AzTrials
AzTrials

AchalasiaPOEMrctNCT01601678

Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia

A study testing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) in people with Achalasia, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 8 sites in 6 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus leading to dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Achalasia
What is being tested?
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
240 participants
Where
8 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
Dec 2012to 30 May 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with symptomatic achalasia with an Eckardt score of > 3 and pre-op barium swallow, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy consistent with the diagnosis
  • Persons of age > 18 years with medical indication for surgical myotomy or EBD
  • Signed written Informed Consent

Who cannot join

  • Patients with previous surgery of the stomach or esophagus
  • Patients with known coagulopathy
  • Previous surgical achalasia treatment
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis and/or esophageal varices
  • Active esophagitis
  • Eosinophilic esophagitis
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Barrett's esophagus
  • Pregnancy
  • Stricture of the esophagus
  • Malignant or premalignant esophageal lesion
  • Severe Candida esophagitis
  • Hiatal hernia > 1cm
  • Extensive tortuous dilatation (>7cm luminal diameter, S shape) of the esophagus
  • Advanced malignant tumor with prognosis < 2 years

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 6 countries.

8 sites in 6 countries

Germany3 sites
  • Klinikum Augsburg,Klinik für Innere Medizin III

    Augsburg, 86156

  • Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf

    Hamburg, 20246

  • University Hospital Würzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Belgium1 site
  • University Hospital Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Czechia1 site
  • University Hospital Prague (IKEM)

    Prague

Other trials in Czechia

Italy1 site
  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas

    Rozzano

Other trials in Italy

Netherlands1 site
  • Academic Medical Center

    Amsterdam

Other trials in Netherlands

Sweden1 site
  • Ersta Hospital and Karolinska University Hospital

    Stockholm, S141 86

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus leading to dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. therapies for achalasia consist of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) and botulinum toxin injection (EBTI), or surgical Treatment via i Heller Myotomy; surgery is nowadays mostly performed via the laparoscopic approach. Surgical therapy demonstrated superior treatment efficacy compared to EBD and EBTI. Recently, an endoscopic means to perform myotomy via a submucosal tunnel has been developed, namely PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Uncontrolled studies have indicated a symptomatic success rate of >90% for POEM in short term follow-ups.The aim of this study is to compare short and long-term feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic (POEM) with laparoscopic myotomy (Heller myotomy) in the treatment of achalasia.

Read the detailed description

Achalasia is considered a primary esophageal motility disorder which is defined as an insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus are characteristics of achalasia. Incidence peaks between ages 20 to 40. The most commonly reported symptoms are dysphagia (both for solids and liquids), regurgitation, and chest pain. The diagnosis is established with esophageal manometry and barium swallow radiographic studies and also with endoscopy being performed to exclude neoplastic or inflammatory diseases. Endoscopic therapies consist of either balloon dilatation (EBD) or Botulinum toxin injection (EBTI). The surgical treatment for achalasia is Heller Myotomy, nowadays almost exclusively performed laparoscopically.Superior to EBD and EBTI, surgical myotomy has shown sustained therapeutic efficacy in approximately 90% of patients which may be especially relevant for young patients with achalasia.

Recently an endoscopic technique to create myotomy via a submucosal tunnel has been developed, named PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). The technique was first reported by Pasricha et al. in a porcine study, and Inoue et al. later reported the first clinical results in achalasia patients which showed significantly reduced dysphagia symptom scores and decreased resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 months . No serious complications related to POEM were encountered in this initial single-center trial. Several smaller pilot studies from Asia, Europe and USA have replicated the promising results regarding feasibility, safety and short-term efficacy,leading us to hope for a similar success rate along with reduced patient discomfort At present, POEM has the potential to be the first scarless flexible endosurgical intervention to become an established clinical treatment.The technique uses a submucosal esophageal tunnel through which a distal esophageal myotomy down to the proximal stomach is performed. For POEM to be integrated into clinical routine, comparative data regarding safety and efficacy are necessary.Our study group intends to compare safety and long-term efficacy of POEM to laparoscopic Heller myotomy, the current gold-Standard, in a non-inferiority design.

Patients with symptomatic achalasia and medical indication for interventional therapy will be randomized to either POEM therapy or standard laparoscopic Heller myotomy (with anti-reflux procedure)(LHM). They will be followed up closely in a defined time pattern evolving individual life quality and achalasia scores as well as clinical scores and diagnostics over a period of 5 years.

Due to considerations concerning the comparability to other achalsia Trials (Boeckxstaens,NEJM 2011), in November 2012 primary outcome has been changed to Eckardt Score instead of lower sphicter pressure. Amendment was done before patient inclusion started. Sample size was not affected by amendment.

Conditions
Achalasia
Being tested
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM), Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
Keywords
Achalasia, Heller Myotomy, Dysphagia, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy, LHM, POEM
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Achalasia, Deglutition Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)Procedure or surgery

    After lavage, measure gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in cm from mouth piece. Determine entry point 12-14cm above GEJ at the lesser curvature site, inject 10ml coloured saline, create entry point. Advance endoscope into the submucosa, dissect the submucosal tunnel up to 2-3cm into the cardia. Dissect the submucosa close to the muscularis and check endoluminally for the direction of the lesser curvature, sufficient extension onto the cardia and mucosal integrity. After tunnel completion flush with gentamycin and saline. Start myotomy from proximally to distally starting 4-5cm below the mucosal entry site; the inner circular muscle layer should be fully dissected especially at the cardia for good symptomatic results. It is vital that the mucosa of the tubular esophagus remains intact. Extend myotomy at least 2cm onto the cardia. After completion check for mucosal integrity and opening of the distal esophageal sphincter. Close the entry point with clips from distal to proximal.

  • Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)Procedure or surgery

    Use five trocar technique with patient in the French position as for laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures. Establish 12-15 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum. Use left paramedian trocar for camera, two lateral trocars for elevating liver and retraction of stomach and two trocars for dissection and suturing. Use of robotic surgery devices is allowed. Divide phrenoesophageal ligament starting on the right and mobilize distal esophagus on the lateral and anterior side. Identify and spare anterior vagal nerve. Perform myotomy by dividing both muscle-layers extending at least 6 cm above gastroesophageal junction and at least 2-3 cm inferiorly over stomach. Perform extent downwards after dividing epiphrenic fat pad overlying cardia. Measure myotomy length. Peroperative endoscopy check is advisable. Perform anterior fundoplication according to Dor. Only if necessary mobilize fundus of the stomach by dividing short gastric vessels. Suture fundus to both cut edges of myotomy, using non-resorbable material.

Study groups in NCT01601678
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy POEMActive comparatorPatients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the POEM therapy group
Receives: Procedure: Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy LHMActive comparatorPatients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the LHM therapy group.
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Eckhard symptom scores

    Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range), treatment success is defined as an Eckardt Score ≤ 3

    Measured: 2 years after treatment

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Eckhard symptom scores

    Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range)

    Measured: before,and 3 and 6 months, 1,3 and 5 years past procedure

  2. Treatment success rates

    success rates result from Eckardt Scores

    Measured: 3 and 6 months, and 1, 3, and 5 years post procedure

  3. Manometry data

    Achalasia subtypes (before treatment) and assessment of lower esophagus sphincter function

    Measured: before, and 3 months, and 2 and 5 years post procedure

  4. Reflux score (clinical DeMeester score)

    clinical DeMeester Reflux questionnaire to evaluate therapeutic side effects, range from 0 (no Reflux symptoms) to 6 (full symptom range).

    Measured: before, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years post procedure

  5. Reflux symptoms

    List of side effects due to reflux past POEM as short term and long term outcomes

    Measured: before, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years post procedure

  6. pH metry

    pH metry data after therapy

    Measured: 3 months and 2 and 5 years after therapy

  7. Adverse Events

    complication rate (Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE))

    Measured: Baseline to five years past procedure

  8. Quality of Life index

    Life quality assessment (gastrointestinal LQ index by Eypasch, Wood-Dauphinee and Troidl) for individual success Evaluation (GIQLI), Best outcome score is 144.

    Measured: before, and 3 months, and 2 and 5 years post procedure

  9. EGD findings

    EGD findings to evaluate reflux effects after therapy

    Measured: 3 months and (optional) 2 and 5 years after therapy

  10. CRP lab values

    CRP values measured in mg/l (milligrams per litre) pre and post procedure

    Measured: day before procedure to day after procedure

  11. Hb lab values

    Hemoglobin values measured in g/dl (grams per decilitre) pre and post procedure

    Measured: day before procedure to day after procedure

  12. Leucocyte lab values

    Leucocyte values measured in billions per litre pre and post procedure, number of days of hospitalisation, myotomy length, duration of procedure

    Measured: day before procedure to day after procedure

  13. number of days of hospitalisation

    inhouse stay after procedure

    Measured: through inhouse stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days

  14. myotomy length

    myotomy length in cm

    Measured: day of procedure

  15. duration of procedure

    duration of procedure in minutes

    Measured: day of procedure

  16. Therapy failures

    number of therapy failures

    Measured: from procedure to 5 years after procedure

  17. Retreatments

    number and kinds of retreatments

    Measured: from procedure to 5 years after procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2012
  3. Primary completion30 May 2022
  4. Study completion30 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01601678
Sponsor's protocol ID
POEM vs. LHM
Other IDs
PV 4133
Acronym
POEMrct
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
15 May 2012
Last updated
28 Jun 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, Takata M, Gadenstatter M, Lin F, Ciovica R. Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e43ab.

    PubMed 19106675
  • von Rahden BH, Germer CT. [Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia is clearly superior to the endoscopic treatment]. Chirurg. 2010 Jan;81(1):69-70. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1840-7. No abstract available. German.

    PubMed 19940967
  • Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Farinella E, Campaci R, Morino M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for achalasia: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1023-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a776.

    PubMed 19092347
  • Ortiz A, de Haro LF, Parrilla P, Lage A, Perez D, Munitiz V, Ruiz D, Molina J. Very long-term objective evaluation of heller myotomy plus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia of the cardia. Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):258-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318159d7dd.

    PubMed 18216530
  • Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Allemann P, Marescaux J. Multimedia manuscript. Heller myotomy and intraluminal fundoplication: a NOTES technique. Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2903. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1073-3. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

    PubMed 20428893
  • Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Gostout CJ. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):761-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966764.

    PubMed 17703382
  • Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.

    PubMed 20354937
  • von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H, Werner YB, Pace A, Kersten JF, Much CC, Schachschal G, Mann O, Keller J, Fuchs KH, Rosch T. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):411-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.388. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

    PubMed 22068665
  • Swanstrom LL, Rieder E, Dunst CM. A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

    PubMed 21996484
  • Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, Elizalde JI, Fumagalli U, Gaudric M, Rohof WO, Smout AJ, Tack J, Zwinderman AH, Zaninotto G, Busch OR; European Achalasia Trial Investigators. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1807-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010502.

    PubMed 21561346
  • ZHOU PH, CAI MY, YAO LQ, ZHONG YS, REN Z, XU MD, CHEN WF, QIN XY. [Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: report of 42 cases]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;14(9):705-8. Chinese.

    PubMed 21948538
  • Smith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):579-84; discussion 584-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217524.75529.2d.

    PubMed 16632991
  • Hugova K, Mares J, Hakanson B, Repici A, von Rahden BHA, Bredenoord AJ, Bisschops R, Messmann H, Ruppenthal T, Mann O, Izbicki J, Harustiak T, Fumagalli Romario U, Rosati R, Germer CT, Schijven M, Emmermann A, von Renteln D, Dautel S, Fockens P, Boeckxstaens G, Rosch T, Martinek J, Werner YB. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy plus Dor fundoplication in patients with idiopathic achalasia: 5-year follow-up of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 May;10(5):431-441. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00012-3. Epub 2025 Mar 17.

    PubMed 40112837
  • Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J, Repici A, von Rahden BHA, Bredenoord AJ, Bisschops R, Messmann H, Vollberg MC, Noder T, Kersten JF, Mann O, Izbicki J, Pazdro A, Fumagalli U, Rosati R, Germer CT, Schijven MP, Emmermann A, von Renteln D, Fockens P, Boeckxstaens G, Rosch T. Endoscopic or Surgical Myotomy in Patients with Idiopathic Achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2219-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905380.

    PubMed 31800987

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) and Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM) in people with Achalasia, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 8 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Germany, Belgium, Czechia, Italy, Netherlands and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Eckhard symptom scores (time frame: 2 years after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01601678, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jun 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in