AzTrials
AzTrials

Obsessive-Compulsive DisorderPhase 2NACTOCNCT01555970

Efficacy Study of add-on Therapy With N-Acetylcysteine in Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder

A Phase 2 study testing N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this study is to determine if N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) has efficacy as an augmentation agent in the treatment of treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
What is being tested?
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Mar 2012to Oct 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Voluntary signed informed consent prior to the performance of any study specific procedures
  • A DSM-IV primary diagnosis of OCD that has failed to clinically respond, as defined by a Y-BOCS score of greater than 16, to at least one first-line adequate treatments, like:
  • SRI
  • CBT
  • SRI + CBT
  • SRI + atypical antipsychotic
  • OCD symptoms at least of one year's duration and of least moderate severity on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI).

Who cannot join

  • Psychiatric diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder
  • Hepatitis or any liver disease
  • Patients who have had psychosurgery
  • Recent (<1 month) change in psychotropic medications
  • Presence of clinically significant somatic disease and/or medical problem that requires frequent changes in medication.
  • History of or current diagnosis of seizure disorder
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Evidence of Substance Use Disorder (DSM-IV) within past 1 months or current illicit drug use.
  • Active Suicidal Ideation
  • Patients who have been previously exposed to N-acetylcysteine.
  • Women who are pregnant, lactating, or of childbearing potential (not sterile nor using reliable birth control).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Instituto de Psiquiatria do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01060-970

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Augmentation With N-Acetylcysteine in Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: a Double-blind, Randomized and Controlled Study

The primary objective of this study is to determine if N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) has efficacy as an augmentation agent in the treatment of treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The investigators predict that NAC will reduce OCD symptoms after sixteen weeks of add-on treatment as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS).

Read the detailed description

OCD is a debilitating psychiatric condition with a lifetime prevalence of 2-3%. It is characterized by recurrent, intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and/or repetitive, stereotyped behaviors (compulsions) that last for at least one hour per day and significantly interfere with an individual's normal level of functioning. Although cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacotherapy with serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) are effective treatments for many patients, a subset experience minimal relief from their symptoms with these standard treatments. When severe, OCD is completely incapacitating with devastating consequences for patients and their families. Augmentation strategies with antipsychotic medications can improve the effectiveness of SRI therapy but do no eliminate OCD symptoms (Saxena et al., 1996; McDougle et al., 1995) and are associated with adverse effects when used chronically; consequently, improved pharmacological treatments are needed. The clinical observation that few patients experience a complete response to SRI's or dopamine antagonists suggests that other neurochemical systems are involved in the pathophysiology of OCD.

The pathophysiologic hypothesis underlying this proposal is that the well-described hyperactivity of the cortico-striato-thalamic track in OCD reflects glutamatergic hyperactivity that is addressed only partially in some OCD patients by serotonin reuptake inhibitors treatment. It is thought that NAC modulates brain glutamate by stimulating the cysteine-glutamate antiporter located on glia, increasing extrasynaptic glutamate levels and thereby stimulating the feedback inhibition of synaptic glutamate release (Baker et al., 2003). In addition to attenuating synaptic glutamate release by feedback inhibition, NAC is also thought to enhance the clearance of glutamate from the synapse via its neuroprotective and growth factor promoting effects on glial cells. Its glutamatergic antagonistic properties may be effective in reducing the glutamatergic hyperactivity that is thought to contribute to the pathophysiology of OCD.

The proposed study is based on recent preclinical and neuroimaging studies that implicate glutamatergic hyperactivity in the pathogenesis of OCD (Carlsson et al., 2000). Neuroimaging studies have consistently identified increased blood flow, metabolism and brain activity in the orbitofrontal cortex, striatum, and thalamus of individuals with OCD (Baxter et al., 1987, 1988, 1992; Swedo et al., 1989; Sawle et al., 1991; Rubin et al., 1992, 1995; Adams et al., 1993; Perani et al., 1995; McGuire et al., 1994; Breiter et al., 1996; Rausch et al., 1996). Within these brain areas, glutamate and GABA driven pathways are thought to be responsible for balancing neural tone. The direct (glutamatergic) pathway is thought to modulate the initiation and sustainability of behavioral routines, while the indirect (GABAergic) pathway modulates the cessation of these behaviors. The leading explanatory model for OCD suggests that over activity in the direct pathway relative to the indirect pathway results in a disinhibited thalamus and the creation of a self-perpetuating circuit between the thalamus and the orbital cortex that drives OCD symptoms (Baxter 1992, Baxter et al., 1996). Clinical studies support this model. Compared to controls, treatment naïve OCD patients have significantly increased glutamatergic activity as measured by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) (Rosenberg et al., 2000; Bolton et al., 2001). Moreover, treatment with an SRI was associated with a significant decline in caudate glutamate concentration in those individuals who responded to SRI treatment (Rosenberg et al., 2000; Bolton et al., 2001). These clinical findings are consistent with pharmacological studies demonstrating an SRI-induced inhibition of glutamate release (Maura et al, 1988; Zhang et al., 1997).

The investigators propose a double-blind, placebo controlled study to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of N-Acetylcysteine in the augmentation of SRI therapy in resistant OCD. Four recent reports suggest that riluzole, an antiglutamatergic agent, possesses anti-depressant, anti-obsessional, and anti-anxiety properties (Coric et al., 2003, 2005; Zarate et al., 2004; Sanacora et al., 2004).

The rationale for exploring the efficacy of NAC in treatment resistant OCD stems from preliminary findings from the open label Riluzole study and represents an effort to explore other novel strategies for modulating brain glutamate in OCD.

Being tested
N-Acetylcysteine (NAC), Placebo
Keywords
Obsessive-compulsive disorder, Treatment, Glutamate, N-Acetylcysteine
Medical subject headings
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)Drug

    Week 1: 1200 mg (one 600 mg capsule twice a day) Week 2: 2400 mg (two 600 mg capsules twice a day) Weeks 3-16: 3000 mg (two 600 mg capsules in the morning and 3 in the evening)

  • PlaceboDrug

    Week 1: one capsule twice a day Week 2: two capsules twice a day Weeks 3-16: two capsules in the morning and 3 in the evening

Study groups in NCT01555970
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NACExperimentalPatients allocated in this group will receive N-acetylcysteine 1200 mg (one 600 mg capsule twice a day) during the first week of the study. On day 8 this will increase to 4 capsules per day (2400 mg NAC; 2 capsules twice a day). Finally, on day 15 (after 1 week at 2400 mg) the dose will be increased to the target dose of 5 capsules per day (3000 mg; 2 capsules in the morning and 3 in the evening), at which dose it will be continued for the remainder of the study.
Receives: Drug: N-Acetylcysteine (NAC)
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPatients allocated in this group will receive one capsule of placebo twice a day during the first week of the study. On day 8 this will increase to 4 capsules per day (2 capsules twice a day). Finally, on day 15 the dose will be increased to the target dose of 5 capsules per day (2 capsules in the morning and 3 in the evening), at which dose it will be continued for the remainder of the study.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total score

    Percent reduction of baseline Y-BOCS total score at weeks 16 or at withdrawal from the study

    Measured: 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Dimensional Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score

    The mean change in DYBOCS scores at week 16 or at withdrawal from the study

    Measured: 16 weeks

  2. Clinical Global Impression Scale

    Global Improvement score of the Clinical Global Impression Scale measured at week 16 or at withdrawal from the study

    Measured: 16 weeks

  3. Beck Depression Inventory

    The mean change in Beck Depression Inventory scores measured at week 16 or at withdrawal from the study

    Measured: 16 weeks

  4. Beck Anxiety Inventory

    The mean change in Beck Anxiety Inventory scores measured at week 16 or at withdrawal from the study

    Measured: 16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Mar 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01555970
Sponsor's protocol ID
NACTOC
Acronym
NACTOC
Status last verified
Oct 2014
First submitted
14 Mar 2012
Last updated
24 Oct 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Costa DLC, Diniz JB, Requena G, Joaquim MA, Pittenger C, Bloch MH, Miguel EC, Shavitt RG. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of N-Acetylcysteine Augmentation for Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2017 Jul;78(7):e766-e773. doi: 10.4088/JCP.16m11101.

    PubMed 28617566

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) in people with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale total score (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01555970, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in