AzTrials
AzTrials

StressNCT01502189

Information to Parents of Children With Cancer. An Exploratory Study

A study testing Representational approach in people with Stress and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Umeå University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to explore whether an intensified informational intervention built upon the Representational approach framework can reduce stress in parents of children with cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stress, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
What is being tested?
Representational approach
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Feb 2012to Aug 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being a parent of a child that
  • is diagnosed with a first occurrence of a malignancy that is curatively treated
  • was diagnosed two months ago
  • Able to talk, read and write Swedish enough to be able to participate without an interpreter
  • Have access to a computer and an internet connection.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Umeå University Hospital

    Umeå, Västerbotten County, 90185

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

The aim of this study is to explore whether an intensified informational intervention built upon the Representational approach framework can reduce stress in parents of children with cancer.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND

Parents of children with cancer have great information needs and report that these are not always met. Psychosocial suffering such as stress and anxiety is also common in this group.

HYPOTHESIS

An informational intervention emanating from the needs identified by parents is associated to decreased perceived stress, decreased depressive symptoms, decreased anxiety, increased satisfaction with information and decreased use of health care contacts in parents.

INTERVENTION

The intervention builds upon the Representational approach. This approach emanates from Leventhal's theories of illness representations and theories of conceptual change. Central qualities in the approach is that parents identify the area where information is needed themselves and that a thorough assessment of their current representation of that area is performed before information is given.

Each participating parent receives three rounds that consist of two meetings. Each round starts with a meeting where the parent identifies an area where he/she needs more information. The nurse and the parent jointly survey the parent's representation of the area and discusses consequences of knowledge gaps or misunderstandings. Then, new information is introduced and benefits from the new information is discussed. After some days, a follow-up meeting takes place.

DESIGN AND METHODS

The intervention will be evaluated using a single-case design (A-B-A-B-A-B-A) with 10 parents. All parents will receive the intervention, and repeated measures of the outcome variables both before and after will be used to assess the effect of the intervention. Data will be collected by web questionnaires with SMS- and e-mail reminders.

In parallel, a process evaluation aiming at describing treatment fidelity, experiences of participation and impact of contextual factors on the results. For this aim, qualitative interviews with participants and audio recording of intervention sessions will be used.

Being tested
Representational approach
Keywords
patient education as topic, representational approach, parents, childhood cancer, paediatric oncology, nursing, parents of children with cancer, Stress, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Medical subject headings
Behavior, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Representational approachOther

    The Representational approach as described in the detailed description. Each participating parent receives three rounds that consist of two meetings. Each round starts with a meeting where the parent identifies an area where he/she needs more information. The nurse and the parent jointly survey the parent's representation of the area and discusses consequences of knowledge gaps or misunderstandings. Then, new information is introduced and benefits from the new information is discussed. After some days, a follow-up meeting takes place.

Study groups in NCT01502189
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Representational approachExperimentalThe Representational approach as described in the detailed description.
Receives: Other: Representational approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perceived stress

    As measured by the Perceived stress scale (PSS). 10 items answered on a 5-point Likert scale.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Physical symptoms from stress

    Includes headache, sleep disturbances, palpitations, and heartburn, each measured on a 4-point scale.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

  2. Anxiety

    Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

  3. Depressive symptoms

    Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

  4. Satisfaction with information

    Includes general satisfaction with the information from the health care professionals as well as information from the intervention nurses. Measured on a 7-point visual digital scale.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).

  5. Healthcare contacts

    Number of contacts with the health care system concerning the ill child and the parent's own health problems.

    Measured: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured once a week for a total of 11 weeks).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01502189
Sponsor's protocol ID
PROJ07/029
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
21 Dec 2011
Last updated
3 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Representational approach in people with Stress and Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, run by Umeå University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perceived stress (time frame: Changes during baseline and intervention period (measured twice a week for a total of 11 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in