Intensive CareMIIINCT01662375
A Prospective Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Ethical Perspective of Maastricht III Organ Procurement in French Intensive Care Unit Patients
An observational study of Intensive Care and Supportive Care, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The Maastricht III procedure consists of performing organ donation in patients in whom cardiac arrest is consecutive to a decision to withdraw life support.This MIII procedure is not applied in France, in contrast with other industrialized countries.The proposed study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Intensive Care, Supportive Care, Withdrawal of Life Support
- What is being tested?
- Surveillance and interview
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: These are patients medical or surgical intensive care who are subject to a collective decision to stop intensive care treatments
Who may be able to join
- patients eligible to life support withdrawing.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The Maastricht III procedure consists of performing organ donation in patients in whom cardiac arrest is consecutive to a decision to withdraw life support.This MIII procedure is not applied in France, in contrast with other industrialized countries.The proposed study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of adapting the MIII procedure in France by conducting a single-centre, prospective study. Within the population of patients admitted to the Nantes University Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit for whom a clinical team meeting decides to withdraw life support, the investigators want to determine the delay elapsed between the life support withdrawing and the onset of spontaneous cardiac arrest, that is without any intentional procedure susceptible of precipitate the death onset. The cardiovascular state observed during this period and its duration determine the viability of the organs harvested. The invetigators also want to determine the incidence of refusal of organ donation that would be formulated by the family and/or loved ones if they had been asked to consent to an MIII procedure at the time of announcement of the clinical team's decision to withdraw life support.Anonymous data concerning the patient will be collected by using a predefined grid, completed partly by the medical team in charge of the patient and partly by a CRA from data in the patient's medical file.The study with families and/or loved ones will be conducted in the context of the CHU de NANTES Clinical Ethics Unit and according to this unit's methodology. The main working tool used by the Clinical Ethics Unit consists of interviews between its members and the various parties participating in elaboration of a decision (in this case, the virtual possibility of organ donation according to the MIII procedure).The purpose of this interview is to stimulate reflection on issues not previously considered, by introducing new elements and by using, as a tool, the principles of biomedical ethics developed by Beauchamps and Childress. This study should be able to determine which types of patients could be concerned by the Maastricht III procedure. The expected results should help to define the quantitative impact and feasibility of this procedure on organ donation and could be used to subsequently propose a larger-scale multicenter prospective study.
- Conditions
- Intensive Care, Supportive Care, Withdrawal of Life Support
- Being tested
- Surveillance and interview
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Surveillance and interviewOther
The interventional nature of the study is justified by the need for particular monitoring of patients in whom life support is withdrawn following the clinical team's decision. The questions posed to the patient's family and/or relatives, do not modify the care provided to the patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MIII | Not described Receives: Other: Surveillance and interview |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delay between the withdrawal of intensive care and spontaneous cardiac arrest
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionOct 2013
- Study completionJul 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Intensive CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Family based
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01662375
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RC12_0038
- Acronym
- MIII
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective Study Evaluating the Feasibility and Ethical Perspective of Maastricht III Organ Procurement in French Intensive Care Unit Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01662375
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIII / RC12_0038
- Conditions
- Intensive Care, Supportive Care, Withdrawal of Life Support
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nantes University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Maastricht III procedure consists of performing organ donation in patients in whom cardiac arrest is consecutive to a decision to withdraw life support.This MIII procedure is not applied in France, in contrast with other industrialized countries.The proposed study is designed to evaluate the feasibility of adapting the MIII procedure in France by conducting a single-centre, prospective study. Within the population of patients admitted to the Nantes University Hospital Medical Intensive Care Unit for whom a clinical team meeting decides to withdraw life support, the investigators want to determine the delay elapsed between the life support withdrawing and the onset of spontaneous cardiac arrest, that is without any intentional procedure susceptible of precipitate the death onset. The cardiovascular state observed during this period and its duration determine the viability of the organs harvested. The invetigators also want to determine the incidence of refusal of organ donation that would be formulated by the family and/or loved ones if they had been asked to consent to an MIII procedure at the time of announcement of the clinical team's decision to withdraw life support.Anonymous data concerning the patient will be collected by using a predefined grid, completed partly by the medical team in charge of the patient and partly by a CRA from data in the patient's medical file.The study with families and/or loved ones will be conducted in the context of the CHU de NANTES Clinical Ethics Unit and according to this unit's methodology. The main working tool used by the Clinical Ethics Unit consists of interviews between its members and the various parties participating in elaboration of a decision (in this case, the virtual possibility of organ donation according to the MIII procedure).The purpose of this interview is to stimulate reflection on issues not previously considered, by introducing new elements and by using, as a tool, the principles of biomedical ethics developed by Beauchamps and Childress. This study should be able to determine which types of patients could be concerned by the Maastricht III procedure. The expected results should help to define the quantitative impact and feasibility of this procedure on organ donation and could be used to subsequently propose a larger-scale multicenter prospective study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Family based
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MIII | – | Other: Surveillance and interview |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- These are patients medical or surgical intensive care who are subject to a collective decision to stop intensive care treatments
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patients eligible to life support withdrawing.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Surveillance and interviewThe interventional nature of the study is justified by the need for particular monitoring of patients in whom life support is withdrawn following the clinical team's decision. The questions posed to the patient's family and/or relatives, do not modify the care provided to the patient. | Other | MIII |
Primary outcome
Delay between the withdrawal of intensive care and spontaneous cardiac arrest
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2014.
Related trials for Intensive Care
Not yet recruiting
Randomized Evaluation of Operating Room Extubation After Cardiac Surgery
Cardiac Surgery
Recruiting
Veno-arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference (CO2gap) for Early Resuscitation of Septic Shock
Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit, Septic Shock
Recruiting
Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Improving Upper Limb Function in Critically Ill Patients
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Acquired Weakness (ICU - AW), Critical Illness
Not yet recruiting
Accuracy of Moni-Patch Compared With Tympanic Temperature Monitoring in Adults at Risk of Fever
Fever, Temperature Monitoring
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adverse Events During Physical Therapy in Neurocritical ICU Patients
Critical Illness, Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Intensive Care and Supportive Care, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delay between the withdrawal of intensive care and spontaneous cardiac arrest (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2014.