AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 3NCT01604265

A Study of Sativex in the Treatment of Central Neuropathic Pain Due to Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 3 study testing Sativex in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Neuropathic Pain, run by Jazz Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the ability of Sativex to relieve central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis subjects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuropathic Pain
What is being tested?
Sativex
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2002to Aug 2002
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or female subjects aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with any disease sub-type of multiple sclerosis, with relapses/remission not expected to influence neuropathic pain.
  • Duration of multiple sclerosis greater than six months.
  • Central neuropathic pain, due to multiple sclerosis, of at least three months duration, for which a nociceptive, peripheral neuropathic or psychogenic cause appeared unlikely and was expected to remain stable for the duration of the study.
  • Pain score with a severity of four or more on at least four completed Numerical Rating Scale scores in the baseline week.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Regular medication regime for neuropathic pain had been stable during the previous two weeks, prior to reduction of tricyclic antidepressants, if applicable.
  • Willing to reduce the dosage of amitriptyline, or equivalent of other tricyclic antidepressants, to a maximum of 75 mg per day, if applicable.
  • No cannabinoid use (cannabis, Marinol or Nabilone) at least seven days before study entry and willing to abstain from any use of cannabis during the study.
  • Female subjects of child bearing potential or male subjects whose partner was of child bearing potential, who were willing to ensure that they or their partner used effective contraception during the study and for three months thereafter.
  • Able (in the investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
  • Willing for his or her name to be notified to the Home Office for participation in this study.
  • Willing for his or her general practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.

Who cannot join

  • History of schizophrenia, other psychotic illness, severe personality disorder or other significant psychiatric disorder other than depression associated with their underlying condition.
  • Concomitant severe non-neuropathic pain or the presence of illness such as diabetes mellitus that could have caused peripheral neuropathic pain.
  • Known or strongly suspected alcohol or substance abuse or considered to be at risk of alcohol or substance abuse by the investigator.
  • Severe cardiovascular disorder, such as ischaemic heart disease, arrhythmias (other than well controlled atrial fibrillation), poorly controlled hypertension or severe heart failure.
  • History of epilepsy or convulsions.
  • Significant renal or hepatic impairment as shown in medical history or indicated by clinical laboratory results from samples taken at baseline.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Elective surgery or other procedures requiring general anaesthesia scheduled during the study.
  • Terminal illness.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could either have put the subject at risk because of participation in the study, or influenced the result of the study, or the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Female subjects who were pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the study.
  • Regular levodopa (Sinemet, Sinemet Plus, Levodopa, L-dopa, Madopar, Benserazide) therapy within seven days of study entry.
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cannabinoids or any of the excipients of the study medications.
  • Known or suspected adverse reaction to cannabinoids.
  • Travel outside the UK planned during study.
  • Donation of blood during the study.
  • Participated in any other pharmacological clinical research study within 30 days of study entry.
  • Previously enrolled into this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Walton Centre for Neurology and Neurosurgery

    Liverpool, L9 7LJ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Double Blind, Randomised, Parallel Group, Placebo Controlled Study of Sativex in the Treatment of Central Neuropathic Pain in Multiple Sclerosis.

To investigate the ability of Sativex to relieve central neuropathic pain in multiple sclerosis subjects.

Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis subjects with a clinical diagnosis of central neuropathic pain entered a seven to ten day baseline period, followed by a four week double blind, randomised, parallel group comparison of Sativex, with placebo. The study medication was self-titrated to symptom resolution or maximum tolerated or allowed dose. Visits occurred at the end of weeks one and four (end of the study) or earlier if they withdrew. A follow-up visit occurred 30 - 40 days after completion or withdrawal.

Being tested
Placebo, Sativex
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Neuralgia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Contained peppermint oil, 0.05% (v/v), quinoline yellow, 0.005% (w/v), sunset yellow, 0.0025% (w/v), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipient. Each actuation delivered 100 μl. The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period, and 48 actuations in any 24 hour period.

  • SativexDrug

    Also called GW-1000-02

    Contained delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), (25 mg/ml):cannabidiol (CBD), (25 mg/ml) as extract of Cannabis sativa L., with peppermint oil, 0.05% (v/v), in ethanol:propylene glycol (50:50) excipient. Each actuation delivered 100 μl (THC 2.5 mg and CBD 2.5 mg). The maximum permitted dose of study medication was eight actuations in any three hour period, and 48 actuations in any 24 hour period.

Study groups in NCT01604265
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo control.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
SativexExperimentalActive treatment.
Receives: Drug: Sativex

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    The average pain Numerical Rating Scale was completed at the same time each day, i.e. bedtime in the evening. The patient was asked "on a scale of '0 to 10', please indicate the number that best describes your pain or average pain in the last 24 hours" where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. A negative value indicates an improvement in pain score from baseline.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Mean 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Sleep Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    Each day patients were asked to record in their subject diary, whether or not they were "woken due to nerve pain last night", using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale sleep score where zero equated with "did not disrupt sleep" and 10 meant "completely disrupts sleep (unable to sleep due to pain)". A decrease in score from baseline indicates an improvement.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  2. Subject Global Impression of Change at Week 4

    A 7-point Likert-type scale was used, with the question: 'Please assess the improvement in overall condition since the start of the study using the scale below' with the markers "very much improved, much improved, slightly improved, no change, slightly worse, much worse or very much worse". At Visit 2 (Baseline) patients wrote a brief description of their condition which was used at Week 4 to aid their memory regarding their symptoms at study start. For each of above markers the number of participants were reported.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in the Mean Neuropathic Pain Scale 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (Week 4)

    The Neuropathic Pain Scale score is the 0-100 sum of 10 individual pain scores (0-10 Numerical Rating Scale, 0= no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in pain.

    Measured: Baseline to end of treatment (0 - 4 weeks).

  4. Change From Baseline in the Mean Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Test Score for 'Selective Reminding' at the End of Treatment (Week 4)

    The Selective Reminding Test measures verbal learning and delayed recall through a multiple-trial list-learning paradigm. Patients are presented aurally with a list of 12 words for trial 1 and are asked to recall as many as possible. For trials 2-6, there is a selective presentation of only those words not recalled on the previous trial. Trial 7 is similar to the other trials but is assessed after an 11-minute delay. The score for the selective reminding test is the unweighted average of seven individual study results (min=0 and max=84) Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.

    Measured: Baseline to end of study (0 - 4 weeks)

  5. Change From Baseline in the Mean Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Test Score for '10/36 Spatial Recall' at the End of Treatment (Week 4)

    The 10/36 Spatial Recall Test assesses visual spatial learning and delayed recall. Patients are asked to view a 6 x 6 checkerboard with ten checkers for 10 seconds. They are then asked to recreate the pattern viewed on a blank checkerboard. The number of correct responses from three immediate trials and one delayed trial (7 minute delay) are recorded. The Total number of correct responses is the unweighted sum from the four trials. The score for the 10/36 spatial recall test was the unweighted average of four individual study results (min=0 and max=40). A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.

    Measured: Weeks 0 - 4

  6. Change From Baseline in the Mean Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Test Score for 'Symbol Digit Modalities' at the End of Treatment (Week 4)

    The Symbol Digit Modalities Test measures complex attention and concentration in a task which also requires speed and accuracy in visual search and scanning. Patients are required to associate symbols with numbers and quickly generate the number when shown the symbol. The summary endpoint is the number of correct responses in 90 seconds. The symbol digit modalities test had a min of 0 and max score of 99. A higher score indicates better cognitive performance.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline in the Mean Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Test Score for the 'Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task' (PASAT) at the End of Treatment (Week 4)

    The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task assesses sustained attention and concentration. A pre-recorded tape is used to present two series of 60 numbers, one every 3 seconds and one every 2 seconds. Patients are asked to add each number to the one immediately preceding it and give the result. The task summary score is the percentage of correct answers is calculated. The PASAT score range was 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline in the Mean Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Test Score for 'Word List Generation' at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    Word list generation measures verbal associative fluency. Patients are given 60 seconds to give as many words beginning with a particular letter. The Total is the unweighted sum of all admissible words over three different trials. Higher scores indicate a better cognitive performance (min=0, max= not defined).

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in the Mean Total Guy's Neurological Disability Scale Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    The Guy's Neurological Disability Scale has 12 separate categories which include cognition, mood, vision, speech, swallowing, upper limb function, lower limb function, bladder function, bowel function, sexual function, fatigue, and 'others'. Each category consists of a series of questions, which are scored on a 0 to 5 scale, with 0 being indicative of a better outcome and 5 being indicative of a worse outcome. The total Guy's Neurological Disability Scale score is the unweighted sum from the 12 categories with a minimum score of 0 and maximum of 60. A negative value indicates an improvement in score from baseline.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  10. Change From Baseline in the Mean 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale Score for Intoxication Levels at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    Intoxication levels were recorded on a Visual Analogue Scale, where zero equated with "no intoxication" and 100 equated with "extreme intoxication". A decrease in baseline score indicates a reduction in intoxication.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  11. Change From Baseline in The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Score for Depression at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    Depression and anxiety was assessed using The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 giving a total score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A reduction in score indicates an improvement. The change from baseline in the overall depression score at the end of treatment is presented.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Score for Anxiety at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    Depression and anxiety was assessed using The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Seven of the items relate to anxiety and seven relate to depression. Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 giving a total score between 0 and 21 for either anxiety or depression. A reduction in score indicates an improvement. The change from baseline in the overall anxiety score at the end of treatment is presented.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

  13. Change From Baseline in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks)

    The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite test is a three-part, standardized, quantitative, assessment instrument for use in clinical studies. The three components of the test measure leg function/ambulation, arm/hand function, and cognitive function. An increase in score indicates an improvement (range -3 to +3).

    Measured: Baseline to end of treatment (0 - 4 weeks).

  14. Incidence of Adverse Events as a Measure of Patient Safety.

    The number of patients who experienced an adverse event during the course of the study is presented.

    Measured: 0 - 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2002
  3. Primary completionAug 2002
  4. Study completionAug 2002

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
66 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01604265
Sponsor's protocol ID
GWMS0107
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
21 May 2012
Last updated
10 Jan 2023
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Rog DJ, Nurmikko TJ, Friede T, Young CA. Randomized, controlled trial of cannabis-based medicine in central pain in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):812-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176753.45410.8b.

    PubMed 16186518

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Sativex in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Neuropathic Pain, run by Jazz Pharmaceuticals at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Mean Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale Score at the End of Treatment (4 Weeks) (time frame: 0 - 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01604265, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in