Non Hodgkin LymphomaPALM2NCT01541072
Lymphocyte Reconstitution After Administration of Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim After Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
A study testing Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim in people with Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to describe the kinetics of lymphocyte subsets reconstitution after growth factor administration, Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim in patients with B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Feb 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients with B-cell NHL, except Burkitt Lymphoma and primary brain lymphoma, as first-line or second-line therapy, with planed BICNU, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy after pre-inclusion.
- Minimum one mobilization with G-CSF, G-CSF and endoxan or mozobil
- Minimum one cytapheresis with CD34>2 millions CD34/kg for stem cell transplantation
- Patients hospitalized in the investigational center throughout the procedure and until recovery from aplasia (neutrophils> 0.5 G/L)
- Mandatory affiliation with a health insurance system
- Subjects must provide written informed consent prior to performance of study-specific assessments
Who cannot join
- Patients already treated with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation
- Total irradiation exposure (patients with partial irradiation exposure can be included in the study)
- Intolerance to one of the two studied growth factors, or hypersensitivity to one of their components
- Patients with neutropenia (neutrophils <1.2 G/L) or thrombopenia (platelets < 100 G/L) before intensive chemotherapy
- Acquired immune deficiency syndrome, seropositivity
- Pregnant or lactating women (pregnancy test, for women of childbearing potential, should be negative, in blood or urine, at inclusion time)
- Impossibility to comply with protocol constraints because of geographical, psychiatric, social or family reasons
- Deprived of liberty (court judgement or administrative decision)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
France2 sites
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
Centre Leon Berard
Lyon
About this study
Official title: Lymphocyte Reconstitution in a Randomized Study After Administration of Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim in Patients With B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
The purpose of this study is to describe the kinetics of lymphocyte subsets reconstitution after growth factor administration, Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim in patients with B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation.
Read the detailed description
High dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation is a standard consolidation treatment used in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in first or second line of treatment. This procedure is associated with prolonged neutropenia and considerable morbidity. Different guidelines have recommended the use of growth factor after peripheral stem cell transplantation.Pegfilgrastim is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) resulting from the modification of Filgrastim by chemical addition of a polyethylene glycol(PEG) moiety which increases its half-life by decreasing its renal clearance. Then, a single injection substitutes several Filgrastim injections. The trial "PALM" realized by our team has shown, between these 2 molecules, an equivalent efficacy on the duration of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients treated for lymphoma or myeloma. This trial has also shown that Pegfilgrastim is a cost-effectiveness dominant strategy.
Some studies have shown that a rapid lymphocyte reconstitution after stem cell transplantation is associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival.
In the present PALM2 study, the investigators want to describe the kinetics of different lymphocyte subsets reconstitution within 3 and 6 months after transplantation, in patients with B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in first or second-line chemotherapy and first autologous transplantation. The investigators will assess the kinetics of reconstitution for T-lymphocytes (Naïve T-lymphocytes, regulatory T-cells and memory T-cells), B-lymphocytes (transitional B cells), cytotoxic T-cells and natural killer T-cells, dendritic cells. A preliminary phase to this assessment will consist in estimate intra-center variability of lymphocyte phenotyping.
- Conditions
- Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Pegfilgrastim, Filgrastim
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, B-cell, Lymphocyte reconstitution, Lymphocyte subsets, Peripheral stem cell transplantation, Induction chemotherapy, growth factor, Granulocyte Colony-stimulating factor, Pegfilgrastim, Filgrastim
- Medical subject headings
- Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Lymphoma, B-Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PegfilgrastimDrug
Also called Neulasta, AMGEN Laboratories
Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, AMGEN Laboratories): single subcutaneous administration of Pegfilgrastim, 6 mg at day 5 (D5) after autologous stem cell transplantation
FilgrastimDrug
Also called Neupogen, AMGEN Laboratories
Filgrastim (Neupogen®, AMGEN Laboratories): daily subcutaneous administration, 5µg/kg/day from day 5 (D5) after autologous stem cell transplantation until recovery from aplasia (Neutrophils >= 0.5 G/L)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pegfilgrastim | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Pegfilgrastim |
| Filgrastim | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Filgrastim |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3 months kinetics of lymphocyte reconstitution, in the two arms
Measured: Lymphocyte count within the 3 months post transplantation
Secondary outcomes (10)
6 months kinetics of lymphocyte reconstitution, in the two arms
Measured: Lymphocyte count within the 6 months post transplantation
6 months kinetics of lymphocyte subsets reconstitution by phenotyping, in the 2 arms
Measured: In the transplant and within the 6 months after transplantation (at Day 15, D30, D90, D180 after transplantation)
Average duration of neutropenia and thrombopenia, in the 2 arms
- neutrophils<0.5 G/L
- neutrophils<1 G/L
- platelets<20 G/L
- platelets<50 G/L
Measured: Within the 3 months post transplantation
Number of days with temperature ≥38°, in the 2 arms
Measured: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Number of bacterial and/or viral and/or fungal infection longer than 7 days, average duration of anti-viral, anti-fungal and antibiotic treatments, in the 2 arms
Measured: Within 3 months post transplantation
Number of red blood cell units and platelets concentrates transfused to patient, in the 2 arms
Measured: Within 3 months post transplantation
Evaluation of duration of Filgrastim treatment, in arm "Filgrastim"
Measured: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Overall survival
Measured: Within 18 months after the first inclusion, from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause
Progression free survival
The progression is measured as per 2007 Cheson international response criteria. Cheson BD et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J of Clin Oncol 2007;25(5):579-586
Measured: Within 18 months after yhe first inclusion, from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first
Average duration of febrile neutropenia (with neutrophils<0.5 G/L and temperature ≥38°), in the 2 arms
Measured: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected duration of 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2012
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Why it stopped: Number of enrolled patients was insufficient during planned inclusion time.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (20)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non Hodgkin LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Catherine SEBBAN, MD, Principal investigator, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541072
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ET2011-010
- Other IDs
- 2011-A00662-39
- Acronym
- PALM2
- Status last verified
- Oct 2016
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2012
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dieckmann D, Plottner H, Berchtold S, Berger T, Schuler G. Ex vivo isolation and characterization of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties from human blood. J Exp Med. 2001 Jun 4;193(11):1303-10. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.11.1303.
PubMed 11390437Goguel AF, Crainic K, Ducailar A, Ouin M. Interlaboratory quality assessment of lymphocyte phenotyping. Etalonorme 1990-1992 surveys. Biol Cell. 1993;78(1-2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(93)90118-x.
PubMed 8220229Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
PubMed 12123336Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, Jones SE, Shogan J, Savin M, Glaspy J, Moore M, Meza L, Wiznitzer I, Neumann TA, Hill LR, Liang BC. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):727-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727.
PubMed 11821454Joao C, Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Gastineau DA, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation predicts superior survival in mantle-cell lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006 May;37(9):865-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705342.
PubMed 16532015Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Stassen M, Tuettenberg A, Knop J, Enk AH. Identification and functional characterization of human CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties isolated from peripheral blood. J Exp Med. 2001 Jun 4;193(11):1285-94. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.11.1285.
PubMed 11390435Noether, G. E. Sample size determination for some common nonparametric statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 : 645-47, 1987.
Peggs KS. Immune reconstitution following stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004 Jun;45(6):1093-101. doi: 10.1080/10428190310001641260.
PubMed 15359987Porrata LF, Gertz MA, Inwards DJ, Litzow MR, Lacy MQ, Tefferi A, Gastineau DA, Dispenzieri A, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Geyer SM, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2001 Aug 1;98(3):579-85. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.579.
PubMed 11468153Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Gastineau DA, Litzow MR, Winters JL, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jul;14(7):807-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.04.013.
PubMed 18541201Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Micallef IN, Ansell SM, Geyer SM, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery post-autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with better survival in Hodgkin's disease. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jun;117(3):629-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03478.x.
PubMed 12028034Reimer P, Kunzmann V, Wilhelm M, Weissbrich B, Kraemer D, Berghammer H, Weissinger F. Cellular and humoral immune reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Ann Hematol. 2003 May;82(5):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0630-4. Epub 2003 Mar 22.
PubMed 12739062Roberts MM, To LB, Gillis D, Mundy J, Rawling C, Ng K, Juttner CA. Immune reconstitution following peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, autologous bone marrow transplantation and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993 Nov;12(5):469-75.
PubMed 7905331Sebban, C., Lefranc, A, Perrier, L., Morreau, P., Espinouse, D., Moles-Moreau, M-P, Kammoun, L, Ghesquieres, H, Segura-Ferlay, C., Bay, J-O, Lissandre, S, PEROL, D, Michallet, M, and Quittet, P. A Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Cost-Effectiveness of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim After High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation In Patients with Lymphoma and Myeloma (PALM Study). ASH . 4-12-2010. Ref Type: Abstract
Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD25+CD4+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol. 1999 Nov 15;163(10):5211-8.
PubMed 10553041
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lymphocyte Reconstitution in a Randomized Study After Administration of Pegfilgrastim Versus Filgrastim in Patients With B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated With High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01541072
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PALM2 / ET2011-010
- Conditions
- Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Keywords
- Lymphoma, B-cell, Lymphocyte reconstitution, Lymphocyte subsets, Peripheral stem cell transplantation, Induction chemotherapy, growth factor, Granulocyte Colony-stimulating factor, Pegfilgrastim
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Number of enrolled patients was insufficient during planned inclusion time.
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Study start
- Feb 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Feb 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to describe the kinetics of lymphocyte subsets reconstitution after growth factor administration, Pegfilgrastim versus Filgrastim in patients with B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation.
Detailed description
High dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation is a standard consolidation treatment used in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in first or second line of treatment. This procedure is associated with prolonged neutropenia and considerable morbidity. Different guidelines have recommended the use of growth factor after peripheral stem cell transplantation.Pegfilgrastim is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) resulting from the modification of Filgrastim by chemical addition of a polyethylene glycol(PEG) moiety which increases its half-life by decreasing its renal clearance. Then, a single injection substitutes several Filgrastim injections. The trial "PALM" realized by our team has shown, between these 2 molecules, an equivalent efficacy on the duration of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in patients treated for lymphoma or myeloma. This trial has also shown that Pegfilgrastim is a cost-effectiveness dominant strategy.
Some studies have shown that a rapid lymphocyte reconstitution after stem cell transplantation is associated with better overall survival and progression-free survival.
In the present PALM2 study, the investigators want to describe the kinetics of different lymphocyte subsets reconstitution within 3 and 6 months after transplantation, in patients with B-cell malignant non-Hodgkin lymphoma, in first or second-line chemotherapy and first autologous transplantation. The investigators will assess the kinetics of reconstitution for T-lymphocytes (Naïve T-lymphocytes, regulatory T-cells and memory T-cells), B-lymphocytes (transitional B cells), cytotoxic T-cells and natural killer T-cells, dendritic cells. A preliminary phase to this assessment will consist in estimate intra-center variability of lymphocyte phenotyping.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pegfilgrastim | Experimental | Drug: Pegfilgrastim |
| Filgrastim | Active comparator | Drug: Filgrastim |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients with B-cell NHL, except Burkitt Lymphoma and primary brain lymphoma, as first-line or second-line therapy, with planed BICNU, etoposide, aracytine and melphalan (BEAM) chemotherapy after pre-inclusion.
- Minimum one mobilization with G-CSF, G-CSF and endoxan or mozobil
- Minimum one cytapheresis with CD34>2 millions CD34/kg for stem cell transplantation
- Patients hospitalized in the investigational center throughout the procedure and until recovery from aplasia (neutrophils> 0.5 G/L)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients already treated with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation
- Total irradiation exposure (patients with partial irradiation exposure can be included in the study)
- Intolerance to one of the two studied growth factors, or hypersensitivity to one of their components
- Patients with neutropenia (neutrophils <1.2 G/L) or thrombopenia (platelets < 100 G/L) before intensive chemotherapy
- Acquired immune deficiency syndrome, seropositivity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PegfilgrastimAlso: Neulasta, AMGEN LaboratoriesPegfilgrastim (Neulasta®, AMGEN Laboratories): single subcutaneous administration of Pegfilgrastim, 6 mg at day 5 (D5) after autologous stem cell transplantation | Drug | Pegfilgrastim |
| FilgrastimAlso: Neupogen, AMGEN LaboratoriesFilgrastim (Neupogen®, AMGEN Laboratories): daily subcutaneous administration, 5µg/kg/day from day 5 (D5) after autologous stem cell transplantation until recovery from aplasia (Neutrophils >= 0.5 G/L) | Drug | Filgrastim |
Primary outcome
3 months kinetics of lymphocyte reconstitution, in the two arms
Time frame: Lymphocyte count within the 3 months post transplantation
10 secondary outcomes
6 months kinetics of lymphocyte reconstitution, in the two arms
Time frame: Lymphocyte count within the 6 months post transplantation
6 months kinetics of lymphocyte subsets reconstitution by phenotyping, in the 2 arms
Time frame: In the transplant and within the 6 months after transplantation (at Day 15, D30, D90, D180 after transplantation)
Average duration of neutropenia and thrombopenia, in the 2 arms
Time frame: Within the 3 months post transplantation
Number of days with temperature ≥38°, in the 2 arms
Time frame: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Number of bacterial and/or viral and/or fungal infection longer than 7 days, average duration of anti-viral, anti-fungal and antibiotic treatments, in the 2 arms
Time frame: Within 3 months post transplantation
Number of red blood cell units and platelets concentrates transfused to patient, in the 2 arms
Time frame: Within 3 months post transplantation
Evaluation of duration of Filgrastim treatment, in arm "Filgrastim"
Time frame: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Overall survival
Time frame: Within 18 months after the first inclusion, from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause
Progression free survival
Time frame: Within 18 months after yhe first inclusion, from the date of randomization until the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause, whichever came first
Average duration of febrile neutropenia (with neutrophils<0.5 G/L and temperature ≥38°), in the 2 arms
Time frame: For duration of post transplantation hospital stay, an expected duration of 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Number of enrolled patients was insufficient during planned inclusion time.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2016.
- Background: PubMed 11390437Dieckmann D, Plottner H, Berchtold S, Berger T, Schuler G. Ex vivo isolation and characterization of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties from human blood. J Exp Med. 2001 Jun 4;193(11):1303-10. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.11.1303.
- Background: PubMed 8220229Goguel AF, Crainic K, Ducailar A, Ouin M. Interlaboratory quality assessment of lymphocyte phenotyping. Etalonorme 1990-1992 surveys. Biol Cell. 1993;78(1-2):79-84. doi: 10.1016/0248-4900(93)90118-x.
- Background: PubMed 12123336Holmes FA, Jones SE, O'Shaughnessy J, Vukelja S, George T, Savin M, Richards D, Glaspy J, Meza L, Cohen G, Dhami M, Budman DR, Hackett J, Brassard M, Yang BB, Liang BC. Comparable efficacy and safety profiles of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim and daily injection filgrastim in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia: a multicenter dose-finding study in women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002 Jun;13(6):903-9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf130.
- Background: PubMed 11821454Holmes FA, O'Shaughnessy JA, Vukelja S, Jones SE, Shogan J, Savin M, Glaspy J, Moore M, Meza L, Wiznitzer I, Neumann TA, Hill LR, Liang BC. Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):727-31. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.727.
- Background: PubMed 16532015Joao C, Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Gastineau DA, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery after autologous stem cell transplantation predicts superior survival in mantle-cell lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006 May;37(9):865-71. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705342.
- Background: PubMed 11390435Jonuleit H, Schmitt E, Stassen M, Tuettenberg A, Knop J, Enk AH. Identification and functional characterization of human CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells with regulatory properties isolated from peripheral blood. J Exp Med. 2001 Jun 4;193(11):1285-94. doi: 10.1084/jem.193.11.1285.
- BackgroundNoether, G. E. Sample size determination for some common nonparametric statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 : 645-47, 1987.
- Background: PubMed 15359987Peggs KS. Immune reconstitution following stem cell transplantation. Leuk Lymphoma. 2004 Jun;45(6):1093-101. doi: 10.1080/10428190310001641260.
- Background: PubMed 11468153Porrata LF, Gertz MA, Inwards DJ, Litzow MR, Lacy MQ, Tefferi A, Gastineau DA, Dispenzieri A, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Geyer SM, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2001 Aug 1;98(3):579-85. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.3.579.
- Background: PubMed 18541201Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Ansell SM, Micallef IN, Johnston PB, Gastineau DA, Litzow MR, Winters JL, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery predicts superior survival after autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a prospective study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2008 Jul;14(7):807-16. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.04.013.
- Background: PubMed 12028034Porrata LF, Inwards DJ, Micallef IN, Ansell SM, Geyer SM, Markovic SN. Early lymphocyte recovery post-autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is associated with better survival in Hodgkin's disease. Br J Haematol. 2002 Jun;117(3):629-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03478.x.
- Background: PubMed 12739062Reimer P, Kunzmann V, Wilhelm M, Weissbrich B, Kraemer D, Berghammer H, Weissinger F. Cellular and humoral immune reconstitution after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). Ann Hematol. 2003 May;82(5):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0630-4. Epub 2003 Mar 22.
Related trials for Non Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Ibrutinib Combination Therapy in Transplant Ineligible Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Primary CNS Lymphoma
Non-hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Multi-omics Profiling of Relapsed Extranodal Natural Killer (NK)/T-cell Lymphoma
Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Catherine SEBBAN, MD principal investigator
Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim in people with Non Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by Centre Leon Berard at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Number of enrolled patients was insufficient during planned inclusion time.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3 months kinetics of lymphocyte reconstitution, in the two arms (time frame: Lymphocyte count within the 3 months post transplantation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01541072, which also lists 20 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2016.