AzTrials
AzTrials

Tracheal IntubationNCT01516164

A Comparison of the Ease of Tracheal Intubation Using a McGrath MAC Laryngoscope and a Standard MacIntosh Laryngoscope

A study testing Laryngoscopy in people with Tracheal Intubation, run by NHS Tayside at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Videolaryngoscopes offer the potential to make tracheal intubation easier for the anaesthetist and less traumatic for the patient. This study aims to compare the intubation difficulty scores (a validated scoring system for ease of intubation) using the McGrath MAC as a videolaryngoscope, the McGrath MAC only as a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Tracheal Intubation
What is being tested?
Laryngoscopy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
158 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2012to Feb 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective procedure requiring oral tracheal tube intubation
  • Over 16 years of age
  • Airway assessment suggests to the anaesthetist that a standard MacIntosh laryngoscope approach to intubation would be appropriate.

Who cannot join

  • Emergency procedure
  • Less than 16 years of age
  • Unable to consent
  • Requiring Rapid Sequence Induction (a specialised anaesthetic induction technique)
  • Predicted difficult intubation
  • Not suitable for the standardised induction technique

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • NHS Tayside

    Tayside, Tayside

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Videolaryngoscopes offer the potential to make tracheal intubation easier for the anaesthetist and less traumatic for the patient. This study aims to compare the intubation difficulty scores (a validated scoring system for ease of intubation) using the McGrath MAC as a videolaryngoscope, the McGrath MAC only as a direct laryngoscope (without video screen) and the MacIntosh laryngoscopes.

Being tested
Laryngoscopy
Keywords
Laryngoscopy, Videolaryngoscopy, Ease of Intubation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LaryngoscopyDevice

    After establishing full monitoring, inducing general anaesthesia and ensuring paralysis laryngoscopy is performed and the patient's trachea intubated.

Study groups in NCT01516164
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MacIntoshActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Laryngoscopy
McGrath MAC directActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Laryngoscopy
McGrath MAC indirectActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Laryngoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intubation Difficulty Score

    The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) is a numerical score based on seven parameters. The scoring of each parameter represents a divergence from an 'ideal' condition and the total score represents a sum divergence from a zero difficulty ideal intubation. The seven parameters are number of supplementary attempts, number of supplementary operators, number and type of alternative techniques used, laryngoscopic grade, subjective lifting force, the use of external laryngeal manipulation and mobility or position of the vocal cords.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Time to intubation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Number and types of alternative techniques used

    Measured: 5 minutes

  3. Perception of force used

    Measured: 5 minutes

  4. Complications

    Measured: 5 minutes

  5. Ease of intubation

    Measured: 5 minutes

  6. Failure to intubate

    Measured: 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
158 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01516164
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011AN04
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
19 Jan 2012
Last updated
6 Oct 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laryngoscopy in people with Tracheal Intubation, run by NHS Tayside at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intubation Difficulty Score (time frame: 5 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in