Leukemia, Myeloid, AcutePhase 2RAvVANCT01617226
Randomised Study of Azacitidine Versus Azacitidine With Vorinostat in Patients With AML or High Risk MDS
A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Vorinostat in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by University of Birmingham at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase II trial comparing azacitidine monotherapy with combined azacitidine and vorinostat in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- What is being tested?
- Azacitidine and Vorinostat
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 260 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults with AML (except Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL)) as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification or patients with high risk MDS categorised as INT-2 or high risk according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) who are deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy on the grounds of age or co-morbidities with ONE of the following disease status:- i) Newly diagnosed OR
- Relapsed Disease: patients must have achieved a previous morphological CR and show evidence of recurrent disease OR
- Refractory Disease: patients who have failed to achieve a morphological CR with previous therapy
- Patients are able to receive treatment as out-patient
- Adequate renal and hepatic function as defined in the Protocol
- Patients have given written informed consent
- ECOG performance status less than or equal to 2
Who cannot join
- Patients with greater than class III NYHA cardiac impairment
- Blastic transformation of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia
- Prior allogeneic/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Adults of reproductive potential not willing to use appropriate, effective, contraception during the trial and for specified amount of time afterwards
- Patients who have received prior histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) treatment as anti-tumour therapy. (Patients who have received HDACi treatment for other indications e.g valproic acid for epilepsy may enrol after a 30-day washout period)
Show all 11Show fewer
- Previous anti-tumour therapies, including prior experimental agents or approved anti-tumour small molecules and biologics, within 30 days before the start of protocol treatment. (Patients receiving anti-tumour therapies to control blood counts may enrol into the trial)
- Patients who have received prior treatment with demethylating agents such as 5-azacitidine or decitabine
- Patients with contraindications to receiving azacitidine or vorinostat such as hypersensitivity, patients unable to have a subcutaneous injection or swallow oral capsules
- Active symptomatic fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection including known active HIV or known viral (A, B, or C) hepatitis
- Any co-morbidity that could limit compliance with the trial
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom13 sites
Belfast City Hospital
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 7AD
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, B152TH
University Hospital of Wales
Cardiff, South Wales, CF14 4XW
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
Glasgow, G12 0YN
St James's University Hospital
Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS9 7TF
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, Merseyside, L7 8XP
Barts and the London NHS Trust
London, Greater London, E1 1BB
King's College Hospital
London, Greater London, SE5 9RS
Hammersmith Hospital
London, Greater London, W12 0HS
The Christie Hospital
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M20 4BX
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG27 2UH
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, SO16 6YD
About this study
Official title: Phase II Randomised Trial of 5-azacitidine Versus 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy
This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase II trial comparing azacitidine monotherapy with combined azacitidine and vorinostat in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) is a common haematological malignancy. As a result of improvements in myelosuppressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, the outcome of children and young adults with AML has improved substantially in the past three decades. By contrast there has only been limited progress in the development of new treatments for older adults in whom long term survival is less than 20% at present.
There is an urgent need to develop more effective treatment options for the treatment of AML and high risk MDS in older adults. Accumulating evidence suggests that Azacitidine is a potentially important treatment modality in newly diagnosed, relapsed/refractory AML and high risk MDS. Phase II trials in AML and MDS demonstrate increased clinical activity of azacitidine when combined with a HDACi. However no randomised trials have yet examined the important question of whether concurrent HDACi administration increases the clinical activity of Azacitidine. Vorinostat is a new HDACi which shows significant clinical activity in combination with Azacitidine in patients with AML and MDS.
We therefore propose a randomised trial of azacitidine compared with azacitidine and vorinostat combination therapy in older adults with newly diagnosed, relapsed, refractory AML or high risk MDS ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. This will represent the first randomised trial, addressing whether there is a clinical benefit to be gained from combining treatment with azacitidine with a HDACi in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, refractory AML or high risk MDS for whom limited therapeutic options currently exist.
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Being tested
- Azacitidine, Vorinostat
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzacitidineDrug
Also called vidaza, ATC code L01BC07, cas number 320-67-2
Azacitidine both arms; 75mg/m^2 by subcutaneous injection for 7 days of a 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles.
VorinostatDrug
Also called MK-0683, ATC code L01XX38, cas number 149647-78-9
Vorinostat (with azacitidine) combined therapy arm; 300mg twice daily for 7 days starting on day 3 of each cycle in 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| azacitidine | Active comparator | azacitidine (75mg/m2) by SC injection on 7 consecutive days (excluding weekends), starting day 1 of 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. This should be delivered in a 5-2-2 schedule Receives: Drug: Azacitidine |
| azacitidine and vorinostat | Active comparator | Patients will receive (75mg/m2) azacitidine by SC injection on 7 consecutive days (excluding weekends), starting day 1 of 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. Azacitidine should be delivered in a 5-2-2 schedule. Vorinostat (300mg bid) will be taken orally for 7 consecutive days starting on day 3 of each cycle in 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. (Day 3 is defined as the 3rd day of azacitidine administration). Receives: Drug: Azacitidine; Drug: Vorinostat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase II - Overall Response Rate
Patients are expected to receive 6 cycles of treatment which is expected to be completed over a period of 6 months. Each cycle lasts for 28 days. Overall response rate (CR, CRi, PR) as defined by Cheson criteria will be assessed during this time. This will be measured for all patients receiving treatment recruited over a 24 month period.
Measured: Upto 6 months
Phase II - Overall Survival
Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause. Patients discontinuing study, lost to follow up or still alive at the end of the study (up to 24 months) will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Phase II - Toxicities measured by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE)
Toxicities will be measured and graded according to the NCI CTCAE v4 from the date of randomisation until 28 days following treatment discontinuation over the duration of the follow up period which is 24 months.
Measured: Up to 28 days
Phase II - Complete Remission (CR) within 6 cycles of treatment
Complete remission within 6 cycles of treatment as defined by Cheson criteria will be assessed. It is expected patients will receive 6 cycles of treatment, which is expected to be completed over a period of 6 months, as each cycle is 28 days. This will be measured for all patients receiving treatment recruited over a 24 month period.
Measured: Up to 6 months
Phase II - Duration of response
This will be measured from date of documented response until date of documented progression, assessed for up to 24 months.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Dose intensity
Dose intensity defined as the total dose prescribed to each patient as a proportion of the protocol dose. This will measured for each patient receiving treatment, assessed up to 24 months.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Quality of Life measured by questionnaires
Quality of Life will be measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and EuroQol EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. This will be measured for each patient receiving treatment until end of treatment, assessed for up to 24 months.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Medical Resource Use
Medical resource use is defined in terms of days in hospital, blood product usage and days on anti-biotics and will be measured from date of randomisation until 24 months.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionDec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Leukemia Research Fund, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Professor Charles Craddock, University of Birmingham
- Investigators
- Charles F Craddock, Professor, Principal investigator, University of Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01617226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RG_11-187
- Acronym
- RAvVA
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 6 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 5 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Buchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, Schiffer CA, Doehner H, Tallman MS, Lister TA, Lo-Coco F, Willemze R, Biondi A, Hiddemann W, Larson RA, Lowenberg B, Sanz MA, Head DR, Ohno R, Bloomfield CD; International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4642-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.036.
PubMed 14673054Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK, Dombret H, Fenaux P, Grimwade D, Larson RA, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz MA, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Lowenberg B, Bloomfield CD; European LeukemiaNet. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010 Jan 21;115(3):453-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
PubMed 19880497Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U, Sanz G, List AF, Gore S, Seymour JF, Dombret H, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach CL, Silverman LR. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):562-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8329. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
PubMed 20026804Sudan N, Rossetti JM, Shadduck RK, Latsko J, Lech JA, Kaplan RB, Kennedy M, Gryn JF, Faroun Y, Lister J. Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia with outpatient azacitidine. Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8):1839-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22204.
PubMed 16967444Soriano AO, Yang H, Faderl S, Estrov Z, Giles F, Ravandi F, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Ouzounian S, Quezada A, Pierce S, Estey EH, Issa JP, Kantarjian HM, Garcia-Manero G. Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2007 Oct 1;110(7):2302-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078576. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
PubMed 17596541Jabbour E, Giralt S, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G, Jagasia M, Kebriaei P, de Padua L, Shpall EJ, Champlin R, de Lima M. Low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):1899-905. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24198.
PubMed 19235255de Lima M, Giralt S, Thall PF, de Padua Silva L, Jones RB, Komanduri K, Braun TM, Nguyen HQ, Champlin R, Garcia-Manero G. Maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study. Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5420-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25500. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
PubMed 20672358Garcia-Manero G, Yang H, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferrajoli A, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Faderl S, Koller C, Morris G, Rosner G, Loboda A, Fantin VR, Randolph SS, Hardwick JS, Reilly JF, Chen C, Ricker JL, Secrist JP, Richon VM, Frankel SR, Kantarjian HM. Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2008 Feb 1;111(3):1060-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-098061. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
PubMed 17962510Khanim FL, Bradbury CA, Arrazi J, Hayden RE, Rye A, Basu S, MacWhannell A, Sawers A, Griffiths M, Cook M, Freeman S, Nightingale KP, Grimwade D, Falciani F, Turner BM, Bunce CM, Craddock C. Elevated FOSB-expression; a potential marker of valproate sensitivity in AML. Br J Haematol. 2009 Feb;144(3):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07449.x. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
PubMed 19036090Wijermans P, Lubbert M, Verhoef G, Bosly A, Ravoet C, Andre M, Ferrant A. Low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a DNA hypomethylating agent, for the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Mar;18(5):956-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.5.956.
PubMed 10694544Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
PubMed 19357394Garcia-Manero G, Estey EH, Jabbour E, et al. Phase II Study of 5-Azacitidine and Vorinostat in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myelogenous Leukaemia (AML) not eligible for Clinical Trials because of poor performance or presence of other comorbidities. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 116: Abstract 604, 21010.
Guieze R, Jouinot A, Itzykson R, et al. Azacytidine (AZA) in Relapsed MDS and AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT): Results of the French ATU Program. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), Abstract 1293, 2010.
Craddock C, Goardon N, Griffiths M, et al. 5' Azacitidine in combination with Valproic Acid induces complete remissions in patients with advanced Acute Myeloid Leukaemia but does not eradicate clonal leukaemic stem/progenitor cells. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts), 112: Abstract 945, 2008.
Craddock CF, Goardon N, Quek L. et al. 5'azacitidine in combination with valproic acid induces complete remissions in patients with advanced acute myeloid leukaemia but does not eradicate clonal leukaemic progenitors. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts), Abstract 638, 2011.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase II Randomised Trial of 5-azacitidine Versus 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukaemia or High Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Ineligible for Intensive Chemotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01617226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RAvVA / RG_11-187
- Conditions
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 260 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Leukemia Research Fund, Celgene, Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase II trial comparing azacitidine monotherapy with combined azacitidine and vorinostat in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia or high risk myelodysplastic syndromes ineligible for intensive chemotherapy.
Detailed description
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) is a common haematological malignancy. As a result of improvements in myelosuppressive chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, the outcome of children and young adults with AML has improved substantially in the past three decades. By contrast there has only been limited progress in the development of new treatments for older adults in whom long term survival is less than 20% at present.
There is an urgent need to develop more effective treatment options for the treatment of AML and high risk MDS in older adults. Accumulating evidence suggests that Azacitidine is a potentially important treatment modality in newly diagnosed, relapsed/refractory AML and high risk MDS. Phase II trials in AML and MDS demonstrate increased clinical activity of azacitidine when combined with a HDACi. However no randomised trials have yet examined the important question of whether concurrent HDACi administration increases the clinical activity of Azacitidine. Vorinostat is a new HDACi which shows significant clinical activity in combination with Azacitidine in patients with AML and MDS.
We therefore propose a randomised trial of azacitidine compared with azacitidine and vorinostat combination therapy in older adults with newly diagnosed, relapsed, refractory AML or high risk MDS ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. This will represent the first randomised trial, addressing whether there is a clinical benefit to be gained from combining treatment with azacitidine with a HDACi in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, refractory AML or high risk MDS for whom limited therapeutic options currently exist.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| azacitidine | Active comparator | Drug: Azacitidineazacitidine (75mg/m2) by SC injection on 7 consecutive days (excluding weekends), starting day 1 of 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. This should be delivered in a 5-2-2 schedule |
| azacitidine and vorinostat | Active comparator | Drug: Azacitidine, Drug: VorinostatPatients will receive (75mg/m2) azacitidine by SC injection on 7 consecutive days (excluding weekends), starting day 1 of 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. Azacitidine should be delivered in a 5-2-2 schedule. Vorinostat (300mg bid) will be taken orally for 7 consecutive days starting on day 3 of each cycle in 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. (Day 3 is defined as the 3rd day of azacitidine administration). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adults with AML (except Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL)) as defined by the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification or patients with high risk MDS categorised as INT-2 or high risk according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) who are deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy on the grounds of age or co-morbidities with ONE of the following disease status:- i) Newly diagnosed OR
- Relapsed Disease: patients must have achieved a previous morphological CR and show evidence of recurrent disease OR
- Refractory Disease: patients who have failed to achieve a morphological CR with previous therapy
- Patients are able to receive treatment as out-patient
- Adequate renal and hepatic function as defined in the Protocol
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with greater than class III NYHA cardiac impairment
- Blastic transformation of Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia
- Prior allogeneic/autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Adults of reproductive potential not willing to use appropriate, effective, contraception during the trial and for specified amount of time afterwards
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AzacitidineAlso: vidaza, ATC code L01BC07, cas number 320-67-2Azacitidine both arms; 75mg/m^2 by subcutaneous injection for 7 days of a 28-day cycle for up to 6 cycles. | Drug | azacitidine, azacitidine and vorinostat |
| VorinostatAlso: MK-0683, ATC code L01XX38, cas number 149647-78-9Vorinostat (with azacitidine) combined therapy arm; 300mg twice daily for 7 days starting on day 3 of each cycle in 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles. | Drug | azacitidine and vorinostat |
Primary outcome
Phase II - Overall Response Rate
Time frame: Upto 6 months
Patients are expected to receive 6 cycles of treatment which is expected to be completed over a period of 6 months. Each cycle lasts for 28 days. Overall response rate (CR, CRi, PR) as defined by Cheson criteria will be assessed during this time. This will be measured for all patients receiving treatment recruited over a 24 month period.
Phase II - Overall Survival
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Overall survival is defined as the time from date of randomisation to the date of death from any cause. Patients discontinuing study, lost to follow up or still alive at the end of the study (up to 24 months) will be censored at the date of last follow-up.
6 secondary outcomes
Phase II - Toxicities measured by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE)
Time frame: Up to 28 days
Phase II - Complete Remission (CR) within 6 cycles of treatment
Time frame: Up to 6 months
Phase II - Duration of response
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Dose intensity
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Quality of Life measured by questionnaires
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Phase II - Medical Resource Use
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 May 2021.
- Background: PubMed 14673054Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Buchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, Schiffer CA, Doehner H, Tallman MS, Lister TA, Lo-Coco F, Willemze R, Biondi A, Hiddemann W, Larson RA, Lowenberg B, Sanz MA, Head DR, Ohno R, Bloomfield CD; International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4642-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.036.
- Background: PubMed 19880497Dohner H, Estey EH, Amadori S, Appelbaum FR, Buchner T, Burnett AK, Dombret H, Fenaux P, Grimwade D, Larson RA, Lo-Coco F, Naoe T, Niederwieser D, Ossenkoppele GJ, Sanz MA, Sierra J, Tallman MS, Lowenberg B, Bloomfield CD; European LeukemiaNet. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet. Blood. 2010 Jan 21;115(3):453-74. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 20026804Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Santini V, Gattermann N, Germing U, Sanz G, List AF, Gore S, Seymour JF, Dombret H, Backstrom J, Zimmerman L, McKenzie D, Beach CL, Silverman LR. Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 1;28(4):562-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.8329. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 16967444Sudan N, Rossetti JM, Shadduck RK, Latsko J, Lech JA, Kaplan RB, Kennedy M, Gryn JF, Faroun Y, Lister J. Treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia with outpatient azacitidine. Cancer. 2006 Oct 15;107(8):1839-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22204.
- Background: PubMed 17596541Soriano AO, Yang H, Faderl S, Estrov Z, Giles F, Ravandi F, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Ouzounian S, Quezada A, Pierce S, Estey EH, Issa JP, Kantarjian HM, Garcia-Manero G. Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 2007 Oct 1;110(7):2302-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-078576. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
- Background: PubMed 19235255Jabbour E, Giralt S, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G, Jagasia M, Kebriaei P, de Padua L, Shpall EJ, Champlin R, de Lima M. Low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia. Cancer. 2009 May 1;115(9):1899-905. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24198.
- Background: PubMed 20672358de Lima M, Giralt S, Thall PF, de Padua Silva L, Jones RB, Komanduri K, Braun TM, Nguyen HQ, Champlin R, Garcia-Manero G. Maintenance therapy with low-dose azacitidine after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for recurrent acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome: a dose and schedule finding study. Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5420-31. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25500. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Background: PubMed 17962510Garcia-Manero G, Yang H, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferrajoli A, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Faderl S, Koller C, Morris G, Rosner G, Loboda A, Fantin VR, Randolph SS, Hardwick JS, Reilly JF, Chen C, Ricker JL, Secrist JP, Richon VM, Frankel SR, Kantarjian HM. Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2008 Feb 1;111(3):1060-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-098061. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 19036090Khanim FL, Bradbury CA, Arrazi J, Hayden RE, Rye A, Basu S, MacWhannell A, Sawers A, Griffiths M, Cook M, Freeman S, Nightingale KP, Grimwade D, Falciani F, Turner BM, Bunce CM, Craddock C. Elevated FOSB-expression; a potential marker of valproate sensitivity in AML. Br J Haematol. 2009 Feb;144(3):332-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07449.x. Epub 2008 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 10694544Wijermans P, Lubbert M, Verhoef G, Bosly A, Ravoet C, Andre M, Ferrant A. Low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a DNA hypomethylating agent, for the treatment of high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: a multicenter phase II study in elderly patients. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Mar;18(5):956-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.5.956.
- Background: PubMed 19357394Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009 Jul 30;114(5):937-51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209262. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
- BackgroundGarcia-Manero G, Estey EH, Jabbour E, et al. Phase II Study of 5-Azacitidine and Vorinostat in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) or Acute Myelogenous Leukaemia (AML) not eligible for Clinical Trials because of poor performance or presence of other comorbidities. Blood (ASH annual meeting abstracts) 116: Abstract 604, 21010.
Related trials for Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Charles F Craddock, Professor principal investigator
University of Birmingham
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Azacitidine and Vorinostat in people with Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, run by University of Birmingham at 13 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase II - Overall Response Rate (time frame: Upto 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01617226, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 May 2021.