AzTrials
AzTrials

InjuriesNCT01620411

War Wounded, a Comparison of Two Pain Management Approaches

A study testing Comprehensive Medical Management and Spinal Cord Stimulator in people with Injuries and Pain, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the relative effectiveness of two different pain management plans for injuries sustained while active duty in the military. One arm of the study has subjects undergo standard comprehensive medical management, while the other adds the placement of a spinal cord stimulator, a common… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Injuries, Pain
What is being tested?
Comprehensive Medical Management and Spinal Cord Stimulator
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2012to Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is a veteran or active duty service member injured while on active military duty receiving care for pain related to the injury(ies) in the Department of Defense health care system or through the Department of Veteran's Affairs.
  • Subject is 18 years of age or older.
  • The elapsed time since the active-duty injury leading to chronic pain is not less than 3 months.
  • Subject reports constant or daily episodes of injury-related pain of at least moderate severity, graded 4 or higher on an 11-point NPRS (point estimate by subject and Investigator at time of enrolment based on overall pain or pain at a specific site). Pain may be nociceptive, neuropathic, or mixed. Phantom pain associated with amputation of an extremity or extremities is allowed.
  • Attempts to control pain with commercially available systemic analgesics have not provided adequate relief, in the judgment of the managing physician and subject.
  • Subject is able to localize site(s) of pain. At least one site of daily pain contributing to moderate severity (Inclusion Criterion 4) and intractability (Inclusion Criterion 5) must be in an extremity, or phantom pain at the site of an amputated extremity. If the extremity site of pain is not an amputated limb, then the pain must have a neuropathic component. This site is identified as the site of Target Pain (TP) for efficacy evaluations during the trial.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subject is an acceptable candidate for surgical placement of an indwelling spinal cord stimulation device.
  • Subject is judged an appropriate candidate for treatment using the available techniques and interventions encompassed within the protocol's definition of comprehensive medical management.
  • For the duration of the trial, subject is willing to limit interventions for control of chronic pain to those approved by the Investigator.
  • The subject is judged psychologically appropriate for either treatment intervention, based on the impression of an interviewing psychologist or psychiatrist.
  • Subject provides informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Subject experiences phantom pain associated with amputation of both an upper and lower extremity.
  • Subject has headache or visceral truncal pain or other non-musculoskeletal pain as the only pain that results in constant or daily scores of ≥4 on the 11-point NPRS.
  • Subject has spinal disease that would, in the judgment of the investigator, preclude placement of a spinal cord stimulator.
  • Subject has ongoing chronic infection or a medical condition associated with an unacceptably increased risk of infection related to device implantation.
  • Subject has a current diagnosis or history of psychosis, cognitive impairment, hallucinations, or unexplained loss of consciousness, whether or not related to a combat injury that, in the opinion of the investigator, would exclude the patient from participating in the trial.
  • Subject has a cardiac pacemaker.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subject has any significant medical or psychiatric condition that would interfere with the conduct of the study or with the outcome measures.
  • Subject is pregnant or is breast feeding.
  • Subject has participated in any drug or device trial in the past 30 days.
  • Subject has any planned elective or semi-elective surgery during the 6 months of the Primary Treatment Phase, including stump revisions or grafting.
  • Subject has a psychological condition of great enough severity that it would unacceptably increase the medical risks associated with implantation and care of the devices required for the treatment on the CMM + SCS arm, or would likely interfere with the subject's ability to sustain participation in a research study of long duration. Investigators are encouraged to include the medical monitor and the coordinating investigator in discussions about individual candidate subjects who have psychological diagnoses as part of the polytrauma syndrome before enrollment or treatment on this protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA Hospital San Diego

    La Jolla, California, 92093

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Management of Chronic Pain in Military Patients With Injuries Sustained During Active Duty. Comparison of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Comprehensive Medical Management.

This study aims to investigate the relative effectiveness of two different pain management plans for injuries sustained while active duty in the military. One arm of the study has subjects undergo standard comprehensive medical management, while the other adds the placement of a spinal cord stimulator, a common procedure for the alleviation of pain.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to investigate the relative effectiveness of two different pain management plans for injuries sustained while active duty in the military. One arm of the study has subjects undergo standard comprehensive medical management, while the other adds the placement of a spinal cord stimulator, a common procedure for the alleviation of pain.

This site was never activated for the research by the sponsor.

Conditions
Injuries, Pain
Being tested
Comprehensive Medical Management, Spinal Cord Stimulator
Keywords
Active Duty, Comprehensive Medical Management, Spinal Cord Stimulator, Veteran, sustained, military
Medical subject headings
Wounds and Injuries, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Comprehensive Medical ManagementOther

    Standard of care for failed back surgery syndrome sustained while on active duty, primarily focused on physical therapy, medication including: opioid analgesics, muscle relaxants, non-opioid analgesics, etc.

  • Spinal Cord StimulatorProcedure or surgery

    This arm combines comprehensive medical management (as above) with the trial and possible eventual permenant placement of a spinal cord stimulator, a common pain management procedure.

Study groups in NCT01620411
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Comprehensive Medical Management (CMM)ExperimentalThis arm will receive standard of care treatment for injuries sustained while on active duty. Non-Invasive.
Receives: Other: Comprehensive Medical Management
CMM + Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS)ExperimentalThis arm will combine comprehensive medical management with placement of a spinal cord stimulator.
Receives: Procedure: Spinal Cord Stimulator

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decreased Pain Ratings

    Pain rating using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) over time. The NPRS is assessing the patients pain on a 11-point rating scale from 0 - 10 with 0 being no pain at all and 10 being the worst imaginable pain. The test is self-reported and can also be administered by an interviewer.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2017 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Site was never activated by sponsor

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01620411
Sponsor's protocol ID
120565
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
13 Jun 2012
Last updated
12 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Comprehensive Medical Management and Spinal Cord Stimulator in people with Injuries and Pain, run by University of California, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Decreased Pain Ratings (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in