AzTrials
AzTrials

Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 3No-Crunch01NCT01589718

A Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of IVT Pre-op 0.3mg Pegaptanib Sodium Versus Sham, for Management of Tractional Retinal Detachment and Vitreous Hemorrhage With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A Phase 3 study testing Macugen in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Greater Houston Retina Research at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess whether preoperative pegaptanib sodium safely improves vitreous hemorrhage prior to surgical intervention and to evaluate the stability of pre-existing tractional retinal detachment. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy
What is being tested?
Macugen
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2012to Mar 2014
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Best corrected visual acuity in the study eye between 20/30 and light perception (LP)
  • Willingness to provide signed informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • For sexually active women of childbearing potential, agreement to the use of an appropriate form of contraception (or abstinence) for the duration of the study

Who cannot join

  • History of anti-VEGF treatment in the study eye
  • History of previous pars plana vitrectomy in the study eye
  • Intraocular surgery in the study eye within one month of the study
  • Patients with extensive vitreous hemorrhage in conjunction with a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
  • Tractional retinal detachment from causes inconsistent with PDR, such as inflammation or trauma
  • Any concurrent intraocular condition in the study eye that could either require medical or surgical intervention during the study period to prevent or treat visual loss that might result from that condition or if allowed to progress untreated could likely contribute to loss of at least 2 Snellen equivalent lines of BCVA over the study period.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
  • Active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as IOP≥ 35 mmHg despite treatment with anti-glaucoma medication)
  • History of glaucoma-filtering surgery in the study eye
  • History of corneal transplant in the study eye

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Retina Consultants of Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase III Randomized 1:1, Masked, Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Intravitreal Pre-op 0.3mg Pegaptanib Sodium Versus Sham, for Adjuvant Management of TRD and Vit Hem Associated With PDR

The purpose of this study is to assess whether preoperative pegaptanib sodium safely improves vitreous hemorrhage prior to surgical intervention and to evaluate the stability of pre-existing tractional retinal detachment.

Read the detailed description

Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for active PDR with TRD will receive a single intravitreal pre-operative 0.3mg Macugen™ prior to surgery versus sham injection.

Specific timing of the injection will be at no sooner than 7 days and no longer than 14 days prior to surgery.

Patients will receive a preinjection fundus photo and another post injection photo the day of surgery as dictated by the operative schedule.

Some photos may be limited secondary to vitreous hemorrhage. Follow up visits after surgery will be one day, one week, one month, and three months.

Being tested
Macugen, Sham
Keywords
Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, Tractional Retinal Detachment, Vitreous Hemorrhage
Medical subject headings
Vitreous Hemorrhage

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MacugenDrug

    Also called 0.3mg Pegaptanib Sodium, Macugen

    one intravitreal injection of Macugen prior to vitrectomy surgery

  • ShamDrug

    The subject in cohort 2 will receive one sham comparator, sham injection prior to vitreous surgery.

Study groups in NCT01589718
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
0.3mg Pegaptanib Sodium, MacugenExperimentalwill receive Macugen intravitreal injection prior to surgery
Receives: Drug: Macugen
Sham injectionSham comparatorwill receive a sham injection
Receives: Drug: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Tractional Retinal Detachment Repair

    Overall score of perceived improvement during surgery as determined by a surgeon's subjective questionnaire.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Post surgical interventions

    Post surgical interventions including need for additional surgery, additional injections or PRP laser

    Measured: 6 Months

  2. Vitreous Hemorrhage and Tractional Retinal Detachment Improvement

    Pre and perioperative fundus photo comparisons on an objective scale

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Adverse Events

    Incidence and severity of ocular and nonocular adverse events, such as redetachment, progression to neovascular glaucoma, endophthalmitis, etc. through post operative month 3

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity as measured by BCVA

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionMar 2014
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Why it stopped: No patients were enrolled

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01589718
Sponsor's protocol ID
No-Crunch 01
Acronym
No-Crunch01
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
27 Apr 2012
Last updated
5 Mar 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Gonzalez VH, Giuliari GP, Banda RM, Guel DA. Intravitreal injection of pegaptanib sodium for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009 Nov;93(11):1474-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2008.155663. Epub 2009 Aug 18.

    PubMed 19692371
  • Wroblewski JJ, Wells JA 3rd, Gonzales CR. Pegaptanib sodium for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jan;149(1):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.08.005. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

    PubMed 19875087
  • Chen E, Park CH. Use of intravitreal bevacizumab as a preoperative adjunct for tractional retinal detachment repair in severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2006 Jul-Aug;26(6):699-700. doi: 10.1097/01.iae.0000225351.87205.69. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16829817
  • Dervenis P, Dervenis N, Smith JM, Steel DH. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in combination with vitrectomy for complications of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD008214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008214.pub4.

    PubMed 37260074

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Macugen in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Greater Houston Retina Research at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Tractional Retinal Detachment Repair (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01589718, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in