AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Cancer RiskSHAPE-2NCT01511276

The Effects of Equivalent Weight Loss With or Without Exercise Training on Breast Cancer Risk (SHAPE-2)

A study testing Diet and Mainly exercise induced weight loss in people with Breast Cancer Risk, run by UMC Utrecht at 2 sites in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Physical inactivity and overweight are two accepted risk factors for breast cancer. However, because of their correlation it is not clear which is most relevant to risk. The investigators now set out to study whether physical activity in addition to weight loss by diet only, affects sex hormone levels, known to be… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 69 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer Risk
What is being tested?
Diet and Mainly exercise induced weight loss
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
243 participants
Where
2 sitesNetherlands
Study dates
Feb 2012to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 69 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Female
  • 50-69 years of age
  • Postmenopausal (>12 months after last menses)
  • BMI 25-35 kg/m2
  • Sedentary (<2 hours per week of at least moderately intensive activities (>4 MET))
  • Willing to be randomly assigned to one of the three study arms
  • Informed consent to participate in all screening and study activities.

Who cannot join

  • Presently using sex-hormones
  • Maintenance use of corticosteroids
  • Suffering cancer (in medical history) except for non-melanoma skin cancers
  • Suffering type II diabetes mellitus or other endocrine related diseases
  • Smoking
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Any disorder that might impede participation in the exercise programme
  • Following, or the intention to follow, a structured weight loss programme elsewhere

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Netherlands2 sites
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente

    Enschede, Overijssel, 7500 KA

  • UMC Utrecht

    Utrecht, 3584 CX

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Equivalent Weight Loss With or Without Exercise Training on Breast Cancer Risk Biomarkers in Postmenopausal Women: the SHAPE-2 Study

Physical inactivity and overweight are two accepted risk factors for breast cancer. However, because of their correlation it is not clear which is most relevant to risk. The investigators now set out to study whether physical activity in addition to weight loss by diet only, affects sex hormone levels, known to be related to breast cancer risk.

In the SHAPE-2 study 250 healthy overweight/obese and physically inactive women are randomly allocated to a diet-induced weight loss group, a combined exercise- and diet-induced weight loss group or a control group. The aim of the first two intervention groups is to loose 5-6 kg of bodyweight, either by dieting or mainly by increased physical activity. Measurements are performed at baseline and after 21 weeks, the end of the study period.

The aim of this study is to provide insight into the effect of weight loss mainly driven by exercise compared to equivalent weight loss due to nutritional calorie restriction on breast cancer biomarkers.

Read the detailed description

Postmenopausal women who are sedentary or overweight, have an increased breast cancer risk. It is suggested that these two factors mediate breast cancer risk mainly through sex hormone-related pathways. However, an inactive lifestyle and obesity are highly correlated and it is not clear which is most relevant to risk.

Literature shows that weight loss/ fat loss reduces postmenopausal sex hormone levels, but the question is if there is an additional beneficial effect on hormones of reaching this weight loss by physical activity instead of nutritional interventions.

In this three-armed, two-center intervention study, 250 sedentary postmenopausal women who are aged 50-69 years will first enter a run-in period of 5 weeks. During this period, all participants get a diet, adapted to the guidelines for healthy nutrition, meeting their energy expenditures to maintain stable weight. After this run-in phase they are randomly allocated to a (1) diet induced weight loss group, (2) a combined exercise and diet induced weight loss group or (3) a control group. Participants allocated to the dietgroup will get a calorie restricted diet of -500 kCal/day, they will remain their habitual exercise pattern. Participants in the combined group will follow an exercise programme (combined endurance and strength) of 4 hours of sports per week with an average energy expenditure of 350 kCal/day and a, less strict. And a calorie restricted diet of -250 kCal/day. The aim of both intervention groups is to loose 5-6 kg of body weight during the 14 week intervention period. Participants in the control group are requested to retain the baseline diet and their habitual exercise pattern. Primary study parameters measured at baseline and after 21 weeks are: serum concentrations of endogenous estrogens, endogenous androgens and sex hormone binding globulin. Other study parameters include: body fat distribution, amount of total and abdominal fat, weight, BMI, physical fitness, blood pressure and lifestyle factors.

The aim of this study is to provide insight into the effect of weight loss mainly driven by exercise compared to equivalent weight loss due to nutritional calorie restriction on breast cancer biomarkers. Furthermore, we are specifically interested whether weight loss mainly due to physical exercise induces greater amounts of fat loss (total and abdominal) and subsequently results in more favourable effects on these hormones compared to equivalent diet-induced weight loss.

Being tested
Diet, Mainly exercise induced weight loss
Keywords
Breast cancer, Sex hormones, Physical activity
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DietBehavioural

    Energy restricted diet, according the national guidelines for healthy nutrition, creating a mean energy deficit of 500 kCal/day.

  • Mainly exercise induced weight lossBehavioural

    Exercise programme of 2 hours per week fitness containing endurance and resistance training. And 2 hours of Nordic Walking. Equivalent to an energy expenditure of 350 kCal/day.

    Next to the exercise programme participants will follow an energy restricted diet according to the national guidelines of healthy nutrition creating an extra energy deficit of 250 kCal/day.

Study groups in NCT01511276
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diet-induced weight lossExperimentalThe diet-induced weight loss group will follow a calorie restricted diet. They are asked to keep their habitual sedentary lifestyle. The aim of this group is to loose 5-6 kg of body weight in 14 weeks time.
Receives: Behavioral: Diet
Mainly exercise induced weight lossExperimentalParticipants in the exercise- plus diet-induced weight loss group are enrolled in an exercise programme. Next to the exercise programme, they will follow a calorie restricted diet. The aim of this group is to loose 5-6 kg of body weight in 14 weeks time.
Receives: Behavioral: Mainly exercise induced weight loss
Control, stable weightNo interventionThe control group is asked to follow a baseline isocaloric diet and to not change their habitual sedentary lifestyle.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. serum sex hormone levels

    Estradiol (total, free), estrone, testosterone, sex hormone binding globulin.

    Measured: 21 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. anthropometrics and physical fitness.

    BMI, weight, waist- and hip-circumference, total body fat (DEXA scan), abdominal fat (subcutaneous and visceral, MRI-abdomen) and physical fitness (maximal exercise capacity test by the ramp protocol).

    Measured: 21 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2013
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
243 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01511276
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-465
Acronym
SHAPE-2
Status last verified
May 2017
First submitted
12 Jan 2012
Last updated
5 May 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • van Gemert WA, Iestra JI, Schuit AJ, May AM, Takken T, Veldhuis WB, van der Palen J, Wittink H, Peeters PH, Monninkhof EM. Design of the SHAPE-2 study: the effect of physical activity, in addition to weight loss, on biomarkers of postmenopausal breast cancer risk. BMC Cancer. 2013 Aug 23;13:395. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-395.

    PubMed 23972905
  • van Gemert WA, van der Palen J, Monninkhof EM, Rozeboom A, Peters R, Wittink H, Schuit AJ, Peeters PH. Quality of Life after Diet or Exercise-Induced Weight Loss in Overweight to Obese Postmenopausal Women: The SHAPE-2 Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 1;10(6):e0127520. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127520. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26029921
  • van Gemert WA, Schuit AJ, van der Palen J, May AM, Iestra JA, Wittink H, Peeters PH, Monninkhof EM. Effect of weight loss, with or without exercise, on body composition and sex hormones in postmenopausal women: the SHAPE-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Sep 2;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0633-9.

    PubMed 26330303
  • van Gemert WA, May AM, Schuit AJ, Oosterhof BY, Peeters PH, Monninkhof EM. Effect of Weight Loss with or without Exercise on Inflammatory Markers and Adipokines in Postmenopausal Women: The SHAPE-2 Trial, A Randomized Controlled Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 May;25(5):799-806. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1065. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

    PubMed 26908432
  • de Roon M, van Gemert WA, Peeters PH, Schuit AJ, Monninkhof EM. Long-term effects of a weight loss intervention with or without exercise component in postmenopausal women: A randomized trial. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Dec 9;5:118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.12.006. eCollection 2017 Mar.

    PubMed 27981025
  • van Gemert WA, Peeters PH, May AM, Doornbos AJH, Elias SG, van der Palen J, Veldhuis W, Stapper M, Schuit JA, Monninkhof EM. Effect of diet with or without exercise on abdominal fat in postmenopausal women - a randomised trial. BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 11;19(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6510-1.

    PubMed 30744621

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Diet and Mainly exercise induced weight loss in people with Breast Cancer Risk, run by UMC Utrecht at 2 sites in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

serum sex hormone levels (time frame: 21 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01511276, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in