AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Low Back PainPhase 4NCT01587274

A Randomized Study of Three Medication Regimens for Acute Low Back Pain

A Phase 4 study testing Naproxen, Cyclobenzaprine and Oxycodone/ acetaminophen in people with Acute Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Low back pain causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In a general low back pain (LBP) population, prognosis is poor. About 50% of patients who visited general practitioners with new onset musculoskeletal LBP report persistent pain and functional disability… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Naproxen, Cyclobenzaprine and Oxycodone/ acetaminophen
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
323 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2012to Dec 2014
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Non-radicular, non-traumatic low back pain of no more than 2 weeks duration

Who cannot join

  • Back pain longer than 2 weeks
  • Prior to the acute attack of low back pain, back pain once per month or more frequently
  • Prior to the acute attack of low back pain, daily or near daily use of pain medication

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Three-armed Comparative Effectiveness Study of Various Medications for Musculoskeletal Low Back Pain: Defining the Added Benefit of Muscle Relaxants and Opioids.

Low back pain causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In a general low back pain (LBP) population, prognosis is poor. About 50% of patients who visited general practitioners with new onset musculoskeletal LBP report persistent pain and functional disability three months after the index visit. Outcomes are similarly poor for the population of patients forced to use an ED for management of their LBP. In an observational study of patients with non-traumatic LBP recently completed at the PI's institution, patients were contacted one week after ED discharge: 70% reported persistent back-pain related functional impairment, 59% reported moderate or severe LBP, and 69% reported analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% reported functional impairment, 42% reported moderate or severe pain, and 46% reported analgesic use within the previous 24 hours.

A variety of evidence-based medications are available to treat LBP. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication. Skeletal muscle-relaxants too are effective for short-term pain relief and global efficacy. Opioids are commonly used for moderate or severe acute LBP,(9) though high-quality evidence supporting this practice is lacking.

Read more

Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED setting. Emergency physicians often prescribe NSAIDs, skeletal muscle relaxants, and opioids in combination. Several clinical trials have compared combination therapy with NSAIDS+ skeletal muscle relaxants to monotherapy with just one of these agents. These trials have reported heterogeneous results. The combination of opioids + NSAIDS has not been evaluated experimentally in patients with acute LBP.

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, the investigators propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, the investigators will evaluate three distinct hypotheses:

  1. The combination of naproxen + cyclobenzaprine will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen alone seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale
  2. The combination of naproxen + oxycodone/ acetaminophen will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen alone seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale
  3. The combination of naproxen + oxycodone/ acetaminophen will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + cyclobenzaprine seven days after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris low back pain functional disability scale
Being tested
Naproxen, Cyclobenzaprine, Oxycodone/ acetaminophen
Keywords
low back pain
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NaproxenDrug

    Naproxen 500mg twice/ day x 10 days

  • CyclobenzaprineDrug

    Cyclobenzaprine 5-10mg three times/ day x 10 days

  • Oxycodone/ acetaminophenDrug

    Oxycodone 5-10mg/ Acetaminophen 325-650 mg three times/ day x 10 days

Study groups in NCT01587274
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OpioidActive comparatorNaproxen + opioid
Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Oxycodone/ acetaminophen
Skeletal muscle relaxantActive comparatorNaproxen + skeletal muscle relaxant
Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Cyclobenzaprine
Naproxen aloneActive comparatorNaproxen + placebo
Receives: Drug: Naproxen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Functional Disability as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a 24 item instrument that evaluates the impact of low back pain on one's daily life. It is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability due to acute, sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Each question can be answered as either a "yes" or "no". The score ranges from 0 to 24 where a higher score reflects greater impairment and, therefore, worsening in the quality of life. The change in RMDQ is obtained by subtracting the RMDQ score at one week after discharge from the baseline score.

    Measured: Baseline and one week after discharge from emergency department

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionDec 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
323 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01587274
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-10-379
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
26 Apr 2012
Last updated
31 Jul 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Friedman BW, Dym AA, Davitt M, Holden L, Solorzano C, Esses D, Bijur PE, Gallagher EJ. Naproxen With Cyclobenzaprine, Oxycodone/Acetaminophen, or Placebo for Treating Acute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1572-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13043.

    PubMed 26501533

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Naproxen, Cyclobenzaprine and Oxycodone/ acetaminophen in people with Acute Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Functional Disability as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (time frame: Baseline and one week after discharge from emergency department). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01587274, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in