Eosinophilic EsophagitisEENCT01631591
Prevalence of Food Allergies in a Cohort of Adult Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
An observational study of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Food Allergies, run by University of South Florida at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by an eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms including dysphagia, emesis, and food impaction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Food Allergies
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with findings of > 15 eosinophils per high powered field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy. Patients should also have symptoms consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis including dysphagia, heartburn, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, or food impaction. The comparative group will include male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with a previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with findings of < 15 eosinophils per high power field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Who may be able to join
- Male and female subjects 18 years and older
- Previous diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis with clinical symptoms including heartburn, dysphagia, vomiting, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, food impaction as well > 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic esophageal biopsy in both the proximal and distal esophagus
- Previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic biopsy
Who cannot join
- 1. Male and female subjects less than 18 years of age 2. Pregnant female subjects 3. Subjects who are receiving systemic steroids and are unable to stop prior to enrollment 4. Subjects who are receiving systemic antihistamines and are unable to stop prior to enrollment 5. Subjects who are unable to cooperate/comply with study procedures or communicate with investigator in order to successfully complete the study 6. Subjects with severe skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, dermatographism, or psoriasis who would be unable to complete skin or patch testing 7. Subjects with an infirmity, disability, or geographical location which seems likely to prevent regular attendance for patient visit
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by an eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms including dysphagia, emesis, and food impaction. Although the underlying mechanism is different, gastroesophageal reflux can present with similar clinical findings but can be distinguished from eosinophilic esophagitis by the number of eosinophils present on esophageal biopsy. In children, food allergies play a role in exacerbating eosinophilic esophagitis, but the role of food allergies in adults is uncertain. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of food allergies in a cohort of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.
Read the detailed description
Study Population Male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with findings of > 15 eosinophils per high powered field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy. Patients should also have symptoms consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis including dysphagia, heartburn, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, or food impaction. The comparative group will include male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with a previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with findings of < 15 eosinophils per high power field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Inclusion Criteria
- Male and female subjects 18 years and older
- Previous diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis with clinical symptoms including heartburn, dysphagia, vomiting, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, food impaction as well > 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic esophageal biopsy in both the proximal and distal esophagus
- Previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic biopsy
Exclusion Criteria
- Male and female subjects less than 18 years of age
- Pregnant female subjects
- Subjects who are receiving systemic steroids and are unable to stop prior to enrollment
- Subjects who are receiving systemic antihistamines and are unable to stop prior to enrollment
- Subjects who are unable to cooperate/comply with study procedures or communicate with investigator in order to successfully complete the study
- Subjects with severe skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, dermatographism, or psoriasis who would be unable to complete skin or patch testing
- Subjects with an infirmity, disability, or geographical location which seems likely to prevent regular attendance for patient visit Risks Skin testing with prick methodology has a risk of systemic reaction of less than 0.1% per 40 tests, however, no deaths have been reported with this method of testing. Systemic reactions are readily treated using Injectable epinephrine with oral antihistamines and oral corticosteroids (prednisone). Patch testing has no known associated risk for development of systemic reactions. Phlebotomy is associated with a minimal risk of bleeding, significant local discomfort, and infection from the needle puncture.
Benefits Treatment options for adults with eosinophilic esophagitis are limited. Food allergies are a known contributor to this disorder in children and a better understanding of food allergies in adult subjects may provide additional treatment options.
Adverse Events and Withdrawal Criteria All subjects will be assessed for adverse events at each study visit. If any adverse events are experienced by the subject, the investigator will document the event within the subject's file and promptly report the event to the IRB. The investigators involved with this study will determine if a participant needs to be withdrawn from the study based upon the subject's health and medical history.
Sample Size Sample size estimation is based on the assumption that up to 50% of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) will have a positive skin test to food and 10% of adults without EE will have a positive skin test to food. With this assumption, a total of 40 subjects are needed, 20 per group, in order to achieve at least 80% power with two sided test at alpha level of 0.05 and beta 0.2.
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Food Allergies
- Medical subject headings
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Food Hypersensitivity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eosinophilic esophagitis | PATIENTS WITH A CURRENT DIAGNOSIS OF eosinophilic esophagitis. | |
| GERD | PATIENTS WITH A DIAGNOSIS WITH GERD. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of food allergies in a cohort of adult patients with EE.
Measured: Study to close on or around May 2014
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionJul 2014
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Eosinophilic EsophagitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of South FloridaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of South Florida
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Richard F. Lockey, MD, University of South Florida
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01631591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- eosinophilic esophagitis
- Acronym
- EE
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 10 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevalence of Food Allergies in a Cohort of Adult Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01631591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EE / eosinophilic esophagitis
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Food Allergies
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of South FloridaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Eosinophilic esophagitis is characterized by an eosinophilic infiltration of the esophagus. It presents clinically with a variety of symptoms including dysphagia, emesis, and food impaction. Although the underlying mechanism is different, gastroesophageal reflux can present with similar clinical findings but can be distinguished from eosinophilic esophagitis by the number of eosinophils present on esophageal biopsy. In children, food allergies play a role in exacerbating eosinophilic esophagitis, but the role of food allergies in adults is uncertain. In this study, we aim to determine the prevalence of food allergies in a cohort of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis.
Detailed description
Study Population Male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with findings of > 15 eosinophils per high powered field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy. Patients should also have symptoms consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis including dysphagia, heartburn, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, or food impaction. The comparative group will include male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with a previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with findings of < 15 eosinophils per high power field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Inclusion Criteria
- Male and female subjects 18 years and older
- Previous diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis with clinical symptoms including heartburn, dysphagia, vomiting, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, food impaction as well > 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic esophageal biopsy in both the proximal and distal esophagus
- Previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic biopsy
Exclusion Criteria
- Male and female subjects less than 18 years of age
- Pregnant female subjects
- Subjects who are receiving systemic steroids and are unable to stop prior to enrollment
- Subjects who are receiving systemic antihistamines and are unable to stop prior to enrollment
- Subjects who are unable to cooperate/comply with study procedures or communicate with investigator in order to successfully complete the study
- Subjects with severe skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, dermatographism, or psoriasis who would be unable to complete skin or patch testing
- Subjects with an infirmity, disability, or geographical location which seems likely to prevent regular attendance for patient visit Risks Skin testing with prick methodology has a risk of systemic reaction of less than 0.1% per 40 tests, however, no deaths have been reported with this method of testing. Systemic reactions are readily treated using Injectable epinephrine with oral antihistamines and oral corticosteroids (prednisone). Patch testing has no known associated risk for development of systemic reactions. Phlebotomy is associated with a minimal risk of bleeding, significant local discomfort, and infection from the needle puncture.
Benefits Treatment options for adults with eosinophilic esophagitis are limited. Food allergies are a known contributor to this disorder in children and a better understanding of food allergies in adult subjects may provide additional treatment options.
Adverse Events and Withdrawal Criteria All subjects will be assessed for adverse events at each study visit. If any adverse events are experienced by the subject, the investigator will document the event within the subject's file and promptly report the event to the IRB. The investigators involved with this study will determine if a participant needs to be withdrawn from the study based upon the subject's health and medical history.
Sample Size Sample size estimation is based on the assumption that up to 50% of adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EE) will have a positive skin test to food and 10% of adults without EE will have a positive skin test to food. With this assumption, a total of 40 subjects are needed, 20 per group, in order to achieve at least 80% power with two sided test at alpha level of 0.05 and beta 0.2.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eosinophilic esophagitis | – | –PATIENTS WITH A CURRENT DIAGNOSIS OF eosinophilic esophagitis. |
| GERD | – | –PATIENTS WITH A DIAGNOSIS WITH GERD. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with findings of > 15 eosinophils per high powered field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy. Patients should also have symptoms consistent with eosinophilic esophagitis including dysphagia, heartburn, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, or food impaction. The comparative group will include male and female subjects, ages 18 years and older with a previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with findings of < 15 eosinophils per high power field by endoscopic esophageal biopsy.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male and female subjects 18 years and older
- Previous diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis with clinical symptoms including heartburn, dysphagia, vomiting, epigastric pain, recurrent vomiting, food impaction as well > 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic esophageal biopsy in both the proximal and distal esophagus
- Previous diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux with < 15 eosinophils per high powered field (400x magnification) by endoscopic biopsy
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- 1. Male and female subjects less than 18 years of age 2. Pregnant female subjects 3. Subjects who are receiving systemic steroids and are unable to stop prior to enrollment 4. Subjects who are receiving systemic antihistamines and are unable to stop prior to enrollment 5. Subjects who are unable to cooperate/comply with study procedures or communicate with investigator in order to successfully complete the study 6. Subjects with severe skin disorders such as atopic dermatitis, dermatographism, or psoriasis who would be unable to complete skin or patch testing 7. Subjects with an infirmity, disability, or geographical location which seems likely to prevent regular attendance for patient visit
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Prevalence of food allergies in a cohort of adult patients with EE.
Time frame: Study to close on or around May 2014
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jul 2018.
Related trials for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Recruiting
The Esophageal String Test as a Diagnostic Screening Tool for Eosinophilic Esophagitis Among Africans With Dysphagia in Mali and the United States
Dysphagia, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History and Genetics of Food Allergy and Related Conditions
Food Allergy, Loeys-Dietz Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Active, not recruiting
Patient-Centered Decision Support for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Food Allergies, run by University of South Florida at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of food allergies in a cohort of adult patients with EE. (time frame: Study to close on or around May 2014). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2018.