AzTrials
AzTrials

Premature BirthMnMsNCT01482078

Magnesium for Neonatal Neuroprotection and Mothers

An observational study of Premature Birth and Sedation During Labor and Delivery; Complications, Pulmonary, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Magnesium is a treatment for mothers to protect brains of babies born early. This study investigates combined effects of magnesium and spinal or epidural anesthesia on mothers having cesareans. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older, women only
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
26 Jan 2012to Jul 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Obstetric patients planning to deliver at British Columbia's Women's Hospital * MgSO4 infusion cohort -Eligible parturients at less than 34 weeks gestational age with potential pre-term labor, pre-term rupture of membranes or intrauterine growth restriction. * Non-MgSO4 infusion cohort -We will approach a control group of subjects: i.e. parturients undergoing cesarean section (elective or emergency) with neuraxial anesthesia.

Who may be able to join

  • Delivering by cesarean section at less than 34 weeks gestational age (maximum 33 weeks and 6 days).
  • ≥19 yr
  • Singleton or multiple pregnancy
  • o There is potentially greater intra-abdominal pressure associated with multiple pregnancies, which may affect anesthetic block height by increasing blood volume in epidural blood vessels. It may also increase the risk of basal atelectasis and will affect respiratory mechanics to a greater extent. We plan to undertake sub-group analysis to test this effect.
  • Primiparous or multiparous
  • English-speaking
  • Undergoing cesarean section with neuraxial anesthesia (intrathecal, epidural or combined spinal epidural [CSE]).
  • Parturients response may not be identical to the different neuraxial techniques, e.g. the degree of respiratory motor blockade exhibited or onset of opioid effect. Therefore we plan to undertake sub-group analysis to test this effect.

Who cannot join

  • Illegal, non-prescription drug use within the last year
  • Psychiatric disorder treated with medication within the last year

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • BC Women's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1

    James D Taylor, BSc, 604-875-2424 ext. 6076, james.taylor1@phsa.ca

    James Brown, MB BCh, 604-875-2424 ext. 6120, James.Brown@cw.bc.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Prospective Observational Study, Maternal Effects of Magnesium Sulphate for Neonatal Neuroprotection in Women Having Cesarean Section Under Neuraxial Anesthesia

Magnesium is a treatment for mothers to protect brains of babies born early. This study investigates combined effects of magnesium and spinal or epidural anesthesia on mothers having cesareans.

The investigators will use a scoring system to measure sedation and devices that subjects breath in and out of to measure breathing strength.

The investigators hypothesize the combination of magnesium and anesthesia will reduce breathing strength and cause sedation.

This is an observational study comparing those having magnesium and anesthesia with those just having anesthesia. Routine medical care will not be altered.

Results will hopefully allow anesthesiologists to provide better patient care.

Read the detailed description
  1. Purpose Neonatal neuroprotection is a new indication for magnesium. Meta-analysis of the available literature suggests beneficial neonatal outcomes, but the direct effects on maternal health have not been studied. Unwanted effects of magnesium therapy such as sedation and respiratory insufficiency may be potentiated by neuraxial anesthesia placing the mother at risk of morbidity.
  2. Hypothesis or Aim Magnesium causes sedation and muscle weakness, which potentiates effects of neuraxial anesthesia, increases respiratory insufficiency, reduces cough effectiveness and increases pulmonary aspiration risk. We hypothesise that compared to the control group, the group receiving magnesium will have a reduced Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) by ≥15 cmH2O, or a 10% higher incidence of a composite sedation score ≤ 3.
  3. Justification for the study There is strong evidence in the medical literature to support the current guidelines and practice to treat parturients presenting for pre-term delivery, less than 34 weeks with magnesium. The presumed benefits are a reduction in the incidence and functional motor deficit from cerebral palsy, and possibly reduction in infant mortality. Treatment with magnesium represents the current accepted practice and level of care. Approximately 50% of these pre-term patients will require neuraxial anesthesia to enable cesarean section, using either intrathecal or epidural techniques. There are potential cumulative side effects from neuraxial anesthesia and magnesium but no studies have been done to examine this. Safety of magnesium in parturients has been demonstrated. The effects of magnesium are known as it is an established therapy in the management of pre-eclampsia. The consequences of neuraxial anesthesia are also well documented. This is a prospective observational study investigating the combined effects of magnesium administration and neuraxial anesthesia. Of particular interest are effects that may place the parturient at increased risk of complications, which need active assessment and management by anesthesiologists e.g. risks of pulmonary aspiration as a result of sedation, vomiting or reduced cough effectiveness. In addition to the effects of magnesium and neuraxial anesthesia, ventilatory mechanics in the parturient are further compromised by:
  • the effects of the gravid uterus, displacing the diaphragm and altering the subcostal angle.
  • supine positioning on the operating table impeding ventilation because of the gravitational effect on abdominal contents.
  • the practice of "skin-to-skin" in the operating room, sitting baby on the patient's chest and mechanically impeding respiratory effort. Although we are interested in potential complications due to the use of magnesium in conjunction with neuraxial anesthesia, there are potential advantages of magnesium for the mother, especially with epidurals, including a reduction in shivering and improved quality of analgesia.
  1. Research Method

This is a prospective, observational study with a comparison control group.

Our target population is women delivering by cesarean with neuraxial anesthesia at BC Women's Hospital. The study group includes those women <34 weeks who are receiving magnesium for neonatal neuroprotection, and the control group includes those >34 weeks who are not receiving magnesium for neonatal neuroprotection.

We propose to study a convenience sample over a 5-month period. In the last 3 years at BC Women's Hospital there have been a mean of 243 deliveries per year at less than 34 weeks and 128 of these are by cesarean section. Over a 5-month period with an average number of presentations it would be theoretically possible to recruit 50 patients.

We realistically expect to recruit 20 patients to the study group. A larger pool of patients is available for the control group and we will aim to recruit the number as directed by the power calculation.

Sample Size and statistical analysis:

The sample size has been chosen for the primary outcome of MEP, to determine a minimum difference in means of 15 cmH20, with an alpha or 0.05 and power of 0.8. The two-sample t-test will be used to analyse normally distributed data (e.g. MEP, MIP, FVC). Chi-squared tests will be used to compare categorical variables between the groups (e.g. composite sedation score OAA/S ≤3 or >3). If there is a significant between group difference we plan to undertake regression analysis to identify independently contributing effects after taking into account demographic factors.

It is hoped that the study will be beneficial in increasing understanding of potential effects of combining magnesium and neuraxial anesthesia in the obstetric population presenting for pre-term cesarean section. Highlighting any potential risks and improving patient safety in the future. This study will to a certain extent also be hypothesis generating in nature.

Keywords
Magnesium Sulphate, Neuroprotection, Neuraxial Anesthesia, Sedation, Respiratory function, Cesarean Section, Obstetrical Anesthesia
Medical subject headings
Premature Birth, Respiratory Insufficiency, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01482078
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Receive MgSO4 infusionParturients who present to the hospital at less than 34 weeks gestational age with potential pre-term labor, pre-term rupture of membranes or intrauterine growth restriction
Do not receive MgSO4 infusionWe will approach a control group of subjects: i.e. parturients undergoing cesarean section (elective or emergency) with neuraxial anesthesia. We will seek to ensure that the control group is similar to the study group with respect to the following parameters: * Number of singleton or multiple pregnancy * Parity of parturients * Anesthetic technique (spinal or epidural) * Time of cesarean section (08:00-19:59 or 20:00 to 07:59) Once informed consent is obtained these subjects will be treated identically to the study group in terms of anesthetic management and data collection.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal Expiratory Pressure

    We consider 15 cmH20 difference in MEP to be clinically significant.

    Measured: 3 minutes for each of 5 tests over 2 hours

  2. Composite sedation score

    A composite score of ≤3 (at any data collection point). This implies one of the following criteria:

    • Subject responds only after name is spoken loudly or repeatedly
    • Speech is slurred or slow
    • Marked relaxation of facial expression
    • Both eyes are glazed with marked ptosis.

    We judge this degree and incidence of sedation to be clinically significant. It would certainly be sufficient to interfere with maternal interaction with the newborn, would likely affect maternal memory of the event, and would place the mother at risk of potential airway compromise and respiratory insufficiency.

    Measured: 30 seconds for each of 6 tests over 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. To compare the following respiratory measurements

    • oxygen saturation ≤95% (% of patients)
    • ETCO2 increase of ≥5mmHg from baseline (% of patients)
    • MEP ≤ 60cmH20 (% of patients)
    • MIP 30% decrease from baseline (% of patients)
    • Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) decrease ≥30% from baseline (% of patients)

    Measured: 3 minutes for each of 5 tests over 2 hours

  2. To compare the following sedation measurements

    • lowest sedation score <4 (% of patients)
    • sedation score decrease of >1 from baseline (% of patients) • nausea and vomiting

    Measured: 30 seconds for each of 6 tests over 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Jan 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01482078
Sponsor's protocol ID
H11-02970
Acronym
MnMs
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
28 Nov 2011
Last updated
12 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Premature Birth and Sedation During Labor and Delivery; Complications, Pulmonary, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact James D Taylor, BSc (604-875-2424 ext. 6076, james.taylor1@phsa.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal Expiratory Pressure (time frame: 3 minutes for each of 5 tests over 2 hours). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in