Cardiogenic Shock AcuteDanShockNCT01633502
Danish Cardiogenic Shock Trial
A study testing Conventional circulatory support and Impella CP in people with Cardiogenic Shock Acute and Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Odense University Hospital at 13 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Cardiogenic shock a serious complication of a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Despite rapid invasive treatment, circulatory support using positive inotropes and mechanical support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), and evaluation of several new treatments during the last decade, the mortality in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiogenic Shock Acute, Acute Myocardial Infarction
- What is being tested?
- Conventional circulatory support and Impella CP
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2012to Apr 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ST segment elevation myocardial infarction of less than 36 hours' duration, confirmed by new onset ST-segment elevation, or emergency angiography demonstrating acute occlusion of coronary artery, and
- Cardiogenic shock of less than 24 hours' duration, confirmed by:
- peripheral signs of tissue hypoperfusion (arterial blood lactate ≥2.5mmol/l and/or SvO2 <55% with a normal PaO2) and
- systolic blood pressure less than 100mmHg and/or need for vasopressor therapy (dopamine/ norepinephrine or epinephrine), and
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 45% visually estimated or by wall motion score index >1,6.
Who cannot join
- Other causes of shock (hypovolemia, hemorrhage, sepsis, pulmonary embolism or anaphylaxis).
- Shock due to mechanical complication to myocardial infarction (papillary muscle rupture, rupture of the ventricular septum or rupture of free wall).
- Severe aorta valve regurgitation/stenosis.
- Predominant right ventricular failure.
- Out of hospital cardiac arrest with persistent Glasgow coma scale <8 after return of spontaneous circulation.
- Shock duration>24 hours.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Known heparin intolerance.
- Already established mechanical circulatory support
- Do not resuscitate wish.
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 3 countries.
13 sites in 3 countries
Germany9 sites
Charite Berlin
Berlin
University Hospital Bonn
Bonn
Dresden University Hospital
Dresden
Düsseldorf University Hospital
Düsseldorf
UKE Hamburg
Hamburg
Hannover Medical School
Hanover
Jena University Hospital
Jena
Brüderkrankenhaus Trier
Trier
University Hospital Würzburg
Würzburg
Denmark3 sites
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Aarhus, 8200
Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100
Odense University Hospital
Odense, DK-5000
About this study
Official title: Effects of Advanced Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. The Danish Cardiogenic Shock Trial
Cardiogenic shock a serious complication of a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Despite rapid invasive treatment, circulatory support using positive inotropes and mechanical support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), and evaluation of several new treatments during the last decade, the mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock still exceeds 50%. An alternative to current management is restoration of the volume of blood pumped by the heart (cardiac output) using a ventricular assist device. In the acute setting this is difficult but can be done using the Impella device which is a catheter-based, axial flow pump that pumps blood directly from the left ventricle into the circulation thereby restoring blood flow to the failing organs. In 2012 a more powerful Impella has been introduced that is able to deliver 3.5l/min (approximately 75% of a normal cardiac output). The hypothesis of the current study is to reduce mortality and morbidity of patients with cardiogenic shock using the Impella CP. The study will be carried out as a randomized multicenter study where eligible patients will be randomized to receive conventional circulatory support or support with the Impella device and inotropic support if needed. A total of 360 patients are planned to be enrolled, and the primary endpoint will be death.
- Being tested
- Conventional circulatory support, Impella CP
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Conventional circulatory supportDevice
Also called Conventional circulatory support will be employed according to enrolling sites usual management.
Control group treated with conventional circulatory support and observed in intensive care unit for a minimum of 48 hrs.
Impella CPDevice
Also called Impella CP, Abiomed
Control group treated with Impella CP for a minimum of 48 hrs.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional circulatory support | Placebo comparator | Patients randomized to conventional circulatory support. Receives: Device: Conventional circulatory support |
| Impella | Active comparator | Patients randomized to Impella CP Receives: Device: Impella CP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death
Death from all causes
Measured: up to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
MACE
Major cardiovascular events, death, cardiac transplant, escalation to permanent left ventricular assist device, re-hospitalization for heart failure.
Measured: minimum follow-up 6 months
Composite saftey
Combined safety comprising major bleeding, vascular complications, and significant hemolysis.
Measured: up to 6 months
Days alive out of hospital
Days alive and out of hospital; calculated by subtracting the number of days spent in hospital, from time of randomization to end of follow-up (180 days) for each patient.
Measured: up tp 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2012
- Primary completionJul 2023
- Study completionApr 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cardiogenic Shock AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Hannover Medical School, University Hospital, Bonn, Jena University Hospital, University Hospital Dresden, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Wuerzburg University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jacob Moller, Odense University Hospital
- Investigators
- Jacob E Moller, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, OdenseAnders Junker, MD, Study chair, Department of Cardiology, Odense University HospitalChristian Hassager, MD, Study chair, Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital GentofteAndreas Shaefer, MD, Study chair, Hannover Medical SchoolNikos Werner, MD, Study chair, University Hospital Trier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01633502
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DanShock-01
- Acronym
- DanShock
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 14 May 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Moller JE, Gerke O; DanGer Shock Investigators. Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial-DanGer shock: Trial design update. Am Heart J. 2023 Jan;255:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.078. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
PubMed 36272450Udesen NJ, Moller JE, Lindholm MG, Eiskjaer H, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Wachtell K, Thiele H, Engstrom T, Hassager C; DanGer Shock investigators. Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial. Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 6.
PubMed 31176289Moller JE, Engstrom T, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Sorensen R, Lonborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Mobius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
PubMed 38587239Zweck E, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Udesen NJ, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Westenfeld R, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Use in Different Phenotypes of Cardiogenic Shock-a Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. J Card Fail. 2026 Mar 3:S1071-9164(26)00083-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2026.02.015. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41785958Sorensen R, Moller JE, Vandenbriele C, Hassager C, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Christensen S, Engstrom T, Beske RP, Frydland M, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Udesen NLJ, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Holmvang L; DanGer Shock Investigators. Bleeding in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A DanGer Shock Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Feb 9;19(3):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.051.
PubMed 41672689Jensen LO, Beske RP, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Wachtell K, Engstom T, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Moller JE, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Delay From First Symptoms in Patients Presenting With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the DanGer Shock Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Mar;19(3):e015718. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015718. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
PubMed 41521915Mangner N, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Linke A, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Lonborg JT, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Schrage B, Woitek FJ, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Sex-Specific Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the DanGer Shock Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Feb 17;87(6):704-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.019. Epub 2025 Nov 12.
PubMed 41222528Mikkelsen AD, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze C, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Frydland M, Junker AB, Schmidt H, Udesen NLJ, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Kjaergaard J, Moller JE, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Systolic Blood Pressure and Microaxial Flow Pump-Associated Survival in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Nov 1;10(11):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3337.
PubMed 40884241Moller JE, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Burkhoff D, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Effect of Microaxial Flow Pump on Hemodynamics in STEMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jul 1;85(25):2456-2468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.062.
PubMed 40562510Klein A, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Linke A, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Engstom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock With a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 18;85(6):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
PubMed 39551167Zweck E, Hassager C, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Kelm M, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Westenfeld R, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
PubMed 39462276Udesen NLJ, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
PubMed 39462240
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Advanced Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients With ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. The Danish Cardiogenic Shock Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01633502
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DanShock / DanShock-01
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospital Skejby, Hannover Medical School, University Hospital, Bonn, Jena University Hospital, University Hospital Dresden, Heinrich-Heine University, Duesseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Charite University, Berlin, Germany, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Wuerzburg University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Study start
- Dec 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiogenic shock a serious complication of a heart attack (myocardial infarction). Despite rapid invasive treatment, circulatory support using positive inotropes and mechanical support with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP), and evaluation of several new treatments during the last decade, the mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock still exceeds 50%. An alternative to current management is restoration of the volume of blood pumped by the heart (cardiac output) using a ventricular assist device. In the acute setting this is difficult but can be done using the Impella device which is a catheter-based, axial flow pump that pumps blood directly from the left ventricle into the circulation thereby restoring blood flow to the failing organs. In 2012 a more powerful Impella has been introduced that is able to deliver 3.5l/min (approximately 75% of a normal cardiac output). The hypothesis of the current study is to reduce mortality and morbidity of patients with cardiogenic shock using the Impella CP. The study will be carried out as a randomized multicenter study where eligible patients will be randomized to receive conventional circulatory support or support with the Impella device and inotropic support if needed. A total of 360 patients are planned to be enrolled, and the primary endpoint will be death.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional circulatory support | Placebo comparator | Device: Conventional circulatory supportPatients randomized to conventional circulatory support. |
| Impella | Active comparator | Device: Impella CPPatients randomized to Impella CP |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ST segment elevation myocardial infarction of less than 36 hours' duration, confirmed by new onset ST-segment elevation, or emergency angiography demonstrating acute occlusion of coronary artery, and
- Cardiogenic shock of less than 24 hours' duration, confirmed by:
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 45% visually estimated or by wall motion score index >1,6.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Other causes of shock (hypovolemia, hemorrhage, sepsis, pulmonary embolism or anaphylaxis).
- Shock due to mechanical complication to myocardial infarction (papillary muscle rupture, rupture of the ventricular septum or rupture of free wall).
- Severe aorta valve regurgitation/stenosis.
- Predominant right ventricular failure.
- Out of hospital cardiac arrest with persistent Glasgow coma scale <8 after return of spontaneous circulation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional circulatory supportAlso: Conventional circulatory support will be employed according to enrolling sites usual management.Control group treated with conventional circulatory support and observed in intensive care unit for a minimum of 48 hrs. | Device | Conventional circulatory support |
| Impella CPAlso: Impella CP, AbiomedControl group treated with Impella CP for a minimum of 48 hrs. | Device | Impella |
Primary outcome
Death
Time frame: up to 6 months
Death from all causes
3 secondary outcomes
MACE
Time frame: minimum follow-up 6 months
Composite saftey
Time frame: up to 6 months
Days alive out of hospital
Time frame: up tp 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2024.
- Background: PubMed 36272450Moller JE, Gerke O; DanGer Shock Investigators. Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial-DanGer shock: Trial design update. Am Heart J. 2023 Jan;255:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.10.078. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
- Background: PubMed 31176289Udesen NJ, Moller JE, Lindholm MG, Eiskjaer H, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Wachtell K, Thiele H, Engstrom T, Hassager C; DanGer Shock investigators. Rationale and design of DanGer shock: Danish-German cardiogenic shock trial. Am Heart J. 2019 Aug;214:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 38587239Moller JE, Engstrom T, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Sorensen R, Lonborg J, Lindholm MG, Udesen NLJ, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Christiansen EH, Linke A, Woitek FJ, Westenfeld R, Mobius-Winkler S, Wachtell K, Ravn HB, Lassen JF, Boesgaard S, Gerke O, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump or Standard Care in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2024 Apr 18;390(15):1382-1393. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312572. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41785958Zweck E, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Udesen NJ, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Westenfeld R, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Use in Different Phenotypes of Cardiogenic Shock-a Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. J Card Fail. 2026 Mar 3:S1071-9164(26)00083-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2026.02.015. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41672689Sorensen R, Moller JE, Vandenbriele C, Hassager C, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Christensen S, Engstrom T, Beske RP, Frydland M, Jensen LO, Junker A, Schmidt H, Udesen NLJ, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Holmvang L; DanGer Shock Investigators. Bleeding in Patients With Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A DanGer Shock Substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Feb 9;19(3):302-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.051.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41521915Jensen LO, Beske RP, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Wachtell K, Engstom T, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Moller JE, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Delay From First Symptoms in Patients Presenting With STEMI and Cardiogenic Shock: Insights From the DanGer Shock Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Mar;19(3):e015718. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.125.015718. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41222528Mangner N, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Linke A, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Lonborg JT, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Schrage B, Woitek FJ, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Sex-Specific Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock in the DanGer Shock Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Feb 17;87(6):704-719. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.09.019. Epub 2025 Nov 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40884241Mikkelsen AD, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze C, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Frydland M, Junker AB, Schmidt H, Udesen NLJ, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Kjaergaard J, Moller JE, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Systolic Blood Pressure and Microaxial Flow Pump-Associated Survival in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Nov 1;10(11):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.3337.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40562510Moller JE, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Schrage B, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Udesen NLJ, Schmidt H, Junker A, Wachtell K, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Burkhoff D, Hassager C; DanGer Shock Investigators. Effect of Microaxial Flow Pump on Hemodynamics in STEMI-Related Cardiogenic Shock. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jul 1;85(25):2456-2468. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.04.062.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39551167Klein A, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Linke A, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Engstom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Treating Older Patients in Cardiogenic Shock With a Microaxial Flow Pump: Is it DANGERous? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Feb 18;85(6):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39462276Zweck E, Hassager C, Beske RP, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Kelm M, Engstrom T, Holmvang L, Junker A, Schmidt H, Terkelsen CJ, Linke A, Westenfeld R, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Use and Renal Outcomes in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Secondary Analysis of the DanGer Shock Trial. Circulation. 2024 Dec 17;150(25):1990-2003. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072370. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39462240Udesen NLJ, Beske RP, Hassager C, Jensen LO, Eiskjaer H, Mangner N, Polzin A, Schulze PC, Skurk C, Nordbeck P, Clemmensen P, Panoulas V, Zimmer S, Schafer A, Werner N, Frydland M, Holmvang L, Kjaergaard J, Engstom T, Schmidt H, Junker A, Terkelsen CJ, Christensen S, Linke A, Moller JE; DanGer Shock Investigators. Microaxial Flow Pump Hemodynamic and Metabolic Effects in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock: A Substudy of the DanGer Shock Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Jan 1;10(1):9-16. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.4197.
Related trials for Cardiogenic Shock Acute
Recruiting
CRP Apheresis in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Assessment of Support With Impella® Best Practices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
AMI Cardiogenic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Changes in Skeletal Muscle Thickness in Patients With Acute Heart Failure
Heart Failure, Muscle Atrophy
Recruiting
Routine Versus Provisional Distal Perfusion Catheter Placement in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction of Inferior Wall
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jacob E Moller, MD principal investigator
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense
Anders Junker, MD study chair
Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital
Christian Hassager, MD study chair
Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Gentofte
13 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Conventional circulatory support and Impella CP in people with Cardiogenic Shock Acute and Acute Myocardial Infarction, run by Odense University Hospital at 13 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in Germany, Denmark, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death (time frame: up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01633502, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2024.