Lumbosacral RadiculopathyPhase 2NCT01655849
Phase 2 Efficacy Trial of Z160 in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
A Phase 2 study testing z160 in people with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, run by Zalicus at 23 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will compare Z160 and placebo in patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy for safety and efficacy for a period of 6 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- What is being tested?
- z160
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 141 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The subject must have a diagnosis of pain due to LSR, with all of the following characteristics:
- The subject perceives pain in one or both lower limbs at sites that are consistent with the area innervated by the L4, L5, or S1 nerve roots, with or without other sensory symptoms in the affected areas (typically, the pain may be perceived in the buttock, thigh, calf, leg, foot, or toes).
- The history of the pain suggests that the cause of the LSR is due to injury of the lumbosacral nerve root(s) by degenerative disease of the vertebrae in the lumbosacral spine or associated soft tissues (including the intervertebral discs).
- The duration of pain since onset is ≥ 12 weeks.
- Based on clinical history, the intensity of pain has been stable during the 2-week period before screening.
- In the investigator's opinion, the subject's diagnosis of LSR is supported by all of the following at screening:
Show all 12Show fewer
- Based on the StEP instrument:
- Neurological examination of lower limbs shows impaired muscle power, sensory function, or deep tendon reflexes in the territory of the affected nerve roots.
- Pain/sensory disturbance in dermatomal/myotomal distribution is precipitated or exacerbated by straight leg raising (the straight-leg-raising test should be performed as specified in StEP).
- The total StEP score is ≥ 4 (indicative of LSR as the cause of the pain)
- 4. At screening, the subject has an average daily pain score for neuropathic pain due to LSR of ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 on the PI-NRS.
- 5. If female, the subject must be postmenopausal (defined as no menstruation for at least 12 months), surgically sterilized for ≥3 months before the screening visit, or agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception (oral, implantable, transdermal, or injectable contraceptives in conjunction with an intrauterine device or a barrier method) during the 6-week treatment period, during the 6 week posttreatment follow-up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9) to avoid pregnancy if of childbearing potential (defined as biologically capable of becoming pregnant). If male, the subject must agree to use condoms during the 6-week treatment period with the study drug, during the 6-week posttreatment follow up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9).
Who cannot join
- The subject has:
- Neuropathic pain due to causes other than that specified in the inclusion criteria (e.g., postherpetic neuralgia; painful diabetic neuropathy; mononeuritis multiplex; central poststroke pain; failed back surgery in relation to the presenting episode of radiculopathy; spinal abscess, infection, hematoma, or malignancy; phantom limb pain; peripheral neuropathy due to alcoholism, malignancy, human immunodeficiency virus [HIV], syphilis; drug abuse; vitamin B12 deficiency; hypothyroidism; liver disease; toxic exposure).
- Pain that is associated with a substantial somatic pain component (e.g., non-neuropathic/musculoskeletal pain in lower limbs or other parts of the body apart from the back) or more than one cause or potential cause for pain symptoms.
- Any painful concurrent rheumatic disease such as, but not limited to, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or significant osteoarthritis.
- Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain should be discussed with the Zalicus medical monitor.
- In the investigator's opinion, the subject is unable to reliably delineate or assess his or her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (e.g., the subject cannot reliably tell the difference between his or her back pain and lower limb pain and cannot rate the intensity of each separately).
Show all 34Show fewer
- The subject has pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.
- The subject has undergone surgery for LSR within the last 6 months or has received treatment with epidural injections, nerve blocks, or acupuncture for LSR within 4 weeks before screening.
- The subject has:
- A history of seizure, excluding pediatric febrile seizures, or currently has seizures
- A history of or a current diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
- Had a stroke or TIA ≤ 6 months before the screening visit
- Has an episode of major depression or generalized anxiety disorder ≤ 6 months before the screening visit.
- The subject has a history of or currently has any of the following conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the study procedures or compromise the subject's safety:
- Cardiovascular disease
- Gastrointestinal disease
- Hepatic disease
- Respiratory disease
- Renal disease
- Any condition that is known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs
- The subject has a history of or currently has:
- Any clinically significant vital sign, ECG, or laboratory abnormalities.
- QTcF >450 msec (males) or >470 msec (females)
- The subject had a malignancy.
- The subject has had a positive test for HIV antibody or a history of HIV.
- The subject has had a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody.
- The subject has a history of AST, ALT or bilirubine >2 times the upper limit of normal.
- The subject has a history of hypersensitivity to calcium channel blockers.
- The subject has a history of multiple drug allergies (≥ 2 kinds) that, in the investigator's opinion, may place him or her at greater risk during participation in the study.
- The subject has participated in a previous clinical study of Z160 or has received another investigational drug ≤ 30 days before the screening visit.
- The subject has taken a prohibited medication ≤ 30 days before the screening visit.
- The subject has a history of alcohol or narcotic substance abuse, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), ≤ 1 year before the screening visit.
- The subject has a positive urine drug test at screening.
- The subject is female and is pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of the screening visit or plans to become pregnant during the study period.
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
United States23 sites
Investigative Site
Anaheim, California, 92804
Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Investigative Site
Bellevue, Washington, 98007
Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02135
Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Investigative Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Investigative Site
Fresno, California, 93726
Investigative Site
Hazelwood, Missouri, 63042
Investigative Site
Huntsville, Alabama, 35801
Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144
Investigative Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Investigative Site
Orange, California, 92868
Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Investigative Site
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Investigative Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33781
Investigative Site
Plantation, Florida, 33317
Investigative Site
Royal Palm Beach, Florida, 33411
Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, 95821
Investigative Site
Sandy City, Utah, 84070
Investigative Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of Z160 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
This study will compare Z160 and placebo in patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy for safety and efficacy for a period of 6 weeks.
- Conditions
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- Being tested
- z160, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
z160Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Z160 | Experimental | 375mg BID Receives: Drug: z160 |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | matching placebo control Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in weekly average of daily pain scores (PI-NRS)
Measured: Baseline to week 6
Secondary outcomes (14)
Change in weekly average of daily pain scores (PI-NRS)
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5, 6
Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Measured: Baseline to week 6
Modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMDQ)
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Rescue medication use
Measured: Weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Daily Sleep Interference Scale
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Measured: Baseline to week 6
Safety and tolerability
Adverse events, ECG, labs
Measured: Baseline, weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,12
Relationship of plasma concentrations
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Time to a 30% reduction in average daily pain score
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Time to a 50% reduction in average daily pain score
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Subjects who have greater than or equal to a 30% reduction in average daily pain score
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Subjects who have greater than or equal to a 50% reduction in average daily pain score
Measured: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lumbosacral RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zalicus
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Margaret Lee, PhD, Study director, Zalicus Inc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01655849
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Z160-LSR-201
- Status last verified
- Dec 2013
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 12 Dec 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Dec 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of Z160 in Subjects With Neuropathic Pain From Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01655849
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Z160-LSR-201
- Conditions
- Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 141 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ZalicusIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will compare Z160 and placebo in patients with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy for safety and efficacy for a period of 6 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Z160 | Experimental | Drug: z160375mg BID |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebomatching placebo control |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- The subject must have a diagnosis of pain due to LSR, with all of the following characteristics:
- In the investigator's opinion, the subject's diagnosis of LSR is supported by all of the following at screening:
- 4. At screening, the subject has an average daily pain score for neuropathic pain due to LSR of ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 on the PI-NRS.
- 5. If female, the subject must be postmenopausal (defined as no menstruation for at least 12 months), surgically sterilized for ≥3 months before the screening visit, or agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception (oral, implantable, transdermal, or injectable contraceptives in conjunction with an intrauterine device or a barrier method) during the 6-week treatment period, during the 6 week posttreatment follow-up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9) to avoid pregnancy if of childbearing potential (defined as biologically capable of becoming pregnant). If male, the subject must agree to use condoms during the 6-week treatment period with the study drug, during the 6-week posttreatment follow up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9).
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- The subject has:
- Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain should be discussed with the Zalicus medical monitor.
- In the investigator's opinion, the subject is unable to reliably delineate or assess his or her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (e.g., the subject cannot reliably tell the difference between his or her back pain and lower limb pain and cannot rate the intensity of each separately).
- The subject has pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.
- The subject has undergone surgery for LSR within the last 6 months or has received treatment with epidural injections, nerve blocks, or acupuncture for LSR within 4 weeks before screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| z160 | Drug | Z160 |
| Placebo | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in weekly average of daily pain scores (PI-NRS)
Time frame: Baseline to week 6
14 secondary outcomes
Change in weekly average of daily pain scores (PI-NRS)
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5, 6
Galer Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time frame: Baseline to week 6
Modified Roland-Morris Disability Scale (RMDQ)
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Rescue medication use
Time frame: Weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Profile of Mood States (POMS)
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,4,6
Daily Sleep Interference Scale
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Short Form 36 (SF-36)
Time frame: Baseline to week 6
Safety and tolerability
Time frame: Baseline, weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,12
Relationship of plasma concentrations
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Time to a 30% reduction in average daily pain score
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Time to a 50% reduction in average daily pain score
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Subjects who have greater than or equal to a 30% reduction in average daily pain score
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Subjects who have greater than or equal to a 50% reduction in average daily pain score
Time frame: Baseline to weeks 1,2,3,4,5,6
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Dec 2013.
Related trials for Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of VER-01 in the Treatment of Participants With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
RecruitingPhase 1
Study to Evaluate Safety of C-1101 Versus Sterile Saline in Adults With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radicular Pain, Sciatic Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Post-market Safety and Effectiveness of the CORUS-LX System in Improving Lumbar Interbody Fusion Outcomes
Radiculopathy Lumbar, Degenerative Lumbar Disc Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparing Three Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches for Lumbar Radicular Pain
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Recruiting
Effect of Trans-spinal Electromagnetic Neuromodulation in Treatment of Patients With Discogenic Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy, Discogenic Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Margaret Lee, PhD study director
Zalicus Inc
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing z160 in people with Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, run by Zalicus at 23 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in weekly average of daily pain scores (PI-NRS) (time frame: Baseline to week 6). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2013.