AzTrials
AzTrials

Patients at Risk for MelanomaNCT01610531

COPARIME: Pilot Study of a Target Detection of Malignant Melanoma

A study testing SAMScore questionnaire in people with Patients at Risk for Melanoma, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Melanoma is nowadays an important public health problem because its growing incidence. Mass screening for melanoma is not recommended worldwide because of its low cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless targeted screening for patients at high risk for melanoma is promoted. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Patients at Risk for Melanoma
What is being tested?
SAMScore questionnaire
How many people
4,118 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2011to Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients more than 18 years old,
  • consulting their GP,
  • assessed at risk for melanoma according to the SAMScore
  • signed the consent.

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • University Hospital

    Nantes

Other trials in France

About this study

Melanoma is nowadays an important public health problem because its growing incidence. Mass screening for melanoma is not recommended worldwide because of its low cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless targeted screening for patients at high risk for melanoma is promoted. This study is designed to assess the effectiveness and the acceptability of a melanoma targeted screening of melanoma, to estimate the risk function to develop a melanoma among patients at high risk according to the SAMScore and to estimate the ratio cost/ efficacy of the melanoma targeted screening. A cohort of 7700 patients is carried out in 2 departments covered by a registry of cancers. The recruitment had began in April 2011. Patients assessed at high risk according to the SAMScore were proposed a skin examination by their GP every year.

Being tested
SAMScore questionnaire
Keywords
Cohort, Melanoma, targeted screening, risks function, cost effectiveness
Medical subject headings
Melanoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SAMScore questionnaireOther

    Patients assessed at high risk according to the SAMScore

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence ratios between those of the COPARIME cohort and those of the general population.

    Number of melanomas detected / Number of patients at high risk of melanoma defined by our selection tool.

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Probability to develop a melanoma at one year.

    Measured: 1 years

  2. Cost ratio for a screened melanoma.

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionFeb 2018
  4. Study completionFeb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
4,118 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01610531
Sponsor's protocol ID
BRD/10/11-N
Status last verified
May 2018
First submitted
31 May 2012
Last updated
27 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rat C, Hild S, Gaultier A, Khammari A, Bonnaud-Antignac A, Quereux G, Dreno B, Nguyen JM. Anxiety, locus of control and sociodemographic factors associated with adherence to an annual clinical skin monitoring: a cross-sectional survey among 1000 high-risk French patients involved in a pilot-targeted screening programme for melanoma. BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 5;7(10):e016071. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016071.

    PubMed 28982813
  • Rat C, Grimault C, Quereux G, Dagorne M, Gaultier A, Khammari A, Dreno B, Nguyen JM. Proposal for an annual skin examination by a general practitioner for patients at high risk for melanoma: a French cohort study. BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 29;5(7):e007471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007471.

    PubMed 26224016
  • Rat C, Quereux G, Grimault C, Gaultier A, Khammari A, Dreno B, Nguyen JM. Melanoma incidence and patient compliance in a targeted melanoma screening intervention. One-year follow-up in a large French cohort of high-risk patients. Eur J Gen Pract. 2015 Jun;21(2):124-30. doi: 10.3109/13814788.2014.949669. Epub 2014 Aug 20.

    PubMed 25141184

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing SAMScore questionnaire in people with Patients at Risk for Melanoma, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence ratios between those of the COPARIME cohort and those of the general population. (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01610531, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in