AzTrials
AzTrials

Disc ProlapsePhase 3NCT01510548

ADALISKIAS: Adalimumab for Acute Disc Prolapse

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients in people with Disc Prolapse and Pain, run by Kuopio University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aims: To study the efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus placebo in the treatment of acute disc prolapse will be will be compared up to 12 months after the start of study drug treatment. Study type: A one year,randomized, placebo controlled double blind single center trial. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Disc Prolapse, Pain
What is being tested?
Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteFinland
Study dates
Mar 2007to Jul 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males and females over 18 years of age
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent
  • Acute or subacute (no more than 2 months) clinical sciatica symptoms caused by herniated disc prolapse confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).
  • Oswestry Disability Score at least 16% at entry.
  • VAS (leg and back pain) at least 40 mm at entry.
  • Able and willing to self-administer s.c. injections or have available a suitable person to administer s.c. injections.
  • A negative pregnancy test (serum HCG) for women of childbearing potential prior to start of study treatment.

Who cannot join

  • Prior treatment with any investigational agent within 30 days, or five half lives of the product whichever is longer.
  • Prior treatment with infliximab or etanercept.
  • History of chronic back pain.
  • Previously operated disc prolapse or other spinal column operation
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, unstable ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV), recent stroke (within three months), chronic leg ulcer and any other condition (e.g. indwelling urinary catheter) which, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the subject at risk by participation in the protocol.
  • History of cancer or malignant lymphoproliferative disease other than a successfully treated non-metastatic cutaneous squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Positive serology for hepatitis B or C indicating active infection.
  • History of positive HIV status.
  • Persistent or recurrent infections or severe infections requiring hospitalization or treatment with i.v. antibiotics within 30 days, or oral antibiotics within 14 days prior to enrollment.
  • Previous diagnosis or signs highly indicative of central nervous system demyelinating diseases (e.g. optic neuritis, ataxia, apraxia).
  • History of active tuberculosis, histoplasmosis or listeriosis.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or breast-feeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Finland1 site
  • Kuopio University Hospital

    Kuopio, 70210

Other trials in Finland

About this study

Official title: Adalimumab (Anti TNF Alfa) in the Management of Acute Lumbar Disc Prolapses - a One Year, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Double Blind, Single Center Trial

Aims:

To study the efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus placebo in the treatment of acute disc prolapse will be will be compared up to 12 months after the start of study drug treatment.

Read more

Study type:

A one year,randomized, placebo controlled double blind single center trial.

Patients and study drug treatment:

The study population consist of 99 patients with sciatica caused by herniated disc prolapse.

The study has 3 arms: 33 patients randomized to adalimumab 40mg every week, 33 patients randomized to adalimumab 40mg every other week, and 33 patients randomized to placebo. Study drug treatment period will be six weeks.

Methods:

Clinical evaluation, global assessments and Oswestry Disability Score and visual analog scale (VAS) will be used as the evaluation of clinical results with the disc prolapse patients confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Health related quality of life will be assessed by 15-D questionnaire. Safety will be evaluated by medical examinations, adverse events (AE) collection and laboratory measurements throughout the study period.

Read the detailed description

Aims of this study:

TNF alpha is believed to have a major role in the pathogenesis of sciatica. The efficacy and safety of adalimumab versus placebo in the treatment of acute disc prolapse will be will be compared up to 12 months after the start of study drug treatment. Primary objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical functionality of the patients with Oswestry Disability Score and VAS (leg and back pain) at the end of study drug treatment at week 6. Secondary objectives are to compare the need of operative treatment, sick leave days, pain killer consumption and quality of life between the two study groups up to 12 months after the start of study drug treatment.

Patients and study drug treatment:

The study population consist of 99 patients with sciatica caused by herniated disc prolapse. The patients will be randomized to 3 arms: 33 patients to adalimumab 40mg every week, 33 patients to adalimumab 40mg every other week, and 33 patients to placebo. Study drug treatment period will be six weeks.

The study population will be collected from the patient population with severe sciatica symptoms sent to Spine Unit of Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in Kuopio University Hospital. The patient information will be given orally by investigators at the first visit and also patient information letter will be given. The informed consent will be signed by the patient and the investigator before any study related procedures. Patient will receive a copy of the written information and signed informed consent form. The patient has the right to discontinue his participation at any time without giving any reason.

The randomisation will be made in groups taken in count the level of disc prolapse and and sex. In emergency cases the randomisation will be opened with the decision of investigator. Each patient require 8 site visits. At the baseline visit (visit 0) the patient history and exclusion and inclusion criteria will be checked and MRI will be done. At visit 1 Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability index and Quality of Life Questionnaire (15-D) and clinical examination of patients will be carried out. In case the MRI is already available at baseline visit, the visit can be combined with visit 1. At the follow up visits (1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the first injection) Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability index and Quality of Life Questionnaire (15-D), Patients and Physicians Global Assessments and clinical examination of patients will be carried out and the Adverse Events are recorded. If the the study medication do not help the sciatica symptoms enough, disc surgery will be evaluated with decision of investigator and neurosurgeon or orthopaedic surgeon at visit of 6 weeks. With very severe symptoms and signs, major neurological signs or intolerable pain the surgery will be evaluated in any phase of study (see rescue medication).

The patient data will be collected to CRF and source data to patient records, where also sick leave days and the use of pain medication will be collected during each site visit. Patient medication and history will be collected at visit 1. The Adverse Events will be evaluated at each visit and recorded to patient records and CRF.

This study is investigator based study and will be carried out on spine center at the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine in Kuopio University Hospital. The laboratory and imaging studies will be carried out in the Departments of Clinical Chemistry and Radiology. If the surgery is needed the Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopedics will be asked to work. The Abbott Laboratories Ltd will provide the study medication. Adalimumab is registered in Finland for Rheumatoid Arthritis. The study medication will be given at the site visit by investigator. Injections for week 3 and 5 will be administered by the study subject at home.

Efficacy Assessments:

To confirm the clinical diagnosis of sciatica Magnetic Resonance Imaging using Siemens Avant 1.5 T clinical scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) will be used. Neural compromise will be assessed according to the system of Pfirrmann et al. from grade 0 (no compromise, normal) to Grade 1 (contact), Grade 2 (deviation) and Grade 3 (compression).

Subjective disability will be measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (0-100%), where 0% represents no disability and 100 % extreme difficult disability.

Pain experience will be measured with self-administered visual analogue scale VAS (range 0-100 mm). It has proved to be a valid index of experimental, clinical and chronic pain.

Patients and physicians Global Assessment will be used as the clinical evaluation of treatment.

Quality of life will be assessed by Finnish 15-D questionnaire

Safety Assessments:

At screening the patients must be evaluated for active and latent TB infections by using PPD and chest x-ray (if not available from previous 3 months prior to screening) and a detailed review of the subjects medical history. Also at screening T SPOT-TB test will be taken.

All patients who receive study drug will be included to the safety analysis. Safety follow-up will continue until 70 days after the last study drug injection. Safety will be assessed by AE collection, physical examination, vital signs and laboratory parameters throughout the study period. Safety laboratory parameters (full blood count, ALT, AST, CRP, ESR) will be evaluated at baseline and at the end of study drug treatment on week 6. Adverse Events will be reported to the local Ethics Committee and National Agency of Medicine according to the regulation 2/2004 Clinical Medicinal Trials on Humans.

Statistical review:

Sample size:

The planned sample size of 33 in each arm is projected to provide 80% power to detect a mean difference of 25 in leg pain VAS at 6 weeks at a two-sided alpha level of 0.0125, assuming that the standard deviation is 20. For Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 33 patients in each arm, would provide 80% power to detect a mean difference of 16 in ODI score at a two-sided alpha level of 0.0125, assuming a standard deviation of 13. Alpha-level of 0.0125 was selected to correct the multiple testing caused by two primary end-point variables and two comparisons for each variable, placebo versus the two different doses of active treatment. The sample size calculation is based on normality assumption; however the final analysis will be performed using non-parametric method. However the use of baseline value as covariate in the analysis should compensate the lost power due to the use of distribution free-method.

Statistical analysis of the primary end-points:

The aim of the study is to demonstrate the efficacy of adalimumab versus placebo by means of Oswestry Disability Index and Leg Pain VAS at week 6. To maintain the overall 5% significance level of the primary end-points, Bonferroni adjustment will be applied, i.e. in the four significance tests applied to the primary hypothesis; p-value should be below 0.0125 to be considered as statistically significant.

As a primary analysis method, non-parametric analysis of covariance with baseline value as a covariate will be applied to ODI and Leg Pain VAS at week 6 separately for adalimumab 40 mg every week versus placebo and adalimumab 40 mg every other week versus placebo. Intent-to-treat population will be used in the primary analysis.

All patient data will be evaluated by intent-to-treat principle.

For the secondary end-points Bonferroni adjustment will be applied on end-point level.

Rescue medication:

Rescue medication will be arranged in case of lack of efficacy at the discretion of the investigator. If cauda equine symptoms or signs of large neurological defects will occur surgery will be performed. Also if the medication is considered a failure by the investigator's clinical judgment the patients will have the opportunity to be evaluated for disc surgery.

Conditions
Disc Prolapse, Pain
Being tested
Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients
Keywords
Disc prolapse, Pain, Disability
Medical subject headings
Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patientsBiological

    Also called Biologic Drugs for ischias, Humira for ischias

    see the study protocol. Three arms, which two of them included active medication and one will be placebo( NaCl solution) in controlled double blind setting.

Study groups in NCT01510548
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adalimumab 20 mg per weekActive comparatorPatient will get at double blind situation adalimumab 20 mg every week (six injections) injections
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients
Adalimumab 40 mg per weekActive comparatorPatient will get at double blind situation adalimumab 40 mg per week injections
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients
placebo armPlacebo comparatorPatient will get at double blind situation placebo (= NaCl liquid solution, absolutely same color as the active drug) injections one per week during six weeks - same as the adalimumab arms
Receives: Biological: Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain

    As primary endpoint the functionality of the patients measured by Oswestry Disability Score and VAS (leg and back pain) will be evaluated and the proportion of patients in each group for the need of surgery at week 6 at the end of the study drug injections.

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. need for operative treatment and functional status = proportion of patients operated after one year

    As secondary endpoints functionality of the patient, need of operative treatment, sick leave days and pain killer consumption will be evaluated at week 1, 2, 4 and 6, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months 1 year after the start of study treatment.

    Measured: one year

  2. safety in general

    All patients who receive study medication will be included to the safety analysis.

    Blood tests before and after administration will be analysed. Vital signs and clinical examination will be recorded on each visits All adverse and serious adverse events will be evaluated in connection to study medication during the follow-up time.

    Measured: During one year follow up.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionJul 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01510548
Sponsor's protocol ID
HUM53
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
2 Jan 2012
Last updated
11 Oct 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Cooper RG, Freemont AJ. TNF-alpha blockade for herniated intervertebral disc-induced sciatica: a way forward at last? Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004 Feb;43(2):119-21. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh013. Epub 2003 Sep 16. No abstract available.

    PubMed 13130150
  • Cuellar MJ, Montesano XP, Carstens E. Role of TNF-alpha in sensitization of nociceptive dorsal horn neurons induced by application of nucleus pulposus to L5 dorsal root ganglion in rats. Pain. 2004 Aug;110(3):578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.03.029.

    PubMed 15288398
  • Genevay S, Stingelin S, Gabay C. Efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of acute, severe sciatica: a pilot study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Sep;63(9):1120-3. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.016451. Epub 2004 Apr 28.

    PubMed 15115710

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab injections for acute disc prolapse patients in people with Disc Prolapse and Pain, run by Kuopio University Hospital at 1 site in Finland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01510548, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in