Post-operative PainPhase 4NCT01667445
Evaluation of the Use of Spinal Epimorph in Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Phase 4 study testing Epimorph and Spinal analgesia in people with Post-operative Pain and Osteoarthritis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of spinal epimorph to patient's perioperative pain management in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study is designed to determine whether spinal epimorph and its associated complications is a necessary addition to provide adequate analgesia given the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-operative Pain, Osteoarthritis
- What is being tested?
- Epimorph and Spinal analgesia
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must receive a primary total knee arthroplasty
Who cannot join
- Inability to have a spinal anaesthetic
- Intolerance to narcotic pain medication
- Inability to use a Patient Controlled Analgesia
- Revision total knee arthroplasty
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
University Hospital, London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
About this study
Official title: Determination of Effectiveness of Periarticular Local Infiltration When Compared to Spinal Epimorph for Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of spinal epimorph to patient's perioperative pain management in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study is designed to determine whether spinal epimorph and its associated complications is a necessary addition to provide adequate analgesia given the multimodal approach to pain management. It is hypothesized that perioperative local infiltration with a cocktail of local and systemic analgesics will provide equal analgesia to patients who are given both local infiltration and spinal epimorph perioperatively.
Read the detailed description
This will be a randomized control trial comparing two patient populations obtained from patients who will receive a primary total knee arthroplasty at LHSC University Campus. Patient participants will be recruited and consented from the arthroplasty clinic and from the preadmit clinic at University Hospital. Both the patients and those measuring the primary outcome, namely, visual pain scales will be blinded to the experimental treatment received.
Patients will be randomized to receive either a spinal with epimorph (150ug) or a spinal with no epimorph at the time of their total hip arthroplasty. This is determined as a result of a computer generated randomization within blocks of 10 (every 10 patients there will be an even number of patients within each group). As each patient signs up they are given a consecutive study number which will determine which group they are assigned to. Note should be made that at the current time patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty may or may not receive epimorph preoperatively depending on their anaesthesiologist (personal communication with Sue Ganapathy) and so both treatment arms represent the current standard of care at LHSC. Again, spinal epimorph is currently being administered for total joint replacement, irregardless of whether or not this study is being done. It is an acceptable standard of care analgesic that is available to each anesthetist should they choose to use it. Many choose to use it as they feel it improves analgesia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, which are recognized as very painful procedures (especially total knees). This is no different that one anesthetist preferring to use dilaudid for pain control and another choosing to use morphine. Both are within accepted standard of care guidelines and it is up to the individual staff to utilize the drug they feel is most beneficial. This decision is based on each individual consultant's interpretation of the available literature as well as their personal practice experience. I hope this justifies our study as we are not introducing any new treatment. Patients will receive spinal epimorph whether or not we conduct this study. As such, no formal study discontinuation rules are applicable. Both patient groups will receive medical treatment as required around the time of their procedure.
Both groups of patients will receive standardized preoperative analgesia including gabapentin (600mg), acetaminophen (975 mg) and naprosyn (500mg). Both groups will receive local anaesthesia in the form of local infiltration of the wound with a previously studied cocktail of morphine, ketoralac, epinephrine and ropivicaine. (3) Post operatively patients will remain on PCA until post operative day one and then will be changed to a standardized oral protocol including long and short acting narcotics on a PRN basis, acetaminophen (975 mg Q6h x 48hrs and then on a PRN basis), naproxyn (500mg BID x 7 days) and gabapentin (300mg BID x 7 days).
Postoperatively visual analogue pain scales will be recorded at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48hrs as well as at 1 week. Foley usage, oxygen usage, nausea/vomiting and use of antiemetics and antipruritics will also be carefully documented. Both patient groups will receive the standard post operative physiotherapy and will be discharged home with a prescription for the narcotic or analgesics that were providing them with suitable analgesia during their hospital stay.
- Conditions
- Post-operative Pain, Osteoarthritis
- Being tested
- Epimorph, Spinal analgesia
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, epimorph, analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Osteoarthritis, Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EpimorphDrug
Also called morphine sulfate, Duramorph PF, MS Contin, Roxano
Patient to receive 150ug of Epimorph with Spinal anaesthetic. Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml.
Spinal analgesiaDrug
Also called Analgesia cocktail
Patient to receive only Spinal anaesthetic (NO EPIMORPH). Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| epimorph | Experimental | single dose administration of 150mcg epimorph Receives: Drug: Epimorph |
| spinal analgesia | Active comparator | spinal alone Receives: Drug: Spinal analgesia |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
visual analogue scale for pain
Measured: 1 week post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (3)
patient report of nausea
Measured: 48hours post-operatively
patient report of pruritus
Measured: 48hours post-operatively
catheterization requirements
Measured: 48hours post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Post-operative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, James Howard, London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
- Investigators
- James L Howard, MD, Principal investigator, London Health Sciences Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01667445
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 102837
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determination of Effectiveness of Periarticular Local Infiltration When Compared to Spinal Epimorph for Analgesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01667445
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 102837
- Conditions
- Post-operative Pain, Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- total knee arthroplasty, epimorph, analgesia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the contribution of spinal epimorph to patient's perioperative pain management in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This study is designed to determine whether spinal epimorph and its associated complications is a necessary addition to provide adequate analgesia given the multimodal approach to pain management. It is hypothesized that perioperative local infiltration with a cocktail of local and systemic analgesics will provide equal analgesia to patients who are given both local infiltration and spinal epimorph perioperatively.
Detailed description
This will be a randomized control trial comparing two patient populations obtained from patients who will receive a primary total knee arthroplasty at LHSC University Campus. Patient participants will be recruited and consented from the arthroplasty clinic and from the preadmit clinic at University Hospital. Both the patients and those measuring the primary outcome, namely, visual pain scales will be blinded to the experimental treatment received.
Patients will be randomized to receive either a spinal with epimorph (150ug) or a spinal with no epimorph at the time of their total hip arthroplasty. This is determined as a result of a computer generated randomization within blocks of 10 (every 10 patients there will be an even number of patients within each group). As each patient signs up they are given a consecutive study number which will determine which group they are assigned to. Note should be made that at the current time patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty may or may not receive epimorph preoperatively depending on their anaesthesiologist (personal communication with Sue Ganapathy) and so both treatment arms represent the current standard of care at LHSC. Again, spinal epimorph is currently being administered for total joint replacement, irregardless of whether or not this study is being done. It is an acceptable standard of care analgesic that is available to each anesthetist should they choose to use it. Many choose to use it as they feel it improves analgesia in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, which are recognized as very painful procedures (especially total knees). This is no different that one anesthetist preferring to use dilaudid for pain control and another choosing to use morphine. Both are within accepted standard of care guidelines and it is up to the individual staff to utilize the drug they feel is most beneficial. This decision is based on each individual consultant's interpretation of the available literature as well as their personal practice experience. I hope this justifies our study as we are not introducing any new treatment. Patients will receive spinal epimorph whether or not we conduct this study. As such, no formal study discontinuation rules are applicable. Both patient groups will receive medical treatment as required around the time of their procedure.
Both groups of patients will receive standardized preoperative analgesia including gabapentin (600mg), acetaminophen (975 mg) and naprosyn (500mg). Both groups will receive local anaesthesia in the form of local infiltration of the wound with a previously studied cocktail of morphine, ketoralac, epinephrine and ropivicaine. (3) Post operatively patients will remain on PCA until post operative day one and then will be changed to a standardized oral protocol including long and short acting narcotics on a PRN basis, acetaminophen (975 mg Q6h x 48hrs and then on a PRN basis), naproxyn (500mg BID x 7 days) and gabapentin (300mg BID x 7 days).
Postoperatively visual analogue pain scales will be recorded at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36 and 48hrs as well as at 1 week. Foley usage, oxygen usage, nausea/vomiting and use of antiemetics and antipruritics will also be carefully documented. Both patient groups will receive the standard post operative physiotherapy and will be discharged home with a prescription for the narcotic or analgesics that were providing them with suitable analgesia during their hospital stay.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| epimorph | Experimental | Drug: Epimorphsingle dose administration of 150mcg epimorph |
| spinal analgesia | Active comparator | Drug: Spinal analgesiaspinal alone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients must receive a primary total knee arthroplasty
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Inability to have a spinal anaesthetic
- Intolerance to narcotic pain medication
- Inability to use a Patient Controlled Analgesia
- Revision total knee arthroplasty
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EpimorphAlso: morphine sulfate, Duramorph PF, MS Contin, RoxanoPatient to receive 150ug of Epimorph with Spinal anaesthetic. Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml. | Drug | epimorph |
| Spinal analgesiaAlso: Analgesia cocktailPatient to receive only Spinal anaesthetic (NO EPIMORPH). Injection Cocktail includes: 10mg Morphine, 30mg Ketorolac, 3.5ug/ml (385ug total) of Ropivicaine, 2.5ug /ml (275ug total) Epinephrine with the remainder of the solution made of Normal Saline to a total volume of 110ml. | Drug | spinal analgesia |
Primary outcome
visual analogue scale for pain
Time frame: 1 week post-operatively
3 secondary outcomes
patient report of nausea
Time frame: 48hours post-operatively
patient report of pruritus
Time frame: 48hours post-operatively
catheterization requirements
Time frame: 48hours post-operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Apr 2015.
Related trials for Post-operative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
James L Howard, MD principal investigator
London Health Sciences Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Epimorph and Spinal analgesia in people with Post-operative Pain and Osteoarthritis, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
visual analogue scale for pain (time frame: 1 week post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2015.