.016. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
PubMed 40637654
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01471522
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISCHEMIA / 11-00498
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Ischemia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 5,179 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- NYU Langone HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New York University, Stanford University, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Albany Stratton VA Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University, Duke University, East Carolina University, Emory University, Harvard University, Massachusetts General Hospital, Montreal Heart Institute, University of British Columbia, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Vanderbilt University
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Jul 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine the best management strategy for higher-risk patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 5179 randomized participants with moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing. A blinded coronary computed tomography angiogram (CCTA) was performed in most participants with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2 to identify and exclude participants with either significant unprotected left main disease (≥50% stenosis) or those without obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all major coronary arteries). Of 8518 participants enrolled, those that had insufficient ischemia, ineligible anatomy demonstrated on CCTA or another exclusion criterion, did not go on to randomization. Eligible participants were then assigned at random to a routine invasive strategy (INV) with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization, if feasible, plus optimal medical therapy (OMT) or to a conservative strategy (CON) of OMT, with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for those who fail OMT.
SPECIFIC AIMS
- Primary Aim The primary aim of the ISCHEMIA trial is to determine whether an initial invasive strategy of cardiac catheterization followed by optimal revascularization, if feasible, in addition to OMT, will reduce the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure in participants with SIHD and moderate or severe ischemia over an average follow-up of approximately 3.5 years compared with an initial conservative strategy of OMT alone with catheterization reserved for failure of OMT.
- Secondary Aims Secondary aims are to determine whether an initial invasive strategy compared to a conservative strategy will improve: 1) the composite of CV death or MI; 2) angina symptoms and quality of life, as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire; 3) all-cause mortality; 4) net clinical benefit assessed by including stroke in the primary and secondary composite endpoints; and 5) individual components of the composite endpoints.
Condition: Coronary Disease Procedure: Coronary CT Angiogram Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Cardiovascular Diseases Procedure: Angioplasty, Transluminal, Percutaneous Coronary, other catheter-based interventions Phase: Phase III per NIH
Condition: Heart Diseases Procedure: Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Phase: Phase III per NIH
Detailed description
BACKGROUND:
Evidence supporting a routine invasive practice paradigm for patients with SIHD is outdated. In strategy trials conducted in the 1970s, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improved survival as compared with no CABG in SIHD patients with high-risk anatomic features. The relevance of these studies today is speculative because contemporary secondary prevention-aspirin, beta-blockers, statins, ACE inhibitors, and lifestyle interventions-were used minimally if at all. Subsequent trials have compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with medical therapy, as PCI has replaced CABG as the dominant method of revascularization for SIHD. To date, PCI has not been shown to reduce death or myocardial infarction (MI) compared with medical therapy in SIHD patients.
COURAGE and BARI 2D, the two largest trials comparing coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in SIHD patients, found that among patients selected on the basis of coronary anatomy after cardiac catheterization, an initial management strategy of coronary revascularization (PCI, PCI or CABG, respectively) did not reduce the primary endpoints of death or MI (COURAGE), or death (BARI 2D) compared with OMT alone. These data suggest, but do not prove, that routine cardiac catheterization--which often leads to ad hoc PCI through the diagnostic-therapeutic cascade--may not be required in SIHD patients. However, most patients enrolled in COURAGE and BARI 2D who had ischemia severity documented at baseline had only mild or moderate ischemia, leaving open the question of the appropriate role of cardiac catheterization and revascularization among higher-risk patients with more severe ischemia. Observational data suggest that revascularization of patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia is associated with a lower mortality than medical therapy alone, but such data cannot establish a cause and effect relationship. In clinical practice only about half such patients are referred for cardiac catheterization, indicating equipoise. Furthermore, analysis of outcomes for 468 COURAGE patients with moderate-to-severe ischemia at baseline did not reveal a benefit from PCI. This issue cannot be resolved using available data because all prior SIHD strategy trials enrolled patients after cardiac catheterization, introducing undefined selection biases (e.g., highest risk patients not enrolled) and making translation of study results problematic for clinicians managing patients who have not yet had cardiac catheterization.
A clinical trial in SIHD patients uniformly at higher risk (which could not have been performed before COURAGE and BARI 2D results were available) is needed to inform optimal management for such patients.
DESIGN NARRATIVE, INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS DURING THE TRIAL
Primary Endpoint
A composite of CV death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure was proposed as the primary endpoint in the application that was funded by NLHBI, with a secondary endpoint of CV death or MI. Study protocol version 1.0 was finalized on January 18, 2012 after review and approval by the protocol review committee (DSMB) with the primary endpoint specified as the composite of CV death or MI. Regarding the final status of the primary endpoint, the protocol stated:
"To ensure that the primary analysis is well-powered and useful, a prospective plan to allow extending follow-up and/or changing the primary endpoint based on aggregate event rate data will be established prior to the first review of unblinded trial data. At a designated time during the trial, an analysis will be conducted to estimate the overall aggregate primary endpoint event rate and project the final number of observed events. If the estimated unconditional power (i.e. based on aggregate event rate data; not by treatment group) is less than the originally targeted 90%, then one or more of the following options will be considered:
- Extend follow-up to allow more events to accrue.
- Change the primary endpoint to one that occurs more frequently. The current primary endpoint would become a secondary endpoint. The proposed new primary endpoint would be the composite of CV death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure.
- Follow the recommendation of an independent advisory panel. An independent advisory panel, separate from the DSMB, will be convened for the purpose of reviewing unconditional power estimates and making a recommendation to the NHLBI Director. Members of this panel will not have access to unblinded data by treatment group or other data that may bias their recommendation." All 5 event types were adjudicated throughout the trial. Study protocol v2.0 (January 2014) allowed ischemia eligibility by non-imaging exercise stress test if more stringent (≥70% stenosis) CCTA criteria were met. The 2016 protocol addendum describes the NHLBI-approved reduction in sample size and extension of recruitment and follow-up due to slower than projected recruitment.
The pre-specified first analysis for monitoring and projecting the final aggregate number of primary endpoint events was conducted in 2015. In 2016, the projected need to increase the power by extending follow-up and elevating the 5-component secondary endpoint to become primary was discussed at Steering Committee and Investigator meetings and communicated by email.
An Independent Advisory Panel convened by NHLBI met in May 2017, and in June 2017 NHLBI approved the Independent Advisory Panel's recommendation to elevate the 5-component secondary endpoint to become primary and retain the 2-component composite as a key secondary endpoint. The panel also recommended extension of follow-up. This was communicated to the Steering Committee and Investigators at August and November 2017 meetings and by email. The last visit date was June 30, 2019.
A statistical plan developed for the Independent Advisory Panel process in 2012 specified that a decision about changing the primary endpoint would be targeted to occur before 75% of the final number of primary endpoint events had accrued. Although the final number of primary endpoint events was unknown during the course of the trial, estimates performed at the time of the Advisory Panel meeting suggested that the ratio of accrued endpoint events to final endpoint events was below 50%. See Maron DJ et al. Am Heart J. 2018 201:124-135. PMC6005768 for additional details about modifications to the trial while it was being conducted.
Analysis of Patients' Health Status as a Key Secondary Endpoint
A key secondary objective of the ISCHEMIA trial is to compare the quality of life outcomes-patients' symptoms, functioning and well-being-between those assigned to an invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. In the protocol, angina frequency and disease-specific quality of life measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Angina Frequency and Quality of Life scales, respectively, are described as the tools that will be used to make this comparative assessment. Recent work has indicated that it is possible to combine the information from the individual domain scores in the SAQ into a new Summary Score that captures the information from the SAQ Angina Frequency, Physical Limitation and Quality of Life scales into a single overall score. The advantages of using a summary score as the primary measure of QOL effects of a therapy are a single primary endpoint comparison rather than two or three (eliminating concerns some may have about multiple comparisons) and a more intuitive holistic (patient-centric) interpretation of the effectiveness results. With these advantages in mind, the ISCHEMIA leadership has agreed that the SAQ Summary Score will be designated as the primary way this outcome for this key secondary endpoint of the ISCHEMIA trial will be analyzed and interpreted, with the individual SAQ scores being used in a secondary, explanatory and descriptive role.
PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES:
North America:
Canada; Mexico; USA
South America:
Argentina; Brazil; Peru
Asia:
China; India; Japan; Malaysia; Singapore; Taiwan; Thailand; Russian Federation
Pacifica:
Australia; New Zealand
Europe:
Austria; Belgium; France; Germany; Hungary; Italy; Lithuania; Macedonia; Netherlands; Poland; Portugal; Romania; Serbia; Spain; Sweden; Switzerland; UK
Middle East:
Egypt; Israel; Saudi Arabia
Africa:
South Africa
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Invasive Strategy (INV) | Active comparator | Procedure: cardiac catheterization, Procedure: coronary artery bypass graft surgery, Procedure: percutaneous coronary intervention, Behavioral: Lifestyle, Drug: MedicationRoutine invasive strategy with cardiac catheterization followed by revascularization plus optimal medical therapy. |
| Conservative Strategy | Active comparator | Behavioral: Lifestyle, Drug: MedicationOptimal medical therapy with cardiac catheterization and revascularization reserved for patients with acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest or refractory symptoms. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- At least moderate ischemia on a qualifying stress test
- Participant is willing to comply with all aspects of the protocol, including adherence to the assigned strategy, medical therapy and follow-up visits
- Participant is willing to give written informed consent
- Age ≥ 21 years
Key exclusion criteria (28 listed)
- LVEF < 35%
- History of unprotected left main stenosis >50% on prior coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) or prior cardiac catheterization (if available)
- Finding of "no obstructive CAD" (<50% stenosis in all major epicardial vessels) on prior CCTA or prior catheterization, performed within 12 months
- Coronary anatomy unsuitable for either PCI or CABG
- Unacceptable level of angina despite maximal medical therapy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cardiac catheterizationAlso: cathNarrowed blood vessels can be opened without surgery using stents or can be bypassed with surgery. To determine which is the best approach for you the doctor needs to look at your blood vessels to see where the narrowings are and how much narrowing there is. This is done by a procedure known as a cardiac catheterization. | Procedure or surgery | Invasive Strategy (INV) |
| coronary artery bypass graft surgeryAlso: CABGArtery narrowing is bypassed during surgery with a healthy artery or vein from another part of the body. This is known as coronary artery bypass grafting, or CABG (said, "cabbage"). The surgery creates new routes around narrowed and blocked heart arteries. This allows more blood flow to the heart. | Procedure or surgery | Invasive Strategy (INV) |
| percutaneous coronary interventionAlso: PCIPercutaneous coronary intervention may be done as part of the cardiac catheterization procedure. With this procedure a small, hollow, mesh tube (stent) is inserted into the narrowed part of the artery. The stent pushes the plaque against the artery wall, and opens the vessel to allow better blood flow. | Procedure or surgery | Invasive Strategy (INV) |
| LifestyleAlso: Behavior changediet, physical activity, smoking cessation | Behavioural | Conservative Strategy, Invasive Strategy (INV) |
| MedicationAlso: Pharmacologic Therapyantiplatelet, statin, other lipid lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-ischemic medical therapies | Drug | Conservative Strategy, Invasive Strategy (INV) |
Primary outcome
Primary Composite Outcome: Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest
Time frame: 3.2 year follow-up (median)
Cumulative Event Rate of Primary Composite Outcome (Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest)
Time frame: 5 years
This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing the primary endpoint within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes or Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 5 years
This measure represents the estimated cumulative probability of experiencing Death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction within the indicated timeframe in each treatment group. The interpretation of the measure is similar to Kaplan-Meier event rates. Estimates are expressed as percentages ranging from 0% (endpoint is certain not to occur) to 100% (endpoint is certain to occur).
Number of Participants That Experienced Death From Any Cause
Time frame: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause
Time frame: 5 years
Number of Participants That Experienced Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 5 years
Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate ( %) of Primary Composite Outcome: Invasive Minus Conservative
Time frame: 5 years
The primary composite outcome includes death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Cardiovascular Causes: Invasive Minus Conservative or Myocardial Infarction Between Invasive and Conservative Strategies
Time frame: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Death From Any Cause: Invasive Minus Conservative
Time frame: 5 years
Estimated Difference in Cumulative Event Rate of Myocardial Infarction: Invasive Minus Conservative
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22137077Maron DJ, Stone GW, Berman DS, Mancini GB, Scott TA, Byrne DW, Harrell FE Jr, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Boden WE, Weintraub WS, Spertus JA. Is cardiac catheterization necessary before initial management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease? Results from a Web-based survey of cardiologists. Am Heart J. 2011 Dec;162(6):1034-1043.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.09.001.
- Background: PubMed 23963599Phillips LM, Hachamovitch R, Berman DS, Iskandrian AE, Min JK, Picard MH, Kwong RY, Friedrich MG, Scherrer-Crosbie M, Hayes SW, Sharir T, Gosselin G, Mazzanti M, Senior R, Beanlands R, Smanio P, Goyal A, Al-Mallah M, Reynolds H, Stone GW, Maron DJ, Shaw LJ. Lessons learned from MPI and physiologic testing in randomized trials of stable ischemic heart disease: COURAGE, BARI 2D, FAME, and ISCHEMIA. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013 Dec;20(6):969-75. doi: 10.1007/s12350-013-9773-4.
- Background: PubMed 29778671ISCHEMIA Trial Research Group; Maron DJ, Hochman JS, O'Brien SM, Reynolds HR, Boden WE, Stone GW, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Mark DB, Alexander KP, Shaw L, Berger JS, Ferguson TB Jr, Williams DO, Harrington RA, Rosenberg Y. International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 30810700Hochman JS, Reynolds HR, Bangalore S, O'Brien SM, Alexander KP, Senior R, Boden WE, Stone GW, Goodman SG, Lopes RD, Lopez-Sendon J, White HD, Maggioni AP, Shaw LJ, Min JK, Picard MH, Berman DS, Chaitman BR, Mark DB, Spertus JA, Cyr DD, Bhargava B, Ruzyllo W, Wander GS, Chernyavskiy AM, Rosenberg YD, Maron DJ; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Baseline Characteristics and Risk Profiles of Participants in the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):273-286. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42641674Phillips LM, Jones PG, Shaw LJ, Mark DB, Berman DS, Kwong RY, Picard MH, Chaitman BR, Min JK, Celutkiene J, Stone GW, Vitola J, Moorthy N, Steg PG, Ong P, Hueb WA, Rezende PC, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Reynolds HR, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Health status relationship to ischemia and coronary artery disease severity in the ISCHEMIA trial. Am Heart J. 2026 Aug 25;303:107586. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107586. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42554061O'Keefe EL, Saxon JT, Cho YJ, Jones PG, Mark DB, Bangalore S, Boden WE, Stone GW, Reynolds HR, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Assessing the Prognostic Value of Serial Seattle Angina Questionnaire Scores in Chronic Coronary Disease. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Aug 5:e013063. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.013063. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42384892O'Keefe E, Sperry BW, Jones PG, O'Keefe JH, Phillips LM, Reynolds HR, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Picard MH, Kwong RY, Chaitman BR, Bateman TM, Bangalore S, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Spertus JA; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Variability in Cardiac Stress Test Interpretation: Agreement Between Enrollment Sites and Core Laboratories in the Global ISCHEMIA Trial. Circ Popul Health Outcomes. 2026 Jul 1:e012920. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.125.012920. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42303606Muller M, Cornwell MG, Rajkumar S, Chen Z, Coit D, Drouard G, Sastourne-Haletou P, Yang H, Raitakari O, Lehtimaki T, Hochman J, Maron DJ, Berger JS, Newman JD, Ruggles KV; ISCHEMIA Biorepository Research Group. Whole blood epigenomic and transcriptomic characterization identifies vulnerable molecular subtypes of chronic coronary disease. Nat Commun. 2026 Jun 16;17(1):7647. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-73815-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42132177Singh A, Brown DL, Jones PG, Fu Z, Reynolds HR, Boden WE, O'Brien SM, Mavromatis K, Poh KK, Ali Z, Stone GW, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Maron DJ, Hochman JS; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Residual Angina Following Complete Revascularization in the ISCHEMIA Trial: Frequency, Clinical Characteristics, Health Status, and Cardiovascular Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026 May 19;15(10):e047355. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.047355. Epub 2026 May 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41978343Grodzinsky A, Cho YJ, Jones PG, Shaw LJ, Merz CNB, Boden WE, Stone GW, Mark DB, Spertus JA, Maron DJ, Hochman JS, Reynolds HR. Sex differences in coronary disease health Status outcomes: the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2026 Aug 11;12(5):765-769. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag052.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41812133Navarese EP, Talanas G, Kereiakes DJ, Henry TD, Gasior M, Kalarus Z, Uminska J, Burzotta F, Buffon A, Van Belle E, Wojakowski W, Mizia-Stec K, Smolka G, Hudzik B, Ciesla D, Waksman R, Kubica J, Sangiorgi GM, Farkouh ME, Stone GW, Andreotti F. Mortality score in chronic coronary syndrome: prediction model from the ISCHEMIA trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2026 Mar 11:zwag116. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwag116. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41351610Kwong RY, Heydari B, Abbasi S, Mongeon FP, Marcotte F, Friedrich M, Shaw LJ, Xu Y, Anthopolos R, Bekeredjian R, Monti L, Selvanayagam J, Lesiak M, Picard MH, Berman DS, Bangalore S, Spertus JA, Stone GW, Boden WE, Min J, Mancini GBJ, Leipsic J, Budoff M, Hague C, Hochman JS, Maron DJ, Reynolds HR; ISCHEMIA Research Group. Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Ischemia Burden and Cardiovascular Events: Post-Hoc Analysis From the ISCHEMIA Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2026 Mar;19(3):326-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2025.10.015. Epub 2025 Dec 5.
- Main Website for ISCHEMIA TrialLink provided by the sponsor.
- AngioplastyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryLink provided by the sponsor.
- Coronary Artery DiseaseLink provided by the sponsor.
- Heart DiseasesLink provided by the sponsor.
- ISCHEMIA Trial UpdateLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Data will be submitted to the NHLBI according to their guidelines within 3 years after the final patient follow-up (June 30, 2019) or 2 years after the main paper of the trial has been published, whichever comes first.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Judith S Hochman, MD study chair
New York University
David J Maron, MD principal investigator
Stanford University
320 sites in 37 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing cardiac catheterization, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with Cardiovascular Diseases and Coronary Disease, run by NYU Langone Health at 320 sites in 37 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 28 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 320 sites in United States, United Kingdom, China, Canada, India and 32 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Jul 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Composite Outcome: Death From Cardiovascular Causes, Myocardial Infarction, or Hospitalization for Unstable Angina, Heart Failure, or Resuscitated Cardiac Arrest (time frame: 3.2 year follow-up (median)). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01471522, which also lists 53 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2023.