Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT01564784
A Study Of Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Versus Investigator's Choice Of Chemotherapy In Patients With Relapsed Or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
A Phase 3 study testing inotuzumab ozogamicin, FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF) and HIDAC (high dose cytarabine) in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 198 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
This study will compare the efficacy, in terms of complete responses and overall survival, of inotuzumab ozogamicin versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- inotuzumab ozogamicin, FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF) and HIDAC (high dose cytarabine)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 326 participants
- Where
- 198 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Aug 2012to 4 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- CD22 expression
- Adequate liver and renal functions
Who cannot join
- Isolated extramedullary disease
- Active Central Nervous System [CNS] disease
Trial locations and contacts
198 sites in 20 countries.
198 sites in 20 countries
United States96 sites
University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131-0001
UNM Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
University of Michigan Health System-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Investigational Drug Service, Emory University Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
The Emory Clinic
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Blood and Marrow Transplant Group of Georgia
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Northside Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Georgia Regents Medical Center Pharmacy, Georgia Regents University Cancer Center
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Georgia Regents University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
University of Colorado Cancer Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Colorado Hospital, Cancer Center Infusion Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Oncology Investigational Drug Service
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231-2410
Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
UNC Cancer Hospital Infusion Pharmacy
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514
UNC Hospitals - The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7600
Hollings Cancer Center
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
MUSC Hospital
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Northwestern Medicine Developmental Therapeutics Institute
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Chicago Medical Center, Dept. of Pharmacy
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Parkland Health and Hospital System
Dallas, Texas, 75235
Baylor Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
University of Texas Southwestern Universtiy Hospital - William P Clements Jr.
Dallas, Texas, 75390
UT Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
UT Southwestern University Hospital- Zale Lipshy
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Karmanos Cancer Institute Weisberg Cancer Treatment Center
Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48334
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
IDS-investigational drug pharmacy Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center,
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
University of Kansas Hospital
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Investigational Drug Services - UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92037-0845
UC San Diego Medical Center - La Jolla
La Jolla, California, 92037
UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-0698
Monter Cancer Center
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Children's Center for Cancer and Blood Diseases, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Keck Hospital of USC
Los Angeles, California, 90033
LAC+USC Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center / Investigational Drug Services
Los Angeles, California, 90033
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033
UCLA Drug Information/Investigation Drug
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Hematology/Oncology Clinic
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
UCLA Rrmc
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Norton Cancer Institute
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
Norton Cancer Institute, Suburban
Louisville, Kentucky, 40207
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, 11030
Miami Children's Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33155
West Virginia University Hospitals Pharmaceutical Services
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
West Virginia University Hospitals
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08903
Yale-New Haven Hospital & Smilow Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10021
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065
Weill Cornell Medical College - New York-Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065
OU Medical Center Presbyterian Tower
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Stephenson Cancer Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
UC Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868-3201
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868
UC Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando - 5th Floor Investigational Pharmacy
Orlando, Florida, 32806
MD Anderson Cancer Center Orlando
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Orlando Heart Health Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Orlando Regional Medical Center
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Freidenrich Center for Translational Research (CTRU), Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, 94304
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143
UC San Diego Medical Center - Hillcrest
San Diego, California, 92103
Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
Seattle, Washington, 98109
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Martha Hamilton, Investigational Drug Services, Dept of Pharmacy
Stanford, California, 94305
Stanford Cancer Institute
Stanford, California, 94305
Stanford University Hospital and Clinics
Stanford, California, 94305
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-7007
Stony Brook University Medical Center, The Cancer Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794-9447
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Stony Brook University Hospital
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
Stony Brook University Medical Center
Stony Brook, New York, 11794
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157
Italy26 sites
Istituto di Ematologia Seragnoli
Bologna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu CTMO P.O. Businco
Cagliari, CA, 09121
Farmacia
Cagliari, CA, 09121
U.O. Radiodiagnostica
Cagliari, CA, 09121
A.O.U. Vittorio Emanuele di Catania-Ospedale Ferrarotto
Catania, 95124
Radiology (Radiology Only)
Catania, 95124
U.O. di Ematologia Dip. Medicine Specialistiche A.O.U. Arcispedale Sant'Anna
Cona, Ferrara, 44124
Clinica Ematologica
Genova, 16132
Pharmacy
Genova, 16132
Radiology Department (Radiology ONLY)
Genova, 16132
Radiology Department
Genova, 16132
U.O. Ematologia 1
Genova, 16132
IRST-Ematologia
Meldola (FC), FC, 47014
S.C. Pharmacy
Milan, 20162
S.C. Radiology
Milan, 20162
SC Ematologia
Milan, 20162
A.O. San Gerardo - Farmacia
Monza, 20900
A.O. San Gerardo di Monza
Monza, 20900
AORN "A. Cardarelli"
Naples, 80131
RAdiology Department (RAdiology only)
Naples, 80131
Clinica Ematologica
Pavia, 27100
Radiologist Department
Ravenna, 48121
Servizio di Farmacia
Ravenna, 48121
U.O. Ematologia, Ospedale S. Maria delle Croci
Ravenna, 48121
Clinica Ematologica
Udine, 33100
Radiology (Radiology Only)
Udine, 33100
Spain11 sites
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Hospital Vall d'Hebron
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau(Nuevo Hospital)
Barcelona, 08025
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hospital Ramon y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hospital General Universitario Jose Maria Morales Meseguer
Murcia, 30008
Hospital Son Llatzer
Palma de Mallorca, Mallorca, 07198
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, Castille and LION, 37007
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
Seville, 41013
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
France10 sites
CHU de Dijon-Hopital d'Enfants-Service d'hematologie Clinique
Dijon, 21000
C.H.U. de Grenoble, Hopital Albert Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
Hopital Universitaire Andre Mignot
Le Chesnay, 78157
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Institut Paoli-Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42271
Iuct - Oncopole
Toulouse, 31059
CHU Brabois- Service d'hematologie
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Japan8 sites
Akita University Hospital
Akita, 010-8543
National Cancer Center Hospital
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 1040045
National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center
Fukuoka, 8111395
Tokai University Hospital
Kanagawa, 259-1193
Nagoya Daini Red Cross Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 4668650
The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine
Nishinomiya-shi, Hyōgo, 6638501
Osaka City University Hospital
Osaka, Osaka, 5458586
Tohoku University Hospital
Sendai, Miyagi, 9808574
China7 sites
Beijing Chao-yang Hospital
Beijing, 100020
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, 100044
The 307th Hospital of PLA
Beijing, 100071
The first hospital of jilin university
Changchun, Jilin, 130021
Guangdong General Hospital
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510080
Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,
Tianjin, 300020
Henan Cancer Hostipal
Zhengzhou, Henan, 450008
Germany7 sites
Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin
Cologne, 50937
Klinikum der Goethe Universitaet
Frankfurt, 60590
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Klinikum Rechts der Isar der TU München
München, 81675
Zentralapotheke des Universitaetsklinikums Muenster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Institut fuer klinische Radiologie
Münster, 48149
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
United Kingdom7 sites
Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre
Bristol, BS2 8ED
Castle Hill Hospital
Hull, HU16 5JQ
Department of Academic Oncology
London, NW3 2QG
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M20 4BX
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, OX3 7LJ
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD
Poland4 sites
Klinika Hematologii i Transplantologii
Gdansk, 80-952
Oddzial Hematologii, Klinika Hematologii, Regionalny Osrodek Onkologiczny Wojewodzki Szpital
Lodz, 93510
Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologii, Klinika Hematologii
Warsaw, 02-776
Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku
Wroclaw, 53-439
Czechia3 sites
Interni Hematologicka a Onkologicka Klinika
Brno, 62500
Fakultni Nemocnice Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 50005
Fakultni nemocnice Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, 10034
South Korea3 sites
Chonnam National University, Hwasun Hospital
Hwasun-Gun, Jeollanam-do, 519-763
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135 710
Australia2 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Eastern Clinical Research Unit, Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Finland2 sites
HUS-Kuvantaminen
Helsinki, 00290
HYKS/Hematologian klinikka
Helsinki, 00290
Hungary2 sites
Egyesitett Szent Istvan és Szent Laszlo Korhaz-Rendelointezet;
Budapest, 1097
Debreceni Egyetem Orvos-es Egeszsegtudomanyi Centrum II. Belgyogyaszati Klinika
Debrecen, 4032
Netherlands2 sites
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CE
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3075 EA
Singapore2 sites
National University Hospital/National University Cancer Institute Singapore (NCIS)
Singapore, 119228
Singapore General Hospital
Singapore, 169608
Sweden2 sites
Universitetssjukhus Lund, Hematologkliniken
Lund, 221 85
Hematology Center
Stockholm, 17176
Taiwan2 sites
Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Kaohsiung Branch
Kaohsiung City, 83301
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 10002
About this study
Official title: AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN COMPARED TO A DEFINED INVESTIGATOR'S CHOICE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CD22-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL)
This study will compare the efficacy, in terms of complete responses and overall survival, of inotuzumab ozogamicin versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy.
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Being tested
- inotuzumab ozogamicin, FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF), HIDAC (high dose cytarabine), cytarabine and mitoxantrone
- Medical subject headings
- Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
inotuzumab ozogamicinDrug
Dose: inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8-0.5 mg/m^2 IV, weekly, 3 times per cycle Cycle length: 21-28 days Total number of cycles: 6
FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF)Drug
Dose: cytarabine 2.0 g/m^2/day IV days 1-6 fludarabine30 mg/m^2/day IV days 2-6 Cycle length: 28 days Total number of cycles: 4
HIDAC (high dose cytarabine)Drug
cytarabine 3 g/m^2 IV every 12 hours for up to 12 times
cytarabine and mitoxantroneDrug
mitoxantrone 12 mg/m^2 IV days 1-3 cytarabine 200 mg/m^2/day IV over 7 days cycle length: 15-20 days Total number of cycles: 4
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: inotuzumab ozogamicin |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF); Drug: HIDAC (high dose cytarabine); Drug: cytarabine and mitoxantrone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery [CRi]) as Assessed by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC)
CR was the disappearance of leukemia indicated by less than (<) 5 percent (%) marrow blasts \& absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to (≥)1000 per microliter (/μL) \& platelets ≥100,000/μL. C1 extramedullary disease status (i.e. complete disappearance of measurable \& non-measurable extramedullary disease with the following exceptions: for participants with at least 1 measurable lesion, all nodal masses greater than (>) 1.5 centimeters (cm) in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) at baseline must have regressed to less than or equal to (≤) 1.5 cm in GTD; all nodal masses ≥1 cm \& ≤1.5 cm in GTD at baseline must have regressed to <1 cm GTD or reduced by 75% in sum of products of greatest diameters, no new lesions, spleen \& other previously enlarged organs must have regressed in size \& must not be palpable) was required. CRi was defined as CR except ANC <1000/μL \&/or platelets <100,000/μL.
Measured: Screening, Day 16 to 28 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, then every 1 to 2 cycles (or as clinically indicated) up to approximately 4 weeks (end of treatment [EoT]) from the last dose
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact.
Measured: Up to 5 years after randomization or 2 years from randomization of the last participant, whichever occurs first.
Secondary outcomes (10)
Duration of Remission (DoR) for Participants Who Achieved CR/CRi (Per Investigator Assessment)
DoR was defined as time from date of first response in responders (CR/CRi per Investigator assessment) to date of PFS event (i.e. death, progressive disease [objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi or treatment discontinuation due to global deterioration of health status] or starting new induction therapy or post-therapy stem cell transplant [SCT] without achieving CR/CRi). Responders without PFS events were censored at the last valid disease assessment including follow-up.
Measured: Up to 2 years from randomization
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as time from date of randomization to earliest date of the following events: death, progressive disease (objective progression, relapse from CR/CRi or treatment discontinuation due to global deterioration of health status) and starting new induction therapy or post-therapy SCT without achieving CR/CRi. Participants without a PFS event at time of analysis were censored at the last valid disease assessment. In addition, participants with documentation of an event after an unacceptably long interval (>28 weeks if there was post-baseline disease assessment, or >12 weeks if there was no post-baseline assessment) since the previous disease assessment were censored at the time of the previous assessment (date of randomization if no post-baseline assessment). Post-study treatment follow-up disease assessments was included. Kaplan-Meier method used and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated based on the Brookmeyer and Crowley method.
Measured: Up to 2 years from randomization
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant (HSCT)
HSCT rate was defined as the percentage of participants who underwent SCT following treatment with inotuzumab ozogamicin or Investigator's choice of chemotherapy.
Measured: Up to 19 weeks from last dose
Percentage of Participants Achieving MRD Negativity (Based on Central Laboratory Analysis) in Participants Achieving a CR/CRi (Per EAC Assessment)
MRD analysis was performed at least once in participants with prior assessment of CR or CRi. Bone marrow aspirates, collected at screening and during the study, were sent to the central laboratory and analyzed using multiparametric flow cytometry. The antibody combinations were designed to maximize discrimination between normal and abnormal cells of B-cell lineage and similar maturational stage and included antibodies detecting cluster of differentiation (CD) 9, CD10, CD13, CD19, CD20, CD33, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD58, CD66c, and CD123. A peripheral blood sample was provided if a participant had an inadequate bone marrow aspirate at screening. MRD negativity was considered to have been achieved if the lowest value of MRD from the first date of CR/CRi to EoT was <1 × 10^-4 blasts/nucleated cells.
Measured: Up to approximately 4 weeks (EoT) from last dose of study drug
Cytogenetic Status (Based on Local Laboratory Analysis) of Participants With CR/CRi (Per EAC Assessment)
Karyotyping was required locally, at screening and at least once during the study in participants who had abnormal cytogenetics at baseline and who achieved CR/CRi. Data presented below are for participants who achieved CR/CRi per EAC and had abnormal karyotype at screening.
Measured: Up to approximately 4 weeks (EoT) from last dose of study drug
Maximum Observed Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentration (Cmax) and Pre-Dose Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Following Single and Multiple Dosing
Blood samples were collected and analyzed for inotuzumab ozogamicin serum concentrations using a validated high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) method with a lower limit of quantification of 1.0 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL). Cmax was the maximum observed concentration occurring between 0-8 hours post-dose. Ctrough was the concentration prior to subsequent dose (pre-dose) occurring after 8 hours. n = number of observations (non-missing concentrations).
Measured: Days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 2 and Day 1 of Cycle 4
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
This questionnaire comprised 30 questions within which are 9 multi-item scales \& 6 single-item measures. There are 5 functional scales; physical, role, cognitive, emotional \& social, 3 symptom scales; fatigue, pain, \& nausea \& vomiting, \& a global health status/quality of life (QoL) scale. There are 5 single item measures assessing additional symptoms commonly reported by cancer patients (loss of appetite, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, \& dyspnea) \& a single item concerning perceived financial impact of the disease. Most questions used a 4 point scale (1='not at all' to 4='very much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1='very poor' to 7='excellent'). Scores were averaged \& transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100; a higher score indicates a better level of functioning or greater degree of symptoms.
Measured: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score
The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQoL Group. It consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS), EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system measures a participants' health state on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels, reflecting "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The EQ-VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. EQ-5D summary index is obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score is interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health).
Measured: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS
The EQ-5D self-report questionnaire is a standardized measure of health status developed by the EuroQoL Group. It consists of the EQ-5D descriptive system and a visual analogue scale (VAS), EQ-VAS. The EQ-5D descriptive system measures a participants' health state on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels, reflecting "no problems", "some problems", and "extreme problems". The EQ-VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Percentage of Participants With Veno-Occlusive Liver Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS) Following Post Study HSCT
VOD/SOS was defined as the occurrence of 2 out of the following 3 clinical criteria: 1) total serum bilirubin level >34 micromoles per liter (μmol/L) (>2.0 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]), 2) an increase in liver size from baseline or development of right upper quadrant pain of liver origin and 3) sudden weight gain >2.5% (eg, within a 72 hour period) because of fluid accumulation in the weeks following infusion of study drug or chemotherapy, or HSCT conditioning/preparative therapy, or development of ascites not present at baseline following such exposures AND the absence of other explanations for these signs and symptoms, OR development of bilirubin elevation, weight gain, or hepatomegaly plus histologic abnormalities on liver biopsy demonstrating hepatocyte necrosis in zone 3 of the liver acinus, sinusoidal fibrosis, and centrilobular hemorrhage, with or without fibrosis of the terminal hepatic venules.
Measured: Up to 2 years from randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Study start2 Aug 2012
- Primary completion8 Mar 2016
- Study completion4 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- UCB Pharma
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01564784
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- B1931022
- Other IDs
- 2011-005491-41
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2012
- Last updated
- 9 Jan 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Zhao Y, Laird AD, Roberts KG, Yafawi R, Kantarjian H, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, O'Brien S, Jabbour E, Cassaday RD, Loyd MR, Olsen S, Neale G, Liu X, Vandendries E, Advani A, Mullighan CG. Association of leukemic molecular profile with efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 25;8(12):3226-3236. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012430.
PubMed 38607410Stelljes M, Advani AS, DeAngelo DJ, Wang T, Neuhof A, Vandendries E, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E. Time to First Subsequent Salvage Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in the Phase III INO-VATE Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Sep;22(9):e836-e843. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
PubMed 35643855Shi Z, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Chen B. Monoclonal antibodies: new chance in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):642-652. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2074704.
PubMed 35622074Kantarjian HM, Stock W, Cassaday RD, DeAngelo DJ, Jabbour E, O'Brien SM, Stelljes M, Wang T, Paccagnella ML, Nguyen K, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Laird AD, Advani AS. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the INO-VATE Trial: CD22 Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety by Baseline CD22. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 15;27(10):2742-2754. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2399. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
PubMed 33602684Stock W, Martinelli G, Stelljes M, DeAngelo DJ, Gokbuget N, Advani AS, O'Brien S, Liedtke M, Merchant AA, Cassaday RD, Wang T, Zhang H, Vandendries E, Jabbour E, Marks DI, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):905-913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33321. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
PubMed 33231879DeAngelo DJ, Advani AS, Marks DI, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, Jabbour E, Merchant A, Wang T, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S. Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden. Blood Cancer J. 2020 Aug 7;10(8):81. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00345-8.
PubMed 32769965Jabbour E, Gokbuget N, Advani A, Stelljes M, Stock W, Liedtke M, Martinelli G, O'Brien S, Wang T, Laird AD, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Nguyen K, Dakappagari N, DeAngelo DJ, Kantarjian H. Impact of minimal residual disease status in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin in the phase III INO-VATE trial. Leuk Res. 2020 Jan;88:106283. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106283. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
PubMed 31790983Fujishima N, Uchida T, Onishi Y, Jung CW, Goh YT, Ando K, Wang MC, Ono C, Matsumizu M, Paccagnella ML, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Fujii Y, Hino M. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2019 Dec;110(6):709-722. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02749-0. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
PubMed 31655984Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, O'Brien SM, Jabbour E, Wang T, Liang White J, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Advani AS. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final report and long-term survival follow-up from the randomized, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2474-2487. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32116. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
PubMed 30920645Jabbour EJ, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Stock W, Liedtke M, Gokbuget N, O'Brien S, Wang T, Paccagnella ML, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Advani AS, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy and safety analysis by age cohort of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in INO-VATE. Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31249. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
PubMed 29381191Kebriaei P, Cutler C, de Lima M, Giralt S, Lee SJ, Marks D, Merchant A, Stock W, van Besien K, Stelljes M. Management of important adverse events associated with inotuzumab ozogamicin: expert panel review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;53(4):449-456. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0019-y. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
PubMed 29330398Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Advani AS, Stelljes M, Kebriaei P, Cassaday RD, Merchant AA, Fujishima N, Uchida T, Calbacho M, Ejduk AA, O'Brien SM, Jabbour EJ, Zhang H, Sleight BJ, Vandendries ER, Marks DI. Hepatic adverse event profile of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the open-label, randomised, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Aug;4(8):e387-e398. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30103-5. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
PubMed 28687420Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Martinelli G, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, O'Brien S, Wang K, Wang T, Paccagnella ML, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Advani AS. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin versus Standard Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 25;375(8):740-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509277. Epub 2016 Jun 12.
PubMed 27292104
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN COMPARED TO A DEFINED INVESTIGATOR'S CHOICE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CD22-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA (ALL)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01564784
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- B1931022
- Conditions
- Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 326 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- UCB Pharma
- Study start
- 2 Aug 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jan 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare the efficacy, in terms of complete responses and overall survival, of inotuzumab ozogamicin versus investigator's choice of chemotherapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Experimental | Drug: inotuzumab ozogamicin |
| Arm B | Active comparator | Drug: FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF), Drug: HIDAC (high dose cytarabine), Drug: cytarabine and mitoxantrone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- CD22 expression
- Adequate liver and renal functions
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Isolated extramedullary disease
- Active Central Nervous System [CNS] disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| inotuzumab ozogamicinDose: inotuzumab ozogamicin 0.8-0.5 mg/m^2 IV, weekly, 3 times per cycle Cycle length: 21-28 days Total number of cycles: 6 | Drug | Arm A |
| FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF)Dose: cytarabine 2.0 g/m^2/day IV days 1-6 fludarabine30 mg/m^2/day IV days 2-6 Cycle length: 28 days Total number of cycles: 4 | Drug | Arm B |
| HIDAC (high dose cytarabine)cytarabine 3 g/m^2 IV every 12 hours for up to 12 times | Drug | Arm B |
| cytarabine and mitoxantronemitoxantrone 12 mg/m^2 IV days 1-3 cytarabine 200 mg/m^2/day IV over 7 days cycle length: 15-20 days Total number of cycles: 4 | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery [CRi]) as Assessed by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC)
Time frame: Screening, Day 16 to 28 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, then every 1 to 2 cycles (or as clinically indicated) up to approximately 4 weeks (end of treatment [EoT]) from the last dose
CR was the disappearance of leukemia indicated by less than (<) 5 percent (%) marrow blasts \& absence of peripheral blood leukemic blasts, with recovery of hematopoiesis defined by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to (≥)1000 per microliter (/μL) \& platelets ≥100,000/μL. C1 extramedullary disease status (i.e. complete disappearance of measurable \& non-measurable extramedullary disease with the following exceptions: for participants with at least 1 measurable lesion, all nodal masses greater than (>) 1.5 centimeters (cm) in greatest transverse diameter (GTD) at baseline must have regressed to less than or equal to (≤) 1.5 cm in GTD; all nodal masses ≥1 cm \& ≤1.5 cm in GTD at baseline must have regressed to <1 cm GTD or reduced by 75% in sum of products of greatest diameters, no new lesions, spleen \& other previously enlarged organs must have regressed in size \& must not be palpable) was required. CRi was defined as CR except ANC <1000/μL \&/or platelets <100,000/μL.
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 5 years after randomization or 2 years from randomization of the last participant, whichever occurs first.
OS was defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact.
10 secondary outcomes
Duration of Remission (DoR) for Participants Who Achieved CR/CRi (Per Investigator Assessment)
Time frame: Up to 2 years from randomization
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Up to 2 years from randomization
Percentage of Participants Who Had a Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Time frame: Up to 19 weeks from last dose
Percentage of Participants Achieving MRD Negativity (Based on Central Laboratory Analysis) in Participants Achieving a CR/CRi (Per EAC Assessment)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 weeks (EoT) from last dose of study drug
Cytogenetic Status (Based on Local Laboratory Analysis) of Participants With CR/CRi (Per EAC Assessment)
Time frame: Up to approximately 4 weeks (EoT) from last dose of study drug
Maximum Observed Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentration (Cmax) and Pre-Dose Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentration (Ctrough) Following Single and Multiple Dosing
Time frame: Days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of Cycle 1, Days 1 and 8 of Cycle 2 and Day 1 of Cycle 4
Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score
Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Change From Baseline in EuroQol 5 Dimension Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Index Score
Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D VAS
Time frame: Day 1 of each cycle prior to dosing and EoT
Percentage of Participants With Veno-Occlusive Liver Disease (VOD)/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome (SOS) Following Post Study HSCT
Time frame: Up to 2 years from randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38607410Zhao Y, Laird AD, Roberts KG, Yafawi R, Kantarjian H, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, O'Brien S, Jabbour E, Cassaday RD, Loyd MR, Olsen S, Neale G, Liu X, Vandendries E, Advani A, Mullighan CG. Association of leukemic molecular profile with efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adults with relapsed/refractory ALL. Blood Adv. 2024 Jun 25;8(12):3226-3236. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023012430.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35643855Stelljes M, Advani AS, DeAngelo DJ, Wang T, Neuhof A, Vandendries E, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E. Time to First Subsequent Salvage Therapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin in the Phase III INO-VATE Trial. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2022 Sep;22(9):e836-e843. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35622074Shi Z, Zhu Y, Zhang J, Chen B. Monoclonal antibodies: new chance in the management of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Hematology. 2022 Dec;27(1):642-652. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2022.2074704.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33602684Kantarjian HM, Stock W, Cassaday RD, DeAngelo DJ, Jabbour E, O'Brien SM, Stelljes M, Wang T, Paccagnella ML, Nguyen K, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Laird AD, Advani AS. Inotuzumab Ozogamicin for Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the INO-VATE Trial: CD22 Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy, and Safety by Baseline CD22. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 15;27(10):2742-2754. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-2399. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33231879Stock W, Martinelli G, Stelljes M, DeAngelo DJ, Gokbuget N, Advani AS, O'Brien S, Liedtke M, Merchant AA, Cassaday RD, Wang T, Zhang H, Vandendries E, Jabbour E, Marks DI, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer. 2021 Mar 15;127(6):905-913. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33321. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32769965DeAngelo DJ, Advani AS, Marks DI, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, Jabbour E, Merchant A, Wang T, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S. Inotuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: outcomes by disease burden. Blood Cancer J. 2020 Aug 7;10(8):81. doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00345-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31790983Jabbour E, Gokbuget N, Advani A, Stelljes M, Stock W, Liedtke M, Martinelli G, O'Brien S, Wang T, Laird AD, Vandendries E, Neuhof A, Nguyen K, Dakappagari N, DeAngelo DJ, Kantarjian H. Impact of minimal residual disease status in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin in the phase III INO-VATE trial. Leuk Res. 2020 Jan;88:106283. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2019.106283. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31655984Fujishima N, Uchida T, Onishi Y, Jung CW, Goh YT, Ando K, Wang MC, Ono C, Matsumizu M, Paccagnella ML, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Fujii Y, Hino M. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2019 Dec;110(6):709-722. doi: 10.1007/s12185-019-02749-0. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30920645Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Liedtke M, Stock W, Gokbuget N, O'Brien SM, Jabbour E, Wang T, Liang White J, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Advani AS. Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Final report and long-term survival follow-up from the randomized, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Cancer. 2019 Jul 15;125(14):2474-2487. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32116. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29381191Jabbour EJ, DeAngelo DJ, Stelljes M, Stock W, Liedtke M, Gokbuget N, O'Brien S, Wang T, Paccagnella ML, Sleight B, Vandendries E, Advani AS, Kantarjian HM. Efficacy and safety analysis by age cohort of inotuzumab ozogamicin in patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia enrolled in INO-VATE. Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31249. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29330398Kebriaei P, Cutler C, de Lima M, Giralt S, Lee SJ, Marks D, Merchant A, Stock W, van Besien K, Stelljes M. Management of important adverse events associated with inotuzumab ozogamicin: expert panel review. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;53(4):449-456. doi: 10.1038/s41409-017-0019-y. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28687420Kantarjian HM, DeAngelo DJ, Advani AS, Stelljes M, Kebriaei P, Cassaday RD, Merchant AA, Fujishima N, Uchida T, Calbacho M, Ejduk AA, O'Brien SM, Jabbour EJ, Zhang H, Sleight BJ, Vandendries ER, Marks DI. Hepatic adverse event profile of inotuzumab ozogamicin in adult patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from the open-label, randomised, phase 3 INO-VATE study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Aug;4(8):e387-e398. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30103-5. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With CD30-Positive Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma
Adult T-Cell Leukemia/Lymphoma, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, ALK-Negative
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Recruiting
A Multicenter Study to Evaluate Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) Testing and Monitoring of B-Cell Recovery to Guide Management Following Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell (CART) Induced Remission in Children and Young Adults With B Lineage Acute Lymph...
B-All, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
198 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing inotuzumab ozogamicin, FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF) and HIDAC (high dose cytarabine) in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Pfizer at 198 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jan 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 198 sites in United States, Italy, Spain, France, Japan and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jan 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Remission (Complete Remission [CR]/Complete Remission With Incomplete Hematologic Recovery [CRi]) as Assessed by the Endpoint Adjudication Committee (EAC) (time frame: Screening, Day 16 to 28 of Cycles 1, 2 and 3, then every 1 to 2 cycles (or as clinically indicated) up to approximately 4 weeks (end of treatment [EoT]) from the last dose). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01564784, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jan 2019.