OsteoporosisPAADRNNCT01507662
Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification
A study testing Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure in people with Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Metabolic, run by Fredric D Wolinsky at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
There is growing evidence that patients undergoing bone mineral density testing (BMD) often do not take important steps to improve their bone health. The investigators will conduct a randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel and practical patient activation intervention (mailing patients their bone… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
- What is being tested?
- Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7,749 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- patients presenting for DXA
- age 50 years of age or older
Who cannot join
- non-English speakers
- prisoners
- people who have mental disabilities
- individuals younger than age 50 years
- individuals who do not have access to a telephone
- deaf patients
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
Kaiser Permanente Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30305
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
About this study
There is growing evidence that patients undergoing bone mineral density testing (BMD) often do not take important steps to improve their bone health. The investigators will conduct a randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel and practical patient activation intervention (mailing patients their bone density test results) on the quality of bone-related healthcare and the cost-effectiveness of BMD testing. Equally important, the investigators intervention could easily be modified to include other patient populations and chronic diseases.
Read the detailed description
Bone mineral density (BMD) peaks in early adulthood and declines progressively with aging. As BMD declines from normal, to low (formerly called osteopenia), to osteoporosis, risk of fractures progressively increases. In an effort to prevent bone loss and reduce fracture risk, most widely accepted guidelines including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and Surgeon General's Office now recommend BMD screening of older adults using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The rationale for screening is that patients and their providers will use DXA results as a "cue to action" and take necessary steps to enhance bone health through lifestyle modification (e.g., weight bearing exercise), Calcium/Vitamin D supplementation, and pharmacotherapy when indicated. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that patients and providers often fail take recommended actions following DXA testing, thus defeating much of the purpose of screening. Over the past five years we have systematically developed and pilot tested a low-cost and practical patient activation intervention based upon the Health Belief Model. The intervention consists of the DXA scanning center mailing each patient a customized letter containing the results of their DXA scan plus educational information about osteoporosis, supplemented by a follow-up phone call from a nurse educator. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that the intervention is well received by both patients and providers and enhances bone-related quality of care. The overarching objective of the current proposal is to rigorously examine the impact of our patient activation intervention on bone-related quality of care in adults undergoing screening DXA scans through a randomized-controlled trial conducted at three study sites. In addition, we will examine the real-world costs associated with our intervention and the impact of our intervention on the overall cost-effectiveness of BMD screening. We hypothesize that the activation intervention will increase optimization of Calcium/Vitamin D intake, enhance use of pharmacotherapy when indicated, will improve patient satisfaction with their bone-related healthcare, and improve patients' osteoporosis specific knowledge when compared with usual care
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
- Being tested
- Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure
- Keywords
- Bone Density, Absorptiometry, Photon, Osteoporosis, Bone, Diseases, Metabolic, Patient Education as Topic, Fractures, Bone/Prevention and Control
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic, Fractures, Bone
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health BrochureBehavioural
Letter mailed to patient to include - Date of DXA, T-score, impression, 10 year major fracture risk with visual depiction of risk, basic bone health guidelines, instructions to follow-up with their healthcare provider. The brochure will include information on osteoporosis, calcium, vitamin D, medicines, exercise, tobacco and alcohol cessation and where to find more information.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BMD Result Letter and Brochure | Experimental | Patients who receive the intervention - BMD result letter with brochure. Receives: Behavioral: Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure |
| Control | No intervention | Those who received usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Guideline Concordant Osteoporosis Therapy
Guideline concordant was defined as those who prescribed a National Osteoporosis Foundation approved osteoporosis therapy for patients with osteoporosis (T-score of femoral neck, hip, or spine ≤-2.5 or FRAX ≥20 %), or patients with a self-reported history of low impact fracture, or patients with osteopenia (T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 at the femoral neck, hips, or lumbar spine) and a 10-year probability of a major osteoporosis-related fracture ≥20 % OR those who were not prescribed a therapy for patients with no self-reported history of prior DXA and study DXA shows normal BMD and no self-reported history of low impact fracture, or study DXA shows osteopenia (T-score of femoral neck, hip, or spine between -1 and -2.5) and FRAX <20 %) and no self-reported history of low impact fracture, or self-reported prior DXA but no self-reported history of low impact fracture and no self-reported history of osteoporosis.
Measured: 12 weeks after DXA
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionNov 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for OsteoporosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 7,749 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fredric D Wolinsky
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Kaiser Permanente, University of Toronto, University of Pittsburgh
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Fredric D Wolinsky, University of Iowa
- Investigators
- Fredric Wolinsky, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Iowa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01507662
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201107758
- Acronym
- PAADRN
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Dec 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Edmonds SW, Wolinsky FD, Christensen AJ, Lu X, Jones MP, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P; PAADRN Investigators. The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
PubMed 23085132Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Lu X, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jun 5;8:827-41. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S60106. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24940049Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lu X, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Saag KG, Solimeo SL; PAADRN Investigators. Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 25;14:101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0101-y.
PubMed 25743200Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Wright NC, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure. Perm J. 2017;21:16-024. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-024. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
PubMed 28080957Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lou Y, Jones MP, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. Effects of a DXA result letter on satisfaction, quality of life, and osteoporosis knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 26;17(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1227-0.
PubMed 27562713Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Wright NC, Saag KG, Cram P, Roblin DW; PAADRN Investigators. Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Densitom. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
PubMed 27647261Cram P, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Saag KG; PAADRN Investigators. Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2016 Dec;27(12):3513-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
PubMed 27363400Roblin DW, Cram P, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Saag KG, Wright NC, Cromwell LF, Robinson BE, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. The Contribution of Patient, Primary Care Physician, and Primary Care Clinic Factors to Good Bone Health Care. Perm J. 2021 Jan;25:1-3. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.095.
PubMed 33635767Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Edmonds SW, Lou Y, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P, Wolinsky FD. Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA. Osteoporos Int. 2019 May;30(5):1033-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04854-6. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PubMed 30701343Hall SF, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds S, Roblin D, Jones M, Saag K, Cram P. The prevalence of overtreatment of osteoporosis: results from the PAADRN trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Sep 28;13(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0517-6.
PubMed 30267162Roblin DW, Cram P, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. Diet and exercise changes following bone densitometry in the Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0402-8.
PubMed 29307094Wolinsky FD, Hall SF, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Saag KG, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Cram P; PAADRN Investigators; Curtis JR, Morgan SL, Schlechte JA, Williams JH, Zelman DJ. The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3061-3066. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4113-1. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
PubMed 28620779Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Saag KG, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Cram P; PAADRN Investigators. The effects of a patient activation intervention on smoking and excessive drinking cessations: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3055-3060. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4101-5. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
PubMed 28573377Cram P, Saag KG, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators*. Racial Differences and Disparities in Osteoporosis-related Bone Health: Results From the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Care. 2017 Jun;55(6):561-568. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000718.
PubMed 28288074
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01507662
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PAADRN / 201107758
- Conditions
- Osteoporosis, Bone Diseases, Metabolic
- Keywords
- Bone Density, Absorptiometry, Photon, Osteoporosis, Bone, Diseases, Metabolic, Patient Education as Topic, Fractures, Bone/Prevention and Control
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7,749 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fredric D WolinskyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Kaiser Permanente, University of Toronto, University of Pittsburgh
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jan 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is growing evidence that patients undergoing bone mineral density testing (BMD) often do not take important steps to improve their bone health. The investigators will conduct a randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a novel and practical patient activation intervention (mailing patients their bone density test results) on the quality of bone-related healthcare and the cost-effectiveness of BMD testing. Equally important, the investigators intervention could easily be modified to include other patient populations and chronic diseases.
Detailed description
Bone mineral density (BMD) peaks in early adulthood and declines progressively with aging. As BMD declines from normal, to low (formerly called osteopenia), to osteoporosis, risk of fractures progressively increases. In an effort to prevent bone loss and reduce fracture risk, most widely accepted guidelines including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and Surgeon General's Office now recommend BMD screening of older adults using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The rationale for screening is that patients and their providers will use DXA results as a "cue to action" and take necessary steps to enhance bone health through lifestyle modification (e.g., weight bearing exercise), Calcium/Vitamin D supplementation, and pharmacotherapy when indicated. However, multiple studies have demonstrated that patients and providers often fail take recommended actions following DXA testing, thus defeating much of the purpose of screening. Over the past five years we have systematically developed and pilot tested a low-cost and practical patient activation intervention based upon the Health Belief Model. The intervention consists of the DXA scanning center mailing each patient a customized letter containing the results of their DXA scan plus educational information about osteoporosis, supplemented by a follow-up phone call from a nurse educator. Preliminary studies have demonstrated that the intervention is well received by both patients and providers and enhances bone-related quality of care. The overarching objective of the current proposal is to rigorously examine the impact of our patient activation intervention on bone-related quality of care in adults undergoing screening DXA scans through a randomized-controlled trial conducted at three study sites. In addition, we will examine the real-world costs associated with our intervention and the impact of our intervention on the overall cost-effectiveness of BMD screening. We hypothesize that the activation intervention will increase optimization of Calcium/Vitamin D intake, enhance use of pharmacotherapy when indicated, will improve patient satisfaction with their bone-related healthcare, and improve patients' osteoporosis specific knowledge when compared with usual care
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BMD Result Letter and Brochure | Experimental | Behavioral: Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health BrochurePatients who receive the intervention - BMD result letter with brochure. |
| Control | No intervention | –Those who received usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- patients presenting for DXA
- age 50 years of age or older
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- non-English speakers
- prisoners
- people who have mental disabilities
- individuals younger than age 50 years
- individuals who do not have access to a telephone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health BrochureLetter mailed to patient to include - Date of DXA, T-score, impression, 10 year major fracture risk with visual depiction of risk, basic bone health guidelines, instructions to follow-up with their healthcare provider. The brochure will include information on osteoporosis, calcium, vitamin D, medicines, exercise, tobacco and alcohol cessation and where to find more information. | Behavioural | BMD Result Letter and Brochure |
Primary outcome
Guideline Concordant Osteoporosis Therapy
Time frame: 12 weeks after DXA
Guideline concordant was defined as those who prescribed a National Osteoporosis Foundation approved osteoporosis therapy for patients with osteoporosis (T-score of femoral neck, hip, or spine ≤-2.5 or FRAX ≥20 %), or patients with a self-reported history of low impact fracture, or patients with osteopenia (T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 at the femoral neck, hips, or lumbar spine) and a 10-year probability of a major osteoporosis-related fracture ≥20 % OR those who were not prescribed a therapy for patients with no self-reported history of prior DXA and study DXA shows normal BMD and no self-reported history of low impact fracture, or study DXA shows osteopenia (T-score of femoral neck, hip, or spine between -1 and -2.5) and FRAX <20 %) and no self-reported history of low impact fracture, or self-reported prior DXA but no self-reported history of low impact fracture and no self-reported history of osteoporosis.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23085132Edmonds SW, Wolinsky FD, Christensen AJ, Lu X, Jones MP, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P; PAADRN Investigators. The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):90-100. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
- Background: PubMed 24940049Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Lu X, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Developing a bone mineral density test result letter to send to patients: a mixed-methods study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jun 5;8:827-41. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S60106. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 25743200Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lu X, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Saag KG, Solimeo SL; PAADRN Investigators. Improving bone mineral density reporting to patients with an illustration of personal fracture risk. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Nov 25;14:101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0101-y.
- Background: PubMed 28080957Edmonds SW, Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Wright NC, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P. Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure. Perm J. 2017;21:16-024. doi: 10.7812/TPP/16-024. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 27562713Edmonds SW, Cram P, Lou Y, Jones MP, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. Effects of a DXA result letter on satisfaction, quality of life, and osteoporosis knowledge: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 26;17(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1227-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 27647261Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Wright NC, Saag KG, Cram P, Roblin DW; PAADRN Investigators. Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Densitom. 2017 Oct-Dec;20(4):464-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 27363400Cram P, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Saag KG; PAADRN Investigators. Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2016 Dec;27(12):3513-3524. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3681-9. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33635767Roblin DW, Cram P, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Saag KG, Wright NC, Cromwell LF, Robinson BE, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. The Contribution of Patient, Primary Care Physician, and Primary Care Clinic Factors to Good Bone Health Care. Perm J. 2021 Jan;25:1-3. doi: 10.7812/TPP/20.095.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30701343Solimeo SL, Nguyen VT, Edmonds SW, Lou Y, Roblin DW, Saag KG, Cram P, Wolinsky FD. Sex differences in osteoporosis self-efficacy among community-residing older adults presenting for DXA. Osteoporos Int. 2019 May;30(5):1033-1041. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04854-6. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30267162Hall SF, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD, Lou Y, Edmonds S, Roblin D, Jones M, Saag K, Cram P. The prevalence of overtreatment of osteoporosis: results from the PAADRN trial. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Sep 28;13(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-018-0517-6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29307094Roblin DW, Cram P, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Hall SF, Jones MP, Saag KG, Wright NC, Wolinsky FD; PAADRN Investigators. Diet and exercise changes following bone densitometry in the Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification (PAADRN) study. Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0402-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28620779Wolinsky FD, Hall SF, Lou Y, Edmonds SW, Saag KG, Roblin DW, Wright NC, Jones MP, Cram P; PAADRN Investigators; Curtis JR, Morgan SL, Schlechte JA, Williams JH, Zelman DJ. The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Oct;28(10):3061-3066. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4113-1. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoporosis
RecruitingObservational study
Glucocorticoid-induced Osteoporosis in Patients With Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases or Psoriasis
Osteoporosis, Inflammatory Rheumatism
Not yet recruiting
Exercise and Fall Prevention for Fracture Reduction
Osteopenia, Osteoporosis
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Screening and Multicomponent Exercise on Fall Rates, Fractures, and Cardiovascular Health in Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes, Osteoporosis
Recruiting
Surgeon-Initiated Bone Health Referral Pathway in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoporosis, Arthroplasty Complications
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Quanduzhong Capsules for Primary Osteoporosis
Primary Osteoporosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fredric Wolinsky, PhD principal investigator
University of Iowa
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Bone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure in people with Osteoporosis and Bone Diseases, Metabolic, run by Fredric D Wolinsky at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Guideline Concordant Osteoporosis Therapy (time frame: 12 weeks after DXA). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01507662, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Nov 2020.