AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Pelvic PainNCT01604837

The Optimal Oblique and Axial Angle of Fluoroscope for Superior Hypogastric Plexus Block

An observational study of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Pelvic Malignancy, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The recommended entry angle for superior hypogastric plexus block is different among references, and there is a need for suggesting a more accurate entry angle for this procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
How many people
268 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Apr 2012to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Those undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan with pelvic malignancy or chronic pelvic pain with constitutional disease

Who may be able to join

  • Those undergoing abdominopelvic CT scan with pelvic malignancy or chronic pelvic pain with constitutional disease

Who cannot join

  • Poor CT image with non-measurable axial or oblique entry angle

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-710

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

The recommended entry angle for superior hypogastric plexus block is different among references, and there is a need for suggesting a more accurate entry angle for this procedure. The investigators are trying to evaluate the entry angle for superior hypogastric plexus block by measuring these angle on the computed tomography image and apply these angle to the real patients.

Read the detailed description

Superior hypogastric plexus block is a kind of sympathetic plexus block which are used to control the pelvic pain caused by malignancy or other chronic condition. Classic posterior approach for this procedure is inserting the block needle at L4 -5 level and proceed the needle 45 degrees medially and 30 degrees caudally to reach the target of anterolateral space of L5 - S1 intervertebral space. Waldman et al. introduced a different angle of 30 degrees medial and caudal with the same approach, while Stevens et al. recommended 15 degrees medial and 20 degrees caudal. As such, the recommended angle for this procedure is different among references, and there is a need for suggesting a more accurate entry angle for this procedure. Therefore, we are trying to evaluate the entry angle for superior hypogastric plexus block by measuring these angle on the computed tomography image and apply these angle to the real patients.

Keywords
superior hypogastric plexus block, pelvic malignancy, chronic pelvic pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01604837
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pelvic malignancy groupthose with diagnosis of gynecologic or urologic malignancy
Pelvic chronic disease groupthose with chronic pelvic pain with constitutional cause e.g. endometriosis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the oblique entry angle

    the oblique entry angle of superior hypogastric plexus block at L5-S1 level

    Measured: 1 month after abdominopelvic CT scan performed

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. the axial entry angle

    the axial entry angle of superior hypogastric plexus block at L4-S1 level

    Measured: 1 month after abdominopelvic CT scan performed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 May 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Enrolment
268 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01604837
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-03-074
Status last verified
Dec 2013
First submitted
22 May 2012
Last updated
25 Dec 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Chronic Pelvic Pain and Pelvic Malignancy, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the oblique entry angle (time frame: 1 month after abdominopelvic CT scan performed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Dec 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in