Coronary Artery DiseaseBIF IVNCT01496638
The Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV
A study testing Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented? A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Dec 2008to Jan 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris or silent angina pectoris.
- Genuine bifurcation lesion ( Medina type 1,1,1 or 1,0,1 or 0,1,1)
- Lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA-PDA/posterolateral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
- Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate >3.0 mm.
- Diameter of side branch by visual estimate >2.75 mm.
- Signed informed consent.
Who cannot join
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- Side branch lesion length >15 mm.
- Expected survival < 1 year.
- S-creatinine >200 µmol/l.
- Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
- Allergy to Sirolimus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: How Should Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branch be Stented? A Strategy of Stenting Both Main Vessel and Side Branch Compared to a Strategy of Stenting the Main Vessel and Only Stenting the Side Branch if Necessary.
How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented?
A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary.
The 2-stent strategy is superior to the 1-stent strategy regarding occurrence of cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction and re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Read the detailed description
Design:
- Randomised open multicentre trial.
Patients:
- Number 450.
Randomisation:
- No side branch treatment group or stenting of main vessel and side branch group.
Evaluation of endpoints:
- Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed by an independent endpoint committee.
- The endpoint committee will consist of experienced cardiologists with professor Kristian Thygesen, Aarhus Universitetshospital, as chairman.
Sample size calculation:
- A total of 225 patients will be included in each group, in total 450 patients. We expect a primary endpoint rate of 10% (cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction related to index lesion or TLR after 6 months) in the 1- stent strategy group and of 3% in the 2-stent strategy group. With an alpha of 5% and a strength of 80%, 194 patients will be needed in each group (two-sided chi-square test) to demonstrate this difference. The expected primary endpoint rate after 6 months is based on 6 months MACE rates and on the angiographic results in our previously published studies. In these studies, a 6 months MACE rate of 3.7% was found in the culotte group of the Nordic Stent Technique Study. Besides, an angiographic restenosis rate of 19.2% in the 1-stent strategy group in the Nordic Bifurcation Study is estimated to translate to a MACE rate of approximately 10% in the present study.
Analysis of the population:
- The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Data management:
- The study is reported to Datatilsynet (The Danish Data Protection Agency) and the agency's guidelines for data management will be followed.
Dedicated case record forms (CRF) will be used and faxed to PCI research, Cardiac Cath. Lab., Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Data will be stored in an Access database and double data entry will be used as quality control. There will be a log of accesses and attempt of accesses. Back-up data and original data will be cryptotized.
Monitoring of the study:
- The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals. During the study period, monitors will have regular contact to the participating departments to ensure that the trial is conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements
Publication:
- Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (drafting of protocol, core lab. function, end point committee membership, etc.) and of number of included patients.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Being tested
- Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion
- Keywords
- PCI, Bifurcation lesion
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionProcedure or surgery
Also called PCI, PTCA
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with no side branch treatment
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionProcedure or surgery
Also called PCI, PTCA
Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with stenting of main vessel and side branch
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| "No side branch treatment" group | Experimental | Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion Receives: Procedure: Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion |
| "Stenting of main vessel and side branch" group | Experimental | Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion Receives: Procedure: Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined endpoint of: Cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation
Measured: After 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
MACE (cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revasculation)
Measured: During admission, after 1, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Cardiac death.
Measured: During the admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Non-index procedure related myocardial infarction during the admission.
Measured: After 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Stent thrombosis.
Measured: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Total mortality
Measured: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months and 10 years.
target lesion revascularisation.
Measured: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
target vessel revascularisation.
Measured: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Index procedure related myocardial infarction based on biomarkers (CK-MB mass, TNT/TNI
Measured: During hospital period, 1, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months
CCS angina class
Measured: After 6, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2008
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionJan 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej Christiansen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Evald Hoej Christiansen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
- Investigators
- Niels R Holm, MD, Principal investigator, MD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01496638
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20080192
- Acronym
- BIF IV
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 2 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kumsars I, Holm NR, Niemela M, Erglis A, Kervinen K, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Dombrovskis A, Abraitis V, Kibarskis A, Trovik T, Latkovskis G, Sondore D, Narbute I, Terkelsen CJ, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Laine M, Jensen LO, Pietila M, Gunnes P, Hebsgaard L, Frobert O, Calais F, Hartikainen J, Aaroe J, Ravkilde J, Engstrom T, Steigen TK, Thuesen L, Lassen JF; Nordic Baltic bifurcation study group. Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 19;7(1):e000947. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 32076558
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How Should Coronary Artery Stenoses With Significant Side Branch be Stented? A Strategy of Stenting Both Main Vessel and Side Branch Compared to a Strategy of Stenting the Main Vessel and Only Stenting the Side Branch if Necessary.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01496638
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BIF IV / 20080192
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Keywords
- PCI, Bifurcation lesion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Evald Hoej ChristiansenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson
- Study start
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Dec 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
How should coronary artery stenoses with significant side branch be stented?
A strategy of stenting both main vessel and side branch compared to a strategy of stenting the main vessel and only stenting the side branch if necessary.
The 2-stent strategy is superior to the 1-stent strategy regarding occurrence of cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction and re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
Detailed description
Design:
- Randomised open multicentre trial.
Patients:
- Number 450.
Randomisation:
- No side branch treatment group or stenting of main vessel and side branch group.
Evaluation of endpoints:
- Primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed by an independent endpoint committee.
- The endpoint committee will consist of experienced cardiologists with professor Kristian Thygesen, Aarhus Universitetshospital, as chairman.
Sample size calculation:
- A total of 225 patients will be included in each group, in total 450 patients. We expect a primary endpoint rate of 10% (cardiac death, non-procedure related myocardial infarction related to index lesion or TLR after 6 months) in the 1- stent strategy group and of 3% in the 2-stent strategy group. With an alpha of 5% and a strength of 80%, 194 patients will be needed in each group (two-sided chi-square test) to demonstrate this difference. The expected primary endpoint rate after 6 months is based on 6 months MACE rates and on the angiographic results in our previously published studies. In these studies, a 6 months MACE rate of 3.7% was found in the culotte group of the Nordic Stent Technique Study. Besides, an angiographic restenosis rate of 19.2% in the 1-stent strategy group in the Nordic Bifurcation Study is estimated to translate to a MACE rate of approximately 10% in the present study.
Analysis of the population:
- The results will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Data management:
- The study is reported to Datatilsynet (The Danish Data Protection Agency) and the agency's guidelines for data management will be followed.
Dedicated case record forms (CRF) will be used and faxed to PCI research, Cardiac Cath. Lab., Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark. Data will be stored in an Access database and double data entry will be used as quality control. There will be a log of accesses and attempt of accesses. Back-up data and original data will be cryptotized.
Monitoring of the study:
- The study will be monitored according to the GCP rules by independent professionals. During the study period, monitors will have regular contact to the participating departments to ensure that the trial is conducted in compliance with the protocol, GCP and applicable regulatory requirements
Publication:
- Results, positive as well as negative, will be published in an international cardiovascular journal. Publication and author issues will be decided by the steering committee on basis of general involvement in the study (drafting of protocol, core lab. function, end point committee membership, etc.) and of number of included patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| "No side branch treatment" group | Experimental | Procedure: Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion |
| "Stenting of main vessel and side branch" group | Experimental | Procedure: Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Stable or unstable angina pectoris or silent angina pectoris.
- Genuine bifurcation lesion ( Medina type 1,1,1 or 1,0,1 or 0,1,1)
- Lesion of "LAD/diagonal", "Cx/obtuse marginal", "RCA-PDA/posterolateral branch" or "LM/Cx/LAD".
- Diameter of main vessel by visual estimate >3.0 mm.
- Diameter of side branch by visual estimate >2.75 mm.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ST-elevation infarction within 24 hours.
- Side branch lesion length >15 mm.
- Expected survival < 1 year.
- S-creatinine >200 µmol/l.
- Allergy to Aspirin, Clopidogrel or Ticlopidine.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionAlso: PCI, PTCAImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with no side branch treatment | Procedure or surgery | "No side branch treatment" group |
| Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesionAlso: PCI, PTCAImplantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion with stenting of main vessel and side branch | Procedure or surgery | "Stenting of main vessel and side branch" group |
Primary outcome
Combined endpoint of: Cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation
Time frame: After 6 months
9 secondary outcomes
MACE (cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis or target lesion revasculation)
Time frame: During admission, after 1, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Cardiac death.
Time frame: During the admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Non-index procedure related myocardial infarction during the admission.
Time frame: After 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Stent thrombosis.
Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Total mortality
Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months and 10 years.
target lesion revascularisation.
Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
target vessel revascularisation.
Time frame: During admission, after 1, 6, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Index procedure related myocardial infarction based on biomarkers (CK-MB mass, TNT/TNI
Time frame: During hospital period, 1, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months
CCS angina class
Time frame: After 6, 8, 24, 36 and 60 months.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Jan 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32076558Kumsars I, Holm NR, Niemela M, Erglis A, Kervinen K, Christiansen EH, Maeng M, Dombrovskis A, Abraitis V, Kibarskis A, Trovik T, Latkovskis G, Sondore D, Narbute I, Terkelsen CJ, Eskola M, Romppanen H, Laine M, Jensen LO, Pietila M, Gunnes P, Hebsgaard L, Frobert O, Calais F, Hartikainen J, Aaroe J, Ravkilde J, Engstrom T, Steigen TK, Thuesen L, Lassen JF; Nordic Baltic bifurcation study group. Randomised comparison of provisional side branch stenting versus a two-stent strategy for treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions involving a large side branch: the Nordic-Baltic Bifurcation Study IV. Open Heart. 2020 Jan 19;7(1):e000947. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000947. eCollection 2020.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Recruiting
Multivessel Balloon Occlusion to Investigate Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and aNgina
Stable Angina, Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Lipoic Acid on Chronic Ischemic Heart Failure Patients
Heart Failure Due to Coronary Artery Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Functional-Nutritional Status in Older Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Acoustics for Early Disease Detection
Valvular Heart Disease, Coronary Artery Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Niels R Holm, MD principal investigator
MD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implantation of coronary stent in bifurcation lesion in people with Coronary Artery Disease, run by Evald Hoej Christiansen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined endpoint of: Cardiac death, non-index procedure related myocardial infarction or target lesion revascularisation (time frame: After 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01496638, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2026.