AzTrials
AzTrials

Radius Fracture DistalNCT01497080

Distal Radius Fracture Prospective Database 50-80 Years Old

An observational study of Radius Fracture Distal, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Problem Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common and result in a variable amount of disability. The investigators have completed considerable work in developing tools that measure impairment and disability after DRF . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Radius Fracture Distal
How many people
195 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2012to Jan 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants aged 50-80 years of age who have incurred a wrist fracture

Who may be able to join

  • individuals 50-80 years old
  • one month of fracture resulting from a fall from standing height or less will be recruited through our orthopedic surgeon
  • wrist fracture

Who cannot join

  • previous history of humeral, hip or vertebral fracture
  • Testing will not be performed on patients with evident postural instability, severe chronic conditions (Parkinson's disease) or other vestibulo-ocular abnormalities.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • HULC, St Joseph's health Care London

    London, Ontario, N6A 4V2

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Distal Radius Fracture Prospective Database 50-80 Years Old Overview: "Identification of Risk of Adverse Activity Transition Following a Distal Radius Fracture".

The Problem Distal radius fractures (DRF) are common and result in a variable amount of disability. The investigators have completed considerable work in developing tools that measure impairment and disability after DRF . The investigators initial studies indicate that the associated disablement process is multifactorial and variable with only 25% of the resultant disability predicted by baseline patient and injury characteristics. The investigators see DRF as a signal event where some people are at-risk of transitioning from an active lifestyle to inactivity and subsequent health risks. The investigators recent data confirms variable participation following a DRF. The traditional focus in orthopedic/rehabilitative approaches to DRF fracture management has been localized to the wrist, largely ignoring this potential transition and its health impacts. The investigators will initiate a line of investigation that will profile the at-risk older adult who presents with a DRF with the ultimate goal of accurate identification and prevention of adverse activity transitions (active to inactive). In this study the investigators will identify the extent of the problem by quantifying changes in activity/participation and its short-term health impacts. The investigators will also identify the risk factors present at time of injury that predict a loss of mobility/activity/participation. This work has the potential to identify tools and/or clinical prediction rules that identify at-risk individuals at a critical time where early intervention might most easily prevent adverse outcomes associated with inactivity.

Keywords
distal radius fracture, Condition, risk factors, adverse activity transitions following DRF, optimal assessment approach
Medical subject headings
Wrist Fractures, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01497080
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Not described
activity levelNot described
no treatmentNot described

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionJan 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
195 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01497080
Sponsor's protocol ID
18482
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
19 Dec 2011
Last updated
19 Mar 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Colquhoun HL, Letts LJ, Law MC, MacDermid JC, Missiuna CA. A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation. Can J Occup Ther. 2010 Dec;77(5):270-9. doi: 10.2182/cjot.2010.77.5.3.

    PubMed 21268509
  • Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Pope J, Chesworth BM. Baseline predictors of pain and disability one year following extra-articular distal radius fractures. Hand (N Y). 2007 Sep;2(3):104-11. doi: 10.1007/s11552-007-9030-x. Epub 2007 Mar 23.

    PubMed 18780068

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Radius Fracture Distal, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01497080, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in