AzTrials
AzTrials

Bowel PreparationPhase 3LOWPEGNCT01568814

Low Volume PEG With Low Residue Test Meals Versus High Volume Split-dose PEG Bowel Preparation

A Phase 3 study testing Low volume PEG and high volume PEG in people with Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy, run by Inje University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Morning only low volume PEG with low reside meals may enhance patient tolerability and have similar bowel cleansing efficacy compared to standard method using high volume split-dose PEG with standard diet. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Bowel Preparation, Colonoscopy
What is being tested?
Low volume PEG and high volume PEG
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
188 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Jan 2012to Mar 2012
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult outpatients and inpatients (18-85 years of age) who undergo colonoscopy for screening, cancer surveillance or with gastrointestinal symptoms, other symptoms

Who cannot join

  • Age under 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Prior history of surgical large bowel resection
  • Severe medical condition such as severe cardiac
  • Hepatic, renal failure (creatinine ≥ 3.0mg/dL (normal 0.8-1.4))
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Drug addiction or major psychiatric illness
  • Suspected bowel obstruction or ileus
  • Allergy to PEG
  • Refusal of consent to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine

    Busan, 612-030

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Tolerability of Morning (AM) Only Low Volume (2L) PEG With Low Residue Test Meals Versus High Volume (4L) Split-dose (PM/AM) PEG Bowel Preparation With Standard Meals: A Prospective Randomized, Investigator Blinded Trial

Morning only low volume PEG with low reside meals may enhance patient tolerability and have similar bowel cleansing efficacy compared to standard method using high volume split-dose PEG with standard diet.

Read the detailed description

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of bowel preparation protocols with low volume PEG and low residue meals PEG compared to conventional high volume (4L) split-dose and standard diet.

Entry criteria: Entry criteria: Adult outpatients and inpatients (18-85 years of age) who undergo colonoscopy for screening, cancer surveillance or with gastrointestinal symptoms, other symptoms

Primary Outcome: Quality of bowel preparation (Ottawa scale) Secondary Outcome: Tolerability (preparation completion, side effect), acceptance, willingness

Being tested
Low volume PEG, high volume PEG
Keywords
colonoscopy, bowel preparation, polyethylene glycol, low residue meal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low volume PEGDrug

    low volume polyethylene glycol 2 liter one time

  • high volume PEGDrug

    high volume polyethylene glycol 4 lilter split-dosing 2L/2L two times

Study groups in NCT01568814
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
High volume PEGPlacebo comparatorPatients who are scheduled colonoscopy ingest high volume PEG(4L) for bowel preparation.
Receives: Drug: high volume PEG
Low volume PEG with low residual mealsActive comparatorPatients who are scheduled colonoscopy ingest low volume PEG(2L) and have a prepackaged low residual meals for bowel preparation.
Receives: Drug: Low volume PEG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quality of bowel preparation

    Quality of bowel preparation is assessed using Ottawa bowel preparation scale.

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Tolerability

    Tolerability of bowel preparation regimen is assessed by patient questionnaire.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionMar 2012
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
188 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01568814
Sponsor's protocol ID
1.0-A2012
Acronym
LOWPEG
Status last verified
Jan 2012
First submitted
29 Mar 2012
Last updated
3 Apr 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Low volume PEG and high volume PEG in people with Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy, run by Inje University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quality of bowel preparation (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in